Skin Flap Necrosis After Mastectomy With Reconstruction: A Prospective Study

Impact of Mastectomy Flap Necrosis on Patient-Reported Quality-of-Life Measures After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Preliminary Analysis

BACKGROUND

Mastectomy skin flap necrosis (SFN) is common following nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM), but studies on its quality-of-life (QOL) impact are limited. We examined patient-reported QOL and satisfaction after NSM with/without SFN utilizing the BREAST-Q patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) survey.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients undergoing NSM between April 2018 and July 2021 at our institution were examined; the BREAST-Q PROM was administered preoperatively, and at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. SFN extent/severity was documented at 2-3 weeks postoperatively; QOL and satisfaction domains were compared between patients with/without SFN.

RESULTS

A total of 573 NSMs in 333 patients were included, and 135 breasts in 82 patients developed SFN (24% superficial, 56% partial thickness, 16% full thickness). Patients with SFN reported significantly lower scores in the satisfaction with breasts (p = 0.032) and psychosocial QOL domains (p = 0.009) at 6 months versus those without SFN, with scores returning to baseline at 1 year in both domains. In the "physical well-being-of-the-chest" domain, there was an overall decline in scores among all patients; however, there were no significant differences at any time point between patients with or without SFN. Sexual well-being scores declined for patients with SFN compared with those without at 6 months and also at 1 year, but this did not reach significance (p = 0.13, p = 0.2, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing NSM who developed SFN reported significantly lower satisfaction and psychosocial well-being scores at 6 months, which returned to baseline by 1 year. Physical well-being of the chest significantly declines after NSM regardless of SFN. Future studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up are needed to determine SFN's impact on long-term QOL.

Understanding healing complications in implant-based breast reconstruction using novel metrics for indocyanine green angiography

INTRODUCTION

Indocyanine green (ICG) angiography for the intraoperative evaluation of tissue perfusion is commonly used in implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR). The assessment of ICG images depends on the surgeon's interpretation and is qualitative or semiqualitative in nature. To quantify ICG metrics, this study aimed to apply a novel assessment of fill-rate dynamics to predict wound-healing complications and provide pragmatic assessment tools in IBR.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent IBR with ICG using the photodynamic eye (PDE-Neo II) qualitative imaging system between April 2021 and September 2023. ICG recordings were reviewed to quantify the relative surface area and fluorescence intensity of visual perfusion deficits using ImageJ. The primary outcome was the incidence of wound-healing complications. t-tests and logistic regression were performed for statistical testing.

RESULTS

A total of 112 patients (201 breasts) were included. The incidence of wound-healing complications was 12.9%. A higher relative surface area of ischemic regions was significantly associated with wound-healing complications (3.3% vs. 0.90%; p = 0.001). The rate of change in the surface area of ischemic regions was significantly associated with wound-healing complications (0.35% per second vs. 1.29% per second; p = 0.003%). On average, the duration of transient ischemic areas was significantly longer in breasts with wound-healing complications (46.0 s vs. 36.0 s, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

A transient ischemic area of > 5% of the breast and/or failure to resolve transient ischemic areas after 60 s may predict wound-healing complications and inform surgical reconstructive decision-making in IBR.

Implant-based Breast Reconstruction Salvage with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Instillation: An Evaluation of Outcomes

Background

Implant infection is problematic in breast reconstruction. Traditionally, infected tissue expanders (TE)/implants are removed for several months before replacement, resulting in breast reconstruction delay. Salvage involving device removal, negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwell (NPWTi-d) placement, and early staged TE/implant replacement within a few days has been described. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of the NPWTi-d salvage pathway with traditional implant removal.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent implant-based reconstruction and developed TE/implant infection/exposure requiring removal. Patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 had TE/implant removal, NPWTi-d placement, and TE/implant replacement 1-4 days later. Group 2 (control) underwent standard TE/implant removal and no NPWTi-d. Reinfection after TE/implant salvage, TE/implant-free days, and time to final reconstruction were assessed.

Results

The study included 47 patients (76 TE/implants) in group 1 (13 patients, 16 TE/implants) and group 2 (34 patients, 60 TE/implants). The success rate (no surgical-site infection within 90 days) of implant salvage was 81.3% in group 1. No group 1 patients abandoned completing reconstruction after TE/implant loss versus 38.2% (13 of 34) in group 2 (P = 0.0094). Mean implant-free days was 2.5 ± 1.2 in group 1 versus 134.6 ± 78.5 in group 2 (P = 0.0001). The interval to final implant-based reconstruction was 69.0 ± 69.7 days in group 1 versus 225.6 ± 93.6 days in group 2 (P = 0.0001).

Conclusions

A breast implant salvage pathway with infected device removal, NPWTi-d placement, and early TE/implant replacement was successful in 81.3%. Patients experienced 132 less implant-free days and faster time to final reconstruction.

Effects of Prostaglandin E1 on Mastectomy Flap Necrosis in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Necrosis of a cutaneous flap including the nipple-areola complex is a common complication in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM)/skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) in reducing such complications.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted at two centers, and the cohort consisted of patients undergoing NSM/SSM followed by immediate reconstruction with a prosthesis. Patients who were randomly allocated to the treatment group were administered daily intravenous PGE1 (10 μg/2 mL) beginning intraoperatively through postoperative day 6. Skin flap complications including nipple/skin necrosis, delayed wound healing, and postoperative wound revision were recorded. Complication rates were compared between the PGE1 and control groups.

RESULTS

A total of 276 breasts in 259 patients were included for analysis (139 breasts in the treatment group and 137 breasts in the control group). There was no difference in patient demographics between the control and treatment groups. Reconstructed breasts receiving PGE1 had significantly lower rates of overall skin complications (21.6% versus 34.3%; P = 0.022) and wound revision (2.9% versus 9.5%; P = 0.025). Among NSM cases, the PGE1 group showed a significantly lower rate of nipple necrosis (15.5% versus 29.4%; P = 0.027). In the multivariate analysis, the use of PGE1 significantly reduced the risk of overall skin flap complications (OR, 0.491; P = 0.018) and wound revision (OR, 0.213; P = 0.018) in NSM/SSM cases, and nipple necrosis (OR, 0.357; P = 0.008) in NSM cases.

CONCLUSION

PGE1 can be effective in reducing risk of mastectomy flap complications in immediate implant-based breast reconstructions.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Use of SPY angiography in tissue assessment for wound healing outcomes after breast reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate whether a systematic image assessment protocol using SPY Elite images (LifeCell Corp., US) of viable tissue at the periphery of the surgical field was associated with positive wound healing outcomes following mastectomy and breast reconstruction.

METHOD

Patients undergoing mastectomy and subsequent breast reconstruction surgery at a single tertiary medical centre were included. SPY images were prospectively analysed using a systematic image assessment protocol, and an absolute value of mean fluorescence was calculated by measuring peripheral, in-situ tissue from each image. Patient medical records were retrospectively reviewed for demographics, surgical characteristics and postoperative outcomes. These variables were statistically tested for associations with mean fluorescence.

RESULTS

A total of 63 patients were included in the final analysis. We found that objectively determined mean fluorescence values were not statistically significantly associated with postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

In this study, objectively measured mean fluorescence values representing breast tissue remaining after dissection showed little utility in the assessment of postoperative wound healing outcomes as they did not identify patients who would later have complications of wound healing.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Use of Ambient Light Compatible Fluorescence-Guided Surgical Technology for Objective Assessment of Flap Perfusion in Autologous Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

 Decreased autologous flap vascular perfusion can lead to secondary procedures. Fluorescence angiography during surgery reduces the probability of repeat surgery but suffers from interpretation variability. Recently, the OnLume Avata System was developed, which evaluates real-time vascular perfusion in ambient light. This study aims to predict complications in autologous breast reconstruction using measures of relative intensity (RI) and relative area (RA).

METHODS

 Patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction underwent intraoperative tissue perfusion assessment using the OnLume Avata System. Post-hoc image annotation was completed by labeling areas of the flap interpreted to be "Well Perfused," "Questionably Perfused," and "Under Perfused." RIs and RAs were calculated for the marked areas. Primary complications of interest were overall complication rate, fat and mastectomy skin flap necrosis, and surgical revision. Logistic regression was applied to determine the odds of developing a complication based on RI and RA for each image.

RESULTS

 A total of 25 patients (45 flaps) were included. In total, 17 patients (68%) developed at least one complication. Patients who developed any complication (p = 0.02) or underwent a surgical revision for complications (p = 0.02) had statistically lower RI of under-perfused portions of the flap. Patients with greater areas of under-perfused flap had a significantly higher risk of developing fat necrosis (odds ratio [OR]: 5.71, p = 0.03) and required a revision operation (OR: 1.10, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

 Image-based interpretation using the OnLume Avata System correlated with the risk of developing postoperative complications that standard fluorescence imaging systems may not appreciate. This information can benefit surgeons to improve perfusion assessment and intraoperative decision-making.

Updated findings of skin flap thickness and residual breast tissue after mastectomy for breast cancer: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

There is limited evidence on the ideal retention thickness of skin flap in mastectomy. Residual breast tissue (RBT) after mastectomy still represents an unknown risk for local recurrence or new breast cancer lesions. We made this systematic review to identify the optimal flap after mastectomy with minimal complications and better oncological safety.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using MEDLINE search in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library with the search terms relevant to skin flap thickness and residual breast tissue in breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies were included of which fifteen studies enrolled 3814 patients who received mastectomy, and additional six studies were based on cadavers or breast specimens. Four studies confirmed the presence of the superficial fascial layer (Camper's fascia) which can theoretically be used as an anatomical marker for flap retention during mastectomy. Two other studies confirmed Camper's fascia deficiency to a greater or lesser extent. The flap thickness ranged from 3.8 mm to 23 mm in 2692 patients of 7 studies, which was related to BMI, breast size, and examination modalities. Two retrospective and one prospective studies confirmed flaps exceeding 5 mm could significantly increase postoperative complications. Nine studies including 1122 patients explored the association among flap thickness, RBT, and complications, 3 studies of which confirmed excessive flap thickness could cause a significant increase in RBT, which proved to be a potential risk factor for local recurrence in 3 studies. Flaps beyond 5 mm were also found to significantly increase the chance of local recurrence in 4 studies.

CONCLUSION

Camper's fascia can serve as an ideal demarcation between fat and breast tissue based on most current studies. 5 mm thickness of the flap retention in mastectomy is recommended if Camper's fascia is absent or obscure, through which better cosmetic outcomes and less RBT can be achieved.

Decoding the Mastectomy SKIN Score: An Evaluation of Its Predictive Performance in Immediate Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The skin ischemia and necrosis (SKIN) score was introduced to standardize the assessment of mastectomy skin flap necrosis (MSFN) severity and the need for reoperation. The authors evaluated the association between the SKIN score and the long-term postoperative outcomes of MSFN after mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who developed MSFN after mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction from January of 2001 to January of 2021. The primary outcome was breast-related complications after MSFN. Secondary outcomes were 30-day readmission, operating room (OR) débridement, and reoperation. Study outcomes were correlated with the SKIN composite score.

RESULTS

The authors identified 299 reconstructions in 273 consecutive patients with mean follow-up time of 111.8 ± 3.9 months. Most patients had a composite SKIN score of B2 (25.0%, n = 13), followed by D2 (17.3%) and C2 (15.4%). We found no significant difference in rates of OR débridement ( P = 0.347), 30-day readmission ( P = 0.167), any complication ( P = 0.492), or reoperation for a complication ( P = 0.189) based on the SKIN composite score. The composite skin score was a poor predictor of reoperation, with an area under the curve of 0.56. A subgroup analysis in patients who underwent implant-based reconstruction revealed no difference in rates of OR débridement ( P = 0.986), 30-day readmission ( P = 0.530), any complication ( P = 0.492), or reoperation for a complication ( P = 0.655) based on the SKIN composite score.

CONCLUSIONS

The SKIN score was a poor predictor for postoperative MSFN outcomes and reoperation. An individualized risk-assessment tool that incorporates the anatomic appearance of the breast, imaging data, and patient-level risk factors is needed.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, IV.

Impact of mastectomy flap necrosis on prepectoral reconstructive outcomes

INTRODUCTION

As reconstructive surgeons have increasingly transitioned to the prepectoral plane for prosthetic breast reconstruction, the implications of mastectomy skin flap necrosis have become more concerning. Our goal was to evaluate the effect of skin flap necrosis on reconstructive outcomes in patients undergoing immediate prepectoral breast reconstruction.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of patients undergoing immediate two-stage prepectoral reconstruction at a single center with at least 3 months follow-up. Postoperative complications, reconstructive outcome, and time to final implant were compared between patients with and without mastectomy skin necrosis.

RESULTS

A total of 301 patients underwent 509 prepectoral breast reconstructions. Forty-four patients (14.6%) experienced postoperative mastectomy skin flap necrosis. Demographic and reconstructive characteristics were similar between the necrosis and no necrosis cohorts. Patients with skin necrosis were more likely to undergo reoperation after tissue expander (64% vs 19%, p < 0.01) and undergo expander replacement (13.6% vs 3.5%, p = 0.02). However, rates of reconstructive failure (6.8% vs 6.2%), major infection (9.1% vs 9.0%), and minor infection (13.6% vs 17.5%) after expander placement were statistically similar. Patients with skin necrosis trended toward longer time before final implant placement, although the difference was not statistically significant (6.5 vs 5.0 months, p = 0.08). There was no difference in complication rates between the necrosis and no necrosis cohort after final implant placement. There was a higher rate of revision surgery after implant placement in the necrosis cohort (12.5% vs 4.1%, p = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

Mastectomy skin flap necrosis is a concerning postoperative event, particularly in patients with prepectoral prostheses. We observed that patients with skin necrosis experience higher reoperation rates in the expander period, yet have similar infection rates and achieve similar final reconstructive outcomes compared to patients without necrosis.

Premastectomy Radiotherapy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Premastectomy radiotherapy (PreMRT) is a new treatment sequence to avoid the adverse effects of radiotherapy on the final breast reconstruction while achieving the benefits of immediate breast reconstruction (IMBR).

Objective

To evaluate outcomes among patients who received PreMRT and regional nodal irradiation (RNI) followed by mastectomy and IMBR.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a phase 2 single-center randomized clinical trial conducted between August 3, 2018, and August 2, 2022, evaluating the feasibility and safety of PreMRT and RNI (including internal mammary lymph nodes). Patients with cT0-T3, N0-N3b breast cancer and a recommendation for radiotherapy were eligible.

Intervention

This trial evaluated outcomes after PreMRT followed by mastectomy and IMBR. Patients were randomized to receive either hypofractionated (40.05 Gy/15 fractions) or conventionally fractionated (50 Gy/25 fractions) RNI.

Main Outcome and Measures

The primary outcome was reconstructive failure, defined as complete autologous flap loss. Demographic, treatment, and outcomes data were collected, and associations between multiple variables and outcomes were evaluated. Analysis was performed on an intent-to-treat basis.

Results

Fifty patients were enrolled. Among 49 evaluable patients, the median age was 48 years (range, 31-72 years), and 46 patients (94%) received neoadjuvant systemic therapy. Twenty-five patients received 50 Gy in 25 fractions to the breast and 45 Gy in 25 fractions to regional nodes, and 24 patients received 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions to the breast and 37.5 Gy in 15 fractions to regional nodes, including internal mammary lymph nodes. Forty-eight patients underwent mastectomy with IMBR, at a median of 23 days (IQR, 20-28.5 days) after radiotherapy. Forty-one patients had microvascular autologous flap reconstruction, 5 underwent latissimus dorsi pedicled flap reconstruction, and 2 had tissue expander placement. There were no complete autologous flap losses, and 1 patient underwent tissue expander explantation. Eight of 48 patients (17%) had mastectomy skin flap necrosis of the treated breast, of whom 1 underwent reoperation. During follow-up (median, 29.7 months [range, 10.1-65.2 months]), there were no locoregional recurrences or distant metastasis.

Conclusions and Relevance

This randomized clinical trial found PreMRT and RNI followed by mastectomy and microvascular autologous flap IMBR to be feasible and safe. Based on these results, a larger randomized clinical trial of hypofractionated vs conventionally fractionated PreMRT has been started (NCT05774678).

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02912312.

Impact of Initial Filling Medium on Outcomes of Subpectoral, Two-Stage, Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Air versus Saline

BACKGROUND

In two-stage expander-based breast reconstruction, the use of air as the initial filling medium has been suggested to confer clinical advantages over conventional saline, but this has not been demonstrated in a large series. This study aimed to evaluate the association between material type (air versus saline) for initial expander filling and postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients who underwent immediate, subpectoral, tissue expander-based breast reconstruction between January of 2018 and March of 2021. The participants were categorized into two groups according to the material used for initial filling: saline-inflated expanders, which were used during the first 22 months consecutively, and air-inflated expanders, which were used during the latter 17 months consecutively. Complications including mastectomy flap necrosis and postoperative expansion profiles were compared. Multivariable analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 443 breasts (400 patients), including 161 air-filled and 282 saline-filled breasts, were analyzed. The two groups had similar baseline characteristics. The air-filled group showed a significantly lower rate of mastectomy flap necrosis; this difference remained significant after adjustment for other variables in the multivariable analysis. The rates of other complications did not differ between the two groups. The air-filled group had fewer office visits and a shorter period to complete expansion.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of air for initial expander filling could provide safe and reliable outcomes with reduced patient discomfort during postoperative expansion; thus, air-filled expanders might be an effective alternative to saline-filled expanders.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Mastectomy Skin Flap Stability Prediction Using Indocyanine Green Angiography: A Randomized Prospective Trial

BACKGROUND

The first step in successful breast reconstruction is obtaining a stable skin flap. Indocyanine green (ICG) angiography has recently been studied for its value and usefulness in predicting the stability of skin flaps; however, relevant prospective studies of its clinical efficacy are limited.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the clinical impact on breast reconstruction outcomes of the intraoperative use of ICG angiography.

METHODS

Between March and December 2021, 64 patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction at the authors' institution were prospectively enrolled. They were classified into an experimental group (n = 39; undergoing ICG angiography) and a control group (n = 25; undergoing gross inspection alone). In the absence of viable skin, debridement was performed at the surgeon's discretion. Skin complications were categorized as skin necrosis (the transition of the skin flap to full-thickness necrosis) or skin erosion (a skin flap that did not deteriorate or become necrotic but lacked intactness).

RESULTS

The 2 groups were matched in terms of basic demographic characteristics and incision line necrosis ratio (P = .354). However, intraoperative debridement was significantly more frequent in the experimental group (51.3% vs 48.0%, P = .006). The authors additionally classified skin flap necrosis into partial- and full-thickness necrosis, with a higher predominance of partial-thickness necrosis in the experimental vs control group (82.8% vs 55.6%; P = .043).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative ICG angiography does not directly minimize skin erosion or necrosis. However, compared to gross examination alone, it enables surgeons to perform a more active debridement during surgery, thereby contributing to a lower incidence of advanced skin necrosis. In breast reconstruction, ICG angiography may be useful for assessing the viability of the postmastectomy skin flap and could contribute to successful reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

The Skin Necrosis Conundrum: Examining Long-term Outcomes and Risk Factors in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Mastectomy skin flap necrosis (MSFN) is a common complication following mastectomy that causes significant distress to patients and physicians and also compromises oncologic, surgical, and quality-of-life outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to investigate the long-term outcomes of MSFN following implant-based reconstruction (IBR) and determine the rates and predictors of post-MSFN complications.

METHODS

This was a 20-year analysis of consecutive adult (>18 years) patients who developed MSFN following mastectomy and IBR from January 2001 to January 2021. Multivariable analyses were performed to identify factors associated with post-MSFN complications.

RESULTS

We identified 148 reconstructions, with a mean follow-up time of 86.6 ± 52.9 months. The mean time from reconstruction to MSFN was 13.3 ± 10.4 days, and most cases (n = 84, 56.8%) were full-thickness injuries. Most cases (63.5%) were severe, 14.9% were moderate, and 21.6% were mild. Forty-six percent (n = 68) developed a breast-related complication, with infection being the most common (24%). An independent predictor of overall complications was longer time from reconstruction to MSFN (odds ratio [OR], 1.66; P = .040). Aging was an independent predictor of overall complications (OR, 1.86; P = .038); infection (OR, 1.72; P = .005); and dehiscence (OR, 6.18; P = .037). Independent predictors of dehiscence were longer interval from reconstruction to MSFN (OR, 3.23; P = .018) and larger expander/implant size (OR, 1.49; P = .024). Independent predictors of explantation were larger expander/implant size (OR, 1.20; P = .006) and nipple-sparing mastectomy (OR, 5.61; P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

MSFN is associated with high risk of complications following IBR. Awareness of the timing and severity of MSFN and the predictors of post-MSFN complications is crucial for guiding evidence-based decision-making and improving outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Development and Assessment of Machine Learning Models for Individualized Risk Assessment of Mastectomy Skin Flap Necrosis

OBJECTIVE

To develop, validate, and evaluate ML algorithms for predicting MSFN.

BACKGROUND

MSFN is a devastating complication that causes significant distress to patients and physicians by prolonging recovery time, compromising surgical outcomes, and delaying adjuvant therapy.

METHODS

We conducted comprehensive review of all consecutive patients who underwent mastectomy and immediate implant-based reconstruction from January 2018 to December 2019. Nine supervised ML algorithms were developed to predict MSFN. Patient data were partitioned into training (80%) and testing (20%) sets.

RESULTS

We identified 694 mastectomies with immediate implant-based reconstruction in 481 patients. The patients had a mean age of 50 ± 11.5 years, years, a mean body mass index of 26.7 ± 4.8 kg/m 2 , and a median follow-up time of 16.1 (range, 11.9-23.2) months. MSFN developed in 6% (n = 40) of patients. The random forest model demonstrated the best discriminatory performance (area under curve, 0.70), achieved a mean accuracy of 89% (95% confidence interval, 83-94), and identified 10 predictors of MSFN. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that ML models have a superior net benefit regardless of the probability threshold. Higher body mass index, older age, hypertension, subpectoral device placement, nipple-sparing mastectomy, axillary nodal dissection, and no acellular dermal matrix use were all independently associated with a higher risk of MSFN.

CONCLUSIONS

ML algorithms trained on readily available perioperative clinical data can accurately predict the occurrence of MSFN and aid in individualized patient counseling, preoperative optimization, and surgical planning to reduce the risk of this devastating complication.

Strategies to avoid mastectomy skin-flap necrosis during nipple-sparing mastectomy

BACKGROUND

Nipple-sparing mastectomy is associated with a higher risk of mastectomy skin-flap necrosis than conventional skin-sparing mastectomy. There are limited prospective data examining modifiable intraoperative factors that contribute to skin-flap necrosis after nipple-sparing mastectomy.

METHODS

Data on consecutive patients undergoing nipple-sparing mastectomy between April 2018 and December 2020 were recorded prospectively. Relevant intraoperative variables were documented by both breast and plastic surgeons at the time of surgery. The presence and extent of nipple and/or skin-flap necrosis was documented at the first postoperative visit. Necrosis treatment and outcome was documented at 8-10 weeks after surgery. The association of clinical and intraoperative variables with nipple and skin-flap necrosis was analysed, and significant variables were included in a multivariable logistic regression analysis with backward selection.

RESULTS

Some 299 patients underwent 515 nipple-sparing mastectomies (54.8 per cent (282 of 515) prophylactic, 45.2 per cent therapeutic). Overall, 23.3 per cent of breasts (120 of 515) developed nipple or skin-flap necrosis; 45.8 per cent of these (55 of 120) had nipple necrosis only. Among 120 breasts with necrosis, 22.5 per cent had superficial, 60.8 per cent had partial, and 16.7 per cent had full-thickness necrosis. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, significant modifiable intraoperative predictors of necrosis included sacrificing the second intercostal perforator (P = 0.006), greater tissue expander fill volume (P < 0.001), and non-lateral inframammary fold incision placement (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Modifiable intraoperative factors that may decrease the likelihood of necrosis after nipple-sparing mastectomy include incision placement in the lateral inframammary fold, preserving the second intercostal perforating vessel, and minimizing tissue expander fill volume.

Predicting Mastectomy Skin Flap Necrosis: A Systematic Review of Preoperative and Intraoperative Assessment Techniques

Mastectomy skin-flap necrosis (MSFN) is one of the most feared complications of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IIBR). Traditionally, mastectomy skin-flap viability was based only on surgeons' clinical experience. Even though numerous studies have already addressed the patients' risk factors for MSFN, few works have focused on assessing quality of breast envelope. This review investigates mastectomy's flap viability-assessment methods, both preoperative (PMFA) and intraoperative (IMFA), to predict MSFN and its sequalae. Between June and November 2022, we conducted a systematic review of Pubmed/MEDLINE and Cochrane electronic databases. Only English studies regarding PMFA and IMFA applied to IIBR were selected. The use of digital mammography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and a combination of several methods before surgery was shown to be advantageous by several authors. Indocyanine performed better than other IMFA, however both thermal imaging and spectroscopy demonstrated novel and promising results. Anyway, the best prediction comes when preoperative and intraoperative values are combined. Particularly in prepectoral reconstruction, when mastectomy flaps are essential to determine a successful breast reconstruction, surgeons' clinical judgment is insufficient in assessing the risk of MSFN. Preoperative and intraoperative assessment techniques play an emerging key role in MSFN prediction. However, although there are several approaches to back up the surgeon's processing choice, there is still a dearth of pertinent literature on the subject, and more research is required.

Modern Approaches to Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction

The modern approach to implant-based breast reconstruction encompasses an evolution in surgical techniques, patient selection, implant technology, and use of support materials. Successful outcomes are defined by teamwork throughout the ablative and reconstructive processes as well as appropriate and evidence-based utilization of modern material technologies. Patient education, focus on patient-reported outcomes, and informed and shared decision-making are the key to all steps of these procedures.

Oncological outcomes after simple and skin-sparing mastectomy of ductal carcinoma in situ: A register-based cohort study of 576 Norwegian women

BACKGROUND

For Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS), recurrence is shown to be higher after skin-sparing (SSM) versus simple (SM) mastectomy. This study aimed to compare the two groups recurrence rates, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall (OS) survival.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective register-based cohort study of women operated with SSM (n = 338) or SM (n = 238) for DCIS between 2007 and 2017. Data from the Norwegian Breast Cancer Registry was used to estimate recurrences rates, DFS and OS.

RESULTS

Mean age was 51 and 61 years in the SSM and SM groups, respectively. Median follow-up time was 77 months for SSM (range: 21-152 months) vs 84 months for SM (range: 7-171 months). After five years of follow-up, the overall recurrence rate (OR) was 2.1%; 3.9% for SSM and 0.9% for SM. After ten years, the rates were 3.0%, 6.2% for SSM and still 0.9% for SM. DFS was after ten years 92.2%; 91.8% for SSM, and 92.4% for SM. OS was 95.0%; 97.5% for SSM and 93.3% for SM at ten years. For SSM, involved margins represented a significant risk for recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The recurrence rate was higher in the SSM versus the SM group. Whether the difference is due to the operating procedures or underlying risk factors remains unknown. When stratifying for the difference in age, there was no statistical difference in DFS or OS. Involved margins in the SSM group were associated with an increased risk of recurrence.

Using Clinical Measurements to Predict Breast Skin Necrosis: A Quantitative Analysis

BACKGROUND

Breast skin necrosis can lead to poor healing, reoperation, and unaesthetic reconstructive outcomes after mastectomy. Furthermore, the prolonged recovery can delay adjuvant oncologic regimens. This study aims to explore the role of breast surface area as a risk factor for mastectomy skin flap necrosis and to identify predictive clinical measurements.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively identified patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction (N = 926 breasts) by 2 surgeons at a single institution between 2011 and 2021. Preoperative breast measurements such as nipple-notch (NN) distance, nipple-inframammary fold (NF) distance, chest width (CW), breast circumference (BC), and breast height (BH) were used to estimate breast surface area. Univariate analysis and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine predictive measurements and optimal cutoff values.

RESULTS

When approximated using either a cone without base or a half ellipsoid, larger surface area was a significant risk factor for mastectomy skin flap necrosis (P = 0.027 and P = 0.022, respectively). Larger NN, NF, CW, BC, and BH measurements were significant predictors of necrosis (P < 0.05). Surface area (cone without base) greater than 212 cm2, surface area (half ellipsoid) greater than 308 cm2, NN distance greater than 27 cm, NF greater than 8.5 cm, CW greater than 15 cm, BC greater than 29 cm, and BH greater than 10.5 cm are all values shown to increase the incidence of necrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Larger breast surface area is an independent risk factor for breast skin necrosis. Preoperative breast measurements can be a useful adjunct for predicting necrosis in postmastectomy patients.

Fold Flaps to the Rescue in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction

SUMMARY

Ischemic complications following postmastectomy breast reconstruction are not uncommon and can lead to reconstructive failure, especially with implant reconstruction. The authors propose a simple local flap for management of such complications. This flap is easily raised from the upper abdomen or lateral chest as a medially or laterally based fasciocutaneous flap, and the donor site is hidden in the inframammary or lateral mammary fold. The authors present a case series of these "fold flaps" that were used to manage complications following implant-based breast reconstruction. All patients between 2007 and 2021 who underwent a fold flap for breast reconstruction salvage were queried from a prospectively maintained database. Demographic variables, clinical factors, and surgical details were analyzed. Outcomes assessed included complications, appropriate wound healing, and reconstructive salvage. Fourteen patients underwent thoracoepigastric or thoracoabdominal fold flaps following breast reconstruction for soft-tissue coverage with an underlying prosthesis. The mean age was 54 years, mean body mass index was 30 kg/m 2 , and mean follow-up duration was 18.5 months. Fold flap indications included mastectomy skin flap necrosis ( n = 9), infection ( n = 4), and chronic seroma ( n = 1). Eleven reconstructions (79%) were salvaged and three (21%) required eventual prosthesis explantation secondary to infection or delayed wound healing. Fold flaps are a reliable option for managing ischemic complications following postmastectomy breast reconstruction. The benefits include improved soft-tissue coverage with a high salvage rate. These flaps are simple to raise, and their donor site is concealed within the folds. Furthermore, they provide a reliable early option to manage complications and potentially prevent reconstructive failure.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Are Large Intraoperative Fill Volumes Associated With Increased Complications After Tissue Expander Placement?

Background

With the increased adoption of skin-sparing mastectomies, immediate 2-stage breast reconstruction is a common option for breast cancer patients. During the first stage of the procedure with tissue expander placement, higher intraoperative percent fill has been identified as a risk factor for complications. However, the postoperative outcomes of higher intraoperative fill volumes are not well established. The authors sought to evaluate if a higher initial intraoperative tissue expander fill volume is associated with higher complication rates in patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expander placement.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction with a tissue expander placement from 2016 to 2018 was conducted. Patient demographics and perioperative data were recorded. Large intraoperative fill was defined as saline fill volume greater than 350 mL. The primary outcome evaluated was skin and nipple necrosis. Secondary outcomes were major infections, minor infections, seroma, and hematoma.

Results

A total of 147 breasts in 86 patients were included. Mean intraoperative fill volume was 246.4 ± 106.6 mL. Thirty-five tissue expanders were filled with greater than 350 mL of saline intraoperatively. Patients with large intraoperative fill volume were older (mean age, 52.6 vs 47.9 years; P = .04), had a higher mean body mass index (BMI; 33.2 vs 25.9 kg/m²; P < .0001), and had larger preoperative breast anthropometrics (P < .0001). During a mean follow-up period of 20.1 months (range, 3-55 months), 9 breasts were noted to have skin/nipple necrosis. After multivariate analysis, large tissue expander fill volume was not a significant predictor of skin or nipple necrosis (P = .62). Hypertension and anticoagulant use were associated with increased skin and nipple necrosis (P = .04 and P = .03, respectively). Large fill volume was not associated with statistically significant increases in rates of other complications like major infections, minor infections, seroma, or hematoma.

Conclusions

Larger fill volumes are often required and benefit patients with higher BMI or bra sizes. This also reduces the number of postoperative fills required. In this patient population, larger intraoperative tissue expander saline fill volume (greater than 350 mL) was not associated with increased postoperative complications. After careful patient selection and perfusion evaluation, larger fill volumes may be considered a safe option to improve the aesthetic outcomes in patients with high BMI.

Predictors of Complications after Breast Reconstruction Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Breast reconstruction (BR) is a unique surgical procedure that provides patients undergoing mastectomy with significant psychosocial and aesthetic benefits and has also become a crucial part of the treatment pathway for women with breast cancer. Due to methodological inadequacies and the absence of substantial risk factor analysis, no conclusion can be drawn about the correlation between risk variables and post-surgical complications in BR surgery. We aim to identify the potential risk factors associated with postoperative complications.

Methods

We queried MEDLINE and Cochrane CENTRAL from their inception to March 2022, for published randomized controlled trials and observational studies that assessed complications post-reconstruction procedure in breast cancer patients following mastectomy or evaluated at least one of the following outcomes of major or reoperative complications. The results from the studies were presented as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals and were pooled using a random-effects model.

Results

Our pooled analysis demonstrated a significant correlation with BR postoperative complications and risk factors such as diabetes, hypertension, and obesity. Diabetes and the development of seroma were found to have a significant relationship. Risk variables such as age, radiotherapy, COPD, and smoking had no significant connection with 0-to-30-day readmission and 30-to-90-day readmission.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis shows that risk factors like age, smoking history, high blood pressure, and body mass index (BMI) have a big effect on complications after BR, and patients with risk factors have a high rate of developing infection.

Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Reconstruction: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Satisfaction and Quality of Life

BACKGROUND

Although it is intuitive that nipple-sparing mastectomy in selected patients would result in excellent cosmetic outcomes and high patient satisfaction, studies of clinical outcomes and health-related quality of life are limited and show mixed results. This study aimed to use a propensity score-matching analysis to compare satisfaction and health-related quality-of-life outcomes in patients who underwent implant-based reconstruction following bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy or skin-sparing mastectomy.

METHODS

A propensity score-matching analysis (1:1 matching, no replacement) was performed comparing patients undergoing nipple-sparing or skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate bilateral implant-based breast reconstruction. Patients with a history of any radiation therapy were excluded. Matched covariates included age, body mass index, race, smoking history, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, bra size, and history of psychiatric diagnosis. Outcomes of interest included BREAST-Q scores and complications.

RESULTS

The authors examined 1371 patients for matching and included 460 patients (nipple-sparing mastectomy, n = 230; skin-sparing mastectomy, n = 230) in the final analyses. The authors found no significant differences in baseline, cancer, and surgical characteristics between matched nipple-sparing and skin-sparing mastectomy patients, who also had similar profiles for surgical complications. Interestingly, the authors found that postoperative Satisfaction with Breasts scores and all other health-related quality-of-life domains were stable over a 3-year period and did not differ significantly between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with skin-sparing mastectomy, bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy did not improve patient-reported or clinical outcomes when combined with immediate implant-based reconstruction. The impact that nipple-sparing mastectomy may have on breast aesthetics and the ability of the BREAST-Q to gauge an aesthetic result following nipple-sparing mastectomy warrant further investigation.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Comparison of Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Using Oxychlorosene versus Triple Antibiotic Solution for Pocket Irrigation

BACKGROUND

Breast pocket irrigation with antiseptic solutions is performed to reduce contamination with breast implants. The optimal antiseptic irrigation solution and the efficacy of individual practices are unclear. Oxychlorosene sodium is frequently used at our institution. Oxychlorosene is bactericidal with a mechanism of action of oxidation and hypochlorination. The purpose of our study was to compare the outcomes of oxychlorosene sodium irrigation with triple antibiotic solution (TAS) in implant-based breast reconstruction.

METHODS

All patients who underwent implant-based reconstruction after mastectomy were reviewed. The primary predictive variable was type of solution used for pocket irrigation (TAS or oxychlorosene). Outcome variables included surgical site infection, device removal, and wound complications.

RESULTS

Between 2013 and 2018, 331 implant-based breast reconstructions were performed. Of these, 62% (n = 206) received oxychlorosene for surgical pocket irrigation (group I), and 38% (n = 125) received TAS (group II). Group I had an 11.7% (n = 24) 90-day surgical site infection rate, with 4.9% (n = 10) requiring oral antibiotics, 2.4% (n = 5) requiring intravenous antibiotics without device removal, and 4.4% (n = 9) requiring prosthetic removal. Group II had an 11.2% (n = 14) 90-day infection rate, with 5.6% (n = 7) requiring oral antibiotics, 2.4% (n = 3) requiring intravenous antibiotics without device removal, and 3.2% (n = 4) requiring removal (P = 0.90). When comparing the cost of oxychlorosene irrigation with TAS irrigation, oxychlorosene was less expensive.

CONCLUSIONS

Oxychlorosene and TAS have similar surgical site infection rates in prosthetic breast reconstruction. Ease of preparation and cost make oxychlorosene a more favorable option for antibiotic irrigation in reconstructive breast surgery with prosthetic devices.

Usefulness of Glucose Measurement To Assess Tissue Perfusion of the Nipple-Areola Complex in Conservative Mastectomy: A Prospective Cohort Study Protocol

In recent decades, the mastectomy technique has undergone progressive adaptations in order to preserve the integrity of the breast structure and the nipple-areola complex (NAC), allowing reconstruction to be performed immediately after ablation. However, mastectomy flap necrosis or NAC has become a common complication, with an incidence between 2% and 22.3%. Blood glucose measurement to monitor microsurgical flaps has been reported as a simple method for the early detection of venous compromise. In this scenario, we propose the need to use an alternative, cost-effective method to assess the vitality of NAC in conservative oncological mastectomies. This protocol describes a prospective cohort study and was approved by the Research Protocols Ethics Committee of our institution. Patients will be included after signing informed consent. The anonymity and confidentiality of the information collected will be respected according to the Declaration of Helsinki and according to local and national guidelines.

SDF-1 Functionalized Hydrogel Microcarriers for Skin Flap Repair

Critically sized skin flaps used to treat skin defects often suffer from necrosis due to insufficient blood supply. Hence there is an urgent need to improve the survival rate of skin flaps by promoting local angiogenesis. The delivery of growth factor loaded microcarriers have shown promise in enhancing defect repair, however, their rapid clearance from the defect site limits their regenerative potential. Thus, it is critical to develop microcarriers which can promote the sustained release of bioactive factors to effectively stimulate tissue repair. This study aimed to develop a stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1) loaded microcarrier coated with Matrigel (MC@SDF-1@Mat) to promote skin flap repair. SEM imaging showed that the surface of the microcarrier was coated by a porous Matrigel film. The drug release experiment showed that the Matrigel-coated microcarriers enhanced the sustained release of the model drug methylene blue when compared to uncoated group. MC@SDF-1@Mat significantly promoted the proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis of HUVECs via CCK-8, wound healing assay, and tube formation assay, respectively. Moreover, the murine random skin flap model was further established and treated. It was found that the flap necrosis area in the MC@SDF-1@Mat treated group was significantly reduced. H&E and Masson staining showed the histological structure and collagen organization exhibited a normal phenotype in the MC@SDF-1@Mat treated group. Additionally, CD31 immunohistochemical analysis showed that the MC@SDF-1@Mat treated group exhibited the greatest degree of neovascularization. In conclusion, our SDF-1 functionalized gelatin-based hydrogel microcarrier has potential clinical applications in promoting skin flap repair and drug delivery.

"The Batwing Mastopexy in Immediate Implant-based Breast Reconstruction: An Aesthetic Enhancement For Cancer Patients"

BACKGROUND

Historically, many patients with breast ptosis have been excluded from nipple-sparing mastectomies (NSM). By performing mastopexy at the time of immediate reconstruction, more ptotic patients can be considered for NSM. We review our experience of simultaneous batwing mastopexy performed at the time of immediate implant-based reconstruction.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review identified patients who underwent immediate implant-based breast reconstruction from 2015 to 2020 at a single institution. The patients were divided into two cohorts, batwing mastopexy and standard reconstruction (no mastopexy) and compared.

RESULTS

A total of 324 breast operations in 188 patients were included (80 concurrent batwing and 244 standard implant-based reconstructions). Patient demographics were similar for both groups, except patients in the batwing group had greater ptosis, while more patients in the standard group underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. Mean follow-up was 15.9 months (range 3.19 to 55.20 months). Complications rates were comparable in the batwing and standard groups with no statistically significant differences in rates of hematoma (1.3% vs 3.3%; p=0.34), seroma (5.0% vs 8.2%; p=0.34), major infection (8.8% vs 9.0%;p=0.94), skin/nipple necrosis (6.3% vs 11.5%; p=0.18) and explantation (11.3% vs 14.8%; p=0.43). Rate of minor infections was higher in the group with concurrent batwing mastopexy (10.0% vs 3.7%; p=0.03).

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate that simultaneous batwing mastopexy can be safely performed at the time of immediate breast reconstruction. In our experience, this technique provides comparable complication rates, improves aesthetic outcomes in patients with significant ptosis or macromastia and allows NSM to be an option for those who would otherwise be excluded.

The Impact of Preoperative Breast Volume on Development of Mastectomy Skin Flap Necrosis in Immediate Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Mastectomy skin flap necrosis (MSFN) can significantly impact outcome after immediate breast reconstruction. Several techniques exist to predict MSFN, but these may require additional testing and information, and they are often not available before surgery. We aim to identify whether breast volume, as calculated from preoperative mammography, can be used as a preoperative predictor of MSFN.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review from 2010 to 2020 resulted in 378 patients who underwent immediate implant-based breast reconstruction. Complete imaging data were available for 278 patients and 441 reconstructed breasts. Demographic, perioperative, and outcomes data were collected. Measurements from preoperative diagnostic mammograms were used to calculate breast volume. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the association of variables available preoperatively, including breast volume from mammogram and MSFN. Secondary analyses were performed for need for reoperation and loss of reconstruction.

RESULTS

On univariate analysis of MSFN development, demographic variables found to be significantly associated with MSFN included body mass index (P = 0.04), diabetes (P = 0.03), and breast volume calculated from routine mammography (P ≤ 0.0001). Average preoperative breast volume via mammography without and with MSFN was 970.6 mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 908.9-1032.3) and 1298.3 mL (95% CI, 1140.0-1456.5) (P < 0.0001), respectively. Statistically significant intraoperative variables for MSFN development included prolonged operative time (P = 0.005), greater initial tissue expander fill volumes (P ≤ 0.001), and prepectoral implant location (P = 0.02). Higher initial tissue expander fill volumes in implant-based reconstructions were associated with increased rates of MSFN, 264.1 mL (95% CI, 247.2-281.0) without MSFN and 349.9 mL (95% CI, 302.0-397.8) in the group with MSFN, respectively (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, preoperative imaging volume (P = 0.02) was found to be significant, whereas body mass index and diabetes lost significance (P = 0.40) in association with MSFN.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study establish an association between larger breast volume on preoperative imaging and development of MSFN. This may be useful as a tool for more appropriate patient selection and guidance in the setting of immediate breast reconstruction.

Primary radiotherapy and deep inferior epigastric perforator flap reconstruction for patients with breast cancer (PRADA): a multicentre, prospective, non-randomised, feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy before mastectomy and autologous free-flap breast reconstruction can avoid adverse radiation effects on healthy donor tissues and delays to adjuvant radiotherapy. However, evidence for this treatment sequence is sparse. We aimed to explore the feasibility of preoperative radiotherapy followed by skin-sparing mastectomy and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction in patients with breast cancer requiring mastectomy.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, non-randomised, feasibility study at two National Health Service trusts in the UK. Eligible patients were women aged older than 18 years with a laboratory diagnosis of primary breast cancer requiring mastectomy and post-mastectomy radiotherapy, who were suitable for DIEP flap reconstruction. Preoperative radiotherapy started 3-4 weeks after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and was delivered to the breast, plus regional nodes as required, at 40 Gy in 15 fractions (over 3 weeks) or 42·72 Gy in 16 fractions (over 3·2 weeks). Adverse skin radiation toxicity was assessed preoperatively using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group toxicity grading system. Skin-sparing mastectomy and DIEP flap reconstruction were planned for 2-6 weeks after completion of preoperative radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was the proportion of open breast wounds greater than 1 cm width requiring a dressing at 4 weeks after surgery, assessed in all participants. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02771938, and is closed to recruitment.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 25, 2016, and Dec 11, 2017, 33 patients were enrolled. At 4 weeks after surgery, four (12·1%, 95% CI 3·4-28·2) of 33 patients had an open breast wound greater than 1 cm. One (3%) patient had confluent moist desquamation (grade 3). There were no serious treatment-related adverse events and no treatment-related deaths.

INTERPRETATION

Preoperative radiotherapy followed by skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate DIEP flap reconstruction is feasible and technically safe, with rates of breast open wounds similar to those reported with post-mastectomy radiotherapy. A randomised trial comparing preoperative radiotherapy with post-mastectomy radiotherapy is required to precisely determine and compare surgical, oncological, and breast reconstruction outcomes, including quality of life.

FUNDING

Cancer Research UK, National Institute for Health Research.

Assessment of Mastectomy Skin Flaps for Immediate Reconstruction with Implants via Thermal Imaging-A Suitable, Personalized Approach?

BACKGROUND

Impaired perfusion of the remaining skin flap after subcutaneous mastectomy can cause wound-healing disorders and consecutive necrosis. Personalized intraoperative imaging, possibly performed via the FLIR ONE thermal-imaging device, may assist in flap assessment and detect areas at risk for postoperative complications.

METHODS

Fifteen female patients undergoing elective subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with implants were enrolled. Pre-, intra- and postoperative thermal imaging was performed via FLIR ONE. Potential patient-, surgery- and environment-related risk factors were acquired and correlated with the occurrence of postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Wound-healing disorders and mastectomy-skin-flap necrosis occurred in 26.7%, whereby areas expressing intraoperative temperatures less than 26 °C were mainly affected. These complications were associated with a statistically significantly higher BMI, longer surgery duration, lower body and room temperature and a trend towards larger implant sizes.

CONCLUSION

Impaired skin-flap perfusion may be multifactorially conditioned. Preoperative screening for risk factors and intraoperative skin-perfusion assessment via FLIR ONE thermal-imaging device is recommendable to reduce postoperative complications. Intraoperative detectable areas with a temperature of lower than 26 °C are highly likely to develop mastectomy-skin-flap necrosis and early detection allows individual treatment concept adaption, ultimately improving the patient's outcome.

Defining Mastectomy Skin Flap Necrosis: A Systematic Review of the Literature and a Call for Standardization

BACKGROUND

Mastectomy skin flap necrosis following breast reconstruction may lead to wound dehiscence, infection, implant exposure, and reconstructive failure. The absence of a standardized definition for it has led to variation in estimated incidence, from as low as 2 percent to greater than 40 percent. The authors systematically reviewed the literature on mastectomy skin flap necrosis to characterize existing definitions and provide a framework for future classification.

METHODS

A systematic review of the PubMed and Cochrane databases identified studies reporting a discrete definition of mastectomy skin flap necrosis and corresponding outcomes in breast reconstruction. Provided definitions were extracted, categorized, and comparatively analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine studies met inclusion criteria, with a combined total of 14,368 patients and 18,920 breasts. Thirty-four studies (57.6 percent) reported mastectomy skin flap necrosis solely as a function of total breasts, and 11 (18.6 percent) reported mastectomy skin flap necrosis solely as a function of total patients. Only 14 studies (23.7 percent) provided two separate rates. The overall rate of mastectomy skin flap necrosis was 10.4 percent (range, 2.3 to 41.2 percent) and 15.3 percent (range, 4.7 to 39.0 percent), when reported per breast or per patient, respectively. Studies were categorized by mastectomy skin flap necrosis definition, including intervention (n = 33), depth (n = 20), area (n = 4), and timing (n = 2). Mastectomy skin flap necrosis rates were highest in studies defining necrosis by depth (15.1 percent), followed by intervention (9.6 percent), timing (6.4 percent), and area (6.3 percent). Necrosis rates among studies defining mastectomy skin flap necrosis by intervention, depth, and area were found to be statistically different (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Reported mastectomy skin flap necrosis definitions and outcomes vary significantly in the existing literature. For accurate characterization and quantification, a clear, simplified, consensus definition must be adopted.

Sexual Well-Being After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Does Preservation of the Nipple Matter?

INTRODUCTION

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing mastectomy with and without breast reconstruction (immediate or delayed) with and without nipple preservation.

METHODS

All female patients undergoing mastectomy between 2011 and 2015 at Mayo Clinic Rochester were identified and were mailed the BREAST-Q survey. Breast satisfaction, psychosocial well-being, and sexual well-being were evaluated and compared by surgery type using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for univariate analysis and linear regression for multivariable analysis adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Of 1547 patients, 771 completed the BREAST-Q survey (response rate 50%). Of these 771 respondents, 237 (31%) did not have reconstruction, 198 (26%) had nipple-sparing mastectomy with reconstruction (NSM), and 336 (44%) had skin-sparing mastectomy with reconstruction (SSM) ± nipple-areolar complex (NAC) reconstruction (via surgery ± tattoo). Patients with breast reconstruction had consistently higher BREAST-Q scores versus those without. Comparing NSM with all SSMs, there was no difference in satisfaction with breasts (mean 71.8 vs. 70.2, p = 0.21) or psychosocial well-being (mean 81.9 vs. 81.3, p = 0.47); however, sexual well-being was significantly higher in the NSM group on univariate (mean 64.5 vs. 58.0, p = 0.002) and multivariable (β = -4.69, p = 0.03) analysis. Sexual well-being scores were similar for NSM and the SSM subgroups with any type of NAC reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that NSM positively impacts patient sexual well-being after breast reconstruction compared with SSM, particularly SSM without nipple reconstruction or tattoo. SSM with any type of NAC reconstruction achieved similar satisfaction and sexual well-being to those undergoing NSM.

Human stem cells prevent flap necrosis in preclinical animal models: A systematic review

Background and Aim

Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs) have been proven effective to prevent distal skin flap necrosis in preclinical models. However, to appropriately translate these findings to clinical trials, the effect of ADSC of human origin (hADSC) needs to be evaluated. We hypothesize that hADSC treatment is as effective as animal ADSC treatment at preventing distal skin flap necrosis in animal flap models.

Methods

Three databases were inquired on August 17, 2020, to evaluate the necrotic flap area after using hADSCs in animal models of ischemic flaps. No publication status or dates were considered. Studies were included if they used hADSCs, measured the surviving or necrotic skin area of flaps, used animal models, and were in English. Studies were excluded if they did not use cells of human origin. The flap survival or necrotic area, perfusion, capillary density, vascular endothelial growth factor secretion and HIF-1α expression were extracted.

Results

Ten studies met inclusion criteria. The mean absolute risk reduction (ARR) in necrotic skin area was 22.37% (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.98-27.76%, P<0.05) for flaps treated with animal ADSCs and 18.04% (95% CI 2.74-33.33%, P<0.05) for flaps treated with hADSCs. The difference between mean ARRs was not statistically significant (4.33%, 95% CI - 34.47-43.13%, P>0.05).

Conclusion

Human ADSCs prevent skin flap necrosis to the same degree as animal ADSCs in rodent and rabbit flap models.

Relevance for Patients

This review found that adipose-derived stem cells of human origin are equally effective at reducing the risk of surgical flap necrosis in preclinical models of small animals as autologous animal cells. The findings in this review should encourage researchers to use human adipose-derived stem cells in animal models of ischemic flaps to accelerate their translation into clinical trials and, eventually, surgical practice. The low immunogenicity of these cells should be leveraged to gain insight into the effects of the products that will be ultimately administered to patients. Furthermore, human adipose-derived stem cells' pro-angiogenic mechanism of action sets this therapy as a promising preventive measure for flap necrosis.

Impact of Incision Placement on Ischemic Complications in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Nipple-sparing mastectomy is associated with greater patient satisfaction than non-nipple-sparing approaches. Although various nipple-sparing mastectomy incisions have been described, the authors hypothesized that incision location would impact the rate and location of ischemic complications to the mastectomy skin flap.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained database was queried to identify patients who underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate microsurgical reconstruction with a minimum postoperative follow-up of 12 months. The impact of incision location on postoperative ischemic complications was investigated. Major complications were defined as those that required reexploration in the operating room or inpatient management; minor complications were amenable to outpatient management. Multivariable logistic and linear regression were performed to investigate risk factors for postoperative complications following breast reconstruction.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients met inclusion criteria. The following nipple-sparing mastectomy incisions were used: radial with a periareolar extension (39 percent), inframammary fold (31 percent), vertical with a periareolar extension (22 percent), vertical (6 percent), and radial (2 percent). Seven patients (8 percent) had major complications, whereas twenty-six patients (29.9 percent) developed minor postoperative complications. Inframammary fold incisions were associated with significantly greater rates of mastectomy skin flap necrosis (p = 0.002), whereas periareolar incisions were associated with significantly greater rates of postoperative nipple-areola complex necrosis (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The authors report a significant association between incision location and ischemic complications to the breast skin envelope in microsurgical breast reconstruction. The authors observed a significant association of inframammary fold and periareolar incisions with mastectomy skin flap and nipple-areola complex necrosis, respectively.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

The Impact of a Single Dual-Trained Surgeon in the Management of Mastectomy and Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Oncoplastic breast surgery is typically performed using a two-surgeon, two-team approach. The authors present their experience with patients undergoing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction performed by a single, dual-trained breast surgical oncologist and plastic and reconstructive microsurgeon.

METHODS

Patients who underwent mastectomy and/or immediate reconstruction performed by the senior author between 2015 and 2019 were divided into single-surgeon or dual-surgeon cohorts, and matched by age, body mass index, reconstruction type, and cancer stage.

RESULTS

The authors included 158 patients in their analysis (single-surgeon, n = 45; dual-surgeon, n = 113). Single-surgeon patients underwent surgery 13.2 days earlier than single-surgeon patients (p < 0.01), and required significantly fewer preoperative (1.9 versus 3.4; p < 0.01) and postoperative visits (6.8 versus 10.7; p < 0.01). Operative duration was comparable (single-surgeon, 245 minutes; dual-surgeon, 245 minutes; p = 0.99). The authors found no significant difference in surgical-site infection, seroma, hematoma, abdominal donor-site healing, or flap and prosthesis loss between the groups. The authors did find that dual-surgeon patients had a significantly higher rate of mastectomy flap necrosis (20 percent versus 4 percent; p = 0.01), which held true on logistic regression when controlling for other variables. BREAST-Q data demonstrated that single-surgeon patients had significantly higher overall scores (p = 0.04), and were significantly more satisfied with their outcomes, surgeon, and the information provided (p = 0.03, p = 0.03, and p = 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The single-surgeon approach has the potential to decrease patient burden by requiring fewer preoperative and postoperative visits without compromising surgical outcomes or oncologic safety. Further investigation is warranted into the financial implications and patient outcomes.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Complication Differences Between the Tumescent and Non-Tumescent Dissection Techniques for Mastectomy: A Meta-Analysis

Purpose

We conducted a systematic literature search and pooled data from studies to compare the incidence of complications between the tumescent and non-tumescent techniques for mastectomy.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, BioMed Central, Ovid, and CENTRAL databases for studies comparing the two mastectomy techniques up to November 1^st, 2020. We used a random-effects model to calculate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

Nine studies were included with one randomized controlled trial (RCT). Meta-analysis indicated no statistically significant difference in the incidence of total skin necrosis (OR 1.18 95% CI 0.71, 1.98 I² = 82% p=0.52), major skin necrosis (OR 1.58 95% CI 0.69, 3.62 I² = 71% p=0.28), minor skin necrosis (OR 1.11 95% CI 0.43, 2.85 I² = 72% p=0.83), hematoma (OR 1.19 95% CI 0.80, 1.79 I² = 4% p=0.39), and infections (OR 0.87 95% CI 0.54, 1.40 I² = 54% p=0.56) between tumescent and non-tumescent groups. Analysis of studies using immediate alloplastic reconstruction revealed no statistically significant difference in the incidence of explantation between the two groups (OR 0.78 95% CI 0.46, 1.34 I² = 62% p=0.37). Multivariable-adjusted ORs on total skin necrosis were available from three studies. Pooled analysis indicated no statistically significant difference between tumescent and non-tumescent groups (OR 1.72 95% CI 0.72, 4.13 I² = 87% p=0.23).

Conclusion

Low-quality evidence derived mostly from non-randomized studies is indicative of no difference in the incidence of skin necrosis, hematoma, seroma, infection, and explantation between the tumescent and non-tumescent techniques of mastectomy. There is a need for high-quality RCTs to further strengthen the evidence.

Impact of Oncoplastic Breast Surgery on Rate of Complications, Time to Adjuvant Treatment, and Risk of Recurrence

Background

The aim of this study was to compare the risk of complications and recurrence between oncoplastic and conventional breast surgery.

Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of 436 patients with stage I-III breast cancer who underwent surgery at the University Hospital of Basel between 2011 and 2018.

Results

The nipple/skin-sparing mastectomy (NSM/SSM) group showed significantly more delayed wound healing (32.7 vs. 5.8%, p < 0.001) and skin necrosis (13.9 vs. 1.9%, p = 0.020) compared to conventional mastectomy (CM), which corresponded to significantly higher odds of short-term complications (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.02-5.35, p = 0.044). The incidence rate of long-term morbidity in oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OBCS) was significantly higher compared to conventional breast-conserving surgery (CBCS; 25.5 vs. 11.3 per 100 patient years [PY], p < 0.001), in particular concerning chronic pain (13.3 vs. 6.6, p = 0.011) and lymphedema (4.1 vs. 0.4, p = 0.003). Seroma as a long-term morbidity occurred more often in the CM group compared to the NSM/SSM group (5.8 vs. 0.5 per 100 PY, p = 0.004). Patients received adjuvant treatment earlier after CM compared to NSM/SSM (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.05-3.19, p = 0.034). There were no significant differences in the incidence of positive margins nor in the odds of recurrence after OBCS versus CBCS and after NSM/SSM versus CM.

Conclusions

Even though the present study confirmed expected differences in complications and morbidity, it suggested that oncoplastic surgery is oncologically safe. Patients undergoing NSM/SSM should be followed closely to allow early detection and treatment of frequently associated complications and ensure timely start of adjuvant therapy.

Quantifying the Effect of Topical Nitroglycerin on Random Pattern Flap Perfusion in a Rodent Model: An Application of the ViOptix Intra.Ox for Dynamic Flap Perfusion Assessment and Salvage

BACKGROUND

Near-infrared spectroscopy can detect changes in tissue oxygenation postoperatively that predict flap necrosis. The authors hypothesized that this technology can be applied along with topical nitroglycerin to measure an improvement in tissue oxygenation that correlates with tissue salvage.

METHODS

Dorsal, random pattern flaps measuring 10 × 3 cm were raised using Sprague-Dawley rats. Tissue oxygenation was measured after flap elevation in 10 locations using the ViOptix Intra.Ox. Animals were divided into three groups that received 30 mg of topical nitroglycerin daily, twice-daily, or not at all. Oxygenation measurements were repeated on postoperative day 1 and animals were euthanized on day 7 and evaluated for tissue necrosis.

RESULTS

Tissue necrosis was greatest in controls (51.3 mm) compared to daily (28.8 mm) and twice-daily nitroglycerin (18.8 mm; p = 0.035). Three flap perfusion zones were identified: healthy (proximal, 50 mm), necrotic (distal, 20 mm), and watershed. Immediate postoperative tissue oxygenation was highest in healthy tissue (57.2 percent) and decreased to 33.0 and 19.3 percent in the watershed and necrotic zones, respectively (p < 0.001). One day after treatment with nitroglycerin, oxygenation in the healthy zone did not increase significantly (mean difference, -1.5 percent). The watershed (17.8 percent; p < 0.001) and necrotic zones (16.3 percent; p <0.001) did exhibit significant improvements that were greater than those measured in control tissues (7.9 percent; both p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Serial perfusion assessment using the ViOptix Intra.Ox measured a significant improvement in flap oxygenation after treatment with topical nitroglycerin. Within the watershed area of the flap, this increase in tissue oxygenation was associated with the salvage of ischemic tissue.

Flow-through flap with wrist epithelial branch of ulnar artery for repair of finger soft tissue defect: a case series

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the surgical technique and the efficacy of flow-through flap with a wrist epithelial branch of the ulnar artery to repair a finger soft tissue defect.

METHODS

Between June 2015 and December 2017, 12 cases of soft tissue defects of fingers and injured digital artery were repaired by flow-through flap with wrist epithelial branch of the ulnar artery, including 7 males and 5 females (age range: 18-45 years old, average age: 23.6 years old). The causes of injury included electric saw injury in 7 cases, and machine crush injury in 5 cases. 5 cases were combined with tendon injury, 4 cases with fracture, 12 cases with vessel injury and 2 cases with nerve injury. The area range of the flap was 3.0 cm ×1.8 cm to 6.0 cm ×3.0 cm. The length of the pedicles of the flaps ranged from 2.3 cm to 4.7 cm, with an average length of 3.7 cm. The donor sites were sutured directly in 10 cases, and 2 cases were repaired with a full-thickness skin graft from the ilioinguinal region. Flow-through anastomoses of the distal and proximal end of the wrist epithelial branch of the ulnar artery to the distal and proximal end of the digital artery were created, so as to connect the vessels and reach the physiologic state of blood supply.

RESULTS

All flaps and skin grafts survived after operation, and all wounds healed at I phase. All patients were followed up 6-12 months (mean: 9 months). The flaps exhibited smooth appearance and soft texture, similar to that of the normal surrounding skin. At last follow-up, the two-point distance of flaps was 9-15 mm (mean: 11 mm). According to the assessment of upper limb function issued by the Hand Surgery Society of Chinese Medical Association, the hand function was excellent in 10 cases, and good in 2 cases. The ulnar wrist donor areas only had linear scar.

CONCLUSION

Flow-through flap with wrist epithelial branch of ulnar artery exhibits strength in a concealed donor site, reliable blood supply, and simple operation. Flow-through method can be used to repair a broken or defective digital artery in I stage. It is a good method to repair a soft tissue defect of fingers.

Comparison of Immediate Breast Reconstruction Outcomes in Patients With and Without Prior Cosmetic Breast Surgery

BACKGROUND

Skin-sparing (SSM) and nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) have significantly increased. There is limited information on complications of IBR in patients with prior cosmetic breast surgery (CBS). We compare IBR outcomes in patients undergoing SSM and/or NSM with and without prior CBS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients undergoing mastectomy from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2019 were selected. Patient characteristics, surgical approach, and complications were compared between mastectomy and IBR cases for breasts with and without prior CBS. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of complications and reconstruction loss.

RESULTS

956 mastectomies were performed in 697 patients, with IBR performed for 545 mastectomies in 356 patients. Median age was 51 (range 19-83), 45.8% of patients were age < 50, 62.6% of mastectomies were performed for breast cancer. 95 mastectomies (17.4%) were performed in breasts with prior CBS and 450 (82.6%) without. NSM was more frequently utilized for breasts with prior CBS (P < .001). Complications occurred in 80 mastectomies (14.7%); reconstruction loss in 30 (5.5%). On multivariable analysis, age ≥ 50 (OR 1.76, 95%CI 1.01-3.09, P = .047) and NSM (OR 2.11, 95%CI 1.17-3.79, P = .013) were associated with an increased risk of any complication. Prior CBS was not associated with an increased risk of complications (OR 1.11, 95%CI 0.58-2.14, P = .743) or reconstruction loss (OR 1.32, 95%CI 0.51-3.38, P = .567).

CONCLUSION

In this analysis of mastectomy and IBR, prior CBS was not associated with an increased risk of complications or reconstruction loss. In patients with prior CBS undergoing mastectomy, IBR may be safely performed.

Bostwick Autoderm and Implant Technique: Improved Outcomes for Obese Patients in Immediate Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The Bostwick autoderm technique uses the patient's own deepithelialized mastectomy flap for lower pole coverage of an implant, similar to the use of acellular dermal matrix. The skin is closed over the autoderm flap in a Wise pattern. Unlike acellular dermal matrix, autoderm is perfused tissue that offers immediate protection for the implant. Because of this extra protective vascularized layer, implants can often be salvaged in cases of wound breakdown.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 370 patients and 592 immediate implant reconstructed breasts was performed.

RESULTS

Four hundred twenty-two (71 percent) were reconstructed with autoderm, 93 (16 percent) with total muscle coverage, and 77 (13 percent) with acellular dermal matrix. Higher body mass index patients were overrepresented in the autoderm group. Ninety-one of the reconstructions in the autoderm group (21.3 percent) were performed on patients with a body mass index greater than 35 kg/m2 compared to four (4.3 percent) in the total muscle coverage group and two (2.6 percent) in the acellular dermal matrix group. Despite this higher proportion of obese patients, the complication rate in the autoderm group was similar to that of the acellular dermal matrix group. The implant loss rate for all reconstructions was 3.4 percent. There were 17 losses (4 percent) in the autoderm group, zero in the total muscle coverage group, and 20 (3.4 percent) in the acellular dermal matrix group. There were 15 patients and 28 breasts that had prepectoral reconstruction.

CONCLUSION

The autoderm flap is a safe, reliable, and resource-conscientious technique for immediate, implant-based breast reconstruction.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Ischemic Complications After Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Implant-based Reconstruction: A Critical Analysis

PURPOSE

Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) has a higher incidence of mastectomy skin flap necrosis (MSFN) than skin-sparing mastectomy. The purpose of this study is to analyze predisposing factors for nipple and skin necrosis after bilateral NSM with immediate implant reconstruction.

METHODS

Sixty-two consecutive patients (124 breasts) from a single breast/plastic surgeon underwent bilateral NSM with immediate implant-based breast reconstruction were included. Factors influencing MSFN were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean age was 45.7 years, and mean body mass index was 22.9. Reconstructive methods were as follows: tissue expander (TE), 76 (61.3%); and direct to implant, 48 (38.7%). Mastectomy skin flap necrosis occurred in 39 (31.5%) breasts, nipple necrosis 38 and skin flap necrosis 19. Thirty-seven breasts healed uneventfully, and 2 (1.6%) required reoperation. Cancer pathology, mastectomy weight greater than 279 g, TE reconstruction, and nipple-notch (N-N) distance greater than 23 cm were predictive of nipple necrosis on univariate analysis. The mean mastectomy weight (380.1 g vs 220.7 g, P < 0.0001), N-N distance greater than 23 cm (30 vs 0, P < 0.0001), and mean implant size (490 cm3 vs 373 cm3, P < 0.0001) were greater in the TE group. On logistic regression model controlling for all significant variables, predictors of MSFN were as follows: diagnosis of cancer (odds ratio [OR], 3.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41-8.03; P = 0.006), TE reconstruction (OR, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.03-8.03; P = 0.04), and N-N distance (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.03-1.66; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Mastectomy skin flap necrosis after NSM and implant reconstruction is common. In this series, only 2 (1.6%) cases required surgical intervention with no implant loss. Treatment of breast cancer, TE reconstruction, and increasing N-N notch distance were positive predictors of MSFN.

The Intra.Ox Near-Infrared Spectrometer Measures Variations in Flap Oxygenation That Correlate to Flap Necrosis in a Preclinical Rodent Model

BACKGROUND

Mastectomy flap necrosis affects 7 to 40 percent of patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction, with many cases resulting in infection and/or explantation. The Intra.Ox near-infrared spectrometer is a novel device that assesses tissue perfusion by measuring the interactions of light with oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin. This handheld device facilitates serial flap perfusion assessment and may objectively identify at-risk tissues and guide evidence-based treatment algorithms. In this preliminary study, we hypothesized that the Intra.Ox spectrometer detects differences in tissue oxygenation that correlate to tissue necrosis.

METHODS

Dorsal, random-pattern flaps measuring 10 × 3 cm were raised in eight male Sprague-Dawley rats. Intraoperative tissue oxygen saturation was measured using Intra.Ox in 10 standardized locations. On postoperative day 7, the skin flaps were evaluated for full-thickness necrosis. Data were analyzed using the chi-square test and one-way analysis of variance. A receiver operating characteristic curve assessed the accuracy of intraoperative tissue oxygenation in predicting the risk of flap necrosis.

RESULTS

Tissue oxygen saturation exhibited a strong negative correlation to distance from the flap pedicle (r = -0.798). Oxygen saturation in tissue that developed necrosis averaged 32 percent, compared to 59 percent in tissues that did not (p < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.969. Post hoc oxygen saturation cutoffs with 100 percent specificity and sensitivity in predicting necrosis were identified at 46 percent and 54 percent, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Intra.Ox detects significant differences in tissue oxygenation saturation that are associated with the risk for flap necrosis. This technology can be used to identify at-risk tissues and represents an avenue for research aimed at preventing flap necrosis.

Hyperbaric oxygen treatment for mastectomy flap ischaemia: A case series of 50 breasts

INTRODUCTION

Hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT) has been suggested as an effective intervention to limit necrosis of ischaemic skin flaps after mastectomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes of HBOT in the largest series of patients to date with mastectomy flap ischaemia.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of 50 breasts requiring HBOT for mastectomy flap ischaemia. The severity of the ischaemia or necrosis was evaluated by four independent observers using the skin ischaemia necrosis (SKIN) score. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess associations between risk factors and re-operation.

RESULTS

HBOT was started a median of 3 days (range 1-23) after surgery and continued for a median of 12 sessions (range 6-22). The breast SKIN surface area scores (n = 175 observations by the independent observers) improved in 34% (of observations) and the depth scores deteriorated in 42% (both P < 0.01). Both the surface area and depth scores were associated with the need for re-operation: higher scores, reflecting more severe necrosis of the mastectomy flap, were associated with increased need for re-operation. Twenty-nine breasts (58%) recovered without additional operation. Pre-operative radiotherapy (OR 7.2, 95% CI 1.4-37.3) and postoperative infection (OR 15.4, 95% CI 2.6-89.7) were risk factors for re-operation in multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

In this case series, the surface area of the breast affected by ischaemia decreased during HBOT, and most breasts (58%) did not undergo an additional operation. A randomised control trial is needed to confirm or refute the possibility that HBOT improves outcome in patients with mastectomy flap ischaemia.

Viability of transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap treated with photobiomodulation and therapeutic ultrasound: an experimental model

Report the effects of photobiomodulation (PBM) and therapeutic ultrasound (TUS) on the viability of TRAM in mice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-five mice Swiss were subjected to treatment for 5 days. Group 1, treatment was performed with the agents switched off. Groups 2 to 5 were treated with different wavelengths 660 and 830 nanometers (nm) and groups 6 to 11 with TUS of 1 and 3 MHz frequency. Macrometric analyses were performed using a specific camera and analyzed by the ImageJ® software. Thermographic analyses were performed with the Flir C2 and analyzed using the FLIR Tools software.

RESULTS

Group 9 obtained 95% of viable area on the 3rd day and 85% on the 5th day, showing the effectiveness of the TUS in the flap viability. Regarding skin temperature, there was a difference only in the immediate postoperative period in group 1, which had a lower temperature than the other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

TUS demonstrated greater efficiency in maintaining the viability of TRAM. PBM 830 nm also demonstrated good results in the viability of TRAM.