Long-Term Follow-Up Evaluation of 68 Patients with Uveal Melanoma Liver Metastases Treated with Isolated Hepatic Perfusion

Intralesional and Infusional Updates for Metastatic Melanoma

Locoregionally advanced and metastatic melanoma represent a challenging clinical problem, but in the era of immune checkpoint blockade and intralesional and infusional therapies, more options are available for use. Isolated limb infusion (ILI) was first introduced in the 1990s for the management of advanced melanoma, followed by the utilization of isolated extremity perfusion (ILP). Following this, intralesional oncolytic viruses, xanthene dyes, and cytokines were introduced for the management of in-transit metastases as well as unresectable, advanced melanoma. In 2015, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first oncolytic intralesional therapy, talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), for the treatment of advanced melanoma. Additionally, immune checkpoint inhibition has demonstrated efficacy in the management of advanced melanomas, and this improvement in outcomes has been extrapolated to aid in the management of in-transit metastatic disease. Finally, percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP), also approved by the FDA, has been reported to have a significant impact on the treatment of hepatic disease in uveal melanoma. While some of these treatments have less utility due to inferior outcomes as well as higher toxicity profiles, there are selective patient profiles for which these therapies carry a role. This review highlights intralesional and infusional therapies for the management of metastatic melanoma.

Isolated liver chemo perfusion for hepatic metastases from uveal melanoma: a report of 38 cases

Aim

To evaluate the outcomes of isolated liver chemo perfusion in patients with hepatic metastases from uveal melanoma.

Materials and methods

Cardiovascular surgeons are often involved in the treatment of oncological diseases. Isolated liver chemoperfusion requires the use a heart-lung machine. A little more than 300 operations of isolated liver chemoperfusion have been performed worldwide. From 2020 to 2023, 38 cases of isolated liver chemoperfusion were performed at the Kostroma Clinical Oncological Dispensary.

Results

There were 3 deaths, 2 due to liver failure. The remaining patient had hepatic artery thrombosis, who despite emergency thrombectomy and repair of common hepatic artery succumbed to multiorgan failure. Bleeding was diagnosed in 7 patients in the postoperative period. In all cases, relaparotomy was performed to stop bleeding. Subsequently, no special features were noted. The median disease-free survival was 5.4 months. The median overall survival was 20.3 months at the time of submission of this manuscript.

Conclusions

Isolated liver chemoperfusion is a safe method of regional chemotherapy and can be considered in patients with isolated hepatic metastases from uveal melanoma.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12055-023-01620-6.

[Isolated liver perfusion with melphalan followed by pembrolizumab therapy for unresectable metastases of uveal melanoma to the liver]

Uveal melanoma accounts for 80% of all ocular melanomas, and 30-60% of patients have metastases to the liver. A few patients are candidates for liver resection, and this disease is associated with poor prognosis. There are few data on optimal management of metastatic uveal melanoma. Isolated hepatic perfusion is a perspective method for regional treatment of inoperable metastatic liver lesions with uveal melanoma. We present a patient with uveal melanoma who underwent previous enucleation of the eye. Cancer progressed 15 years later as an isolated inoperable metastatic liver lesion. The patient underwent isolated liver perfusion with melphalan, hyperthermia and oxygenation. Subsequently, the patient received systemic therapy with pembrolizumab. Partial response was achieved 1 month after the procedure. There was no progression for 20 months after surgery under systemic therapy with pembrolizumab. Thus, isolated liver chemoperfusion with melphalan is advisable in these patients.

Metastatic uveal melanoma: The final frontier

Treatment of primary intraocular uveal melanoma has developed considerably, its driver genes are largely unraveled, and the ways to assess its risk for metastases are very precise, being based on an international staging system and genetic data. Unfortunately, the risk of distant metastases, which emerge in approximately one half of all patients, is unaltered. Metastases are the leading single cause of death after uveal melanoma is diagnosed, yet no consensus exists regarding surveillance, staging, and treatment of disseminated disease, and survival has not improved until recently. The final frontier in conquering uveal melanoma lies in solving these issues to cure metastatic disease. Most studies on metastatic uveal melanoma are small, uncontrolled, retrospective, and do not report staging. Meta-analyses confirm a median overall survival of 10-13 months, and a cure rate that approaches nil, although survival exceeding 5 years is possible, estimated 2% either with first-line treatment or with best supportive care. Hepatic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging as surveillance methods have a sensitivity of 95-100% and 83-100%, respectively, to detect metastases without radiation hazard according to prevailing evidence, but computed tomography is necessary for staging. No blood-based tests additional to liver function tests are generally accepted. Three validated staging systems predict, each in defined situations, overall survival after metastasis. Their essential components include measures of tumor burden, liver function, and performance status or metastasis free interval. Age and gender may additionally influence survival. Exceptional mutational events in metastases may make them susceptible to checkpoint inhibitors. In a large meta-analysis, surgical treatment was associated with 6 months longer median overall survival as compared to conventional chemotherapy and, recently, tebentafusp as first-line treatment at the first interim analysis of a randomized phase III trial likewise provided a 6 months longer median overall survival compared to investigator's choice, mostly pembrolizumab; these treatments currently apply to selected patients. Promoting dormancy of micrometastases, harmonizing surveillance protocols, promoting staging, identifying predictive factors, initiating controlled clinical trials, and standardizing reporting will be critical steppingstones in reaching the final frontier of curing metastatic uveal melanoma.

Meta-Analysis of Isolated Hepatic Perfusion and Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion as a Treatment for Uveal Melanoma Liver Metastases

Simple Summary

Isolated hepatic perfusion is one of the available treatment options for patients with liver metastases from uveal melanoma. This is an open surgical procedure where the liver is isolated from the circulation and perfused with a chemotherapeutic agent. A modern development is the minimally invasive percutaneous hepatic perfusion, where the liver is endovascularly isolated and then perfused with a chemotherapeutic agent through a catheter in the arterial system. Within this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aim to compare these modalities in terms of overall survival, progression-free survival, complications and response.

Abstract

Background: Uveal melanoma is the most commonly occurring primary intraocular malignancy in adults, and patients have a high risk of developing metastatic disease, mostly in the liver. Isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) with melphalan is a liver-directed therapy for patients with liver metastases. Percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP), a minimally invasive technique, is available as well. PHP benefits from the fact that the procedure can be repeated and therefore possibly offers better survival. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing both techniques. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using the electronic databases of Scopus, MEDLINE, Web of Science, PubMed and Cochrane CENTRAL. A total of nine articles reporting on eight studies were included in the analysis. Individual survival data were extracted from each study. Results: The median overall survival (OS) was 17.1 months for IHP and 17.3 months for PHP. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.2 months for IHP and 9.6 months for PHP. The median hepatic progression-free survival was 10 months for IHP and 9.5 months for PHP. The complication rate and 30-day mortality rate were 39.1% and 5.5% for IHP and 23.8% and 1.8% for PHP. Conclusion: There was no difference in OS or PFS between IHP and PHP for patients with uveal melanoma liver metastases, but patients have significantly less of a risk for complications and mortality following PHP.

Poor Response to Checkpoint Immunotherapy in Uveal Melanoma Highlights the Persistent Need for Innovative Regional Therapy Approaches to Manage Liver Metastases

Uveal melanoma is a cancer that develops from melanocytes in the posterior uveal tract. Metastatic uveal melanoma is an extremely rare disease that has a poor long-term prognosis, limited treatment options and a strong predilection for liver metastasis. Median overall survival has been reported to be 6 months and 1 year mortality of 80%. Traditional chemotherapy used in cutaneous melanoma is ineffective in uveal cases. Surgical resection and ablation is the preferred therapy for liver metastasis but is often not feasible due to extent of disease. In this review, we will explore treatment options for liver metastases from uveal melanoma, with a focus on isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP). IHP offers an aggressive regional therapy approach that can be used in bulky unresectable disease and allows high-dose chemotherapy with melphalan to be delivered directly to the liver without systemic effects. Long-term median overall survival has been reported to be as high as 27 months. We will also highlight the poor responses associated with checkpoint inhibitors, including an overview of the biological rationale driving this lack of immunotherapy effect for this disease. The persistent failure of traditional treatments and immunotherapy suggest an ongoing need for regional surgical approaches such as IHP in this disease.

An Overview of Liver Directed Locoregional Therapies

An overview of all liver-directed locoregional therapies, including surgical resection for melanoma liver metastases (MLMs), is provided. MLM patients are divided by their primary melanoma location; cutaneous, uvea (eye), and mucosal melanoma. If patients with isolated cutaneous MLMs are considered for surgical resection, treatment with systemic therapy should be part of the treatment course. For uveal MLMs, complete surgical or ablative treatment of all MLMs suggests superior results compared with other liver-directed or systemic therapies, based on current evidence, no recommendations for any liver-directed regional therapy in the treatment of mucosal MLMs can be made.

Presence of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells and macrophages correlates to longer overall survival in patients undergoing isolated hepatic perfusion for uveal melanoma liver metastasis

Uveal melanoma is a malignant tumor of the eye that often metastasizes to the liver conferring poor prognosis. When comparing immune profiles in peripheral blood of untreated patients with uveal melanoma liver metastasis and healthy blood donors, it was observed that immune cells of uveal melanoma patients carried immunosuppressive features. Patient blood contained an increased content of CD14⁺HLA-DR^−/low M-MDSCs and inflammatory CD16⁺ monocytes, while their dendritic cells expressed lower levels of activation markers. Melanoma patients also harbored an enhanced fraction of CD4⁺Foxp3⁺ regulatory T cells, while their effector T cells expressed lower levels of the activation marker HLA-DR. Biopsies from liver metastases were obtained from patients with uveal melanoma that subsequently underwent hyperthermic isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) with melphalan. There were trends indicating a positive correlation between a high infiltration of CD8⁺ T cells in metastases and an activated immune cell profile in blood. High metastatic infiltration of CD8⁺ T cells and CD68⁺ macrophages, but not of immunosuppressive CD163⁺ macrophages, correlated to a longer overall survival in patients treated with IHP. Hence, while the immune system of patients with uveal melanoma shows signs of immunosuppression, the presence of activated immune cells may correlate to a longer survival, at least following IHP treatment.

Optimizing the treatment of liver metastases from uveal melanomas with transarterial chemoembolization using melphalan and calibrated microspheres

INTRODUCTION

Patients with liver metastasis from uveal melanoma have a poor prognosis. Efficacy and safety of hepatic transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) using melphalan and microspheres was evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Monocentric retrospective study of all consecutive patients treated by TACE using melphalan and 250μm calibrated microspheres between 2004 and 2016. Radiological response was assessed according to RECIST 1.1, modified (m)-RECIST and EASL on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Liver metastasis response, hepatic, extrahepatic and global progression free survival (PFS) complications were evaluated with the common terminology criteria for adverse events version 4.0 (CTCAE 4.0) and survival factors were secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients underwent 138 TACE (4; 4.1 sessions; range 1-9). Median OS was 16.5 months (mean 21.6 months). Liver metastasis response combining partial and complete response was 42.4%, 97%, 97% with RECIST 1.1, mRECIST, EASL, respectively. There were 58 severe (CTCAE≥3) but manageable complications in 28 patients, except for 1 toxic death.

CONCLUSION

For patients with liver metastases from uveal melanoma ineligible for local treatments, TACE using melphalan may be performed as first line therapy in metastatic miliary disease from uveal melanomas with careful supportive care.

Treatment of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

More than 50% of patients with uveal melanoma end up developing metastases. Currently, there is no standard first-line treatment that facilitates proper management of the metastatic disease.

METHODS

A systematic review of the last 40 years in PubMed with an exhaustive and strict selection of studies was conducted, in which the unit of measurement was overall survival (OS) expressed in Kaplan-Meier curves or numerically.

RESULTS

After the selection process, 110 articles were included. Regional therapies, such as intra-arterial liver chemotherapy (OS: 2, 9-22 months), isolated liver perfusion (OS: 9, 6-27, 4 months), or selective internal radiation therapy (OS: 18 months in monotherapy and 26 months in combination with other therapies) showed some superiority when compared to systemic therapies, such as chemotherapy (OS: 4, 6-17 months), immunotherapy (OS: 5-19, 1 month), immunosuppression (OS: 11 months), or targeted therapy (OS: 6-12 months), without being significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this review suggest that there are no important differences in OS when comparing the different current treatment modalities. Most of the differences found seem to be explained by the heterogenicity of the different studies and the presence of biases in their design, rather than actual extensions of patient survival.

Overall survival after treatment for metastatic uveal melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The overall survival (OS) of patients with metastatic uveal melanoma is short, the evidence for effectiveness of treatments is limited, and no consensus on the choice of treatment exists. We aimed to advance interpretation of OS as an outcome by pooling peer-reviewed data. The design is a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched PubMed from 1 January 1980, to 29 March 2017, for articles reporting patient-level survival in Kaplan-Meier or numerical form. We digitized survival graphs, pooled individual survival times, calculated median OS by treatment modality, and compared each modality by the log-rank test and Cox regression using conventional chemotherapy (CHT) as a reference. Individual-level data were obtained from 78 articles with 2494 patients. The median OS across all treatment modalities was 1.07 years (range: 0.59-2.50 years). Pooled OS reported after isolated hepatic perfusion [median OS: 1.34 years; hazard ratio (HR): 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.87-0.97, P = 0.0040], immunoembolization (median OS: 1.63; HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.95-1.00, P = 0.0080), and surgery (median OS: 1.43; HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.92-0.96, P < 0.0001) was longer, and after checkpoint inhibitor shorter (median OS: 0.59; HR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.06-1.20, P < 0.0001) than after CHT (median OS: 0.91 years), but subject to identifiable confounding factors. OS following other modalities did not differ from CHT. Reported OS was unassociated with the decade of publication, but depended on the percentage of first-line treated patients. Our results suggest no clinically significant difference in OS by treatment modality or decade. Most of the difference in reported OS likely is attributable to surveillance, selection, and publication bias rather than treatment-related prolongation. Our pooled data provide benchmarks for future trials.

Systematic review of liver directed therapy for uveal melanoma hepatic metastases

BACKGROUND

Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare malignancy with a propensity for metastasis to the liver. Systemic chemotherapy is typically ineffective in these patients with liver metastases and overall survival is poor. There are no evidence-based guidelines for management of UM liver metastases. The aim of this study was to review the evidence for management of UM liver metastases.

METHODS

A systematic review of English literature publications was conducted across Ovid Medline, Ovid MEDLINE and Cochrane CENTRAL databases until April 2019. The primary outcome was overall survival, with disease free survival as a secondary outcome.

RESULTS

55 studies were included in the study, with 2446 patients treated overall. The majority of these studies were retrospective, with 17 of 55 including comparative data. Treatment modalities included surgery, isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP), hepatic artery infusion (HAI), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) and Immunoembolization (IE). Survival varied greatly between treatments and between studies using the same treatments. Both surgery and liver-directed treatments were shown to have benefit in selected patients.

CONCLUSION

Predominantly retrospective and uncontrolled studies suggest that surgery and locoregional techniques may prolong survival. Substantial variability in patient selection and study design makes comparison of data and formulation of recommendations challenging.

Parthenolide inhibits the proliferation and induces the apoptosis of human uveal melanoma cells

AIM

To explore the effect of parthenolide (PTL) on human uveal melanoma (UM) cells (C918 and SP6.5 cells) and its molecular mechanism.

METHODS

Carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl amino ester (CFSE) assays and cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) were performed to detect the cell viability. Flow cytometry was used to analyze cell cycle and apoptosis. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and Western blot assays were performed to measure proliferation-related and apoptosis-related factors.

RESULTS

Firstly, PTL decreased the viability of C918 and SP6.5 cells in a dose-dependent manner, and the effect of PTL on C918 cells was stronger than on SP6.5; however, it did not affect normal cells. Secondly, PTL increased the proportion of cell number at cell cycle G1 phase in C918 cells, and decreased the proportion of cell number at S phase, but the proportion did not change at G2 phase. In addition, PTL induced the apoptosis of C918 cells, and decreased the expressions of Cyclin D1, B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) and B-cell lymphoma-extra large (Bcl-XL). Also, PTL increased Cyclin inhibition protein 1 (P21), Bcl-2-associated X protein (Bax), Cysteinyl aspartate specific proteinas-3 (Caspase-3) and Caspase-9 expression. However, the expression of Caspase-8 was not changed.

CONCLUSION

PTL inhibites proliferation and induces apoptosis in UM cells by arresting G1 phase and regulating mitochondrial pathway, however, it does not affect normal cells.

Development of a Prognostic Nomogram for Liver Metastasis of Uveal Melanoma Patients Selected by Liver MRI

Patients with liver metastases of uveal melanoma (LMUM) die from their metastatic evolution within 2 years. We established a nomogram to choose a treatment adapted to life expectancy. From 2002 to 2013, we reviewed 224 patients with LMUM selected by liver MRI. A nomogram was developed based on a Cox model. The predictive performance of the model was assessed according to the C-statistic, Kaplan–Meier curve, and calibration plots. The median follow-up was 49.2 months (range, 0.6–70.9). The survival rates at 6, 12, and 24 months were 0.88 (0.95 CI [0.84–0.93]), 0.68 (0.95 CI [0.62–0.75]), and 0.26 (0.95 CI [0.21–0.33]), respectively. The four factors selected for the nomogram with a worse prognosis were: A disease-free interval between the UM and LMUM groups of less than 6 months (HR = 3.39; 0.95 CI [1.90–6.05]), more than 10 LMUM (HR = 3.95; 0.95 CI [1.97–4.43]), a maximum LMUM of more than 1200 mm2 (HR = 2.47; 0.95 CI [1.53–3.98]), and a lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) value greater than 1.5 (HR = 3.72; 0.95 CI [2.30–6.00]). The model achieved relatively good discrimination and calibration (C-statistic 0.71). This nomogram could be useful for decision-making and risk stratification for therapeutic options.

Hepatic artery infusion of melphalan in patients with liver metastases from ocular melanoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Ocular melanoma has a predilection for liver metastases. Systemic treatment is ineffective and the optimal regional therapy approach is poorly defined. Isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) with melphalan has emerged as a viable treatment option, however a subset of patients are not candidates for this treatment. We therefore sought to determine if melphalan could be safely administered via the hepatic artery for these patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients treated with hepatic artery infusion (HAI) of melphalan was undertaken. All patients had contraindications to IHP and were without other therapy options. Melphalan infusion was repeated every four weeks with consideration for dose escalation in the absence of toxicity or significant disease progression.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were treated with HAI of melphalan from 2010 to 2015. All patients had hepatic dysfunction or prohibitive tumor volume precluding IHP. There were no procedure-related complications. Three patients (21%) died within 30 days and the median survival was 2.9 months. Elevated baseline bilirubin > 2.5 mg/dL was associated with worse overall survival (0.93 vs 6.3 months, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

HAI of melphalan is safe and feasible for patients with metastatic ocular melanoma. Further study to determine the optimal utilization of this treatment approach is warranted.

The effect of perfusate buffering on toxicity and response in isolated hepatic perfusion for uveal melanoma liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) is a treatment option for patients with liver metastases. Previous studies have found that liver toxicity is one of the limiting factors, and in an attempt to reduce the toxicity a buffering agent was added to the perfusate. The aim was to retrospectively analyse if this buffering reduced toxicity and complication rates.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 52 consecutive patients with uveal melanoma liver metastases treated with IHP between 2005 and 2013. Patients were followed by daily liver function tests (LFT). Toxicity was graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (CTCAE; United States Department of Health & Human Services, Washington, D.C), complications according to Clavien-Dindo and response according to RECIST-criteria.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were treated with a buffered perfusate and 16 patients without buffer. There was no difference in age, gender, largest tumour size or number of tumours between the groups. There was a significantly lower mean in peak ALT, AST, PK (INR) and bilirubin when comparing buffer with no-buffer. There were five major complications without a significant difference between the groups (8.3 vs. 12.5%, p = 0.33). There was a lower complete response (CR) rate (11 vs. 44%, p = 0.023) and a trend for shorter time to local progression (9.2 vs. 17.6 months, p = 0.096); however, not significant in multivariate analysis. There was no difference in survival (24.2 vs. 26.0 months, p = 0.43) between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding buffer to the perfusate during IHP significantly reduces postoperative LFTs; however, without a reduced complication rate. Interestingly, buffering also seems to reduce the response rate; however, this did not translate into a survival difference. To address if buffering adds any clinical benefit to the patients concerning toxicity, a larger prospective trial is necessary.

Percutaneous Isolated Hepatic Perfusion as a Treatment for Isolated Hepatic Metastases of Uveal Melanoma: Patient Outcome and Safety in a Multi-centre Study

PURPOSE

Percutaneous isolated hepatic perfusion (PIHP) with Melphalan has been developed as a treatment for patients with isolated hepatic metastases of uveal melanoma. We discuss patient outcome and safety in a retrospective multi-centre study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2012 and 2016 18 patients with un-resectable isolated hepatic metastases of uveal melanoma received single or repeated PIHP with Melphalan (n = 35) at seven sites. Progression-free time, overall survival time (OS) and tumour response by means of RECIST 1.1 criteria were evaluated. Peri- and post-procedural adverse events (AE) were registered. Patients' life quality was assessed using four-point scale questionnaires.

RESULTS

Of 18 patients, initial PIHP treatment resulted in partial response (PR) in eight, stable disease (SD) in seven and progressive disease (PD) in three cases. Nine patients underwent second PIHP with PR in eight cases and PD in one case. Six patients were evaluated after third PIHP with PR in five patients and SD in one patient. Two patients received fourth PIHP with PD in both cases. Median OS was 9.6 months (range 1.6-41.0 months). Median progression-free survival time was 12.4 months (range 0.9-41.0 months) with 1-year survival of 44%. Most common post-procedural AE grade 3 and 4 were temporary leukopenia (n = 11) and thrombocytopenia (n = 8). Patients' self-assessments showed good ratings for overall health and quality of life with only slight changes after PIHP, and a high degree of satisfaction with PIHP treatment.

CONCLUSION

PIHP with Melphalan proved to be a relatively safe, minimal-invasive and repeatable treatment for patients with non-resectable hepatic metastases of uveal melanoma.