1
|
Gondi S, Reichl K, Tassone P. Reirradiation after osteocutaneous free flap reconstruction for locally recurrent head and neck cancer. Am J Otolaryngol 2024; 45:104402. [PMID: 39047621 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Recurrent head and neck cancer poses difficult management. Even after salvage surgery, many patients are considered high-risk for further recurrence and benefit from reirradiation, despite the sequelae such as chronic wounds, tissue necrosis, osteoradionecrosis and vascular damage associated with re-irradiation. Free flaps not only enable the reconstruction following salvage surgery, but there has been limited studies suggesting that free flap reconstruction may reduce the amount of reirradiation complications. However, there are no studies to date specifically examining the effects of osteocutaneous free flap reconstruction upon reirradiation outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this retrospective study, patients with recurrent head and neck cancer that had a history of prior head and neck radiation who underwent salvage surgery with osteocutaneous free flaps followed by reirradiation were identified. Descriptive statistics were performed to assess outcomes. RESULTS Five patients met criteria. Complications included chronic wound infection in one patient, fistula in one patient, plate exposure in two patients and plate removal in one patient. No patients had osteoradionecrosis or carotid rupture after reirradiation. There was an association between complications and further local disease recurrence. All patients were tube feed dependent at their most recent follow-up and two patients were tracheostomy dependent 12 months post-irradiation. Two patients had disease recurrence. Median overall survival was 16 months after reirradiation. CONCLUSIONS Osteocutaneous free flap surgery with reirradiation may result in high rates of complications and low functional status with an equivocal improvement in survival. Larger studies are needed to substantiate these findings and assess the risk-benefit analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suma Gondi
- University of Missouri School of Medicine, 1 Hospital Dr, Columbia, MO 65212, USA.
| | - Kaitlyn Reichl
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Missouri School of Medicine, 1 Hospital Dr, MA314, Columbia, MO 65212, USA.
| | - Patrick Tassone
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Missouri School of Medicine, 1 Hospital Dr, MA314, Columbia, MO 65212, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kim JK, Hardy-Abeloos C, Purswani JM, Kamen E, Concert CM, Duckworth T, Tam M, Haas J, Rybstein M, Vaezi A, Jacobson A, Hu KS. Repeat re-irradiation with interstitial HDR-brachytherapy for an in-field isolated nodal recurrence in a patient with HPV-positive squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Brachytherapy 2023; 22:503-511. [PMID: 36593130 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2022.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Locoregionally recurrent head and neck cancer is a complex clinical scenario that often requires multimodality treatment. These patients have often previously received definitive treatment with a combination of surgery, radiation therapy, and systemic therapy, which can make further management difficult. A second isolated locoregional failure is rare and clinicians are faced with a challenge to optimize disease control while minimizing treatment-related toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS In this report, we present the diagnosis, management, and outcomes of a patient with an isolated locoregional recurrence who was previously treated with two courses of radiation. The patient was treated with a second course of reirradiation using interstitial brachytherapy as well as a discussion regarding patient selection and optimal management for recurrent head and neck cancer. RESULTS Repeat reirradiation using interstitial HDR-brachytherapy with the use of an alloderm spacer was successfully delivered to the patient for an in-field right neck nodal recurrence. He received a total EQD2/BED dose of 127.70/153.24 Gy. At 1-year followup, the patient was without evidence of recurrent disease or new significant side effects. CONCLUSION Recurrent head and neck cancer should be managed with a multidisciplinary approach given the complex clinical scenario. Reirradiation is a commonly used salvage measure for recurrent head and neck cancer that requires careful planning and patient selection due to prior treatment-related effects and dose constraints. We reported a case of a second course of reirradiation using interstitial HDR-brachytherapy for locoregionally recurrent head and neck cancer and showed no recurrence of disease or worsening long term side effects at 1 year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph K Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY.
| | - Camille Hardy-Abeloos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Juhi M Purswani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Emily Kamen
- Department of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| | - Catherine M Concert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Tamara Duckworth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Moses Tam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jonathan Haas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Alec Vaezi
- Department of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| | - Adam Jacobson
- Department of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| | - Kenneth S Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ward MC, Koyfman SA, Bakst RL, Margalit DN, Beadle BM, Beitler JJ, Chang SSW, Cooper JS, Galloway TJ, Ridge JA, Robbins JR, Sacco AG, Tsai CJ, Yom SS, Siddiqui F. Retreatment of Recurrent or Second Primary Head and Neck Cancer After Prior Radiation: Executive Summary of the American Radium Society® (ARS) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC): Expert Panel on Radiation Oncology - Head and Neck Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 113:759-786. [PMID: 35398456 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.03.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Revised: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Re-treatment of recurrent or second primary head and neck cancers occurring in a previously irradiated field is complex. Few guidelines exist to support practice. METHODS We performed an updated literature search of peer-reviewed journals in a systematic fashion. Search terms, key questions, and associated clinical case variants were formed by panel consensus. The literature search informed the committee during a blinded vote on the appropriateness of treatment options via the modified Delphi method. RESULTS The final number of citations retained for review was 274. These informed five key questions, which focused on patient selection, adjuvant re-irradiation, definitive re-irradiation, stereotactic body radiation (SBRT), and re-irradiation to treat non-squamous cancer. Results of the consensus voting are presented along with discussion of the most current evidence. CONCLUSIONS This provides updated evidence-based recommendations and guidelines for the re-treatment of recurrent or second primary cancer of the head and neck.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew C Ward
- Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina; Southeast Radiation Oncology Group, Charlotte, North Carolina.
| | | | | | - Danielle N Margalit
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Beth M Beadle
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | | | | | | | | | - John A Ridge
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jared R Robbins
- University of Arizona College of Medicine Tucson, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Assuntina G Sacco
- University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California
| | - C Jillian Tsai
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sue S Yom
- University of California, San Francisco, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zebolsky AL, Ochoa E, Badran KW, Heaton C, Park A, Seth R, Knott PD. Appearance-Related Distress and Social Functioning after Head and Neck Microvascular Reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2021; 131:E2204-E2211. [PMID: 33797087 DOI: 10.1002/lary.29548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Revised: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS To better understand aesthetic patient-reported outcomes and psychosocial quality of life (QOL) after head and neck microvascular reconstruction for benign or malignant tumors. STUDY DESIGN Single-center prospectively obtained in-office validated questionnaire-based study. METHODS Analysis of prospectively collected surveys at a tertiary care academic center from June 2018 to February 2021. Patients completed two FACE-Q scales: Appearance-Related Psychosocial Distress (ARPD) and Social Function (SF). Survey scores, demographics, operative course, and adjuvant therapy data underwent univariate and multivariable analyses. RESULTS One hundred and three patients completed surveys at a median of 13.5 months postoperatively (interquartile range: 5.2-30.8). Mean ARPD from 0 (no distress) to 100 (maximum distress) was 32.4 (standard error of the mean [SEM]: 2.7). Mean SF from 0 (worst functioning) to 100 (best functioning) was 55.5 (SEM: 2.7). Postoperative adjuvant radiation was associated with 13.9% higher ARPD (95% CI: 3.4-24.4, P = .019) and 10.4% lower SF (95% CI: -20.7 to -0.1, P = .047). Each appearance-related question on the ARPD scale independently predicted impaired SF (P < .001 for all questions). Upon multivariable logistic regression, osteocutaneous reconstruction, compared to soft tissue alone (P = .043), and postoperative adjuvant radiation (P = .014) were associated with higher levels of ARPD. Age, sex, relationship status, anxiety or depression history, defect location, and hospital stay were not significantly associated with ARPD or SF scores. CONCLUSIONS Aesthetic outcomes are important determinants of psychosocial QOL following head and neck microvascular reconstruction: an effect that is worsened by adjuvant radiation. Reconstructive surgeons should prioritize aesthetic outcomes, in addition to functional restoration, to optimize social functioning in patients with head and neck tumors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 Laryngoscope, 131:E2204-E2211, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron L Zebolsky
- Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - Edgar Ochoa
- School of Medicine, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - Karam W Badran
- Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - Chase Heaton
- Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - Andrea Park
- Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - Rahul Seth
- Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - P Daniel Knott
- Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Deng D, Liu J, Chen F, Lv D, Gan W, Li L, Wang J. Double-island anterolateral thigh free flap used in reconstruction for salvage surgery for locally recurrent head and neck carcinoma. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97:e12839. [PMID: 30313121 PMCID: PMC6203530 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000012839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Salvage surgery is usually the only treatment for recurrent head and neck tumors but often poses a challenge to surgeons due to post-resected defects at 2 or more sites. Here we present the outcomes and rationale for reconstruction by a double-island anterolateral thigh (ALT) free flap following the salvage surgery.Patients treated with double-island ALT free flaps in salvage surgery between September 2012 and January 2017 at West China Hospital, Sichuan University were retrospectively viewed.A total of 18 patients (15 males) underwent reconstruction with double-island ALT free flaps (range from 40 to 77 years old). All patients had recurrent tumors after surgery and/or chemoradiotherapy and were selected for salvage surgery by a multidisciplinary team. The flaps were initially harvested as 7 cm × 7 cm to 16 cm × 10 cm single blocks and then divided into double-island flaps with each individual paddle ranging from5 cm × 3 cm to 10 cm × 8 cm. The average flap thickness was 3.5 cm (range from 2 to 6 cm), and the average pedicle length was 8 cm (range from 6 to 10 cm). A total of 18 arteries and 32 veins were anastomosed. Three patients developed fistula, 1 developed flap failure due to thrombosis and was re-operated with a pedicle flap. One patient died of pulmonary infection 6 months after the operation.Flap reconstruction for complex head and neck defects after salvage surgery remains challenging, but double-island ALT free flap reconstruction conducted by a multidisciplinary team and experienced surgeons would have a role in this setting.
Collapse
|
6
|
Meregaglia M, Cairns J, Licitra L, Bossi P. The use of intensive radiological assessments in routine surveillance after treatment for head and neck cancer: An economic evaluation. Eur J Cancer 2018; 93:89-98. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.01.082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2017] [Revised: 01/06/2018] [Accepted: 01/21/2018] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
|
7
|
Yan H, Mo Z, Xiang Z, Rong D, Zhang Y, Chen G, Zhong Z, Zhang F, Gao F. CT-guided 125I brachytherapy for locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Cancer 2017; 8:2104-2113. [PMID: 28819412 PMCID: PMC5559973 DOI: 10.7150/jca.19078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2017] [Accepted: 04/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The study evaluated the feasibility, clinical effectiveness, and quality of life of computed tomography (CT)-guided 125I brachytherapy for locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods: We recruited 81 patients diagnosed with locally recurrent NPC after previous radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. Thirty-nine patients received 125I brachytherapy (group A) and 42 received re-irradiation (IMRT, group B). The evaluated outcomes were local control, complications, and quality of life. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to compare local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS) and overall survival (OS) in the two treatment groups. Results: The median follow-up was 30 months (range, 5-68 months), median LTPFS was 21 in group A and 17 months in group B. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS in group A were 84.6%, 51.3%, 30.7%, and 85.7%, 50.0%, and 32.6% in group B. In group A, 10/39 patients (25.6%) experienced at least one ≥grade III complication; no grade V complications occurred. In group B, 28/42 (66.7%) experienced at least one ≥grade III complication and 6/42 (14.3%) died of severe grade V complications. No significant between-group difference existed in the Quality of Life score on the EORTC QLQ-H&N35 questionnaire before treatment. In group A, quality of life was significantly improved after treatment; but did not improve, or even deteriorated in group B. Conclusions: 125I brachytherapy was a feasible, safe, and effective treatment for locally recurrent NPC. 125I brachytherapy significantly reduced complications caused by re-irradiation and improved patients' quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huzheng Yan
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China. ADD: 651 Dongfeng Road, East, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhiqiang Mo
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China. ADD: 651 Dongfeng Road, East, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhanwang Xiang
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China. ADD: 651 Dongfeng Road, East, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dailin Rong
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China. ADD: 651 Dongfeng Road, East, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yanlin Zhang
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China. ADD: 651 Dongfeng Road, East, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guanyu Chen
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China. ADD: 651 Dongfeng Road, East, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhihui Zhong
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China. ADD: 651 Dongfeng Road, East, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fujun Zhang
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China. ADD: 651 Dongfeng Road, East, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fei Gao
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China. ADD: 651 Dongfeng Road, East, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|