Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis in the Elderly: A Case-Controlled, Multicenter Study

Advances in the management of peritoneal malignancies

Peritoneal surface malignancies (PSMs) are usually associated with a poor prognosis. Nonetheless, in line with advances in the management of most abdominopelvic metastatic diseases, considerable progress has been made over the past decade. An improved understanding of disease biology has led to the more accurate prediction of neoplasia aggressiveness and the treatment response and has been reflected in the proposal of new classification systems. Achieving complete cytoreductive surgery remains the cornerstone of curative-intent treatment of PSMs. Alongside centralization in expert centres, enabling the delivery of multimodal and multidisciplinary strategies, preoperative management is a crucial step in order to select patients who are most likely to benefit from surgery. Depending on the specific PSM, the role of intraperitoneal chemotherapy and of perioperative systemic chemotherapy, in particular, in the neoadjuvant setting, is established in certain scenarios but questioned in several others, although more prospective data are required. In this Review, we describe advances in all aspects of the management of PSMs including disease biology, assessment and improvement of disease resectability, perioperative management, systemic therapy and pre-emptive management, and we speculate on future research directions.

Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Elderly is Safe and Effective

INTRODUCTION

An increasing proportion of elderly patients (EP) are undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC). They have increased comorbidities and perioperative risk. Current literature is deficient in describing the outcomes of EP undergoing CRS/HIPEC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of our prospectively maintained CRS/HIPEC database analyzed perioperative and oncological outcomes of EP (>70 y) compared to younger patients (YP) (<60 y).

RESULTS

Of 500 CRS/HIPEC patients, 62 EP and 210 YP were included. Median age was 73 y in EP and 46 y in YP. Demographic, clinical, operative, and perioperative outcomes were similar between groups. American Society of Anesthesiologists > 3 was more prevalent in the EP with 88.2% versus 54.8% in the YP (P < 0.001). Comorbidities were higher in the EP with 87.1% versus 39.0% in the YP (P < 0.001). Peritoneal Cancer Index score was similar with a median of 9. All postoperative and severe complications were similar with 55.2% and 17.1% in the YP and 64.5% and 21.0% in the EP (P = 0.242; P = 0.448). Postoperative mortality was similar with 1.5% in the YP and 5.0% in the EP (P = 0.134). In colorectal primary patients, median overall and disease-free survival was 61.8 and 12.9 mo in the YP and 64.6 and 11.3 mo in the EP (P = 0.363; P = 0.845).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a significant age difference, increased comorbidities, worse American Society of Anesthesiologists, and similar Peritoneal Cancer Index burden, we found no significant differences in perioperative complications or oncological benefit in elderly CRS/HIPEC patients. EP appear to have similar perioperative and oncological outcomes as YP.

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal peritoneal metastases in an elderly population: outcomes from a single centre

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of elderly patients with resectable colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM) is increasing. This study aimed to compare short and long-term outcomes of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for CRPM in patients above and below 70 years of age.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, 10-year analysis of 90-day major morbidity and mortality, and long-term survival.

RESULTS

Thirty-two (21.3%) of 150 consecutive patients who underwent CRS and HIPEC during the study period were aged 70 and older. PCI (P = 0.04), perioperative chemotherapy use (P < 0.01) and organ resections (rectum P = 0.04, diaphragm P = 0.03) were less in the over 70 group. There was no significant differences in major morbidity (P = 0.19) and mortality (P = 0.32). There was also no difference in 5-year overall survival (OS) (≥70: 26% vs. <70: 39%; P = 0.68) and disease-free survival (DFS) (≥70: 25% vs. <70: 14%; P = 0.22). Age above 70 was not independently associated with worse OS (HR 1.55, P = 0.20) and DFS (HR 1.07, P = 0.81).

CONCLUSION

The surgical management of CRPM appears safe and feasible in this elderly population. Appropriate selection of elderly patients for such radical intervention is reinforced by the comparable survival with those under 70.

Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for resectable peritoneal metastases is feasible in elderly patients

The aim is to evaluate the feasibility and the prognosis of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for resectable peritoneal metastases (RPM) in elderly patients. Patients who underwent CRS with HIPEC for RPM between 2012 and 2018 in one tertiary reference center were retrospectively included and divided according to the age: Group A (< 65 years) and Group B (≥ 65 years). Postoperative outcomes and survivals were compared. Ninety-five patients were included in Groups A (n = 65) and B (n = 30). The incidence of comorbidities was significantly higher in elderly patients (65 vs 90%, p = 0.01), but RPM characteristics were similar between groups. There was no difference between groups in terms of postoperative results: 30-day major morbidity (33 vs 23%, p = 0.4), 30-day mortality (0 vs 3%, p = 0.3), mean length of stay (26.7 ± 19.4 vs 22.4 ± 10.3 days, p = 0.3) and readmission's rate (15 vs 33%, p = 0.06). The only one significant difference was the 90-day mortality which never occurred before 65 years but in 10% of elderly patients (p = 0.03). There was no difference regarding recurrence's rate (56 vs 37%, p = 0.1), neither 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates (86, 64 and 52% vs 85, 74% and not reached, p = 0.8) and disease-free survival rates (61, 28 and 28% vs 56, 45% and not reached, p = 0.6). CRS with HIPEC is feasible in elderly patients. Since the 90-day mortality appeared to be higher in elderly patients, additional criteria are necessary to improve the selection of elderly patients for this major surgery.

The Intersection of Age and Tumor Biology with Postoperative Outcomes in Patients After Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC

BACKGROUND

Patient age is a significant factor in preoperative selection for major abdominal surgery. The association of age, tumor biology, and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) remains ill-defined.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was performed for patients who underwent a CCR0/1 CRS/HIPEC from the US HIPEC Collaborative Database (2000-2017). Age was categorized into < 65 or ≥ 65 years. Primary outcome was postoperative major complications. Secondary outcomes were non-home discharge (NHD) and readmission. Analysis was stratified by disease histology: non-invasive (appendiceal LAMN/HAMN), and invasive (appendiceal/colorectal adenocarcinoma).

RESULTS

Of 1090 patients identified, 22% were ≥ 65 (n = 240), 59% were female (n = 646), 25% had non-invasive (n = 276) and 51% had invasive (n = 555) histology. Median PCI was 13 (IQR 7-20). Patients ≥ 65 had a higher rate of major complications (37 vs 26%, p = 0.02), NHD (12 vs 5%, p < 0.01), and readmission (28 vs 22%, p = 0.05), compared to those < 65. For non-invasive histology, age ≥ 65 was not associated with major complications or NHD on multivariable analysis. For invasive histology, when accounting for PCI and CCR, age ≥ 65 was associated with major complications (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.16-3.59, p = 0.01). When accounting for major complications, age ≥ 65 was associated with NHD (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.08-5.98, p = 0.03). Age ≥ 65 was not predictive of readmission for any histology when accounting for major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Age ≥ 65 years is an independent predictor for postoperative major complications and non-home discharge for invasive histology, but not non-invasive histology. These data inform preoperative counseling, risk stratification, and early discharge planning.

[Treatment of primary and metastatic peritoneal tumors in the Covid-19 pandemic. Proposals for prioritization from the RENAPE and BIG-RENAPE groups]

La pandémie de COVID-19 modifie profondément l’organisation et l’accès aux soins, en particulier pour les pathologies néoplasiques péritonéales, dont la prise en charge curative mobilise des moyens importants en personnel, bloc opératoire et réanimation. Les groupes BIG-RENAPE et RENAPE proposent des pistes de réflexion et de priorisation pour leur prise en charge. Un renforcement des critères habituels de sélection est nécessaire pour une prise en charge à visée curative : patients jeunes, avec peu de co-morbidités et une extension péritonéale limitée. Il est souhaitable de prioriser les pathologies pour lesquelles la chirurgie de cytoréduction associée ou non à une chimiohyperthermie intrapéritonéale (CHIP) est le traitement de référence et celles pour lesquelles la chimiothérapie systémique ne peut être une alternative temporaire ou prolongée : pseudomyxomes péritonéaux ; mésothéliomes péritonéaux malins résécables ; métastases péritonéales d’origine colorectale si résécables, non répondeuses à la chimiothérapie systémique et/ou après 12 cures, carcinoses ovariennes en 1^re intention si résécables et limitées ou en situation intervallaire après un maximum de 6 cycles de chimiothérapie systémique. L’adjonction d’une CHIP devra être discutée au cas par cas, en centre expert. La priorisation des indications devra prendre en considération les conditions locales et la phase de la période épidémique pour permettre une prise en charge péri-opératoire optimale.

Treatment of primary and metastatic peritoneal tumors in the Covid-19 pandemic. Proposals for prioritization from the RENAPE and BIG-RENAPE groups

The Covid-19 pandemic is profoundly changing the organization of healthcare access. This is particularly so for peritoneal neoplastic diseases, for which curative treatment mobilizes substantial personnel, operating room and intensive care resources. The BIG-RENAPE and RENAPE groups have made tentative proposals for prioritizing care provision. A tightening of the usual selection criteria is needed for curative care: young patients with few or no comorbidities and limited peritoneal extension. It is desirable to prioritize disease conditions for which cytoreduction surgery with or without associated hyperthermic intraoperative peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is the gold-standard treatment, and for which systemic chemotherapy cannot be a temporary or long-term alternative: pseudomyxoma peritonei, resectable malignant peritoneal mesotheliomas, peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin if they are resectable and unresponsive to systemic chemotherapy after up to 12 courses, first-line ovarian carcinomatosis if resectable or in interval surgery after at most six courses of systemic chemotherapy. Addition of HIPEC must be discussed case by case in an expert center. The prioritization of indications must consider local conditions and the phase of the epidemic to allow optimal peri-operative care.

Failure-to-Rescue Following Cytoreductive Surgery with or Without HIPEC is Determined by the Type of Complication-a Retrospective Study by INDEPSO

To determine factors influencing failure-to-rescue in patients with complications following cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC. A retrospective analysis of patients enrolled in the Indian HIPEC registry was performed. Complications were graded according to the CTCAE classification version 4.3. The 30- and 90-day morbidity were both recorded. Three hundred seventy-eight patients undergoing CRS with/without HIPEC for peritoneal metastases from various primary sites, between January 2013 and December 2017 were included. The median PCI was 11 [range 0-39] and a CC-0/1 resection was achieved in 353 (93.5%). Grade 3-4 morbidity was seen 95 (25.1%) at 30 days and 122 (32.5%) at 90 days. The most common complications were pulmonary complications (6.8%), neutropenia (3.7%), systemic sepsis (3.4%), anastomotic leaks (1.5%), and spontaneous bowel perforations (1.3%). Twenty-five (6.6%) patients died within 90 days of surgery due to complications. The failure-to-rescue rate was 20.4%. Pulmonary complications (p = 0.03), systemic sepsis (p < 0.001), spontaneous bowel perforations (p < 0.001) and PCI > 20 (p = 0.002) increased the risk of failure-to-rescue. The independent predictors were spontaneous bowel perforation (p = 0.05) and systemic sepsis (p = 0.001) and PCI > 20 (p = 0.02). The primary tumor site did not have an impact on the FTR rate (p = 0.09) or on the grade 3-4 morbidity (p = 0.08). Nearly one-fifth of the patients who developed complications succumbed to them. Systemic sepsis, spontaneous bowel perforations, and pulmonary complications increased the risk of FTR and multidisciplinary teams should develop protocols to prevent, identify, and effectively treat such complications. All surgeons pursuing this specialty should perform a regular audit of their results, irrespective of their experience.

A proposal of Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology (BSSO/SBCO) for standardizing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) procedures in Brazil: pseudomixoma peritonei, appendiceal tumors and malignant peritoneal mesothelioma

Cytoreductive surgery plus hypertermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy has emerged as a major comprehensive treatment of peritoneal malignancies and is currently the standard of care for appendiceal epithelial neoplasms and pseudomyxoma peritonei syndrome as well as malignant peritoneal mesothelioma. Unfortunately, there are some worldwide variations of the cytoreductive surgery and hypertermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy techniques since no single technique has so far demonstrated its superiority over the others. Therefore, standardization of practices might enhance better comparisons between outcomes. In these settings, the Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology considered it important to present a proposal for standardizing cytoreductive surgery plus hypertermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy procedures in Brazil, with a special focus on producing homogeneous data for the developing Brazilian register for peritoneal surface malignancies.

Current Opinion and Knowledge on Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: A Survey among a Swiss Oncology Network

Aims of the Study: The present survey aimed to evaluate current opinion and practice regarding peritoneal metastasis (PM), satisfaction with available treatment options, and need for new therapeutic approaches. Methods: This was a qualitative study conducted between October 2016 and October 2017 in the Réseau Suisse Romand d’Oncologie including 101 members of various oncological specialties. Participants’ demographics, current practice, knowledge, and satisfaction regarding available treatment options and need for new treatment options were assessed by semantic differential scales through 33 closed questions with automatic reminders at 4-, 8-, 12-, and 16-week intervals. Results: Twenty-seven participants (27%) completed the survey. Participants were gastrointestinal or gynecologic oncologists and surgeons. Most participants (67%) evaluated their knowledge on PM as moderate, while 22% considered themselves as experts. Clinical usefulness of systemic chemotherapy and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy was judged to be moderate to high for PM of ovarian and colorectal origin and moderate to poor for gastric origin. Satisfaction with available treatment options was 6/10 (interquartile range [IQR] 4–7) for ovarian, 5/10 (IQR 3–7) for colorectal, and 3/10 (IQR 1–3) for gastric PM. Treatment strategies varied widely for typical case vignettes. The need for new treatment modalities was rated as 8/10 (IQR 6–10). Conclusion: Usefulness of and satisfaction with available treatment options for PM were rated as moderate at best by oncological experts, and treatment strategies differed importantly among participants. There appears to be a clear need for standardization and new treatment modalities.

Cirrhosis is not a contraindication to cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in highly selected patients

BACKGROUND

Patient selection for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is critically important to optimizing outcomes. There is currently no literature regarding the safety of CRS/HIPEC in patients with cirrhosis. The aim of this case series is to report the outcomes of three patients with well-compensated cirrhosis who underwent CRS/HIPEC.

METHODS

Patients were identified from a prospectively maintained peritoneal surface malignancy database. Patient, tumor, and operative-related details were recorded as short-term postoperative outcomes. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

All patients had well-compensated (Child-Pugh Class A) cirrhosis and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0. One patient had preoperative evidence of portal hypertension. All safely underwent CRS/HIPEC with completeness of cytoreduction (CC) scores of 0. The postoperative morbidity profile was unique, but all complications were manageable and resulted in full recovery to preoperative baseline status.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient selection for CRS/HIPEC is critical for optimization of short- and long-term outcomes. This small series suggests that well-compensated cirrhosis should not be an absolute contraindication to CRS/HIPEC.

Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for the Elderly: Is It Reasonable? A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is safe and worthwhile for elderly patients remains unclear. This meta-analysis of outcomes after CRS plus HIPEC for the elderly aimed to generate a higher level of evidence and precise indications for these patients.

METHODS

A systematic literature search for studies reporting postoperative outcomes after CRS plus HIPEC for elderly patients was performed in the MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, Web of Knowledge Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science, and Google Scholar databases. The included studies evaluated the overall 30-day postoperative morbidity, 90-day postoperative mortality, grade 3 or higher postoperative morbidity, rates of anastomotic leaks, reoperation and readmission, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

The inclusion criteria were met by 13 retrospective studies involving 2544 patients. Considering only comparative studies, the 90-day postoperative mortality was significantly increased for elderly patients [odds ratio (OR), 0.49; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.27-0.88; I ² = 79%]. The 30-day grade 3 or higher postoperative morbidity was increased in the patients 70 years of age or older (14.5%; 95% CI 8.1-24.4 vs. 32.3%; 95% CI 22.4-44.0%; p = 0.004; I ² = 85%). The overall 30-day postoperative morbidity, rates of anastomotic leaks, reoperation and readmission, and length of hospital stay were not affected by age.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of the elderly with CRS plus HIPEC was associated with increased severe postoperative morbidity and mortality. However, these conclusions should be weighted given the existence of major biases in the included studies. Age alone probably would not be a formal contraindication, but frailty should be taken into account. Further prospective studies are needed.