A descriptive comparison of postoperative outcomes between hybrid mediastino-thoracoscopic approach and conventional thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the results of the hybrid mediastino-thoracoscopic approach with that of the conventional thoracoscopic approach and to identify the advantages and disadvantages of the hybrid approach.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 172 patients who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer from July 2009 to June 2021, excluding salvage surgery. In the mediastinoscopic approach, the lymph nodes were dissected from a small incision in the left aspect of the neck to the aortic arch with supine double-lung ventilation. Thereafter, the middle-to-lower mediastinum and right superior mediastinum were dissected thoracoscopically in the prone position. The patients' demographics, surgical outcomes, postoperative complications, and postoperative recurrence patterns were compared between 51 patients in the hybrid approach and 121 patients in the conventional approach.

RESULTS

The hybrid group had more elderly patients (71 years vs. 67 years; P = 0.010), more cardiovascular disease (33.3% vs. 16.7%; P = 0.021), lower rates of preoperative chemotherapy (49.0% vs. 69.4%; P = 0.015), and shorter right lung collapse time (196 min vs. 264 min; P < 0.001). Postoperative hoarseness was not different between the two groups (31.4% vs. 27.3%; P = 0.584), and there was a significant difference in the sternal-vertebral distance at the level of the sternal notch (41 mm in the hybrid group vs. 48 mm in the conventional group; P = 0.029). The sternal-vertebral distance of less than 45 mm was an independent risk factor for postoperative hoarseness in the logistic analysis (odds ratio 3.636, 95% confidence interval 1.054-12.546; P = 0.041).

CONCLUSION

The hybrid mediastino-thoracoscopic approach could be safely adapted to elderly or cardiopulmonary diseased patients; however, short sternal-vertebral distance might be a risk factor of postoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy.

Incidence of Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Palsy in Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive McKeown Esophagectomy in Prone Position: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

BACKGROUND

Esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy is the principal treatment for localized esophageal cancer. Conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (C-MIE) in prone position has spread worldwide as it is less invasive. However, its efficacy remains controversial. Robot-assisted MIE (RAMIE) can have more advantages than C-MIE. Therefore, the current study aimed to validate whether RAMIE is associated with lower incidence of left recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy compared with C-MIE in prone position.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In total, 404 patients with esophageal carcinoma underwent MIE (353 C-MIEs and 51 RAMIEs) in prone position at Kobe University between 2010 and 2020. Then, propensity score matching was performed, and results showed that 51 patients should be included in each group. Thereafter, the perioperative outcomes between the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

The RAMIE group had a significantly longer operative time than the C-MIE group (P < 0.0001). However, the number of lymph nodes resected along the left RLN was similar in both groups. Moreover, the incidence of left RLN palsy was significantly lower in the RAMIE group than in the C-MIE [Clavien-Dindo classification grade II; 0 (0%) versus 32 (9%), P = 0.022 in entire cohort, and 0 (0%) versus 5 (10%), P = 0.022 in matched cohort. Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group definitions type I; 8 (16%) versus 101 (29%), P = 0.041 in entire cohort and 8 (16%) versus 18 (35%) in matched cohort, P = 0.023].

CONCLUSION

RAMIE is superior to C-MIE in prone position in decreasing the incidence of left RLN palsy.

Novel "Modified Bascule Method" for Lymphadenectomy Along the Left Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve During Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Given the worldwide popularization of conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (C-MIE), robot-assisted MIE (RAMIE) can be expected to provide a finer procedure. However, controversy remains regarding whether RAMIE is superior to C-MIE in preventing recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy. Considering the shallow learning curve for RAMIE, a novel procedure for lymphadenectomy along the RLN during RAMIE is needed.

METHODS

Based on a logical and simple understanding of the left upper mediastinum anatomy, the authors developed a novel "modified bascule method" for RAMIE that could simplify lymphadenectomy along the left RLN and prevent it from being touched and stretched. Between 2018 and 2020, 46 patients with esophageal carcinoma underwent RAMIE using this method at Kobe University.

RESULTS

The modified bascule method was used to perform RAMIE for 29 men and 17 women with a median age of 67 years (range, 49-82 years). The median thoracoscopic procedure time was 438 min (range, 344-625 min), and the median console time was 351 min (range 273-518 min). The study harvested a median of 24 (range, 8-34) lymph nodes from the thoracic portion and 4 (range, 0-10) lymph nodes from along the left RLN. The mortality rate was 0%. Postoperative left RLN palsy classified as Clavien-Dindo (C-D) grade 1 or higher was observed for 9 patients (19%), whereas grade 2 or higher was not seen (0%). Pneumonia and anastomotic leakage rates higher than C-D grade 2 were respectively 13% and 19%.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel modified bascule method for RAMIE can promote feasible lymphadenectomy along the left RLN even when performed during the learning period.

Application of esophageal wire traction in lymph node dissection during three-hole thoracoscopic McKeown esophagectomy

INTRODUCTION

The quality of left recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node dissection is critical in esophageal cancer. We investigated whether esophageal wire traction in three-hole thoracoscopic esophagectomy can improve the same.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 98 patients who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy in our center from January 2018 to July 2018: 36 patients with esophageal wire traction and 62 patients without traction (control group). The clearance time for left recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes, thoracic bleeding volume, number of left recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes, and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

The observation group had a shorter clearance time for the left recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes (15.8 ± 6.9 min vs. 20.00 ± 6.2 min), less thoracic bleeding (55.8 ± 30.2 mL vs. 70.7 ± 30.3 mL), and higher number of dissected left recurrent laryngeal lymph nodes (3.3 ± 1.4 vs. 2.5 ± 1.1) than the control group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of anastomotic leakage, pulmonary infection, arrhythmia, chylothorax, and nerve injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal wire traction shortens the clearance time for the left recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes, reduces thoracic bleeding, and improves the quality of left recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node dissection in three-hole thoracoscopic esophagectomy.

Postoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy is associated with pneumonia in minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

During the past decade, minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer has been adopted worldwide with expectations of lower invasiveness. However, the rate of postoperative pneumonia, which is an independent risk factor for oncological prognosis in esophageal cancer, remains high. The aim of this retrospective follow-up study is to clarify whether there is a strong correlation between recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy and postoperative pneumonia in MIE.

METHODS

This retrospective follow-up study included 209 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position (TEP) at Kobe University between 2011 and 2018. Inclusion criteria included age 18-85 years; cT1-3, cN0-3 disease; upper mediastinal lymphadenectomy; and ability to undergo simultaneous esophagectomy and reconstruction of the gastric conduit or pedicled jejunum. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were conducted to identify independent risk factors for pneumonia.

RESULTS

Among 209 TEPs, pneumonia of Clavien-Dindo classification grade > II occurred in 44 patients (21%). In the pneumonia positive and negative groups, there were significant differences in age (67.9 ± 7.5 vs. 64.9 ± 8.6 years), 3-field lymph node dissection [27 (61%) vs. 67 (41%)], transfusion [20 (45%) vs. 41 (25%)], left RLN palsy [19 (43%) vs. 18 (11%)], and any RLN palsy [20 (45%) vs. 18 (11%)]. In multivariate analysis, any RLN palsy was associated with a higher incidence of pneumonia [odds ratio (OR), 6.210; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.728-14.480; P < 0.0001]. In addition, age was associated with a higher incidence of pneumonia (OR, 1.049; 95% CI, 1.001-1.103; P = 0.046). Changes in the rate of any RLN palsy over time were quite similar to changes in the incidence of pneumonia.

CONCLUSION

There is a strong correlation between RLN palsy and pneumonia in MIE for esophageal cancer. Prevention of RLN palsy may reduce the incidence of pneumonia, leading to better oncological prognosis.

Comparative study of three types of lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by minimally invasive esophagectomy

Background

The objective of this study was to compare three kinds of lymphadenectomy methods along the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) and assess the safety and effectiveness of the new method.

Methods

A total of 194 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) at our institution from May 2013 to May 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the method of lymphadenectomy along the left RLN, the patients were divided into three groups: 75 cases underwent the conventional method (A group), 80 cases the skeletonized method (B group) and 39 cases the modified Bascule method (C group). The number of dissected lymph nodes and surgical outcomes were recorded and compared to identify differences among the three groups.

Results

The frequency of metastasis to the LRLN lymph node was 18.6% among all patients, and 12%, 20% and 28% in groups A, B and C, respectively. The number of harvested lymph nodes (total/chest/LRLN/LRLN+) in group B and group C were significantly greater than that of group A, but not significant between group B and group C. The hoarseness rate in group C was 15.4%, which was lower than the rate in group B (21.3%) and higher than the rate in group A (13.3%), but there was no statistical significance.

Conclusions

The new method for lymphadenectomy along the left RLN during MIE in the semi‐prone position is safe and reliable. It provides sufficient lymph node dissection along the left RLN.

Standardizing procedures improves and homogenizes short-term outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy

PURPOSE

Esophageal cancer is one of the deadliest cancers worldwide. Esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy is regarded as the only curative option for resectable esophageal cancer, but it is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Multidisciplinary team (MDT) management was recently associated with improved outcomes after surgery for esophageal cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of standardizing procedures for minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) in the MDT setting.

METHODS

This was a case-matched control study of 154 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position (TEP) between 2012 and 2016. Surgery was performed by two attending surgeons (surgeons A and B) who began working together in the same MDT in 2015. At that time, the following surgical procedures were standardized between surgeons A and B: mediastinal lymphadenectomy, abdominal procedures, and estimation of the blood supply of the gastric conduit. Short-term outcomes were compared between the following paired groups using propensity scores: surgeon A's pre- and post-standardization groups, surgeon B's pre- and post-standardization groups, and surgeon A's post-standardization group and surgeon B's post-standardization group.

RESULTS

Concerning surgeon A, the estimated total blood loss in the post-standardization group (142 ± 87 mL) was significantly lower than that in the pre-standardization group (376 ± 215 mL, P = 0.006). The rate of left recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy in the post-standardization group (13%) was significantly lower than that in the pre-standardization group (47%, P = 0.046). Concerning surgeon B, the rate of anastomotic leakage in the post-standardization group (0%) was significantly lower than that in the pre-standardization group (11%, P = 0.039). Comparing the post-standardization groups of surgeons A and B, there were no significant differences in operative outcomes or morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Standardizing procedures for MIE improved and homogenized surgical short-term outcomes.

Comparison between neck-first approach and thoracic approach during thoracoscopic esophagectomy

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of the prior cervical and thoracic approaches of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position for esophageal cancer.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of 103 consecutive patients who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position for esophageal cancer. Seventy-four patients underwent the prior cervical approach (Cervical group); the other 29 underwent the thoracic approach (Thoracic group). The perioperative outcomes of the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

Total operative time and volume of blood loss were not different between the two groups, but the median thoracoscopic time was significantly longer in the Thoracic group than in the Cervical group (296 vs. 210 min; P < 0.001). The incidence of recurrent nerve palsy was not different; however, the incidence of the postoperative pneumonia tended to be higher in the Thoracic group than in the Cervical group (20.7 vs. 10.8%; P = 0.188), and the duration of postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer in the Thoracic group than in the Cervical group (22 vs. 17 days; P = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

Patients who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position via the prior cervical approach had better short-term outcomes than those who underwent the thoracic approach.

Successful video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in prone position in patients with esophageal cancer and aberrant right subclavian artery: report of three cases

Background

An aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) with an associated nonrecurrent right inferior laryngeal nerve (NRILN) is a relatively rare anomaly that occurs at a frequency of 0.3 to 2.0% of the general population. NRILN has been mainly documented in the head and neck region; it has been rarely described in patients with esophageal cancer, especially those undergoing thoracoscopic surgery. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer (VATS-E) is becoming more widespread as a reliable minimally invasive surgical procedure associated with reduced perioperative complications.

Case presentation

Herein, we report three cases of esophageal cancer with ARSA and NRILN which underwent successful VATS-E. Case 1, a 53-year-old male who had early stage esophageal cancer was performed VATS-E. Upper gastrointestinal (GI) series showed “Bayonet sign” (T1aN0M0, pStageIA in UICC). Case 2, a 75-year-old male who had advanced esophageal cancer was performed neoadjuvant chemotherapy and following VATS-E. This case had right thoracic duct and “Bayonet sign” on upper GI series (T1bN2M0, pStage IIIA in UICC). Case3, a 72-year-old male who had advanced esophageal cancer was performed neoadjuvant chemotherapy and following VATS-E (T3N2M0, pStageIIIB in UICC). All of these three cases were performed VATS-E and discharged without any complication.

Conclusion

VATS-E in the prone position is a feasible procedure that can reduce the risk of complications with an enlarged and clear view, and knowledge of this type of anomaly is very important for surgeons who perform esophagectomy.