1
|
Benderska-Söder N, Ecke T, Kleinlein L, Roghmann F, Bismarck E, van Rhijn BWG, Stenzl A, Witjes JA, Todenhöfer T, Hakenberg OW, Grimm MO, Goebell PJ, Burger M, Jensen JB, Schmitz-Dräger BJ. Simulation of the effects of molecular urine markers in follow-up of patients with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:229-235. [PMID: 38403529 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
A plethora of urine markers for the management of patients with bladder cancer has been developed and studied in the past. However, the clinical impact of urine testing on patient management remains obscure. The goal of this manuscript is to identify scenarios for the potential use of molecular urine markers in the follow-up of patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive BC (NMIBC) and estimate potential risks and benefits. Information on the course of disease of patients with high-risk NMIBC and performance data of a point-of-care test (UBC rapid™), an MCM-5 directed ELISA (ADXBLADDER™), and 2 additional novel assays targeting alterations of mRNA expression and DNA methylation (Xpert bladder cancer monitor™, Epicheck™) were retrieved from high-quality trials and/or meta-analyses. In addition, the sensitivity of white light cystoscopy (WLC) and the impact of a urine marker result on the performance of WLC were estimated based on fluorescence cystoscopy data and information from the CeFub trial. This information was applied to different scenarios in patient follow-up and sensitivity, estimated number of cystoscopies, and the numbers needed to diagnose were calculated. The sensitivity of guideline-based regular follow-up (SOC) at 1 year was calculated at 96%. For different marker-supported strategies sensitivities ranging from 77% to 97.9% were estimated. Calculations suggest that several strategies are effective for the SOC. While for the SOC 24.6 WLCs were required to diagnose 1 tumor recurrence (NND), this NND dropped below 5 in some marker-supported strategies. Based on the results of this simulation, a marker-supported follow-up of patients with HR NMIBC is safe and offers the option to significantly reduce the number of WLCs. Further research focusing on prospective randomized trials is needed to finally find a way to implement urine markers into clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thorsten Ecke
- Department of Urology, Helios Klinikum, Bad Saarow, Germany; Department of Urology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lisa Kleinlein
- Urologie 24, St. Theresienkrankenhaus, Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Florian Roghmann
- Department of Urology, Marienhospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany
| | | | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, University of Regensburg, Caritas-Hospital St. Josef, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Arnulf Stenzl
- Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls-University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Peter J Goebell
- Department of Urology, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, University of Regensburg, Caritas-Hospital St. Josef, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | - Bernd J Schmitz-Dräger
- Urologie 24, St. Theresienkrankenhaus, Nürnberg, Germany; Studienpraxis Urologie, Nürtingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
de Jong FC, Iflé IG, van der Made AC, Kooper D, de Jong JJ, Franckena M, Zuiverloon TC, van Criekinge W, Incrocci L, Zwarthoff EC, Boormans JL. A Genomic Urine Assay for Surveillance of Patients with Bladder Cancer Treated with Radiotherapy. EUR UROL SUPPL 2024; 62:131-139. [PMID: 38496820 PMCID: PMC10940129 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who receive radiotherapy with curative intent are followed by imaging, cystoscopy, and urine cytology. However, interpretation of cytology and cystoscopy is hampered by the impact of ionizing radiation on cells. Objective To assess the diagnostic performance of a genomic urine assay to detect urinary tract recurrences in patients with MIBC treated by (chemo)radiation. Design setting and participants Patients with nonmetastatic MIBC who underwent (chemo)radiation with curative intent from 2016 to 2020 were prospectively included. Follow-up consisted of cystoscopy and upper tract imaging. Prior to cystoscopy, a urine sample was analyzed to assess mutations in the genes FGFR3, HRAS, and TERT and methylation of OTX1, TWIST1, and ONECUT2. The treating physician was blinded for the assay result. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The primary endpoint was a urinary tract recurrence. Cross-sectional sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value (NPV) were analyzed using a previously developed logistic regression model for the detection of bladder cancer with this assay. The secondary endpoint was the risk of a future urinary tract recurrence following a positive test and negative cystoscopy/imaging, using a time-dependent Cox proportional hazard analysis. Results and limitations A total of 143 patients were included, and 503 urine samples were analyzed. The median study duration was 20 mo (interquartile range [IQR] 10-33), and the median time to a recurrence was 16 mo (IQR 12-26). In 27 patients, 32 urinary tract recurrences were diagnosed, including three upper tract tumors. Of 32 recurrences, 18 (56%) had a concomitant urine test available. The diagnostic model had an area under the curve of 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-0.90) with corresponding sensitivity, specificity, and NPV of 78 (95% CI 52-94), 77% (95% CI 73-81), and 99% (95% CI 97-100). When taking into account the anticipatory effect of the test, 28/32 (88%) recurrences were detected. A Cox regression analysis showed a hazard ratio of 14.8 for the development of a future recurrence (p < 0.001). A major limitation was the lack of a concomitant urine test result in 14/32 (44%) recurrences. Conclusions A genomic urine assay detected urinary tract recurrences after (chemo)radiation in patients with MIBC, and a positive test was strongly associated with future recurrences. Although validation in a large cohort is warranted, the test has the potential to limit frequent cystoscopies. Patient summary Radiotherapy is a bladder-sparing treatment in patients with bladder cancer. After treatment, these patients undergo visual inspection of the bladder by cystoscopy to detect possible recurrences. However, interpretation of cystoscopy is difficult due to the effects of radiation on the bladder lining. Hence, we analyzed the diagnostic value of a molecular urine test to detect recurrent disease in bladder cancer patients treated by radiotherapy, and we showed that the urine test has the potential to limit the number of cystoscopies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florus C. de Jong
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris G. Iflé
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Angelique C. van der Made
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Denise Kooper
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joep J. de Jong
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martine Franckena
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tahlita C.M. Zuiverloon
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wim van Criekinge
- Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Computational Genomics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Luca Incrocci
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen C. Zwarthoff
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost L. Boormans
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lotan Y, Barocas DA, Chang SS, Daneshmand S, Konety B, Meeks JJ, Porten S, Raman JD, Rosser CJ, Scarpato KR, Sexton WJ, Sfakianos JP, Shore ND, Svatek RS. Commentary on Novitas LCD. Bladder Cancer 2023; 9:305-312. [PMID: 38994243 PMCID: PMC11165914 DOI: 10.3233/blc-230057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Yair Lotan
- University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Daniel A Barocas
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Sam S Chang
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Badrinath Konety
- Allina Health Cancer Institute, Minneapolis, MN, USA and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Joshua J Meeks
- Department of Urology and Biochemistry, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sima Porten
- Department of Urology, University of San Francisco, San Fransisco, CA, USA
| | - Jay D Raman
- Department of Urology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Charles J Rosser
- Samuel Oschin Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kristen R Scarpato
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Wade J Sexton
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - John P Sfakianos
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Neal D Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
| | - Robert S Svatek
- Department of Urology, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Flores Monar GV, Reynolds T, Gordon M, Moon D, Moon C. Molecular Markers for Bladder Cancer Screening: An Insight into Bladder Cancer and FDA-Approved Biomarkers. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:14374. [PMID: 37762677 PMCID: PMC10531979 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241814374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2023] [Revised: 09/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Bladder cancer is one of the most financially burdensome cancers globally, from its diagnostic to its terminal stages. The impact it imposes on patients and the medical community is substantial, exacerbated by the absence of disease-specific characteristics and limited disease-free spans. Frequent recurrences, impacting nearly half of the diagnosed population, require frequent and invasive monitoring. Given the advancing comprehension of its etiology and attributes, bladder cancer is an appealing candidate for screening strategies. Cystoscopy is the current gold standard for bladder cancer detection, but it is invasive and has the potential for undesired complications and elevated costs. Although urine cytology is a supplementary tool in select instances, its efficacy is limited due to its restricted sensitivity, mainly when targeting low-grade tumors. Although most of these assays exhibit higher sensitivity than urine cytology, clinical guidelines do not currently incorporate them. Consequently, it is necessary to explore novel screening assays to identify distinctive alterations exclusive to bladder cancer. Thus, integrating potential molecular assays requires further investigation through more extensive validation studies. Within this article, we offer a comprehensive overview of the critical features of bladder cancer while conducting a thorough analysis of the FDA-approved assays designed to diagnose and monitor its recurrences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thomas Reynolds
- NEXT Bio-Research Services, LLC, 11601 Ironbridge Road, Suite 101, Chester, VA 23831, USA;
| | - Maxie Gordon
- BCD Innovations USA, 10606 Candlewick Road, Lutherville, MD 2109, USA
| | - David Moon
- HJM Cancer Research Foundation Corporation, 10606 Candlewick Road, Lutherville, MD 2109, USA
| | - Chulso Moon
- HJM Cancer Research Foundation Corporation, 10606 Candlewick Road, Lutherville, MD 2109, USA
- BCD Innovations USA, 10606 Candlewick Road, Lutherville, MD 2109, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Cancer Research Building II, 5M3, 1550 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Salari K, Sundi D, Lee JJ, Wu S, Wu CL, DiFiore G, Yan QR, Pienkny A, Lee CK, Oberlin D, Barme G, Piser J, Kahn R, Collins E, Phillips KG, Caruso VM, Goudarzi M, Garcia-Ransom M, Lentz PS, Evans-Holm ME, MacBride AR, Fischer DS, Haddadzadeh IJ, Mazzarella BC, Gray JW, Koppie TM, Bicocca VT, Levin TG, Lotan Y, Feldman AS. Development and Multicenter Case-Control Validation of Urinary Comprehensive Genomic Profiling for Urothelial Carcinoma Diagnosis, Surveillance, and Risk-Prediction. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:3668-3680. [PMID: 37439796 PMCID: PMC10502470 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Urinary comprehensive genomic profiling (uCGP) uses next-generation sequencing to identify mutations associated with urothelial carcinoma and has the potential to improve patient outcomes by noninvasively diagnosing disease, predicting grade and stage, and estimating recurrence risk. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN This is a multicenter case-control study using banked urine specimens collected from patients undergoing initial diagnosis/hematuria workup or urothelial carcinoma surveillance. A total of 581 samples were analyzed by uCGP: 333 for disease classification and grading algorithm development, and 248 for blinded validation. uCGP testing was done using the UroAmp platform, which identifies five classes of mutation: single-nucleotide variants, copy-number variants, small insertion-deletions, copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity, and aneuploidy. UroAmp algorithms predicting urothelial carcinoma tumor presence, grade, and recurrence risk were compared with cytology, cystoscopy, and pathology. RESULTS uCGP algorithms had a validation sensitivity/specificity of 95%/90% for initial cancer diagnosis in patients with hematuria and demonstrated a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99%. A positive diagnostic likelihood ratio (DLR) of 9.2 and a negative DLR of 0.05 demonstrate the ability to risk-stratify patients presenting with hematuria. In surveillance patients, binary urothelial carcinoma classification demonstrated an NPV of 91%. uCGP recurrence-risk prediction significantly prognosticated future recurrence (hazard ratio, 6.2), whereas clinical risk factors did not. uCGP demonstrated positive predictive value (PPV) comparable with cytology (45% vs. 42%) with much higher sensitivity (79% vs. 25%). Finally, molecular grade predictions had a PPV of 88% and a specificity of 95%. CONCLUSIONS uCGP enables noninvasive, accurate urothelial carcinoma diagnosis and risk stratification in both hematuria and urothelial carcinoma surveillance patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keyan Salari
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Debasish Sundi
- Department of Urology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center & Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Jason J. Lee
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shulin Wu
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Chin-Lee Wu
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Gabrielle DiFiore
- Department of Urology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center & Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Q. Robert Yan
- Golden Gate Urology, Oakland, Berkeley and San Francisco, California
| | - Andrew Pienkny
- Golden Gate Urology, Oakland, Berkeley and San Francisco, California
| | - Chi K. Lee
- Golden Gate Urology, Oakland, Berkeley and San Francisco, California
| | - Daniel Oberlin
- Golden Gate Urology, Oakland, Berkeley and San Francisco, California
| | - Greg Barme
- Golden Gate Urology, Oakland, Berkeley and San Francisco, California
| | - Joel Piser
- Golden Gate Urology, Oakland, Berkeley and San Francisco, California
| | - Robert Kahn
- Golden Gate Urology, Oakland, Berkeley and San Francisco, California
| | - Edward Collins
- Golden Gate Urology, Oakland, Berkeley and San Francisco, California
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Joe W. Gray
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Theresa M. Koppie
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
- Willamette Urology, Salem, Oregon
| | | | | | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, Dallas, Texas
| | - Adam S. Feldman
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lozano F, Raventós CX, Carrion A, Dinarés C, Hernández J, Trilla E, Morote J. Xpert Bladder Cancer Monitor for the Early Detection of Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Recurrences: Could Cystoscopy Be Substituted? Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3683. [PMID: 37509344 PMCID: PMC10378094 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15143683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Revised: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
XBM was prospectively assessed in spontaneous urine collected just before flexible cystoscopy and washing cytology carried out within the first 2 years follow-up of 337 patients with NMIBC. Recurrences were pathologically confirmed in 49 patients (14.5%), 22 of them being high-risk (6.5%). The XBM sensitivity for detecting any type of recurrence was 69.4% and 63.6% in the cases of high-risk NMIBC. Negative predictive value (NPV) for XBM was 93% for all recurrences and 96.2% for high-risk recurrences. XBM could have avoided 213 invasive controls but missed the detection of 15 recurrences (30.6%)-8 of them of high-risk (36.4%). XBM false positive elevations were detected in 90 patients (26.7%), whereas 10 patients with the invasive method had a false positive result (3%), p <0.001. However, early detection of recurrences during the first year's follow-up after an XBM false positive result was observed in 18 patients (20%). On the other hand, 19 recurrences were detected during this period among the rest of the patients (7.7%)-p = 0.003, and odds ratio (OR) 3.0 (95% CI 1.5-6.0). Regarding one-year follow-up recurrences, 10% were high-risk recurrences in the XBM false positive group and 3.2% in the rest of the patients-p = 0.021, and OR 3.3 (95% CI 1.2-8.9). Additionally, 11.3% of the patients without false positive results developed a recurrence, p = 0.897, for any recurrence, being 10% and 5.2%, respectively, and high-risk and low-risk recurrences, p = 0.506. After searching for the best XBM cutoff for detecting the 38 high-risk initial recurrences and the early high-risk recurrences after a one-year follow-up, a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) of 0.13 could have avoided 11.3% of cystoscopies and bladder wash cytologies, as this cutoff missed only 1 high-risk recurrence (2.6%). More extensive and well-designed studies will confirm if XBM can improve the surveillance of NMIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando Lozano
- Department of Urology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autonoma Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carles X Raventós
- Department of Urology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autonoma Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Albert Carrion
- Department of Urology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autonoma Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carme Dinarés
- Pathology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Javier Hernández
- Pathology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Enrique Trilla
- Department of Urology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autonoma Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan Morote
- Department of Urology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autonoma Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yuan L, Gero M, Zia S, Aryal SC, Shetty S, Reynolds JP. Cyto-histo correlation and false-negative urine: Before and after the Paris system for reporting urinary cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 2022; 50:404-410. [PMID: 35652594 DOI: 10.1002/dc.24982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Revised: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of implementing the Paris system (TPS) on the rate of discrepant cases in the negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (NHGUC) category that had a subsequent diagnosis of high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC) on histology is not well studied. METHODS We adopted TPS in May 2019. We searched discrepant cases with negative urine cytology 2017-2019 in our cyto-histo correlation database. The urine cytology and follow-up biopsy/resection were reviewed by a cytopathologist who also did Genitourinary (GU) Pathology subspecialty sign-out. Voided urine and instrumented urine were included in this study. RESULTS There were total of 70 discrepant cases with negative cytology interpretation but HGUC on the subsequent biopsy or resected specimen. Following the TPS criteria, the rate of discrepant negative cytology cases increased from 6 cases between January 2017 and May 2019 to 64 cases after May 2019 when we adopted TPS. There were 2 discrepant negative cases in 2017, 3 cases in 2018, and 65 cases in 2019. Out of 65 cases in 2019, 64 cases were identified after May 2019. Additional 55 urine cytology slides were reviewed according to the TPS criteria, of which, the diagnoses remained unchanged in 45 (82%) cases and 10 (19%) cases were reassigned to either atypical or suspicious categories. The discrepancy was noted more on the instrumented urine and the upper tract urine. However, the false-negative rate rose faster in voided urine and lower tract urine. The risk of HGUC with the category of NHGUC was 0.03% in 2017, 0.05% in 2018, and 1.06% in 2019 at our institution. The increase in false-negative rate could not be attributed to a single cytopathologist. CONCLUSION After adopting TPS for reporting urine cytology, there was an increase in HGUC from negative urine cytology which was subsequently confirmed on histology as cases of HGUC. The quality control of negative urines could be important monitoring the process when implementing TPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisi Yuan
- RJ Tomsich Pathology & Lab Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Margaret Gero
- RJ Tomsich Pathology & Lab Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Shereen Zia
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Sameer Chhetri Aryal
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Sindhu Shetty
- RJ Tomsich Pathology & Lab Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Jordan P Reynolds
- RJ Tomsich Pathology & Lab Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cowan B, Klein E, Jansz K, Westenfelder K, Bradford T, Peterson C, Scherr D, Karsh LI, Egerdie B, Witjes A, Trainer A, Harris R, Goldfarb B, Flax S, Kroeger R, Boyd B, Liao J, Patel S, Bridge J, Reuter V, Quigley N, Brown S, Zhao S, Satya M, Bates M, Simon IM, Campbell S, Lotan Y. Longitudinal follow-up and performance validation of an mRNA-based urine test (Xpert ® Bladder Cancer Monitor) for surveillance in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. BJU Int 2021; 128:713-721. [PMID: 33793062 PMCID: PMC9292663 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the performance of the Xpert Bladder Cancer Monitor (Xpert; Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) test as a predictor of tumour recurrence in patients with non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Patients and Methods Patients (n = 429) undergoing surveillance for NMIBC underwent Xpert, cytology, and UroVysion testing. Patients with a positive Xpert and a negative cystoscopy result (positive‐negative [PN] group, n = 66) and a control group of double negative patients (negative Xpert and cystoscopy results [NN] group) were followed for 12 months (±90 days). Results Histology‐confirmed recurrences were detected in 58 patients (13.5%). Xpert had an overall sensitivity of 60.3% and a specificity of 76.5%. The sensitivity for high‐grade (HG) cancer was 87% with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99%. Urine cytology showed an overall sensitivity of 23.2% (47.6% sensitivity for HG tumours) and a specificity of 88.3%. In the PN group, 32% (n = 21) developed a recurrence within 12 months, 11 of which were HG tumours. In the NN control group, 14% (n = 9) developed a recurrence and only two were HG tumours. The hazard ratio for developing recurrence in the PN group was 2.68 for all tumours and 6.84 for HG cancer. Conclusions The Xpert test has a high sensitivity for detecting the recurrence of cancer and a high NPV for excluding HG cancer. In addition, the data suggest that patients with a positive Xpert assay in the setting of negative cystoscopy are at high risk for recurrence and need close surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eric Klein
- Idaho Urologic Institute, Meridian, ID, USA
| | - Ken Jansz
- Jansz Medicine Professional Corp, Burlington, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Blair Egerdie
- Urology Associates/Urology Medical Research, Kitchener, ON, Canada
| | - Alfred Witjes
- Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Buffi Boyd
- Urology Associates of Savannah, Savannah, GA, USA
| | - Joseph Liao
- VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Sanjay Patel
- Stephenson Cancer Centre, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Julia Bridge
- University of Nebraska Medical Centre, Omaha, NE, USA
| | | | - Neil Quigley
- Geneuity Clinical Research Services, Maryville, TN, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Comparison of the clinical usefulness of different urinary tests for the initial detection of bladder cancer: a systematic review. Curr Urol 2021; 15:22-32. [PMID: 34084118 PMCID: PMC8137038 DOI: 10.1097/cu9.0000000000000012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2019] [Accepted: 01/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: The standard initial approach in patients with hematuria or other symptoms suggestive of bladder cancer (BC) is a combination of cystoscopy and urine cytology (UC); however, UC has low sensitivity particularly in low-grade tumors. The aim of the present review was to critically analyze and compare results in the literature of promising molecular urinary tests for the initial diagnosis of BC. Methods: We searched in the Medline and Cochrane Library databases for literature from January 2009 to January 2019, following the PRISMAguidelines. Results: In terms of sensitivity, ImmunoCyt showed the highest mean and median value, higher than UC. All tests analyses showed higher mean and median sensitivity when compared with UC. In terms of specificity, only UroVysion and Microsatellite analyses showed mean and median values similar to those of UC, whereas for all other tests, the specificity was lower than UC. It is evident that the sensitivity of UC is particularly low in low grade BC. Urinary tests mainly had improved sensitivity when compared to UC, and ImmunoCyt and UroVysion had the highest improvement in low grade tumors. Conclusions: Most of the proposed molecular markers were able to improve the sensitivity with similar or lower specificity when compared to UC. However, variability of results among the different studies was strong. Thus, as of now, none of these markers presented evidences so as to be accepted by international guidelines for diagnosis of BC.
Collapse
|
10
|
Pastorello RG, Barkan GA, Saieg M. Experience on the use of The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytopathology: review of the published literature. J Am Soc Cytopathol 2020; 10:79-87. [PMID: 33160893 DOI: 10.1016/j.jasc.2020.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Revised: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (TPS) was first published in 2016 with clear objectives to standardize cytologic diagnostic criteria and provide uniform reporting, in order to improve patient stratification and associated clinical management. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the performance of TPS and review the literature published since TPS was introduced. MATERIALS AND METHODS Original articles focusing on the utilization and performance of TPS in urinary cytology specimens were identified using PubMed for publications from January 2016 to July 2020, using the keywords "Paris System", "urine cytology", and "urinary cytology". RESULTS Twenty-three relevant articles in the literature regarding the use of TPS were included in the review from a total of 30,802 urine cytology specimens, of which 21,485 (69.8%) had available diagnoses. Distribution of cases among categories ranged from 50.5% to 95.3% for negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma (NHGUC), 1.2% to 23% for atypical urothelial cells (AUC), 0.2% to 6.6% for suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinomas (SHGUC), and 2.2% to 14.1% for high-grade urothelial carcinomas (HGUC). The calculated risk of high-grade malignancy (ROHM) ranged from 8.7% to 36.8% for NHGUC, 12.3% to 60.9%% for AUC, 33.3% to 100% for SHGUC, and 58.8% to 100% for HGUC. Mean ROHM weighted by sample size was calculated at 15.7% (±7.8%), 38.5% (±14.3%), 76.2% (±17.2%), and 88.8% (±12.7%) for NHGUC, AUC, SHGUC, and HGUC, respectively. Reported sensitivity of TPS ranged from 40% to 84.7%, specificity from 73% to 100%, PPV from 62.3% to 100%, and NPV from 46% to 90%. CONCLUSIONS The application of TPS in the selected series has improved the screening and surveillance potential of urine cytology, while reducing high rates of indeterminate diagnoses, improving sensitivity and providing proper risk stratification for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo G Pastorello
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Güliz A Barkan
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Loyola University Healthcare System, Maywood, Illinois; Department of Urology, Loyola University Healthcare System, Maywood, Illinois
| | - Mauro Saieg
- Department of Pathology, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Pathology, Santa Casa Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Assessing the Clinical Benefit of UBC Rapid in the Surveillance and Initial Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2020; 18:230-235. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Revised: 11/01/2019] [Accepted: 11/27/2019] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
|
12
|
Srougi V, Reis ST, Viana N, Gallucci FP, Leite KR, Srougi M, Nahas WC. Prospective evaluation of a urinary biomarker panel to detect and predict recurrence of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. World J Urol 2020; 39:453-459. [PMID: 32253580 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03188-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2019] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To perform a feasibility phase study of a panel of putative protein biomarkers and determine whether it can identify and predict tumor recurrence in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) on follow-up. METHODS We prospectively analyzed the urine of 152 patients previously treated for NMIBC. Quantitative expression of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), DJ-1, apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-1), matrix metallopeptidase-9 (MMP-9), and interleukin-8 (IL-8) was assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and compared amongst patients with and without bladder cancer recurrence at urine collection and during 3 years of follow-up. Tumor recurrence was confirmed by pathologic analysis. We performed a prediction analysis, excluding patients with recurrence at the start of the study, and assessed the influence of previous use of intravesical BCG on the level of biomarkers. RESULTS Median follow-up time was 47 months (interquartile range 39-50 months). Sixteen patients (10.5%) were diagnosed with recurrence at the start of the study, and 21 (15.4%) were diagnosed during the study. Three biomarker proteins (apoA-1, MMP-9, and IL-8) appear to hold diagnostic potential [odds ratio (OR) = 12.9; 95% CI 3.5-47.4]; while, PAI-1 and IL-8 predict recurrence (OR = 4.1; 95% CI 1.4-11.4). Previous use of intravesical BCG did not affect biomarker levels. CONCLUSION In the feasibility phase, the panel of urine biomarkers analyzed detected and predicted recurrence of NMIBC and provided reliable results in patients who had previously used intravesical BCG. Validation studies are required to confirm the panel clinical utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Srougi
- Division of Urology, University of São Paulo Medical School, Hospital das Clínicas de São Paulo, Av Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil.
| | - Sabrina T Reis
- Division of Urology, University of São Paulo Medical School, Hospital das Clínicas de São Paulo, Av Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil.,Faculdade Atenas, Campos Passos, Rua Oscar Cândido Monteiro, 1000, Passos, MG, 37900-380, Brazil
| | - Nayara Viana
- Division of Urology, University of São Paulo Medical School, Hospital das Clínicas de São Paulo, Av Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil
| | - Fabio P Gallucci
- Division of Urology, University of São Paulo Medical School, Hospital das Clínicas de São Paulo, Av Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil
| | - Katia R Leite
- Division of Urology, University of São Paulo Medical School, Hospital das Clínicas de São Paulo, Av Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil
| | - Miguel Srougi
- Division of Urology, University of São Paulo Medical School, Hospital das Clínicas de São Paulo, Av Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil
| | - William C Nahas
- Division of Urology, University of São Paulo Medical School, Hospital das Clínicas de São Paulo, Av Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Batista R, Vinagre J, Prazeres H, Sampaio C, Peralta P, Conceição P, Sismeiro A, Leão R, Gomes A, Furriel F, Oliveira C, Torres JN, Eufrásio P, Azinhais P, Almeida F, Gonzalez ER, Bidovanets B, Ecke T, Stinjs P, Pascual ÁS, Abdelmalek R, Villafruela A, Beardo-Villar P, Fidalgo N, Öztürk H, Gonzalez-Enguita C, Monzo J, Lopes T, Álvarez-Maestro M, Servan PP, De La Cruz SMP, Perez MPS, Máximo V, Soares P. Validation of a Novel, Sensitive, and Specific Urine-Based Test for Recurrence Surveillance of Patients With Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer in a Comprehensive Multicenter Study. Front Genet 2019; 10:1237. [PMID: 31921291 PMCID: PMC6930177 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2019] [Accepted: 11/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Bladder cancer (BC), the most frequent malignancy of the urinary system, is ranked the sixth most prevalent cancer worldwide. Of all newly diagnosed patients with BC, 70-75% will present disease confined to the mucosa or submucosa, the non-muscle-invasive BC (NMIBC) subtype. Of those, approximately 70% will recur after transurethral resection (TUR). Due to high rate of recurrence, patients are submitted to an intensive follow-up program maintained throughout many years, or even throughout life, resulting in an expensive follow-up, with cystoscopy being the most cost-effective procedure for NMIBC screening. Currently, the gold standard procedure for detection and follow-up of NMIBC is based on the association of cystoscopy and urine cytology. As cystoscopy is a very invasive approach, over the years, many different noninvasive assays (both based in serum and urine samples) have been developed in order to search genetic and protein alterations related to the development, progression, and recurrence of BC. TERT promoter mutations and FGFR3 hotspot mutations are the most frequent somatic alterations in BC and constitute the most reliable biomarkers for BC. Based on these, we developed an ultra-sensitive, urine-based assay called Uromonitor®, capable of detecting trace amounts of TERT promoter (c.1-124C > T and c.1-146C > T) and FGFR3 (p.R248C and p.S249C) hotspot mutations, in tumor cells exfoliated to urine samples. Cells present in urine were concentrated by the filtration of urine through filters where tumor cells are trapped and stored until analysis, presenting long-term stability. Detection of the alterations was achieved through a custom-made, robust, and highly sensitive multiplex competitive allele-specific discrimination PCR allowing clear interpretation of results. In this study, we validate a test for NMIBC recurrence detection, using for technical validation a total of 331 urine samples and 41 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues of the primary tumor and recurrence lesions from a large cluster of urology centers. In the clinical validation, we used 185 samples to assess sensitivity/specificity in the detection of NMIBC recurrence vs. cystoscopy/cytology and in a smaller cohort its potential as a primary diagnostic tool for NMIBC. Our results show this test to be highly sensitive (73.5%) and specific (93.2%) in detecting recurrence of BC in patients under surveillance of NMIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Batista
- i3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Porto, Portugal.,Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal.,U-Monitor Lda, Porto, Portugal.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - João Vinagre
- i3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Porto, Portugal.,Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal.,U-Monitor Lda, Porto, Portugal.,Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Hugo Prazeres
- i3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Porto, Portugal.,Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal.,U-Monitor Lda, Porto, Portugal.,Department of Molecular Pathology, Portuguese Institute of Oncology, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Cristina Sampaio
- i3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Porto, Portugal.,Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal
| | - Pedro Peralta
- Department of Urology Service, Portuguese Institute of Oncology, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Paulo Conceição
- Department of Urology Service, Portuguese Institute of Oncology, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Amílcar Sismeiro
- Department of Urology Service, Portuguese Institute of Oncology, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Ricardo Leão
- Department of Urology, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal.,Department of Urology, Hospital CUF Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Andreia Gomes
- Department of Urology, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal
| | | | | | | | - Pedro Eufrásio
- Department of Urology, Hospital CUF Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Paulo Azinhais
- Department of Urology, Hospital CUF Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Fábio Almeida
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitário Fernando Pessoa, Porto, Portugal
| | | | - Bohdan Bidovanets
- Department of Surgery, Ternopil Regional Oncology Center, Ternopil, Ukraine
| | - Thorsten Ecke
- Department of Urology, Helios Hospital, Bad Saarow, Germany
| | - Pascal Stinjs
- Department of Urology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Ainara Villafruela
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastian, Spain
| | | | - Nuno Fidalgo
- Department of Urology, Hospital Garcia de Horta, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Hakan Öztürk
- Department of Urology, Medicalpark Izmir Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | | | - Juan Monzo
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundacion Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Tomé Lopes
- Department of Urology, Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | | | | | | | - Valdemar Máximo
- i3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Porto, Portugal.,Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Paula Soares
- i3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Porto, Portugal.,Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal.,U-Monitor Lda, Porto, Portugal.,Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
D'Andrea D, Soria F, Zehetmayer S, Gust KM, Korn S, Witjes JA, Shariat SF. Diagnostic accuracy, clinical utility and influence on decision-making of a methylation urine biomarker test in the surveillance of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. BJU Int 2019; 123:959-967. [PMID: 30653818 PMCID: PMC6850401 DOI: 10.1111/bju.14673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Objectives To investigate prospectively the clinical utility and influence on decision‐making of Bladder EpiCheck™, a non‐invasive urine test, in the surveillance of non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Materials and Methods Urine samples from 440 patients undergoing surveillance for NMIBC were prospectively collected at five centres and evaluated using the Bladder EpiCheck test (NCT02647112). A multivariable nomogram and decision‐curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the impact of Bladder EpiCheck on decision‐making when used in routine clinical practice. The test was designed to exclude recurrent disease. Results Data from 357 patients were available for analysis. The test had a specificity of 88% (95% confidence interval [CI] 84–91), a negative predictive value (NPV) of 94.4% (95% CI 91–97) for the detection of any cancer and an NPV of 99.3% for the detection of high‐grade cancer. In multivariable analysis, positive Bladder EpiCheck results were independently associated with any and high‐grade disease recurrence (odds ratio [OR] 18.1, 95% CI 8.7–40.2; P < 0.001 and OR 78.3, 95% CI 19.2–547; P < 0.001). The addition of Bladder EpiCheck to standard variables improved its predictive ability for any and high‐grade disease recurrence by a difference of 16% and 22%, respectively (area under the curve 85.9% and 96.1% for any and high‐grade cancer, respectively). DCA showed an improvement in the net benefit relative to cystoscopy over a large threshold of probability, resulting in a significant reduction in unnecessary investigations. These results were similar in subgroups assessing the impact of specific clinical features. Conclusions Bladder EpiCheck is a robust high‐performing diagnostic test in patients with NMIBC undergoing surveillance that can potentially reduce the number of unnecessary investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Francesco Soria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Sonja Zehetmayer
- Centre for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Kilian M Gust
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stephan Korn
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - J Alfred Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tan WS, Sarpong R, Khetrapal P, Rodney S, Mostafid H, Cresswell J, Watson D, Rane A, Hicks J, Hellawell G, Davies M, Srirangam SJ, Dawson L, Payne D, Williams N, Brew‐Graves C, Feber A, Kelly JD. Does urinary cytology have a role in haematuria investigations? BJU Int 2019; 123:74-81. [PMID: 30003675 PMCID: PMC6334509 DOI: 10.1111/bju.14459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the diagnostic accuracy of urinary cytology to diagnose bladder cancer and upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) as well as the outcome of patients with a positive urine cytology and normal haematuria investigations in patients in a multicentre prospective observational study of patients investigated for haematuria. PATIENT AND METHODS The DETECT I study (clinicaltrials.gov NCT02676180) recruited patients presenting with haematuria following referral to secondary case at 40 hospitals. All patients had a cystoscopy and upper tract imaging (renal bladder ultrasound [RBUS] and/ or CT urogram [CTU]). Patients, where urine cytology were performed, were sub-analysed. The reference standard for the diagnosis of bladder cancer and UTUC was histological confirmation of cancer. A positive urine cytology was defined as a urine cytology suspicious for neoplastic cells or atypical cells. RESULTS Of the 3 556 patients recruited, urine cytology was performed in 567 (15.9%) patients from nine hospitals. Median time between positive urine cytology and endoscopic tumour resection was 27 (IQR: 21.3-33.8) days. Bladder cancer was diagnosed in 39 (6.9%) patients and UTUC in 8 (1.4%) patients. The accuracy of urinary cytology for the diagnosis of bladder cancer and UTUC was: sensitivity 43.5%, specificity 95.7%, positive predictive value (PPV) 47.6% and negative predictive value (NPV) 94.9%. A total of 21 bladder cancers and 5 UTUC were missed. Bladder cancers missed according to grade and stage were as follows: 4 (19%) were ≥ pT2, 2 (9.5%) were G3 pT1, 10 (47.6%) were G3/2 pTa and 5 (23.8%) were G1 pTa. High-risk cancer was confirmed in 8 (38%) patients. There was a marginal improvement in sensitivity (57.7%) for high-risk cancers. When urine cytology was combined with imaging, the diagnostic performance improved with CTU (sensitivity 90.2%, specificity 94.9%) superior to RBUS (sensitivity 66.7%, specificity 96.7%). False positive cytology results were confirmed in 22 patients, of which 12 (54.5%) had further invasive tests and 5 (22.7%) had a repeat cytology. No cancer was identified in these patients during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Urine cytology will miss a significant number of muscle-invasive bladder cancer and high-risk disease. Our results suggest that urine cytology should not be routinely performed as part of haematuria investigations. The role of urine cytology in select cases should be considered in the context of the impact of a false positive result leading to further potentially invasive tests conducted under general anaesthesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Shen Tan
- Division of Surgery and Interventional ScienceUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Department of UrologyUniversity College London HospitalLondonUK
| | - Rachael Sarpong
- Surgical and Interventional Trials UnitUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Pramit Khetrapal
- Division of Surgery and Interventional ScienceUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Department of UrologyUniversity College London HospitalLondonUK
| | - Simon Rodney
- Division of Surgery and Interventional ScienceUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- UCL Cancer InstituteLondonUK
| | - Hugh Mostafid
- Department of UrologyRoyal Surrey County HospitalGuildfordUK
| | - Joanne Cresswell
- Department of UrologyJames Cook University HospitalMiddlesbroughUK
| | - Dawn Watson
- Department of UrologyJames Cook University HospitalMiddlesbroughUK
| | - Abhay Rane
- Department of UrologyEast Surrey HospitalRedhillUK
| | - James Hicks
- Department of UrologyWorthing HospitalWorthingUK
| | | | - Melissa Davies
- Department of UrologySalisbury District HospitalSalisburyUK
| | | | | | - David Payne
- Department of UrologyKettering General HospitalKetteringUK
| | - Norman Williams
- Surgical and Interventional Trials UnitUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Chris Brew‐Graves
- Surgical and Interventional Trials UnitUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Andrew Feber
- Division of Surgery and Interventional ScienceUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- UCL Cancer InstituteLondonUK
| | - John D. Kelly
- Division of Surgery and Interventional ScienceUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Department of UrologyUniversity College London HospitalLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
McHale T, Ohori NP, Cieply KM, Sherer C, Bastacky SI. Comparison of urinary cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization in the detection of urothelial neoplasia: An analysis of discordant results. Diagn Cytopathol 2018; 47:282-288. [PMID: 30417563 DOI: 10.1002/dc.24108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2018] [Revised: 09/29/2018] [Accepted: 10/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We examine the performance of cytology and FISH in the detection of urothelial carcinoma (UC), and explore the reasons for discrepant results, and potential clinical implications. METHODS Urine samples from 89 patients were prospectively collected for simultaneous cytology and UroVysion FISH, and results correlated with concurrent biopsies and/or clinical or histologic follow-up data. Corresponding tissue biopsies, where available, were also evaluated by FISH. RESULTS Sensitivity and specificity of cytology and FISH for the detection of UC was 54.8% and 92% and 50% and 88%, respectively. Only one of seven false-positive urinary FISH results proved to be an "anticipatory positive" on extended follow-up. Five of eight (62.5%) high grade (HG) carcinomas with false-negative urinary FISH, were negative due to the absence/paucity of FISH-detectable changes in the tumor cells. In atypical cytology cases, the FISH result did not assist in identifying UC. There was no significant difference between an atypical cytology result and a positive FISH result, with respect to the identification of patients with UC. CONCLUSIONS We found urinary cytology to be more sensitivity and specific than FISH in the detection of UC, though the difference was not statistically significant. Up to 24% of HG UCs are FISH negative due to an absence of FISH-detectable abnormalities in the tumor cells. Paucity of neoplastic cells in the urine also contributes to false-negative FISH results in both HG and low grade tumors. Negative urinary FISH cannot be taken alone as indicating the absence of significant disease in patients with atypical cytology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa McHale
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Anatomic Pathology, Galway University Hospital, Galway City, Ireland
| | - N Paul Ohori
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Kathy M Cieply
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Carol Sherer
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Monteiro LL, Witjes JA, Agarwal PK, Anderson CB, Bivalacqua TJ, Bochner BH, Boormans JL, Chang SS, Domínguez-Escrig JL, McKiernan JM, Dinney C, Godoy G, Kulkarni GS, Mariappan P, O'Donnell MA, Rentsch CA, Shah JB, Solsona E, Svatek RS, van der Heijden AG, van Valenberg FJP, Kassouf W. ICUD-SIU International Consultation on Bladder Cancer 2017: management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. World J Urol 2018; 37:51-60. [PMID: 30109483 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2438-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2018] [Accepted: 08/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide a summary of the Third International Consultation on Bladder Cancer recommendations for the management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). METHODS A detailed review of the literature was performed focusing on original articles for the management of NMIBC. An international committee assessed and graded the articles based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine system. The entire spectrum of NMIBC was covered such as prognostic factors of recurrence and progression, risk stratification, staging, management of positive urine cytology with negative white light cystoscopy, indications of bladder and prostatic urethral biopsies, management of Ta low grade (LG) and high risk tumors (Ta high grade [HG], T1, carcinoma in situ [CIS]), impact of BCG strain and host on outcomes, management of complications of intravesical therapy, role of alternative therapies, indications for early cystectomy, surveillance strategies, and new treatments. The working group provides several recommendations on the management of NMIBC. RESULTS Recommendations were summarized with regard to staging; management of primary and recurrent LG Ta and high risk disease, positive urine cytology with negative white light cystoscopy and prostatic urethral involvement; indications for timely cystectomy; and surveillance strategies. CONCLUSION NMIBC remains a common and challenging malignancy to manage. Accurate staging, grading, and risk stratification are critical determinants of the management and outcomes of these patients. Current tools for risk stratification are limited but informative, and should be used in clinical practice when determining diagnosis, surveillance, and treatment of NMIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonardo L Monteiro
- Division of Urology, McGill University Health Center-Glen Site, 1001 Decarie Blvd, Montreal, QC, H3A 3J1, Canada
| | - J Alfred Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Piyush K Agarwal
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Trinity J Bivalacqua
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Bernard H Bochner
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Kimmel Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Joost L Boormans
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sam S Chang
- Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University, Tennessee, USA
| | | | | | - Colin Dinney
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Guilherme Godoy
- Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA
| | - Girish S Kulkarni
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Jay B Shah
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA
| | - Eduardo Solsona
- Department of Urology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Robert S Svatek
- Department of Urology, Division of Urologic Oncology, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, USA
| | | | | | - Wassim Kassouf
- Division of Urology, McGill University Health Center-Glen Site, 1001 Decarie Blvd, Montreal, QC, H3A 3J1, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rosolen DCB, Faria DK, Faria CS, Antonangelo L. Performance of the UroVysion ® FISH assay for the diagnosis of malignant effusions using two cutoff strategies. Cancer Med 2018; 7:1967-1977. [PMID: 29577646 PMCID: PMC5943432 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2018] [Revised: 02/09/2018] [Accepted: 02/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The cytological examination of cavity fluids has limited sensitivity in the diagnosis of malignancy. Aneuploidy, which is commonly observed in neoplastic cells, could potentially be used as an ancillary diagnostic tool. To evaluate the detection of aneuploid cells in cavitary effusion samples using the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay UroVysion® with some adaptations and two different cutoff strategies. Seventy samples of pleural or peritoneal fluid with positive (n = 40), negative (n = 15), or suspicious (n = 15) oncotic cytology were subjected to FISH assay with the multitarget UroVysion® kit, which is composed of probes that hybridize to the centromeric region of chromosomes 3, 7, and 17 and to the locus 9p21. FISH performance was evaluated using two different cutoffs: (1) the manufacturer's cutoff (M‐FISH) and 2) a proposed cutoff (P‐FISH). Using M‐FISH, the diagnostic sensitivity was 57.1%, specificity 87.5%, and accuracy 60.0%; with P‐FISH, the sensitivity was 87.3%, specificity 71.4%, and accuracy 85.7%. When combined with cytology, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 88.0%, 83.3%, and 87.8%, respectively. Malignant cells presented a predominance of chromosomal gains. The UroVysion® test using the P‐FISH cutoff was effective in demonstrating aneuploid cells in all malignant effusions, confirming the diagnosis of malignancy even in cases with suspicious cytology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Débora C B Rosolen
- Division of Clinical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Daniel K Faria
- Division of Clinical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Caroline S Faria
- Faculdade de Medicina, Medical Investigation Laboratory (LIM03), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Leila Antonangelo
- Division of Clinical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.,Faculdade de Medicina, Medical Investigation Laboratory (LIM03), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Springer SU, Chen CH, Rodriguez Pena MDC, Li L, Douville C, Wang Y, Cohen JD, Taheri D, Silliman N, Schaefer J, Ptak J, Dobbyn L, Papoli M, Kinde I, Afsari B, Tregnago AC, Bezerra SM, VandenBussche C, Fujita K, Ertoy D, Cunha IW, Yu L, Bivalacqua TJ, Grollman AP, Diaz LA, Karchin R, Danilova L, Huang CY, Shun CT, Turesky RJ, Yun BH, Rosenquist TA, Pu YS, Hruban RH, Tomasetti C, Papadopoulos N, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Dickman KG, Netto GJ. Non-invasive detection of urothelial cancer through the analysis of driver gene mutations and aneuploidy. eLife 2018; 7:32143. [PMID: 29557778 PMCID: PMC5860864 DOI: 10.7554/elife.32143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2017] [Accepted: 02/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Current non-invasive approaches for detection of urothelial cancers are suboptimal. We developed a test to detect urothelial neoplasms using DNA recovered from cells shed into urine. UroSEEK incorporates massive parallel sequencing assays for mutations in 11 genes and copy number changes on 39 chromosome arms. In 570 patients at risk for bladder cancer (BC), UroSEEK was positive in 83% of those who developed BC. Combined with cytology, UroSEEK detected 95% of patients who developed BC. Of 56 patients with upper tract urothelial cancer, 75% tested positive by UroSEEK, including 79% of those with non-invasive tumors. UroSEEK detected genetic abnormalities in 68% of urines obtained from BC patients under surveillance who demonstrated clinical evidence of recurrence. The advantages of UroSEEK over cytology were evident in low-grade BCs; UroSEEK detected 67% of cases whereas cytology detected none. These results establish the foundation for a new non-invasive approach for detection of urothelial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simeon U Springer
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Baltimore, United States.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, United States
| | - Chung-Hsin Chen
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Maria Del Carmen Rodriguez Pena
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States.,Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
| | - Lu Li
- Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, United States
| | - Christopher Douville
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
| | - Yuxuan Wang
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Baltimore, United States.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, United States
| | - Joshua David Cohen
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Baltimore, United States.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, United States
| | - Diana Taheri
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States.,Department of Pathology, Isfahan Kidney Diseases Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Natalie Silliman
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Baltimore, United States.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, United States
| | - Joy Schaefer
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Baltimore, United States.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, United States
| | - Janine Ptak
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Baltimore, United States.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, United States
| | - Lisa Dobbyn
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Baltimore, United States.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, United States
| | - Maria Papoli
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Baltimore, United States.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, United States
| | - Isaac Kinde
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Baltimore, United States.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, United States
| | - Bahman Afsari
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States.,Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
| | - Aline C Tregnago
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
| | | | | | | | - Dilek Ertoy
- Department of Pathology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Isabela W Cunha
- Department of Pathology, AC Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Lijia Yu
- Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
| | | | - Arthur P Grollman
- Department of Pharmacological Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, United States.,Department of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, United States
| | - Luis A Diaz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
| | - Rachel Karchin
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States.,Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
| | - Ludmila Danilova
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States.,Department of Pathology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Chao-Yuan Huang
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Tung Shun
- Department of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Robert J Turesky
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States.,Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
| | - Byeong Hwa Yun
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States.,Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
| | - Thomas A Rosenquist
- Department of Pharmacological Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, United States
| | - Yeong-Shiau Pu
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ralph H Hruban
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
| | - Cristian Tomasetti
- Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, United States.,Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
| | - Nickolas Papadopoulos
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Baltimore, United States.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, United States
| | - Ken W Kinzler
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Baltimore, United States.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, United States
| | - Bert Vogelstein
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Baltimore, United States.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, United States
| | - Kathleen G Dickman
- Department of Pharmacological Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, United States.,Department of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, United States
| | - George J Netto
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States.,Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
| |
Collapse
|