1
|
Ricci C, Dika E, Lambertini M, Ambrosi F, Chiarucci F, Chillotti S, Fiorentino M, Fabbri E, Tassone D, Veronesi G, Tartari F, Corti B. The EORTC protocol for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) reveals a high number of nodal nevi and a strong association with nevus-associated melanoma. Pathol Res Pract 2022; 233:153805. [PMID: 35361504 DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2022.153805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Revised: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The diagnosis of nodal nevi (NN) is challenging as they mimic melanoma metastases (MM), with a detection rate mostly ranging between 1% and 11% in sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Herein, we assessed the incidence of NN and the association with the clinical-pathological features of primary melanoma, adopting the updated European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) protocol for SLNB. METHODS All cases of paired melanoma and SLNB were retrospectively evaluated (April 2019-May 2020). Appropriate statistical tests were adopted, with significant variables included in the logistic regression model. RESULTS 81 patients and a total of 186 lymph nodes (LNs) were included. Eleven patients had only NN and 4 had both NN and MM (18.5%); 29 LNs (15.6%) showed at least one NN and 12 (6.5%) showed more than one NN (a total amount of 43 NN was detected). All NN and none MM stained for p16. NN were associated with age < 60 years (p: 0.042), no ulceration (p: 0.025) and nevus-associated melanoma (NAM) (p: 0.018), with this latter being the only predictor at the logistic regression model (p: 0.022). CONCLUSIONS The updated EORTC protocol shows a high number of NN and highlights a strong association with NAM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Costantino Ricci
- Pathology Unit, Maggiore Hospital, AUSL Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Emi Dika
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Martina Lambertini
- Dermatology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Federico Chiarucci
- Pathology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefano Chillotti
- Pathology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Michelangelo Fiorentino
- Pathology Unit, Maggiore Hospital, AUSL Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Dermatology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Pathology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Erich Fabbri
- Department of Facial Surgery, Plastic Surgery Unit, Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Daniela Tassone
- Plastic Surgery Department, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giulia Veronesi
- Dermatology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Federico Tartari
- Dermatology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Barbara Corti
- Pathology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|