Anterolateral Thigh Flap Combined with Reconstruction Plate Versus Double Free Flaps for Composite Mandibular Reconstruction: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

Reconstructive flap surgery in head and neck cancer patients: an interdisciplinary view of the challenges encountered by radiation oncologists in postoperative radiotherapy

Background

Major advances have been made in reconstructive surgery in the last decades to reduce morbidity in head and neck cancer. Flaps are now present in 80% of patients with oral cavity cancer to cover anatomic, functional, and cosmetic needs. However, gaps in interdisciplinary innovation transfer from surgery to postoperative radiotherapy (poRT) remain challenging. We aimed to provide an interdisciplinary view of the challenges encountered by radiation oncologists in planning head and neck postoperative radiotherapy.

Methods

A systematic and critical review was conducted to address areas of optimization in surgery and radiology that may be relevant to poRT.

Results

Despite extensive surgical literature on flap techniques and salvage surgery, 13 retrospective series were identified, where flap outcomes were indirectly compared between surgery alone or poRT. These low-evidence studies suggest that radiotherapy accelerates flap atrophy, fibrosis, and osteoradionecrosis and deteriorates functional outcomes. Preliminary evidence suggests that tumor spread occurs at the flap-tissue junction rather than in the flaps. One prospective 15-patient study showed 31.3% vs. 39.2% flap volume reduction without or with poRT. In an international consensus, experts recognized the needs for optimized flap-sparing poRT against flap-related functional deterioration and bone damage. CT, MRI, and PET-CT modalities show potential for the delineation of the junction area between native tissues and flap for flap segmentation and to characterize flap-specific changes quantitatively and correlate them with patterns of relapse or complications.

Conclusion

Flap management in poRT is insufficiently documented, but poRT seems to damage flaps. Current gaps in knowledge underscore the need for prospective flap assessment and interdisciplinary trials investigating flap morbidity minimization by flap-sparing poRT planning.

Management of Through-and-Through Oromandibular Defects after Segmental Mandibulectomy with Fibula Osteocutaneous Flap

BACKGROUND

 Oromandibular defects involving the external skin are a reconstructive challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the use of the fibula osteocutaneous free flap (FOCFF) for through-and-through oromandibular defects by comparing the surgical outcomes and complications of different techniques to close the external skin defect.

METHODS

 A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients who underwent reconstruction of through-and-through oromandibular defects after oncologic segmental mandibulectomy between January 2011 and December 2014. Five groups were analyzed according to the method of external skin coverage: primary closure, locoregional flaps, deepithelialized double-skin paddle FOCFF (deEpi-FOCFF), division of the skin paddle for double-skin paddle FOCFF (div-FOCFF), and a simultaneous second free flap. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes along with complications were analyzed between groups.

RESULTS

 A total of 323 patients were included. The mean total defect area requiring a simultaneous second free flap was larger in comparison to other groups (p < 0.001). Reconstructions performed with div-FOCFF had a higher number of perforators per flap when compared with deEpi-FOCFF (p < 0.001). External defects closed with another free flap exhibited higher intraoperative time for the reconstructive segment in comparison to other groups (p < 0.05). The overall rate of complications was comparable between groups (24%, p = 0.129).

CONCLUSION

 The FFOCF is a reliable alternative to harvesting multiple simultaneous free flaps for through-and-through oromandibular defects. The authors recommend appropriate curation of the surgical plan based on individual patient characteristics and reconstructive requirements.

Mandibular reconstruction in head and neck cancer: which is the gold standard?

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review to compare the outcomes of the different surgical options for mandibular reconstruction in head and neck cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

93 articles were selected. Four groups were identified: titanium plate without flaps, titanium plate covered by soft tissue flap, bone tissue flaps and double flaps. We compared patients' characteristics, site of mandibulectomy, type of reconstruction and complications.

RESULTS

4697 patients were reported. The groups were not homogeneous regarding the type of defect and the treatment history. A significant difference in terms of post-operative complications was found between group 1 and group 2 (p < 0.00001), and between group 2 and group 3 (p < 0.00001). Total complications rate for group 4 was significantly higher when compared to group 3 (p < 0.00001), but no significant difference was found with group 2.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that mandibular reconstruction using a microvascular bone flap is the best surgical option in patients without significant comorbidities.

Factors associated with survival and patient's quality of life after segmental mandibulectomy

AIM

This study aimed to explore the survival rate and quality of life (QoL) in patients who underwent segmental mandibulectomy and determine the associated factor with survival rate and QoL.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, all patients who underwent segmental mandibular resection in the referral center of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Iran, during 2015-2019 were included. Inclusion criteria were segmental mandibulectomy due to any pathology and age of more than 8 years old. Demographic, clinical data and patient survival were recorded. EORTC QLQ-HN43 was used to evaluate QoL.

RESULTS

Totally, 82 patients were studied. The overall 3-year survival rate was 69.5% (57 patients) (mean ± SD: 1.35 ± 1.03 years). According to univariate analysis, age (p-value = 0.001), hospital lengths of stay (p-value < 0.001), gender (p-value = 0.014, OR = 4.143), education (p-value = 0.015, OR = 0.291), pathology (p-value < 0.001, OR = 17.000), metastasis (p-value = 0.018, OR = 4.894), neck dissection (p-value < 0.001, OR = 52.381), frozen margin (p-value < 0.001 OR = 8.000), recurrence (p-value = 0.001, OR = 6.273), and status of chemoradiotherapy (p-value < 0.001) were significantly associated with survival rate. Logistic regression revealed that survival was associated with gender (p-value = 0.040, OR = 23.689), level of education (p-value = 0.019, OR = 0.019), and neck dissection (p-value = 0.019, OR = 175.781). According to univariate analysis, pathology (p-value = 0.003), neck dissection (p-value = 0.024), frozen margin (p-value = 0.004), and chemoradiotherapy (p-value = 0.026) were significantly associated with QoL. Linear regression revealed that QoL was associated with none of the measured factors.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, gender, level of education, and neck dissection were related to 3-year patients' survival. None of the measured factors in this study were associated with QoL.

Plate-related complication and health-related quality of life after mandibular reconstruction by fibula flap with reconstruction plate or miniplate versus anterolateral thigh flap with reconstruction plate

BACKGROUND

Plate-related complications are major long-term complications in mandible reconstruction. There are controversies regarding the use of a reconstruction plate versus miniplates and a bone flap versus a soft tissue flap with a bridging plate. Direct comparisons of a fibula flap and an anterolateral thigh flap, the applicability between a reconstruction plate and miniplate, and the correlation between plate-related complications and quality of life remain unclarified. Therefore, this study aimed to the explore complications of different flaps and plates and how they impact the patients' quality of life.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of a total of 205 patients aged >18 years who underwent segmental mandibulectomy and reconstruction using fibula flap with reconstruction plate (FR; n = 86), fibula flap with miniplate (FM; n = 61), and anterolateral thigh flap with reconstruction plate (AR; n = 58) due to cancer ablation, osteoradionecrosis, or benign tumor excision between August 2010 and December 2019. Data on characteristics, complications, and health-related quality of life were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

The plate-related complication rate was the highest in the AR group (37.9%), then in the FR group (25.6%), and was the lowest in the FM group (13.1%; p = 0.0079). The plate exposure rate was the highest in the AR group (24.1%), then in the FR group (15.7%), and was the lowest in the FM group (4.9%; p = 0.0128). The plate fracture and dislodge rates for the AR group were both higher than those for the FR and FM groups (24.1% versus 9.3% versus 9.8%, respectively; p = 0.023). The AR group had worse complication-free survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.61, 95% CI: 1.99-6.56, and p < 0.0001) than the FR and FM groups. Osteoradionecrosis (HR: 6.19, 95% CI: 2.11-18.21, and p = 0.0009) and postoperative radiotherapy (HR: 2.87, 95% CI: 1.34-6.12, and p = 0.0402) were both independent adverse factors for complication-free survival, whereas patient treated primarily (HR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.17-0.73, and p = 0.0048) was an independent protective factor. Plate-related complication negatively impacted the quality of life based on pain scores (β: -0.56, SE: 0.26, and p = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

Using a fibular flap fixed with miniplates and avoiding the use of a reconstruction plate may yield a reduced plate exposure rate and better health-related quality of life, particularly for patients with osteoradionecrosis or those who need postoperative radiotherapy.

Comparison of surgical outcomes between primary plate and fibular flap transfer for reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects

PURPOSE

Although two ways of reconstruction have been reviewed for a long period, comparison of large sample size with nearly randomized patient selection is rare. Here, we compare the surgical outcomes of these two methods from two large medical institutes.

METHODS

Totally 176 patients were included from two medical centers with different protocols, 62 patients from MacKay Hospital repair defects with fibula flaps using reconstruction plates. Also 114 patients from Kaohsiung ChangGung Hospital treat with reconstruction plates combine anterior lateral thigh flaps, in which 12 cases had secondary fibula flap after plate exposure. Electronic medical records were reviewed retrospectively. Short (3-12 months) and long-term (>12 months) outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

Short-term evaluation revealed that the secondary fibula had a higher rate of vascular complications (33 vs. 6%, p = .02). Primary fibula had a higher risk of post reconstructive surgical debridement (60 vs. 40%, p = .018). Long-term follow-up revealed radiation therapy significantly worsened bone healing (p = .03). Primary fibula had a lower rate of screw loosening (14.0 vs. 40.3%, p = .002). Radiation therapy did not increase the plate exposure rate among the groups (33 vs. 27%, p = .389). Disease free survival showed no significant difference between two groups (53.1 ± 3.5 vs. 47.8 ± 2.8 months, p = .317).

CONCLUSION

Primary fibula reconstruction should be considered whenever possible to reduce the risk of late complications and simplifies the management after a potential plate exposure. Notably, radiation therapy apparently has no significant effect on plate exposure rate both in ALT or fibula groups.

Complications After Soft Tissue With Plate vs Bony Mandibular Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Mandibular reconstruction for segmental defects is a well-studied topic. However, there are conflicting data on the risks of delayed plate-related complications. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess long-term plate-related complications following reconstruction of the mandible with soft tissue and a plate as compared with immediate vascularized bony reconstruction.

DATA SOURCES

A medical librarian created search strategies with a combination of keywords and controlled vocabulary in Ovid Medline (1946-), Embase (1947-), Scopus (1960-), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Clinicaltrials.gov.

REVIEW METHODS

Candidate articles were independently reviewed by 2 authors. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were uniformly applied. Articles were considered eligible if they included adequate reporting of plate extrusion and/or fracture and had follow-up ≥12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 2379 patients were included. The risk of plate fracture was low in cases of soft tissue with a plate (5%; 95% CI, 0.03-0.08) and osseous reconstruction (1%). The risk of extrusion following soft tissue and plate reconstruction was 20% (95% CI, 0.15-0.27). In the osseous reconstruction group, the risk of extrusion was 10% (95% CI, 0.06-0.18). Revision surgery was performed twice as often following soft tissue with a plate as compared with vascularized bony reconstruction (32% [95% CI, 0.25-0.40] vs 14% [95% CI, 0.09-0.21], respectively).

CONCLUSION

Delayed plate-related complications remain a significant problem following segmental defect reconstruction. Soft tissue and plate reconstruction techniques may increase the risk of plate removal and revision surgery.

Quality of life in patients with oral cancer treated by different reconstruction methods as measured by the EORTC QLQ-H&N43

This was a prospective clinical study and the purpose was to assess the quality of life (QoL) as the primary endpoint for patients given prospective treatment for cancer of the oral cavity that required reconstruction using various reconstruction methods in Azerbaijan. All patients who were operated on during the year 2017 to 2018 were entered into the study. Quality of life was assessed six months postoperatively using the European Organization for Research and Cancer Treatment Core Cancer Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the Head and Neck Specific Quality of Life (QLQ-H&NN43) questionnaires. A total of 96 patients completed the questionnaires. There were 36 patients who did not receive a flap, 31 patients received a local flap, and 29 patients had distant-regional flaps. QoL assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30, and the QLQ-H&N43 was lower in patients who received a local flap. In general, the results showed that the reconstruction with a distant-regional flap compared with no flap and local flap leads to improved quality of life of patients with oral cancer.

Double free flaps in oral cavity and oropharynx reconstruction: Systematic review, indications and limits

The simultaneous use of two different free flaps, harvested from distinct donor sites, has demonstrated a reasonable degree of safety and success rates in head and neck composite defects reconstruction. Unfortunately, their relatively low frequent use, together with the lack of proper statistics on their management strategies, make their indications weak of robust conclusions to better define their role in common practice. The aim of the present study was to review the literature of the last 15 years regarding simultaneous free flap transposition, presenting advantages, disadvantages, and results of this technique, with the final purpose to propose an up-to-date panorama for the use of double free flap for complex head and neck defects reconstruction. Depending on which factors are present, surgeons may choose to select an approach that is theoretically safer, but yields less-than-ideal functional outcomes, such as local flap. Two free flaps may be necessary when the defect contains both a large, complex bony defect, large soft tissue needs, and proper surgical planning and meticulous monitoring continues to be the cornerstone of success.

Free Flap Outcomes of Microvascular Reconstruction after Repeated Segmental Mandibulectomy in Head and Neck Cancer Patients

This is the first study to investigate the impact of a second fibula flap or a soft tissue flap combined with bridging plate for a repeated segmental mandibulectomy reconstruction on flap outcomes in head and neck cancer patients. A retrospective comparative analysis (2007–2016) of 61 patients who underwent a second segmental mandibulectomy was performed. 20 patients underwent a fibula flap reconstruction whereas 41 had a soft tissue flap and plate reconstruction. No significant difference was seen in the operative time, total hospital stay, flap loss, re-exploration rates, plate exposure rate, or recipient site infection rate. On multivariate analysis, patients reconstructed with a soft tissue flap and bridging plate (odds ratio (OR) 3.997; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.046–15.280, p = 0.043) and complications developed in previous surgery (OR 4.792; 95% CI, 1.120–20.493, p = 0.035) were shown to be independent predictors of a prolonged nasogastric tube dependence. The utilization of a soft tissue flap with plate is associated with comparative results of acute complication rate within 1 week, recipient site infection rate, and plate exposure rate to free fibula flaps alone. Free fibula flaps may result in a decreased risk for prolonged tube dependence compared to free soft tissue flap reconstructions.