Diagnostic and prognostic value of CD44v9 and TIM3 expression in CK‑ and CK+ regions in gastric cancer tissues

The specificity and sensitivity of the current diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for gastric cancer (GC) are limited. The present study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic significance of cluster-of-differentiation gene 44 variant isoform 9 (CD44v9) and T cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain-containing protein 3 (TIM3) expression levels alone or combined in the tumor tissues of patients with GC and reveal the roles of CD44v9 and TIM3 in the cytokeratin (CK)+ and CK- regions. Multiplex immunofluorescence staining was performed for CD44v9, TIM3 and CK using a tissue microarray. The tissues were divided into three regions based on CK expression: Total, CK+, and CK- regions. The diagnostic and prognostic value was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves, Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. The results demonstrated that the density of cells expressing CD44v9, TIM3 and co-expressing CD44v9 and TIM3 (CD44v9/TIM3) in both the CK+ and CK- regions of tumor tissues was significantly higher than those in normal tissues (P<0.001). Moreover, the expression of CD44v9 in the CK- region was significantly positively correlated with age and tumor grade (P<0.05), and the expression of CD44v9/TIM3 in the CK- region of tumor tissues was significantly positively correlated with age, tumor grade and metastasis (P<0.05). Furthermore, the area under the curve for TIM3 expression in the CK+ region was 0.709, with a sensitivity of 45.83% and a specificity of 85.54% (P<0.001). High expression of CD44v9 in the CK- region was also significantly associated with poor survival and independently predicted a poor prognosis in patients with GC (hazard ratio, 2.387; 95% confidence interval, 1.384-4.118; P<0.01). In conclusion, dividing tissue regions based on CK expression is important for the diagnosis of GC. The expression of TIM3 in the CK+ region demonstrated diagnostic potential for GC, and high expression of CD44v9 in the CK- region was an independent prognostic risk factor for patients with GC.

Biomarkers in Cancer Detection, Diagnosis, and Prognosis

Biomarkers are vital in healthcare as they provide valuable insights into disease diagnosis, prognosis, treatment response, and personalized medicine. They serve as objective indicators, enabling early detection and intervention, leading to improved patient outcomes and reduced costs. Biomarkers also guide treatment decisions by predicting disease outcomes and facilitating individualized treatment plans. They play a role in monitoring disease progression, adjusting treatments, and detecting early signs of recurrence. Furthermore, biomarkers enhance drug development and clinical trials by identifying suitable patients and accelerating the approval process. In this review paper, we described a variety of biomarkers applicable for cancer detection and diagnosis, such as imaging-based diagnosis (CT, SPECT, MRI, and PET), blood-based biomarkers (proteins, genes, mRNA, and peptides), cell imaging-based diagnosis (needle biopsy and CTC), tissue imaging-based diagnosis (IHC), and genetic-based biomarkers (RNAseq, scRNAseq, and spatial transcriptomics).

Lung Cancer Stem Cell Markers as Therapeutic Targets: An Update on Signaling Pathways and Therapies

Cancer stem cells, a relatively small group of self-renewing cancer cells, were first isolated from acute myeloid leukemia. These cells can play a crucial role in tumor metastasis, relapse, and therapy resistance. The cancer stem cell theory may be applied to lung cancer and explain the inefficiency of traditional treatments and eventual recurrence. However, because of the unclear accuracy and illusive biological function of cancer stem cells, some researchers remain cautious about this theory. Despite the ongoing controversy, cancer stem cells are still being investigated, and their biomarkers are being discovered for application in cancer diagnosis, targeted therapy, and prognosis prediction. Potential lung cancer stem cell markers mainly include surface biomarkers such as CD44, CD133, epithelial cell adhesion molecule, and ATP-binding cassette subfamily G member 2, along with intracellular biomarkers such as aldehyde dehydrogenase, sex-determining region Y-box 2, NANOG, and octamer-binding transcription factor 4. These markers have different structures and functions but are closely associated with the stem potential and uncontrollable proliferation of tumor cells. The aberrant activation of major signaling pathways, such as Notch, Hedgehog, and Wnt, may be associated with the expression and regulation of certain lung cancer stem cell markers, thus leading to lung cancer stem cell maintenance, chemotherapy resistance, and cancer promotion. Treatments targeting lung cancer stem cell markers, including antibody drugs, nanoparticle drugs, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, and other natural or synthetic specific inhibitors, may provide new hope for patients who are resistant to conventional lung cancer therapies. This review provides comprehensive and updated data on lung cancer stem cell markers with regard to their structures, functions, signaling pathways, and promising therapeutic target approaches, aiming to elucidate potential new therapies for lung cancer.

Cancer Stem Cells-Origins and Biomarkers: Perspectives for Targeted Personalized Therapies

The use of biomarkers in diagnosis, therapy and prognosis has gained increasing interest over the last decades. In particular, the analysis of biomarkers in cancer patients within the pre- and post-therapeutic period is required to identify several types of cells, which carry a risk for a disease progression and subsequent post-therapeutic relapse. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are a subpopulation of tumor cells that can drive tumor initiation and can cause relapses. At the time point of tumor initiation, CSCs originate from either differentiated cells or adult tissue resident stem cells. Due to their importance, several biomarkers that characterize CSCs have been identified and correlated to diagnosis, therapy and prognosis. However, CSCs have been shown to display a high plasticity, which changes their phenotypic and functional appearance. Such changes are induced by chemo- and radiotherapeutics as well as senescent tumor cells, which cause alterations in the tumor microenvironment. Induction of senescence causes tumor shrinkage by modulating an anti-tumorigenic environment in which tumor cells undergo growth arrest and immune cells are attracted. Besides these positive effects after therapy, senescence can also have negative effects displayed post-therapeutically. These unfavorable effects can directly promote cancer stemness by increasing CSC plasticity phenotypes, by activating stemness pathways in non-CSCs, as well as by promoting senescence escape and subsequent activation of stemness pathways. At the end, all these effects can lead to tumor relapse and metastasis. This review provides an overview of the most frequently used CSC markers and their implementation as biomarkers by focussing on deadliest solid (lung, stomach, liver, breast and colorectal cancers) and hematological (acute myeloid leukemia, chronic myeloid leukemia) cancers. Furthermore, it gives examples on how the CSC markers might be influenced by therapeutics, such as chemo- and radiotherapy, and the tumor microenvironment. It points out, that it is crucial to identify and monitor residual CSCs, senescent tumor cells, and the pro-tumorigenic senescence-associated secretory phenotype in a therapy follow-up using specific biomarkers. As a future perspective, a targeted immune-mediated strategy using chimeric antigen receptor based approaches for the removal of remaining chemotherapy-resistant cells as well as CSCs in a personalized therapeutic approach are discussed.