The Changing Paradigms for Breast Cancer Surgery: Performing Fewer and Less-Invasive Operations

Timing of autologous fat grafting in implant-based breast reconstruction: Best practices based on systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Fat grafting is commonly undertaken as a third-stage procedure in patients with staged implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR). However, fat grafting performed during second-stage expander/implant exchange provides faster results without an additional procedure and associated risks (Patel et al., 2020). We previously demonstrated that fat grafting during second-stage expander/implant exchange did not increase clinical complications (Patel et al., 2020). As a corollary, this study investigates patients' satisfaction with second- versus third-stage fat grafting to help establish a set of best practices for the timing of fat grafting in such patients.

METHODS

A review of PubMed/MEDLINE databases (2010-2022) was performed to identify articles investigating the quality of life in patients undergoing second- or third-stage fat grafting after IBR. BREAST-Q scores were pooled using random-effects modeling and the DerSimonian-Laird method. Post-hoc sensitivity analyses were completed using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method. The Haldane-Anscombe correction was used for outcomes with low counts. All study analyses adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

RESULTS

Six studies (216 patients) were included. Pooled random-effects modeling demonstrated no significant changes in BREAST-Q satisfaction with outcome scores when comparing patients who received second- versus third-stage fat grafting (p = 0.178) with results robust to sensitivity analyses. In addition, pooled analyses of the available data demonstrated that second-stage fat grafting did not increase downstream revision surgery needs compared to third-stage fat grafting.

CONCLUSIONS

In combination with our prior work, this meta-analysis suggests that second-stage fat grafting provides not only equivalent but improved clinical and quality of life outcomes with fewer procedures in patients undergoing expander/IBR.

The involvement of axillary reverse mapping nodes in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Axillary reverse mapping (ARM) was developed to preserve the lymphatic drainage from the upper arm during sentinel lymph-node (SLN) biopsy or axillary lymph-node dissection (ALND). However, the oncological safety of ARM has been controversial because of not infrequent involvement of ARM nodes.

METHODS

Patients with clinically negative nodes (cN0) underwent SLN biopsy and ARM. SLNs were identified using blue dye and radioisotope, and ARM nodes were traced using the fluorescent method. Patients with positive SLN underwent the standard ALND. After surgery, they were followed up for more than 3 years.

RESULTS

A total of 507 patients with cN0 breast cancer were enrolled between May 2009 and November 2017. SLNs were identified in 499 (98%) of 507 patients, and ARM nodes were identified in 159 (31%) patients in the SLN field. The crossover rate of SLN-ARM nodes was 28%. Among 95 patients with positive SLNs, 70 patients underwent conventional ALND. ARM nodes were identified in 65 (93%) of those patients in the ALND field. The mean number of removed ARM nodes was 7.2 (range 0-25) in patients who underwent the standard ALND. Although ARM nodes were involved in 18 of 65 patients, the involved ARM nodes were the same SLNs identified in 14 (78%) patients. Since SLN-ARM nodes should be removed, ARM nodes were involved only in 4 (5.7%) patients after SLN biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

Except for positive SLN-ARM nodes, the involvement of ARM nodes is infrequent in patients with positive SLN.

Surgical Trends in Breast Cancer in Turkey: An Increase in Breast-Conserving Surgery

PURPOSE

Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer in women, and there is a great variability in surgical practice for treating that cancer in different countries. The aims of this study were to analyze the effect of guidelines from the Turkish Federation of Breast Diseases Societies on academic institutions that have breast centers and to evaluate surgical practice in Turkey in 2018.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January and March 2019, a survey was sent to breast surgeons who were working in breast centers in academic institutions. The sampling frame included 24 academic institutions with breast centers in 18 cities in Turkey to evaluate interdisciplinary differences among breast centers and seven regions in Turkey regarding patients’ choices, surgical approaches, and academic institutions.

RESULTS

All surgeons responded to the survey, and all 4,381 patients were included. Most of the surgeons (73.9%) were working in a breast center. Multidisciplinary tumor boards were performed in 87% of the breast centers. The average time between clinical evaluation and initiation of treatment was 29 days; the longest time was in Southeast Anatolia (66 days). Only 6% of patients had ductal carcinoma in situ. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was available in every region across the country and was performed in 64.5% of the patients. In 2018, the overall breast-conserving surgery rate was 57.3% in Turkey, and it varied from 72.2% in the Black Sea region to 33.5% in Central Anatolia (P < .001). Oncoplastic breast surgery options were available at all breast centers. However, 25% of the breast centers from the Black Sea region and half the breast centers from Eastern Anatolia and the Mediterranean region did not perform this type of surgery.

CONCLUSION

Increasing rates of nonpalpable breast cancer and decreasing rates of locoregional recurrences favored breast-conserving surgery, especially in developed countries. Guidelines from the Turkish Federation of Breast Diseases Societies resulted in more comprehensive breast centers and improved breast health in Turkey.

Nomograms for Predicting Axillary Lymph Node Status Reconciled With Preoperative Breast Ultrasound Images

Introduction

The axillary lymph node (ALN) status of breast cancer patients is an important prognostic indicator. The use of primary breast mass features for the prediction of ALN status is rare. Two nomograms based on preoperative ultrasound (US) images of breast tumors and ALNs were developed for the prediction of ALN status.

Methods

A total of 743 breast cancer cases collected from 2016 to 2019 at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University were randomly divided into a training set (n = 523) and a test set (n = 220). A primary tumor feature model (PTFM) and ALN feature model (ALNFM) were separately generated based on tumor features alone, and a combination of features was used for the prediction of ALN status. Logistic regression analysis was used to construct the nomograms. A receiver operating characteristic curve was plotted to obtain the area under the curve (AUC) to evaluate accuracy, and bias-corrected AUC values and calibration curves were obtained by bootstrap resampling for internal and external verification. Decision curve analysis was applied to assess the clinical utility of the models.

Results

The AUCs of the PTFM were 0.69 and 0.67 for the training and test sets, respectively, and the bias-corrected AUCs of the PTFM were 0.67 and 0.67, respectively. Moreover, the AUCs of the ALNFM were 0.86 and 0.84, respectively, and the bias-corrected AUCs were 0.85 and 0.81, respectively. Compared with the PTFM, the ALNFM showed significantly improved prediction accuracy (p < 0.001). Both the calibration and decision curves of the ALNFM nomogram indicated greater accuracy and clinical practicality. When the US tumor size was ≤21.5 mm, the Spe was 0.96 and 0.92 in the training and test sets, respectively. When the US tumor size was greater than 21.5 mm, the Sen was 0.85 in the training set and 0.87 in the test set. Our further research showed that when the US tumor size was larger than 35 mm, the Sen was 0.90 in the training set and 0.93 in the test set.

Conclusion

The ALNFM could effectively predict ALN status based on US images especially for different US tumor size.

Ultrasound-Guided Laser Ablation After Excisional Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy for Small Malignant Breast Lesions: Preliminary Results

Background:

The purpose of this preliminary study is to evaluate the feasibility of the excisional ultrasound (US) guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VAE), followed by US-guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (LITT) in the treatment of unifocal ductal breast carcinomas ≤ 1 cm and estimate the ablation rate analyzing the final histopathological results after subsequent surgical excision.

Methods:

In a single session 11 female patients with unifocal less than a centimeter breast cancer underwent 2 different minimally invasive percutaneous US-guided techniques: a VAE breast biopsy with an 8 G needle to remove the lesion and, immediately after, a LITT ablation in the biopsy site. Four weeks later, all patients underwent radiological follow-up. Afterward, a systematic surgery was performed, the ablation rate was calculated, and iconographic and histological features were correlated.

Results:

Average maximum diameter of the lesions was 7.6 mm (5-10 mm). No patient reported pain or discomfort during procedure. 1/11 patient (9.1%) reported an early minor complication (a small superficial skin burn). After surgical excision, the histopathological evaluation reported in 10/11 cases (90.9%) complete ablation of the target lesion. In only one case (9.1%) residual cancer was detected. The necrotic-hemorrhagic cavities showed a mean maximum diameter of 27.3 mm (20-35 mm).

Conclusions:

Laser ablation performed after excisional biopsy could be considered a valid alternative to surgical excision for the treatment of lesions ≤ 1 cm, if carried out by expert radiologists. The association of these minimally invasive percutaneous methods has proven to be reliable, fast, and safe with an ablation rate of 90.9% and excellent aesthetic results. RM and CESM are potentially able to quantifying treatment results and to follow-up the ablation effects.

Oncological safety of selective axillary dissection after axillary reverse mapping in node-positive breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Although the need for axillary lymph node dissection (AD) is decreasing in breast cancer patients, it remains necessary in some cases. Axillary reverse mapping (ARM) enables the detection of upper extremity lymphatic drainage that may be spared during selective axillary dissection (SAD) so as to reduce the risk of lymphedema. The ability of the ARM-SAD procedure to reduce the incidence of lymphedema is being tested in an ongoing randomized trial. Crossover between arm drainage and breast drainage is well documented in the axilla, however, and whether the procedure is oncologically safe remains controversial. We aim to assess the axillary failure rate when a few nodes draining the upper arm are being spared by the ARM-SAD.

METHODS

We report oncological outcomes, and axillary failure in particular, in the first 100 consecutive axillary node-positive patients treated with ARM-SAD as part of a pilot study and a randomized trial.

RESULTS

A median of 18 (IQR 14-22) axillary nodes were excised per patient. During the follow-up (median 51 months, IQR 34-91), 11 patients experienced a treatment failure, but only one - treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy - developed overt axillary disease as a first (and isolated) event. The crude rate of axillary failure was 1.36% (95% CI: 0.19-9.63) with an estimated 5-year crude cumulative incidence of 1.85% (95% CI: 0-5.47%).

CONCLUSIONS

The axillary failure rate was low in our patients and did not exceed rates reported in the literature after standard AD, thus indicating that the ARM-SAD procedure is oncologically safe.

Patterns of Chest Wall Recurrence and Suggestions on the Clinical Target Volume of Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of 121 Postmastectomy Patients

Purpose

Radiotherapy is a powerful strategy to prevent chest wall recurrence (CWR) of postmastectomy breast cancer (BC). This retrospective study aims at analyzing patterns of CWR to explore the delineation of clinical target volume.

Patients and Methods

Detailed clinicopathological information of postmastectomy BC patients with CWR was collected from our single cancer center based on clear criteria. To describe recurrent positions more accurately, the chest wall was divided into three layers: skin layer (skin and subcutaneous tissues), pectoralis layer (pectoralis major and minor), and rib layer (rib and intercostal muscle). The frequency distribution of recurrence location and its association with clinical pathological factors were analyzed.

Results

A total of 121 postmastectomy BC with CWR were included in this study. The percentages of breast tumor located in the upper outer quadrant, upper inner quadrant, lower inner quadrant, lower outer quadrant, overlapping quadrant, and areola area were 31.0% (35/113), 26.5% (30/113), 12.4% (14/113), 5.3% (6/113), 21.1% (25/113), and 2.7% (3/113), respectively. HER2-positive BC (51/113, 45.1%) is the most common BC subtype. Analysis on the patterns of CWR showed that recurrences locating in the skin layer, pectoralis layer, rib layer, mixed layers, and incision periphery accounted for 58.6% (68/116), 9.5% (11/116), 1.7% (2/116), 30.2% (35/116), and 60.5% (46/76), respectively. Rates of recurrences located in the skin and/or pectoralis layers for all BC patients, patients with concomitant distance metastasis, and patients without concomitant distance metastasis were 82.8% (96/116), 85.9% (49/57), and 81.0% (47/58), respectively.

Conclusion

For BC patients receiving mastectomy, skin, subcutaneous tissues, pectoralis, and area around incision have a high risk of recurrence, which should be paid more attention in chest wall radiotherapy.

Progress in Local Treatment of Breast Cancer: A Narrative Review

The present paper reports on the local treatment of breast cancer from a historical perspective. A search for articles written in English was made in the Medline and EMBASE databases, and 40 papers were selected. Over the past 10 years, various randomized, controlled clinical trials on the local treatment of breast cancer indicated that patients with the same molecular subtype may receive different individualized surgical treatments aimed at optimizing systemic adjuvant therapy. With a view to retaining the gains made in disease-free and overall survival, surgical techniques have advanced from radical surgery to conservative mastectomies, thus reducing sequelae, while adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies have contributed toward controlling the disease, both distant metastases and local recurrence. Current studies evaluate whether future breast cancer therapy may even succeed in eliminating surgery to the breast and axilla altogether.