1
|
Ramaswamy A, Chaudhari V, Srinivas S, Bhargava P, Kannan S, Agarwal A, Seshadri RA, Talwar V, Goel S, Goel V, Singh S, Kayal S, Rebala P, Rao GV, Prajapati B, Parikh D, Kothari J, Kadamapuzha JM, Ramesh H, Kapoor D, Chaudhary A, Gupta A, Sekar A, Misra S, Vishnoi JR, Soni S, Varshney VK, Bairwa SK, Ghosh J, Lavingia V, Bhandare M, Shrikhande SV, Ostwal V. Adjuvant therapy may improve overall survival in high-risk periampullary adenocarcinomas patients - A match-pair analysis from a multi-institutional cohort study (The MIPPAP study). HPB (Oxford) 2024; 26:1261-1269. [PMID: 39019675 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2024] [Accepted: 06/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of adjuvant therapy in resected periampullary adenocarcinomas is equivocal due to contrasting data and limited prospective trials. METHODS The Multicentre Indian Pancreatic & Periampullary Adenocarcinoma Project (MIPPAP), included data from 8 institutions across India. Of the 1679 pancreatic resections, 736 patients with T3/T4 and/or Node positive adenocarcinomas (considered as high risk for recurrence) were included for analysis. Three (adjuvant): one (observation) matching, using T3/T4 T staging, nodal positivity and ampullary subtype was performed by using the nearest neighbour matching method. RESULTS Of 736 patients eligible for inclusion, 621 patients were matched of which 458 patients received adjuvant therapy (AT) (predominantly gemcitabine-based) and 163 patients were observed (O). With a median follow-up of 42 months, there was a statistical difference in overall survival in favour of patients receiving AT as compared to those on observation [68.7 months vs. 61.1 months, Hazard ratio: 0.73 (95% CI: 0.54-0.97); p = 0.03]. Besides AT, presence of nodal involvement (median OS: 65.4 months vs not reached; p = 0.04) predicted for inferior OS. CONCLUSIONS The results of the match-pair analysis suggest that adjuvant therapy improves overall survival in periampullary adenocarcinomas at high risk of recurrence with a greater benefit in T3/T4, node-positive and ampullary subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anant Ramaswamy
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, 400012, India
| | - Vikram Chaudhari
- Dept. of GI & HPB Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Dr. E Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, 400 012, India
| | - Sujay Srinivas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Prabhat Bhargava
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Sadhana Kannan
- Department of Statistics, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Ajit Agarwal
- BALCO Medical Centre, Sector-36, P.O. Uparwar, Naya Raipur, Chattisgarh, 493661, India
| | - Ramakrishnan A Seshadri
- Cancer Institute (WIA), Dr. S Krishnamurthy campus, No.38, Sardar Patel Road, Chennai, 600036, India
| | - Vineet Talwar
- Dept of Medical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute & Research Centre, Delhi, India
| | - Shaifali Goel
- Surgical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute & Research Centre, Delhi, India
| | - Varun Goel
- Medical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute & Research Centre, Delhi, India
| | - Shivendra Singh
- GI-Oncosurgery & Liver Transplantation, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute & Research Centre, Delhi, India
| | - Smita Kayal
- Dept of Medical Oncology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, India
| | - Pradeep Rebala
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Somajiguda, Hyderabad, 500082, India
| | - G V Rao
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Somajiguda, Hyderabad, 500082, India
| | - Bharat Prajapati
- Dept of GI and Robotic Surgery, HCG Cancer Center, Science City Road, Sola, 380060, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Devendra Parikh
- Dept of GI and Robotic Surgery, HCG Cancer Center, Science City Road, Sola, 380060, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Jagdish Kothari
- Dept of GI and Robotic Surgery, HCG Cancer Center, Science City Road, Sola, 380060, Ahmedabad, India
| | | | - Hariharan Ramesh
- Lakeshore Hospital & Research Center Cochin, 682304, Kerala, India
| | - Deeksha Kapoor
- Department of GI Surgery, GI Oncology, Minimal Access and Bariatric Surgery, Medanta - The Medicity, Gurugram, India
| | - Adarsh Chaudhary
- Department of GI Surgery, GI Oncology, Minimal Access and Bariatric Surgery, Medanta - The Medicity, Gurugram, India
| | - Amit Gupta
- Dept. of GI & HPB Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Dr. E Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, 400 012, India
| | - Anbarasan Sekar
- Dept. of GI & HPB Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Dr. E Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, 400 012, India
| | - Sanjeev Misra
- Department of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Science, Jodhpur, India
| | - Jeewan R Vishnoi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Science, Jodhpur, India
| | - Subhash Soni
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Science, Jodhpur, India
| | - Vaibhav K Varshney
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Science, Jodhpur, India
| | - Sandeep K Bairwa
- Department of Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Science, Jodhpur, India
| | - Joydeep Ghosh
- Department of Medical Oncology Tata Medical Centre Kolkata, West Bengal, 700156, Kolkata, India
| | - Viraj Lavingia
- Dept of GI Medical Oncology, HCG Cancer Center, Science City Road, Sola, 380060, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Manish Bhandare
- Dept. of GI & HPB Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Dr. E Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, 400 012, India
| | - Shailesh V Shrikhande
- Dept. of GI & HPB Service, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Dr. E Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, 400 012, India
| | - Vikas Ostwal
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, 400012, India.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jun SY, Lee EJ, Kim SI, An S. Tumor Microenvironment Prognostic Risk and Its Association With MUC5AC in Ampullary Carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2023; 147:1060-1074. [PMID: 36445719 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2022-0131-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— The tumor-host interaction in the tumor microenvironment (TME) affects the prognosis of patients with malignant tumors. TME assessed via tumor budding (BD) and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) had a prognostic impact in patients with nonampullary small intestinal and colorectal carcinomas. In ampullary carcinoma (AC), MUC5AC was recently revealed as a significant prognosticator, but studies about the TME have not been conducted. OBJECTIVE.— To assess TME-based prognostic risk in AC. DESIGN.— We generated a collective TME risk index based on high-grade BD at the invasive front (BD3) and high density of stromal-TIL (>5%) in 64 surgically resected ACs. We evaluated its predictive values for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). We also investigated the relationship of TME to MUC5AC expression. RESULTS.— TME prognostic risk index was classified into low-risk (BDLow/TILHigh; 26 of 64; 41%), intermediate-risk (BDLow/TILLow or BDHigh/TILHigh; 23; 36%), and high-risk (BDHigh/TILLow; 15; 23%) groups. Higher TME prognostic risk was associated with higher tumor grade (P = .03), lymphovascular invasion (P = .05), and MUC5AC immunopositivity (P = .02). TME prognostic risk index displayed better predictive ability for both OS (53.9 versus 46.1 versus 42.2) and RFS (24.8 versus 16.9 versus 15.3) than BD or TIL alone. In multivariate analysis, TME prognostic risk index was an independent prognosticator for OS (P = .003) and RFS (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS.— TME risk index in combination with BD and TIL was a stronger predictor of prognostic risk stratification than either BD or TIL alone for both OS and RFS in patients with AC. MUC5AC may modulate the interaction between tumor cells and immunity toward enhancing invasiveness in TME.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sun-Young Jun
- From the Department of Pathology (Jun, Kim, An), Incheon St Mary�s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Eui-Jin Lee
- The Clinical Research Center (Lee), Incheon St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang-Il Kim
- From the Department of Pathology (Jun, Kim, An), Incheon St Mary�s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Soyeon An
- From the Department of Pathology (Jun, Kim, An), Incheon St Mary�s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liao X, Zhang D. The 8th Edition American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging for Hepato-pancreato-biliary Cancer: A Review and Update. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2021; 145:543-553. [PMID: 32223559 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0032-ra] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— Cancer staging provides critical information for patients and treating physicians to battle against cancer, predict prognosis, and guide treatment decisions. The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system uses a tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) scoring algorithm and is the foremost classification system for adult cancers. This system is updated every 6 to 8 years to allow sufficient time for implementation of changes and for relevant examination and discussion of data validating those changes in staging. OBJECTIVE.— To review the updates in the 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system on hepato-pancreato-biliary cancer. DATA SOURCES.— Literature review. CONCLUSIONS.— The 8th edition, published in 2016 and implemented on January 1, 2018, has been in use for approximately 3 years. Compared with the 7th edition, some of the changes are quite radical. This review aims to provide a summary of the changes/updates of the 8th edition with focus on hepato-pancreato-biliary cancers, and evaluate its performance through literature review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyan Liao
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Dongwei Zhang
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wen G, Gu J, Zhou W, Wang L, Tian Y, Dong Y, Fu L, Wu H. Benefits of 18F-FDG PET/CT for the preoperative characterisation or staging of disease in the ampullary and duodenal papillary. Eur Radiol 2020; 30:5089-5098. [PMID: 32346795 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-06864-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Accepted: 04/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Diagnosing ampullary and duodenal papillary carcinomas (ADPCs) is challenging. In the present study, we investigated the application value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) in the preoperative evaluation of these tumours. METHODS 18F-FDG PET/CT images of 58 patients with ADPC and 28 patients with benign disease were retrospectively analysed. Preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT was compared to contrast-enhanced (CE) CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in terms of diagnostic efficacy, certainty, staging and impact on treatment decisions. RESULTS 18F-FDG PET/CT showed a high sensitivity (93.1%) and a medium specificity (78.6%) for diagnosing ADPC. Compared to CE CT/MRI, 18F-FDG PET/CT had a higher diagnostic specificity (78.6 vs. 35.7%, p = 0.001) but a similar sensitivity (93.1 vs. 89.6%, p = 0.508). 18F-FDG PET/CT provided a much higher diagnostic certainty than CE CT/MRI (definite reports, 88.4 vs. 50.0%, χ2 = 29.698, p < 0.001), especially for small tumours ≤ 1.5 cm, and found distant metastases in five patients. The 18F-FDG PET/CT findings affected the treatment plans of 11 patients and improved the confidence in the diagnoses of 28 patients. CONCLUSIONS The present study demonstrated that 18F-FDG PET/CT can supplement CE CT/MRI to provide a more accurate diagnosis for ADPC, and thus, plays an important role in the decision-making process before complicated pancreaticoduodenectomy procedures. KEY POINTS • It is a challenge for CT and MRI to diagnose ampullary carcinoma, especially at their early stage. • Our study demonstrated that the benefit of PET/CT was improving the diagnostic confidence for ampullary and duodenal papillary carcinomas. • 18F-FDG PET/CT can change the treatment decision for ampullary and duodenal papillary carcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guanghua Wen
- Nanfang PET Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Jinhua Municipal Central Hospital, Jinhua Hospital of Zhejiang University, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jiamei Gu
- Nanfang PET Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Wenlan Zhou
- Nanfang PET Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Lijuan Wang
- Nanfang PET Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Ying Tian
- Nanfang PET Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Ye Dong
- Nanfang PET Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Lilan Fu
- Nanfang PET Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Hubing Wu
- Nanfang PET Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|