1
|
Ertekin SC, Cetindag O, Ergenç M, Yeğen C. Laparoscopic repair vs open repair for perforated peptic ulcers: Quality of life assessment. J Gastrointest Surg 2024:S1091-255X(24)00558-4. [PMID: 39089488 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.07.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2024] [Revised: 07/09/2024] [Accepted: 07/27/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Studies reporting patient-centered outcomes, including quality of life and satisfaction, in perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) treatment are insufficient. This study was designed to assess the relative efficacy of laparoscopic repair (LR) as opposed to open surgical repair (OR) in the treatment of and its impact on quality of life. METHODS This investigation performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent treatment for PPU at a secondary care hospital between January 2017 and April 2020. Patients were categorized into 2 separate groups according to the type of surgical procedure received: LR and OR. Comparisons were made based on a variety of factors, such as demographic data, intra- and postoperative metrics, pain control, patient contentment, and quality of life indicators. RESULTS In the analysis, there were no statistically significant differences in demographic or clinical characteristics between the LR (n = 35) and OR (n = 62) groups (P > .05). Conversely, the rates of incisional hernia and surgical site infection were significantly greater in the OR group (P < .05). Moreover, the LR exhibited benefits such as a shorter length of hospital stay (P < .05), more rapid resumption of a normal diet, and fewer surgical site infections-factors that contributed to a lower rate of overall postoperative complications. According to the quality-of-life questionnaire, the LR group exhibited significantly greater scores for physical function, role, pain, and general health by the 30th postoperative day (P = .003, P < .001, P = .006, and P = .001, respectively), and by the 1-year follow-up, the LR group showed substantial improvements in physical function, physical role, emotional role, pain and general health (P = .047, P = .004, P = .039, P = .001, and P = .021, respectively), indicating its effectiveness in patient recovery and quality of life enhancement after surgery. CONCLUSION This study showed that LR could provide certain benefits in managing PPUs, such as reduced lengths of hospital stay and lower incidences of surgical site infections. Although LR reported promising directions in patient satisfaction and quality of life indicators, the limited duration of postoperative monitoring necessitates caution in broadly applying these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suleyman Caglar Ertekin
- Department of General Surgery, Altinbas University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey; Department of General Surgery, Cekirge State Hospital, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Ozhan Cetindag
- Department of General Surgery, Dr. Suat Seren Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Muhammer Ergenç
- Department of General Surgery, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Cumhur Yeğen
- Department of General Surgery, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gikandi A, Fong ZV, Qadan M, Narayan RR, Lwin T, Fernández-del Castillo C, Lillemoe KD, Ferrone CR. Do Complications After Pancreatoduodenectomy Have an Impact on Long-Term Quality of Life and Functional Outcomes? ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2024; 5:e400. [PMID: 38911654 PMCID: PMC11191981 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective Our aim was to assess whether complications after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) impact long-term quality of life (QoL) and functional outcomes. Background There is an increasing number of long-term post-PD survivors, but few studies have evaluated long-term QoL outcomes. Methods The EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PAN26 questionnaires were administered to patients who survived >5 years post-PD. Clinical relevance (CR) was scored as small (5-10), moderate (10-20), or large (>20). Patients were stratified based on whether they experienced a complication during the index hospitalization. Results Of 305 patients >5 years post-PD survivors, with valid contact information, 248 completed the questionnaires, and 231 had complication data available. Twenty-nine percent of patients experienced a complication, of which 17 (7.4%) were grade 1, 27 (11.7%) were grade 2, and 25 (10.8%) were grade 3. Global health status and functional domain scores were similar between both groups. Patients experiencing complications reported lower fatigue (21.4 vs 28.1, P < 0.05, CR small) and diarrhea (15.9 vs 23.1, P < 0.05, CR small) symptom scores when compared to patients without complications. Patients experiencing complications also reported lower pancreatic pain (38.2 vs 43.4, P < 0.05, CR small) and altered bowel habits (30.1 vs 40.7, P < 0.01, CR moderate) symptom scores. There was a lower prevalence of worrying (36.2% vs 60.5%, P < 0.05) and bloating (42.0% vs 56.2%, P < 0.05) among PD survivors with complications. Conclusions Post-PD complication rates were not associated with long-term global QoL or functionality, and may be associated with less severe pancreas-specific symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajami Gikandi
- From the Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Zhi Ven Fong
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Motaz Qadan
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Raja R. Narayan
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Thinzar Lwin
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| | | | - Keith D. Lillemoe
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dagorno C, Marique L, Korrel M, de Graaf N, Thouny C, Renault G, Ftériche FS, Aussilhou B, Maire F, Lévy P, Rebours V, Lesurtel M, Sauvanet A, Dokmak S. Long-term quality of life is better after laparoscopic compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:769-779. [PMID: 38052888 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10581-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Three randomized controlled trials have reported improved functional recovery after Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD), as compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD). Long-term results regarding quality of life (QoL) are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare long-term QoL of LPD versus OPD. METHODS AND PATIENTS A monocentric retrospective cross-sectional study was performed among patients < 75 years old who underwent LPD or OPD for a benign or premalignant pathology in a high-volume center (2011-2021). An electronic three-part questionnaire was sent to eligible patients, including two diseases specific QoL questionnaires (the European Organization for Research and Treatment in Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for cancer (QLQ-C30) and a pancreatic cancer module (PAN26) and a body image questionnaire. Patient demographics and postoperative data were collected and compared between LPD and OPD. RESULTS Among 948 patients who underwent PD (137 LPD, 811 OPD), 170 were eligible and 111 responded (58 LPD and 53 OPD). LPD versus OPD showed no difference in mean age (51 vs. 55 years, p = 0.199) and female gender (40% vs. 45%, p = 0.631), but LPD showed lower BMI (24 vs 26; p = 0.028) and higher preoperative pancreatitis (29% vs 13%; p = 0.041). The postoperative outcome showed similar Clavien-Dindo ≥ III morbidity (19% vs. 23%; p = 0.343) and length of stay (24 vs. 21 days, p = 0.963). After a similar median follow-up (3 vs. 3 years; p = 0.122), LPD vs OPD patients reported higher QoL (QLQ-C30: 49.6 vs 56.3; p = 0.07), better pancreas specific health status score (PAN20: 50.5 vs 55.5; p = 0.002), physical functioning (p = 0.002), and activities limitations (p = 0.02). Scar scores were better after LPD regarding esthetics (p = 0.001), satisfaction (p = 0.04), chronic pain at rest (p = 0.036), moving (p = 0.011) or in daily activities (p = 0.02). There was no difference in digestive symptoms (p = 0.995). CONCLUSION This monocentric study found improved long-term QoL in patients undergoing LPD, as compared to OPD, for benign and premalignant diseases. These results could be considered when choosing the surgical approach in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Dagorno
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, APHP, Hôpital Beaujon, DMU DIGEST, 100 Boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110, Clichy, France
| | - Lancelot Marique
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, APHP, Hôpital Beaujon, DMU DIGEST, 100 Boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110, Clichy, France
| | - Maarten Korrel
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nine de Graaf
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Camille Thouny
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, APHP, Hôpital Beaujon, DMU DIGEST, 100 Boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110, Clichy, France
| | - Gilles Renault
- Plateforme d'Imagerie du Vivant (PIV), Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Fadhel Samir Ftériche
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, APHP, Hôpital Beaujon, DMU DIGEST, 100 Boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110, Clichy, France
| | - Béatrice Aussilhou
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, APHP, Hôpital Beaujon, DMU DIGEST, 100 Boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110, Clichy, France
| | - Frédérique Maire
- Department of Pancreatology, APHP, Hôpital Beaujon, DMU DIGEST, Clichy, France
| | - Philippe Lévy
- Department of Pancreatology, APHP, Hôpital Beaujon, DMU DIGEST, Clichy, France
- Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Vinciane Rebours
- Department of Pancreatology, APHP, Hôpital Beaujon, DMU DIGEST, Clichy, France
- Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Mickael Lesurtel
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, APHP, Hôpital Beaujon, DMU DIGEST, 100 Boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110, Clichy, France
- Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Alain Sauvanet
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, APHP, Hôpital Beaujon, DMU DIGEST, 100 Boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110, Clichy, France
- Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Safi Dokmak
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, APHP, Hôpital Beaujon, DMU DIGEST, 100 Boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110, Clichy, France.
- Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jia B, Zhou J. Liver round-ligament retraction method in LPD: A technical note. Asian J Surg 2023; 46:5944-5945. [PMID: 37714785 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.08.228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Binyang Jia
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450003, China
| | - Jinxue Zhou
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450003, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lee S, Varghese C, Fung M, Patel B, Pandanaboyana S, Dasari BVM. Systematic review and meta-analysis of cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open pancreatic resections. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:306. [PMID: 37572127 PMCID: PMC10423165 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03017-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The systematic review is aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and open distal pancreatectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHOD The MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, and clinical trial registries were systematically searched using the PRISMA framework. Studies of adults aged ≥ 18 year comparing laparoscopic and/or robotic versus open DP and/or PD that reported cost of operation or index admission, and cost-effectiveness outcomes were included. The risk of bias of non-randomised studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, while the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool was used for randomised studies. Standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for continuous variables. RESULTS Twenty-two studies (152,651 patients) were included in the systematic review and 15 studies in the meta-analysis (3 RCTs; 3 case-controlled; 9 retrospective studies). Of these, 1845 patients underwent MIS (1686 laparoscopic and 159 robotic) and 150,806 patients open surgery. The cost of surgical procedure (SMD 0.89; 95% CI 0.35 to 1.43; I2 = 91%; P = 0.001), equipment (SMD 3.73; 95% CI 1.55 to 5.91; I2 = 98%; P = 0.0008), and operating room occupation (SMD 1.17, 95% CI 0.11 to 2.24; I2 = 95%; P = 0.03) was higher with MIS. However, overall index hospitalisation costs trended lower with MIS (SMD - 0.13; 95% CI - 0.35 to 0.06; I2 = 80%; P = 0.17). There was significant heterogeneity among the studies. CONCLUSION Minimally invasive major pancreatic surgery entailed higher intraoperative but similar overall index hospitalisation costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suhyun Lee
- University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Chris Varghese
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | - Bijendra Patel
- Institute of Cancer, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
- Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Sanjay Pandanaboyana
- HPB and Transplant Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Bobby V M Dasari
- Department of HBP and Liver Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Liu JB, Tam V, Zenati MS, Schwartz D, Ali A, Low CA, Smith LJ, Zeh HJ, Zureikat AH, Hogg ME. Association of robotic approach with patient-reported outcomes after pancreatectomy: a prospective cohort study. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:1659-1667. [PMID: 35568654 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic-assisted pancreatectomy continues to proliferate despite limited evidence supporting its benefits from the patient's perspective. We compared patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between patients undergoing robotic and open pancreatectomies. METHODS PROs, measured with the FACT-Hep, FACT-G, and HCS, were assessed in the immediate postoperative (i.e., preoperative to discharge) and recovery (i.e., discharge to three months postoperative) periods. Linear mixed models estimated the association of operative approach on PROs. Minimally important differences (MIDs) were also considered. RESULTS Among 139 patients, 105 (75.5%) underwent robotic pancreatectomies. Compared to those who underwent open operations, those who underwent robotic operations experienced worse FACT-Hep scores that were both statistically and clinically significant (mean difference [MD] 8.6 points, 95% CI 1.0-16.3). Declines in FACT-G (MD 4.3, 95% CI -1.0 to 9.6) and HCS (MD 4.3, 95% CI 0.8-7.9) scores appeared to contribute equally in both operative approaches to the decline in total FACT-Hep score. Patients who underwent robotic versus open operations both statistically and clinically significantly improved due to improvements in HCS (MD 6.1, 95% CI 2.3-9.9) but not in FACT-G (MD 1.2, 95% CI - 5.1-7.4). CONCLUSION The robotic approach to pancreas surgery might offer, from the patient's perspective, greater improvement in symptoms over the open approach by three months postoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason B Liu
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Vernissia Tam
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mazen S Zenati
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Danielle Schwartz
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Areej Ali
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Carissa A Low
- Departments of Medicine and Psychology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Lillian J Smith
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Herbert J Zeh
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Melissa E Hogg
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Complications and chemotherapy have little impact on postoperative quality of life after pancreaticoduodenectomy - a cohort study. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:1464-1473. [PMID: 35410782 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the poor prognosis of pancreatic cancer and the high rate of postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy, it is important to evaluate how the operation affects patients' quality of life. METHODS This single-centre study included all patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy from 2006 to 2016. Quality of life was measured with two questionnaires preoperatively, and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Comparisons between groups were made using a linear mixed models analysis. RESULTS Of 279 patients planned for pancreaticoduodenectomy, 245 underwent the operation. The postoperative response rates were all 80% or more. Differences were found in one domain between the early and late time periods and three domains between patients receiving and not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. No significant differences were found between patients with and without severe postoperative complications. However, the demographic variables of age group, sex, preoperative diabetes and smoking all exerted a significant impact on postoperative quality of life. CONCLUSION While little or no impact was shown for the factors of postoperative complications, time period and adjuvant chemotherapy, demographic data, such as age, sex, preoperative diabetes and smoking, had considerable impacts on postoperative quality of life after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Collapse
|
8
|
Moris D, Rushing C, McCracken E, Shah KN, Zani S, Perez A, Allen PJ, Niedzwiecki D, Fish LJ, Blazer DG. Quality of Life Associated with Open vs Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Prospective Pilot Study. J Am Coll Surg 2022; 234:632-644. [PMID: 35290283 PMCID: PMC10166568 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This prospective study was designed to compare quality of life (QoL) among patients who underwent open (O-PD) vs minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MI-PD), using a combination of validated qualitative and quantitative methodologies. STUDY DESIGN From 2017 to 2019, patients scheduled for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) were enrolled and presented with Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary surveys preoperatively, before discharge, at first postoperative visit and approximately 3 to 4 months after operation ("3 months"). Longitudinal plots of median QoL scores were used to illustrate change in each score over time. In a subset of patients, content analysis of semistructured interviews at postoperative time points (1.5 to 6 months after operation) was conducted. RESULTS Among 56 patients who underwent PD, 33 had an O-PD (58.9%). Physical and functional scores decreased in the postoperative period but returned to baseline by 3 months. No significant differences were found in any domains of QoL at baseline and in the postoperative period between patients who underwent O-PD and MI-PD. Qualitative findings were concordant with quantitative data (n = 14). Patients with O-PD and MI-PD reported similar experiences with complications, pain, and wound healing in the postoperative period. Approximately half the patients in both groups reported "returning to normal" in the 6-month postoperative period. A total of 4 patients reported significant long-term issues with physical and functional well-being. CONCLUSIONS Using a novel combination of qualitative and quantitative analyses in patients undergoing PD, we found no association between operative approach and QoL in patients who underwent O-PD vs MI-PD. Given the increasing use of minimally invasive techniques for PD and the steep learning curve associated with these techniques, continued assessment of patient benefit is critical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Moris
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Christel Rushing
- Duke Cancer Institute-Biostatistics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Emily McCracken
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kevin N. Shah
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Sabino Zani
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Alexander Perez
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Peter J. Allen
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Duke Cancer Institute-Biostatistics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Laura J. Fish
- Duke Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Dan G. Blazer
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jin J, Shi Y, Chen M, Qian J, Qin K, Wang Z, Chen W, Jin W, Lu F, Li Z, Wu Z, Jian L, Han B, Liang X, Sun C, Wu Z, Mou Y, Yin X, Huang H, Chen H, Gemenetzis G, Deng X, Peng C, Shen B. Robotic versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic and Periampullary Tumors (PORTAL): a study protocol for a multicenter phase III non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. Trials 2021; 22:954. [PMID: 34961558 PMCID: PMC8711152 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05939-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatoduodenectomy is a complex and challenging procedure that requires meticulous tissue dissection and proficient suturing skills. Minimally invasive surgery with the utilization of robotic platforms has demonstrated advantages in perioperative patient outcomes in retrospective studies. The development of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) in specific has progressed significantly, since first reported in 2003, and high-volume centers in pancreatic surgery are reporting large patient series with improved pain management and reduced length of stay. However, prospective studies to assess objectively the feasibility and safety of RPD compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) are currently lacking. METHODS/DESIGN The PORTAL trial is a multicenter randomized controlled, patient-blinded, parallel-group, phase III non-inferiority trial performed in seven high-volume centers for pancreatic and robotic surgery in China (> 20 RPD and > 100 OPD annually in each participating center). The trial is designed to enroll and randomly assign 244 patients with an indication for elective pancreatoduodenectomy for malignant periampullary and pancreatic lesions, as well as premalignant and symptomatic benign periampullary and pancreatic disease. The primary outcome is time to functional recovery postoperatively, measured in days. Secondary outcomes include postoperative morbidity and mortality, as well as perioperative costs. A sub-cohort of 128 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) will also be compared to assess the percentage of patients who undergo postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy within 8 weeks, in each arm. Secondary outcomes in this cohort will include patterns of disease recurrence, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival. DISCUSSION The PORTAL trial is designed to assess the feasibility and safety of RPD compared to OPD, in terms of functional recovery as described previously. Additionally, this trial will explore whether RPD allows increased access to postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, in a sub-cohort of patients with PDAC. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04400357 . Registered on May 22, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiabin Jin
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yusheng Shi
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Mengmin Chen
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianfeng Qian
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Kai Qin
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhen Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shanxi Province, China
| | - Wei Chen
- Department of Pancreaticobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Weiwei Jin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Fengchun Lu
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Zheyong Li
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Zehua Wu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China
| | - Li Jian
- Clinical Research Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Bing Han
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China
| | - Xiao Liang
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Chuandong Sun
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China
| | - Zheng Wu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shanxi Province, China
| | - Yiping Mou
- Department of Gastroenterology and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Xiaoyu Yin
- Department of Pancreaticobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Heguang Huang
- Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Hao Chen
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Georgios Gemenetzis
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
- Department of Pancreatobiliary Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
| | - Xiaxing Deng
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
| | - Chenghong Peng
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
| | - Baiyong Shen
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Korrel M, Roelofs A, van Hilst J, Busch OR, Daams F, Festen S, Groot Koerkamp B, Klaase J, Luyer MD, van Oijen MG, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Besselink MG. Long-Term Quality of Life after Minimally Invasive vs Open Distal Pancreatectomy in the LEOPARD Randomized Trial. J Am Coll Surg 2021; 233:730-739.e9. [PMID: 34530127 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.08.687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Revised: 08/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) shortens time to functional recovery and improves 30-day quality of life (QoL), as compared with open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) for nonmalignant disease. The impact of MIDP on QoL, cosmetic satisfaction, and overall major complications beyond 1-year follow-up is currently unknown. STUDY DESIGN The Minimally Invasive Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy (LEOPARD) trial randomized 108 patients to MIDP (laparoscopic or robotic) or ODP in 14 Dutch centers (April 2015 to March 2017). The primary outcome measure of this study was quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), as assessed with the EQ-5D. QoL was assessed using subscales of the EORTC QLQ-C30, PAN-26, and a body image questionnaire. The latter included a cosmetic satisfaction score (range 3-24), and a body image score (range 5-20). Differences between MIDP and ODP for QALYs, generic, and disease-specific QoL and body image were analyzed. Missing QoL data were imputed using multiple imputation. RESULTS In total, 84 patients were alive, with a median follow-up of 44 months; 62 of these patients (74%) completed the questionnaires (27 MIDP, 35 ODP). There was no significant difference in QALYs between the 2 groups (mean score 2.34 vs 2.46 years, p = 0.63), nor on the QoL subscales. Significant overall change in EQ-5D health utilities were found for both groups over time (p < 0.001). Patients in the MIDP group scored higher on cosmetic satisfaction (21 vs 14, p = 0.049). No differences between the 2 groups were observed for clinical outcomes such as major complications, readmissions, and incisional hernias. CONCLUSIONS More than 3 years after distal pancreatectomy, no improvement in QALYs and overall QoL was seen after MIDP, whereas cosmetic satisfaction was higher after MIDP as compared with ODP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten Korrel
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anne Roelofs
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jony van Hilst
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Freek Daams
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Joost Klaase
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Misha D Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn G van Oijen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Louie AD, Nwaiwu CA, Rozenberg J, Banerjee D, Lee GJ, Senthoor D, Miner TJ. Providing Appropriate Pancreatic Cancer Care for People Experiencing Homelessness: A Surgical Perspective. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2021; 41:1-9. [PMID: 33929879 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_100027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
People experiencing homelessness are particularly vulnerable when diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. Patients with lower socioeconomic status have worse outcomes from pancreatic cancer as the result of disparities in access to treatment and barriers to navigation of the health care system. Patients with lower socioeconomic status, or who are vulnerably housed, are less likely to receive surgical treatment even when it is recommended by National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. This disparity in access to surgical care explains much of the gap in pancreatic cancer outcomes. There are many factors that contribute to this disparity in surgical management of pancreatic cancer in people experiencing homelessness. These include a lack of reliable transportation, feeling unwelcome in the medical setting, a lack of primary care and health insurance, and implicit biases of health care providers, including racial bias. Solutions that focus on rectifying these problems include utilizing patient navigators, addressing implicit biases of all health care providers and staff, creating an environment that caters to the needs of patients experiencing homelessness, and improving their access to insurance and regional support networks. Implementing these potential solutions all the way from the individual provider to national safety nets could improve outcomes for patients with pancreatic cancer who are experiencing homelessness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna D Louie
- Department of Surgery, Lifespan Health System, and Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.,Cancer Center at Brown University, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI
| | - Chibueze A Nwaiwu
- Department of Surgery, Lifespan Health System, and Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.,Supporting Underrepresented Research to Generate Equity (SURGE) Lab Collaborators, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI
| | - Julia Rozenberg
- Department of Surgery, Lifespan Health System, and Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI
| | - Debolina Banerjee
- Department of Surgery, Lifespan Health System, and Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI
| | - Gillian J Lee
- Department of Surgery, Lifespan Health System, and Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI
| | - Dewahar Senthoor
- Department of Surgery, Lifespan Health System, and Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI
| | - Thomas J Miner
- Department of Surgery, Lifespan Health System, and Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.,Cancer Center at Brown University, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Flick KF, Schmidt CM, Colgate CL, Yip-Schneider MT, Sublette CM, Maatman TK, Soufi M, Ceppa EP, House MG, Zyromski NJ, Nakeeb A. Preoperative Nomogram Predicts Non-home Discharge in Patients Undergoing Pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 25:1253-1260. [PMID: 32583325 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-020-04689-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2020] [Accepted: 06/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy, non-home discharge is common and often results in an unnecessary delay in hospital discharge. This study aimed to develop and validate a preoperative prediction model to identify patients with a high likelihood of non-home discharge following pancreatoduodenectomy. METHODS Patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy from 2013 to 2018 were identified using an institutional database. Patients were categorized according to discharge location (home vs. non-home). Preoperative risk factors, including social determinants of health associated with non-home discharge, were identified using Pearson's chi-squared test and then included in a multiple logistic regression model. A training cohort composed of 80% of the sampled patients was used to create the prediction model, and validation carried out using the remaining 20%. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. RESULTS Seven hundred sixty-six pancreatoduodenectomy patients met the study criteria for inclusion in the analysis (non-home, 126; home, 640). Independent predictors of non-home discharge on multivariable analysis were age, marital status, mental health diagnosis, functional health status, dyspnea, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The prediction model was then used to generate a nomogram to predict likelihood of non-home discharge. The training and validation cohorts demonstrated comparable performances with an identical area under the curve (0.81) and an accuracy of 84%. CONCLUSION A prediction model to reliably assess the likelihood of non-home discharge after pancreatoduodenectomy was developed and validated in the present study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katelyn F Flick
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - C Max Schmidt
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
- Department of Biochemistry/Molecular Biology, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
- Walther Oncology Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
- Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
- Indiana University Health Pancreatic Cyst and Cancer Early Detection Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| | - Cameron L Colgate
- Center for Outcomes Research in Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Michele T Yip-Schneider
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Walther Oncology Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Indiana University Health Pancreatic Cyst and Cancer Early Detection Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | - Thomas K Maatman
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Mazhar Soufi
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Eugene P Ceppa
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Indiana University Health Pancreatic Cyst and Cancer Early Detection Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Michael G House
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Nicholas J Zyromski
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Attila Nakeeb
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Shaw K, Thomas AS, Rosario VL, Sugahara KN, Schrope BA, Chabot JA, Genkinger JM, Kwon W, Kluger MD. Long-term quality of life and global health following pancreatic surgery for benign and malignant pathologies. Surgery 2021; 170:917-924. [PMID: 33892953 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.03.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While the frequency of pancreatic operations are increasing, understanding quality of life is still insufficient. The aim was to evaluate global health and quality of life of long-term survivors from a range of pancreatic operations using internationally validated instruments. METHODS Patients surviving longer than 5 years after pancreatic operations were surveyed using the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Cancer-30 and Pancreatic Cancer-26 modules. Variables were analyzed according to demographic and clinical features. RESULTS Eighty patients completed questionnaires. The median follow-up was 9.3 years from the time of operation. The mean scores of global health status/quality of life, physical function, role function, emotional function, cognitive function, and social functioning were 73.9, 83.7, 84.6, 81.1, 80.2, and 86.3, respectively. The participants' reported quality of life was comparable or better than the general United States population. The summary score, which was defined as weighted average of function and symptom scores (excluding global health status/quality of life and financial impact scores), showed significant differences according to the level of education (70.1 no college vs 85.2 college and 85.7 grad school, P = .049), operation type (79.9 pancreatoduodenectomy vs 91.1 total, P = .043), additional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (77.3 vs 86.0, P = .029), and additional abdominal operations related to the primary operation (79.0 vs 86.6, P = .026). CONCLUSION Long-term survivors of pancreatectomy had comparable or better global health status/quality of life, function scale, and lower symptom scores than the general population of the United States, though persistent gastrointestinal symptoms are common. These findings should help inform patients of the long-term consequences of pancreatectomy, so they can make better decisions especially when considering prophylactic operations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlin Shaw
- Division of GI/Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY. https://twitter.com/KaitlinShawMPH
| | - Alexander S Thomas
- Division of GI/Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Vilma L Rosario
- Division of GI/Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Kazuki N Sugahara
- Division of GI/Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Beth A Schrope
- Division of GI/Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - John A Chabot
- Division of GI/Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Jeanine M Genkinger
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Wooil Kwon
- Division of GI/Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY; Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Michael D Kluger
- Division of GI/Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY. https://twitter.com/drkluger
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Shaw K, Thomas AS, Rosario V, Kwon W, Schrope BA, Sugahara K, Chabot JA, Genkinger JM, Kluger MD. Long term quality of life amongst pancreatectomy patients with diabetes mellitus. Pancreatology 2021; 21:501-508. [PMID: 33509685 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2021.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Revised: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatogenic diabetes is common after pancreatectomy, and the impact on quality of life (QOL) is poorly understood. The objective of this study was to investigate QOL between diabetic and non-diabetic patients at least five years after pancreatectomy. METHODS Patients were recruited from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Participants were administered the Audit of Diabetes-Dependent Quality of Life (ADDQOL). Quality of life was compared between diabetics and non-diabetics using validated European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaires. RESULTS 80 individuals completed surveys. 55% were female, 80% non-Hispanic white, 44% underwent Whipple, 48% were cystic neoplasms and 39% were adenocarcinoma. Diabetic patients (42.5%) reported comparable EORTC QLQ-C30 and Pan26 scores to non-diabetic patients. Pre-operative diabetic patients reported more dyspnea (p = 0.02) and greater pain (p = 0.02) than new-onset diabetics. Diabetic patients reported an overall ADDQOL quality of life score 'very good' (IQR: excellent, good) though felt life would be much better without diabetes (IQR: very much better, little better). While operation type was not influential, patients diagnosed with cystic neoplasms were almost twice as likely as those with other pathologies to report that life would be much better without diabetes (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION At a median of 9.3 years from pancreatic surgery, ADDQoL scores of patients were similar to cohorts of non-pancreatogenic diabetics in the general population. Patients without cancer were more likely to report that diabetes affected their overall QOL, regardless of operation. This study provides nuanced understanding of long-term QOL to improve the informed consent process and post-operative long-term care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlin Shaw
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Ave, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| | - Alexander S Thomas
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Ave, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| | - Vilma Rosario
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Ave, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| | - Wooil Kwon
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Ave, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| | - Beth A Schrope
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Ave, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| | - Kazuki Sugahara
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Ave, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| | - John A Chabot
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Ave, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| | - Jeanine M Genkinger
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Ave, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| | - Michael D Kluger
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Ave, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Watanabe G, Ishizawa T, Yamamoto S, Kokudo T, Nishioka Y, Ichida A, Akamatsu N, Kaneko J, Arita J, Hasegawa K. Impact of Abdominal Incision Type on Postoperative Pain and Quality of Life Following Hepatectomy. World J Surg 2021; 45:1887-1896. [PMID: 33598727 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-021-05992-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this prospective study was to analyze the impact of abdominal incision type on postoperative pain and quality of life (QOL) in hepatectomy. METHODS In patients undergoing hepatectomy by open, hybrid, or pure laparoscopic approaches, we classified abdominal incisions as: pure laparoscopic (LAP), midline (MID), J-shaped (J), and J-shaped incision plus thoracotomy (TRC). Postoperative pain was measured on postoperative day (POD) 3, 7, 30, and 90 using a visual analog scale (VAS). QOL was evaluated using the short-form-36 questionnaire preoperatively and on POD 30 and 90. RESULTS We categorized 165 patients into LAP (n = 9, 5%), MID (n = 21, 13%), J (n = 95, 58%), and TRC (n = 40, 24%) groups. Median VAS scores on PODs 3/7/30/90 were: LAP, 27.5/7.5/10/10; MID, 30/10/15/5; J, 50/27.5/20/10, and TRC, 50/30/30/19. The J and TRC groups had significantly higher VAS scores vs. MID on PODs 3 and 7; the LAP and MID groups did not differ significantly. No significant positive correlations were observed between incision length and postoperative VAS, when we stratified patients into two groups according to the presence or absence of a transverse incision. Physical QOL summary scores did not return to preoperative levels even on POD 90, in patients with an additional transverse incision. Mental QOL summary scores worsened with postoperative complications rather than with abdominal incision type. CONCLUSIONS Transverse incisions, rather than incision length, led to worse midline incision pain and poorer QOL recovery post-hepatectomy. A hybrid approach may be a considerable option when pure laparoscopic hepatectomy is technically difficult. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (registration number: UMIN000017467; http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Genki Watanabe
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Takeaki Ishizawa
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Satoshi Yamamoto
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Takashi Kokudo
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Yujiro Nishioka
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Akihiko Ichida
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Nobuhisa Akamatsu
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Junichi Kaneko
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Junichi Arita
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Hasegawa
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Liu R, Cai Y, Cai H, Lan Y, Meng L, Li Y, Peng B. Dynamic prediction for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula: a novel prediction model for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. BMC Surg 2021; 21:7. [PMID: 33397337 PMCID: PMC7784027 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-020-00968-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background With the recent emerge of dynamic prediction model on the use of diabetes, cardiovascular diseases and renal failure, and its advantage of providing timely predicted results according to the fluctuation of the condition of the patients, we aim to develop a dynamic prediction model with its corresponding risk assessment chart for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy by combining baseline factors and postoperative time-relevant drainage fluid amylase level and C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio. Methods We collected data of 251 patients undergoing LPD at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2016 to April 2019. We extracted preoperative and intraoperative baseline factors and time-window of postoperative drainage fluid amylase and C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio relevant to clinically relevant pancreatic fistula by performing univariate and multivariate analyses, developing a time-relevant logistic model with the evaluation of its discrimination ability. We also established a risk assessment chart in each time-point. Results The proportion of the patients who developed clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy was 7.6% (19/251); preoperative albumin and creatine levels, as well as drainage fluid amylase and C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio on postoperative days 2, 3, and 5, were the independent risk factors for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula. The cut-off points of the prediction value of each time-relevant logistic model were 14.0% (sensitivity: 81.9%, specificity: 86.5%), 8.3% (sensitivity: 85.7%, specificity: 79.1%), and 7.4% (sensitivity: 76.9%, specificity: 85.9%) on postoperative days 2, 3, and 5, respectively, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.866 (95% CI 0.737–0.996), 0.896 (95% CI 0.814–0.978), and 0.888 (95% CI 0.806–0.971), respectively. Conclusions The dynamic prediction model for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula has a good to very good discriminative ability and predictive accuracy. Patients whose predictive values were above 14.0%, 8.3%, and 7.5% on postoperative days 2, 3, and 5 would be very likely to develop clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Runwen Liu
- West China Clinical Medicine Academy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yunqiang Cai
- Department of General Surgery, Chengdu Shangjin Nanfu Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - He Cai
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yajia Lan
- West China School of Public Health, SCU, Chengdu, China
| | - Lingwei Meng
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China.,Department of General Surgery, Chengdu Shangjin Nanfu Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Yongbin Li
- Department of General Surgery, Chengdu Shangjin Nanfu Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Bing Peng
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China. .,Department of General Surgery, Chengdu Shangjin Nanfu Hospital, Chengdu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Frumovitz M, Obermair A, Coleman RL, Pareja R, Lopez A, Ribero R, Isla D, Rendon G, Bernardini MQ, Buda A, Moretti-Marquez R, Zevallos A, Vieira MA, Zhu T, Land RP, Nicklin J, Asher R, Robledo KP, Gebski V, Ramirez PT. Quality of life in patients with cervical cancer after open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (LACC): a secondary outcome of a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21:851-860. [PMID: 32502445 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30081-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Revised: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the phase 3 LACC trial and a subsequent population-level review, minimally invasive radical hysterectomy was shown to be associated with worse disease-free survival and higher recurrence rates than was open radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer. Here, we report the results of a secondary endpoint, quality of life, of the LACC trial. METHODS The LACC trial was a randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial done in 33 centres worldwide. Eligible participants were women aged 18 years or older with International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IA1 with lymphovascular space invasion, IA2, or IB1 adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, who were scheduled to have a type 2 or 3 radical hysterectomy. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive open or minimally invasive radical hysterectomy. Randomisation was done centrally using a computerised minimisation program, stratified by centre, disease stage according to FIGO guidelines, and age. Neither participants nor investigators were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint of the LACC trial was disease-free survival at 4·5 years, and quality of life was a secondary endpoint. Eligible patients completed validated quality-of-life and symptom assessments (12-item Short Form Health Survey [SF-12], Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cervical [FACT-Cx], EuroQoL-5D [EQ-5D], and MD Anderson Symptom Inventory [MDASI]) before surgery and at 1 and 6 weeks and 3 and 6 months after surgery (FACT-Cx was also completed at additional timepoints up to 54 months after surgery). Differences in quality of life over time between treatment groups were assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population, which included all patients who had surgery and completed at least one baseline (pretreatment) and one follow-up (at any timepoint after surgery) questionnaire, using generalised estimating equations. The LACC trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00614211. FINDINGS Between Jan 31, 2008, and June 22, 2017, 631 patients were enrolled; 312 assigned to the open surgery group and 319 assigned to the minimally invasive surgery group. 496 (79%) of 631 patients had surgery completed at least one baseline and one follow-up quality-of-life survey and were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (244 [78%] of 312 patients in the open surgery group and 252 [79%] of 319 participants in the minimally invasive surgery group). Median follow-up was 3·0 years (IQR 1·7-4·5). At baseline, no differences in the mean FACT-Cx total score were identified between the open surgery (129·3 [SD 18·8]) and minimally invasive surgery groups (129·8 [19·8]). No differences in mean FACT-Cx total scores were identified between the groups 6 weeks after surgery (128·7 [SD 19·9] in the open surgery group vs 130·0 [19·8] in the minimally invasive surgery group) or 3 months after surgery (132·0 [21·7] vs 133·0 [22·1]). INTERPRETATION Since recurrence rates are higher and disease-free survival is lower for minimally invasive radical hysterectomy than for open surgery, and postoperative quality of life is similar between the treatment groups, gynaecological oncologists should recommend open radical hysterectomy for patients with early stage cervical cancer. FUNDING MD Anderson Cancer Center and Medtronic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Frumovitz
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Andreas Obermair
- Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Robert L Coleman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rene Pareja
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia; Clínica de Oncología Astorga, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Aldo Lopez
- Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru
| | | | - David Isla
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Gabriel Rendon
- Instituto de Cancerologia-Las Americas, Medellín, Colombia
| | | | | | - Renato Moretti-Marquez
- Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Centro de Oncologia e Hematologia, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | - Tao Zhu
- Institute of Cancer Research and Basic Medical Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China
| | - Russell P Land
- School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - James Nicklin
- School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Rebecca Asher
- National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kristy P Robledo
- National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Val Gebski
- National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Pedro T Ramirez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Belyaev O, Bösch F, Brunner M, Müller-Debus CF, Radulova-Mauersberger O, Wellner UF, Grützmann R, Keck T, Werner J, Witzigmann H, Uhl W. Von der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie konsentierte Operationsindikationen beim duktalen Pankreasadenokarzinom. Zentralbl Chir 2020; 145:354-364. [DOI: 10.1055/a-1161-9501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund Die Zahl der Operationen für Pankreaskarzinome in Deutschland nimmt kontinuierlich zu. Das entspricht der steigenden Inzidenz dieser Erkrankung in der Bevölkerung. Diese Übersichtsarbeit fasst die evidenzbasierten aktuellen Operationsindikationen bei Patienten mit Pankreaskarzinom zusammen.
Methode Als DGAV-Initiative wurde eine Arbeitsgruppe von Pankreasexperten eingerichtet. Diese formulierte konkrete Schlüsselfragen nach dem PICO-Schema, führte eine systematische Literatursuche in Medline und Cochrane Library (1989 – 2019) zu Studien und Leitlinien mit Aussagen zu Operationsindikationen bei Pankreaskarzinom durch und erstellte daraus resultierende evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen. Diese wurden innerhalb der CALGP im Rahmen eines Delphi-Verfahrens abgestimmt.
Ergebnisse Die Operationsindikation bei Pankreaskarzinom soll im Tumorboard von erfahrenen Pankreaschirurgen leitliniengerecht und unter Berücksichtigung der individuellen Besonderheiten der Patienten gestellt werden. Fortgeschrittene Infiltration der großen Viszeralgefäße, multiple Fernmetastasen und schwere Komorbiditäten, die einen Eingriff in Vollnarkose verbieten, stellen die häufigsten Kontraindikationen zur Operation dar. Die Therapie von Borderline-resektablen und primär resektablen oligometastatischen Patienten sowie solchen mit sekundärer Resektabilität nach neoadjuvanter Behandlung soll bevorzugt an Zentren und im Rahmen von Studien erfolgen. Die Behandlung an Pankreaszentren reduziert die Mortalität und verbessert das Überleben. Die palliative Bypasschirurgie kann bei endoskopisch nicht therapierbaren Gallenwegs- und Duodenalobstruktionen indiziert sein. Bei diagnostischen Schwierigkeiten kann die Staging-Laparoskopie mit histologischer Sicherung
eingesetzt werden.
Schlussfolgerung Unabhängig von der Entwicklung erfolgversprechender multimodaler Behandlungskonzepte bleibt die chirurgische Resektion weiterhin der einzig kurative Therapieeinsatz. Wegen des hohen Anteils von primär fortgeschrittenen und metastasierten Pankreaskarzinomen spielt auch die palliative Chirurgie weiterhin eine wichtige Rolle in der komplexen Versorgung dieses Patientenkollektivs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orlin Belyaev
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Katholisches Klinikum Bochum, St. Josef-Hospital, Deutschland
| | - Florian Bösch
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Gefäß- und Transplantationschirurgie, Klinikum der Universität München, Deutschland
| | | | | | - Olga Radulova-Mauersberger
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Thoraxchirurgie, Städtisches Klinikum Dresden-Friedrichstadt, Deutschland
| | | | | | - Tobias Keck
- Klinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Deutschland
| | - Jens Werner
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Gefäß- und Transplantationschirurgie, Klinikum der Universität München, Deutschland
| | - Helmut Witzigmann
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Thoraxchirurgie, Städtisches Klinikum Dresden-Friedrichstadt, Deutschland
| | - Waldemar Uhl
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Katholisches Klinikum Bochum, St. Josef-Hospital, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wu J, Zhang G, Yao X, Xiang Y, Lin R, Yang Y, Zhang X. Achilles'heel of laparoscopic pancreatectomy: reconstruction of the remnant pancreas. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 14:527-537. [PMID: 32567383 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2020.1775582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Laparoscopic pancreatic reconstruction is a challenging procedure and is considered the Achilles' heel of laparoscopic pancreatectomy. Multiple techniques of laparoscopic pancreatic reconstruction have been reported, but the optimal technique remains unclear. AREAS COVERED This paper provides a brief introduction to the developmental status and major related complications of laparoscopic pancreatic reconstruction. We reviewed all published literature on the technology of laparoscopic pancreatic reconstruction within the last 5 years and herein discuss the advantages and disadvantages of different reconstruction methods. We also discuss several details of different reconstruction techniques in terms of their significance to the operation and complications. EXPERT OPINION No individual method of laparoscopic pancreatic reconstruction is considered optimal for all conditions. The reconstruction strategy should be based on the surgeon's proficiency with laparoscopic technology and the patient's individual risk factors. Personalized methods of pancreatic reconstruction may more effectively reduce morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiacheng Wu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Second Hospital of Jilin University , 130041, Changchun, China, East Asia.,Jilin Engineering Laboratory for Translational Medicine of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases , 130041, Changchun, China, East Asia
| | - Guofeng Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Second Hospital of Jilin University , 130041, Changchun, China, East Asia
| | - Xiaoxiao Yao
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Second Hospital of Jilin University , 130041, Changchun, China, East Asia
| | - Yien Xiang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Second Hospital of Jilin University , 130041, Changchun, China, East Asia.,Jilin Engineering Laboratory for Translational Medicine of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases , 130041, Changchun, China, East Asia
| | - Ruixin Lin
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Second Hospital of Jilin University , 130041, Changchun, China, East Asia
| | - Yongsheng Yang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Second Hospital of Jilin University , 130041, Changchun, China, East Asia
| | - Xuewen Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Second Hospital of Jilin University , 130041, Changchun, China, East Asia.,Jilin Engineering Laboratory for Translational Medicine of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases , 130041, Changchun, China, East Asia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Song HB. Possible involvement of HSP70 in pancreatic cancer cell proliferation after heat exposure and impact on RFA postoperative patient prognosis. Biochem Biophys Rep 2019; 20:100700. [PMID: 31867446 PMCID: PMC6895569 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2019.100700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2019] [Revised: 10/19/2019] [Accepted: 10/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose As an alleviative treatment measured in patients with unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) needed more clinical data to prove its advantages and to explore limitations in its utilization. This study was determined to observe the efficacy of RFA, and to explore its impact on perioperative periphery carcinoma as well as the normal pancreatic tissues. Methods Clinical data of 32 patients with pancreatic cancer accepted RFA surgery were collected. Followed up patients' pain degree and the changes in serum tumor markers CA19-9 and CA 242 before and after surgery. Ex vivo, gave human pancreatic cancer cell line PANC-1 heat treatment to simulate the heat exposure condition periphery carcinoma was experienced during RFA surgery, and to observe the proliferation rate and HSP70 expression change compared with control group. Results Of the 32 patients, 1 died of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and 29 survived for more than 5 months, 2 of which for more than 16 months. The average CA19-9 and CA 242 levels of the patients were significantly decreased in 3 months after surgery (t = 9.873, 5.978, P < 0.001). During in vitro experiments, the proliferation rate of PANC-1 cells after heating was significantly increased, accompanied with the increased HSP70 expression. The addition of HSP70 inhibitor can inhibit the rise of proliferation after heat therapy. Conclusion Utilizing RFA treat patients with unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer, could effectively relieve the pain, decline jaundice, and deduce tumor marker levels significantly. However, it failed to extend the long-term survival rate of the patients significantly. This study found that a higher proliferative rate accompanied with a higher HSP70 expression level were observed on in vitro cultured pancreatic carcinoma cells after heat treatment, which could be altered by HSP70 inhibitor. And these findings indicated that the heat exposure might impact periphery carcinoma during RFA surgery and HSP70 might play an important role in patients' prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui-Bin Song
- The Third Affiliated Hospital of Qiqihar Medical College, 27 Taishun Street, Tiefeng District, Qiqihar, Heilongjiang province, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Torphy RJ, Gleisner A. ASO Author Reflections: Can Minimally Invasive Techniques Improve Quality of Life following Pancreatic Resection? Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:845-846. [PMID: 31773518 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07953-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Torphy
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Ana Gleisner
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|