1
|
Lautenschlaeger S, Dumke C, Exeli L, Hauswald H, Engenhart-Cabillic R, Eberle F. Treatment of primary or recurrent non-resectable pancreatic cancer with proton beam irradiation combined with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2023; 199:982-991. [PMID: 37428207 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02106-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic cancer accounts for around 4.6% of cancers deaths worldwide per year. Despite many advances in treatment regimes, the prognosis is still poor. Only 20% of tumors are primarily resectable. Recurrences-both with distant metastasis as well as locoregional-are frequent. For patients with primary nonresectable localized disease or localized recurrences, we offered chemoradiation to achieve local control over a long period of time. We here report our results on combined chemoradiation of pancreatic tumors and local recurrences using proton beam therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We report on 25 patients with localized nonresectable pancreatic cancer (15 patients) or local recurrent disease (10 patients). All patients were treated with combined proton radiochemotherapy. Overall survival, progression-free survival, local control, and treatment-related toxicity were analyzed using statistically methods. RESULTS Median RT dose was 54.0 Gy (RBE) for proton irradiation. The toxicity of treatment was acceptable. Four CTCAE grade III and IV adverse events (bone marrow disfunction, gastrointestinal [GI] disorders, stent dislocation, myocardial infarction) were recorded during or directly after the end of radiotherapy; two of them were related to combined chemoradiation (bone marrow disfunction, GI disorders). Six weeks after radiotherapy, one additional grade IV toxicity was reported (ileus, caused by peritoneal carcinomatosis, not treatment related). The median progression-free survival was 5.9 months and median overall survival was 11.0 months. The pretherapy CA19‑9 level was a statistically significant prognostic factor for enhanced overall survival. Local control at 6 months and 12 months were determined to be 86% and 80%, respectively. CONCLUSION Combined proton chemoradiation leads to high local control rates. Unfortunately, PFS and OS are driven by distant metastasis and were not improved compared to historical data and reports. With this in mind, enhanced chemotherapeutical regimes, in combination with local irradiation, should be evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Lautenschlaeger
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
- Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (MIT), Marburg, Germany.
| | - C Dumke
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (MIT), Marburg, Germany
| | - L Exeli
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (MIT), Marburg, Germany
| | - H Hauswald
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (MIT), Marburg, Germany
- RNS Gemeinschaftspraxis, St. Josefs-Hospital, Wiesbaden, Germany
- Klinik für Radio-Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - R Engenhart-Cabillic
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (MIT), Marburg, Germany
| | - F Eberle
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (MIT), Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McKay SC, Pathak S, Roberts KJ. Evaluation of post-operative surveillance strategies and surgeon perceptions and beliefs of surveillance for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in the UK. HPB (Oxford) 2023; 25:1247-1254. [PMID: 37357113 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite high rates of recurrence after surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) there is lack of standardised surveillance practices. We aimed to identify UK surveillance practice and interrogate surgeon beliefs around surveillance. METHODS A web-based survey was sent to all UK pancreatic units to assess surveillance practice for resected PDAC, factors influencing surveillance protocols, and perceptions and beliefs surrounding on current postoperative surveillance. RESULTS There was wide variation in reported practice between 40 consultant surgeons from 28 pancreatic units (100% unit response rate). 26% had standardised surveillance compared to 18% with no standardised practice. 16% individualised surveillance to the patient, and 40% reported differing practices between surgeons within units despite local surveillance protocols. 66% felt surveillance should be tailored to patient factors, and 58% to patient preference. There was a broad belief regarding a lack of robust evidence supporting surveillance making a trial necessary. Thematic analysis identified surveillance barriers, considerations for trial design, necessity for patient engagement and potential benefits of surveillance. DISCUSSION Wide variation in surveillance practice exists within and between units. A surveillance trial was deemed beneficial, however identified barriers potentially preclude a trial. Future work should assess acceptability for patients including impact on anxiety and quality-of-life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siobhan C McKay
- Liver and Pancreas Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham, UK; Department of Academic Surgery, University of Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Keith J Roberts
- Liver and Pancreas Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kobeissi JM, Simone CB, Lin H, Hilal L, Hajj C. Proton Therapy in the Management of Pancreatic Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:2789. [PMID: 35681769 PMCID: PMC9179382 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14112789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Revised: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy plays a central role in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. While generally shown to be feasible, proton irradiation, particularly when an ablative dose is planned, remains a challenge, especially due to tumor motion and the proximity to organs at risk, like the stomach, duodenum, and bowel. Clinically, standard doses of proton radiation treatment have not been shown to be statistically different from photon radiation treatment in terms of oncologic outcomes and toxicity rates as per non-randomized comparative studies. Fractionation schedules and concurrent chemotherapy combinations are yet to be optimized for proton therapy and are the subject of ongoing trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana M. Kobeissi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut 1107, Lebanon; (J.M.K.); (L.H.)
| | - Charles B. Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (C.B.S.II); (H.L.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10027, USA
| | - Haibo Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (C.B.S.II); (H.L.)
| | - Lara Hilal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut 1107, Lebanon; (J.M.K.); (L.H.)
| | - Carla Hajj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (C.B.S.II); (H.L.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10027, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Carbon ion radiotherapy as definitive treatment in locally recurrent pancreatic cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 198:378-387. [PMID: 34351449 PMCID: PMC8940823 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01827-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Data on management of locally recurrent pancreatic cancer (LRPC) after primary resection are limited. Recently, surprisingly high overall survival rates were reported after irradiation with carbon ions. Here, we report on our clinical experience using carbon ion radiotherapy as definitive treatment in LRPC at the Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT). Methods Between 2015 and 2019, we treated 13 patients with LRPC with carbon ions with a median total dose of 48 Gy (RBE) in 12 fractions using an active raster-scanning technique at a rotating gantry. No concomitant chemotherapy was administered. Overall survival, local control, and toxicity rates were evaluated 18 months after the last patient finished radiotherapy. Results With a median follow-up time of 9.5 months, one patient is still alive (8%). Median OS was 12.7 months. Ten patients (77%) developed distant metastases. Additionally, one local recurrence (8%) and two regional tumor recurrences (15%) were observed. The estimated 1‑year local control and locoregional control rates were 87.5% and 75%, respectively. During radiotherapy, we registered one gastrointestinal bleeding CTCAE grade III (8%) due to gastritis. The bleeding was sufficiently managed with conservative therapy. No further higher-grade acute or late toxicities were observed. Conclusion We demonstrate high local control rates in a rare cohort of LRPC patients treated with carbon ion radiotherapy. The observed median overall survival rate was not improved compared to historical in-house data using photon radiotherapy. This is likely due to a high rate of distant tumor progression, highlighting the necessity of additional chemotherapy.
Collapse
|
5
|
Ge JC, Tao M, Li L, Ma ZL, Jiang B, Yuan CH, Wang HY, Peng Y, Xiu DR. Nomogram and competing risk model to predict recurrence after curative surgical resection of PDAC. Pancreatology 2021; 21:S1424-3903(21)00149-6. [PMID: 34001437 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2021.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Revised: 04/25/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical resection remains the only potentially curative treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, a number of patients get disease recurred in a short time post-operation. Few studies have focused on the predictors of different recurrence patterns of PDAC. OBJECTIVE To try to establish and verify a nomogram to predict recurrence free survival (RFS) in PDAC patients, and to distinguish the risk factors of local recurrence first and distant metastasis first via competing risk model. METHODS Patients who underwent radical pancreatectomy for PDAC in our center from 2010 to 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. Kaplan-Meier methods and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify the clinicopathological predictors of recurrence post-operation. And then, a nomogram was constructed and validated. Competing risk regression model was used to compare the predictors between local recurrence group and distant metastasis group. RESULTS A total of 200 patients were included into the final analysis, and 153 patients got disease relapsed post-operation. CA19-9 level, vascular resection, tumor differentiation, lymph node ratio (LNR) and adjuvant chemotherapy were identified as independent risk factors for recurrence free survival (RFS) and incorporated into the nomogram. The C-index of the nomogram was 0.650. Competing risk model indicated that the status of lymph-node metastasis was significantly associated the patterns of first relapse. CONCLUSIONS Nomogram and competing risk model were constructed to quantify the risk of recurrence following surgery for PDAC. Our findings may be useful for predicting RFS and recurrence pattern in clinical work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia-Chen Ge
- Department of General Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Ming Tao
- Department of General Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Lei Li
- Department of General Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhao-Lai Ma
- Department of General Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Bin Jiang
- Department of General Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Chun-Hui Yuan
- Department of General Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Hang-Yan Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Ying Peng
- Department of General Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Dian-Rong Xiu
- Department of General Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Görte J, Beyreuther E, Danen EHJ, Cordes N. Comparative Proton and Photon Irradiation Combined with Pharmacological Inhibitors in 3D Pancreatic Cancer Cultures. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12113216. [PMID: 33142778 PMCID: PMC7692858 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12113216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2020] [Revised: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Due to higher precision and consequent sparing of normal tissue, pancreatic cancer patients might profit from proton beam radiotherapy, a treatment modality increasingly used. Since molecular data upon proton irradiation in comparison to standard photon radiotherapy are limited in pancreatic cancer, the aims of our study were to unravel differences in the effectiveness of photon versus proton irradiation and to exploit radiation type-specific molecular changes for radiosensitizing 3D PDAC cell cultures. Although protons showed a slightly higher effectiveness and a stronger induction of molecular alterations than photons, our results revealed a radiation-type independent sensitization of molecular-targeted agents selected according to the discovered molecular, radiation-induced alterations. Abstract Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly therapy-resistant tumor entity of unmet needs. Over the last decades, radiotherapy has been considered as an additional treatment modality to surgery and chemotherapy. Owing to radiosensitive abdominal organs, high-precision proton beam radiotherapy has been regarded as superior to photon radiotherapy. To further elucidate the potential of combination therapies, we employed a more physiological 3D, matrix-based cell culture model to assess tumoroid formation capacity after photon and proton irradiation. Additionally, we investigated proton- and photon-irradiation-induced phosphoproteomic changes for identifying clinically exploitable targets. Here, we show that proton irradiation elicits a higher efficacy to reduce 3D PDAC tumoroid formation and a greater extent of phosphoproteome alterations compared with photon irradiation. The targeting of proteins identified in the phosphoproteome that were uniquely altered by protons or photons failed to cause radiation-type-specific radiosensitization. Targeting DNA repair proteins associated with non-homologous endjoining, however, revealed a strong radiosensitizing potential independent of the radiation type. In conclusion, our findings suggest proton irradiation to be potentially more effective in PDAC than photons without additional efficacy when combined with DNA repair inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josephine Görte
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (J.G.); (E.B.)
- Institute of Radiooncology—OncoRay, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf, 01328 Dresden, Germany
| | - Elke Beyreuther
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (J.G.); (E.B.)
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf, 01328 Dresden, Germany
| | - Erik H. J. Danen
- Division of Drug Discovery and Safety, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, 2333CC Leiden, The Netherlands;
| | - Nils Cordes
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (J.G.); (E.B.)
- Institute of Radiooncology—OncoRay, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf, 01328 Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Dresden: German Cancer Research Center, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-351-458-7401; Fax: +49-351-458-7311
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Calvo FA, Krengli M, Asencio JM, Serrano J, Poortmans P, Roeder F, Krempien R, Hensley FW. ESTRO IORT Task Force/ACROP recommendations for intraoperative radiation therapy in unresected pancreatic cancer. Radiother Oncol 2020; 148:57-64. [PMID: 32339779 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.03.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) is a valuable component of multimodal treatment for localized pancreatic cancer. Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) is a very precise sub-component of RT that can intensify the irradiation effect for cancer involving an anatomically well-defined volume, generally delivered with electrons (IOERT). Unresectable disease categories benefit from dose-escalated chemoradiation strategies in the context of active systemic therapy and potential radical surgery. Prolonged preoperative treatment may act as a filter for selecting patients with occult resistant metastatic disease. Long-term survivors were observed among unresected patients treated with external beam RT and an IOERT boost (OS 6% at 3 years; 3% >5 years). Improvement of local control through higher RT doses has an impact on the survival of patients with a lower tendency towards disease spread. IOERT is a well-accepted asset in the clinical scenario (maturity and reproducibility of results, albeit of low official level of evidence) and extremely accurate in terms of dose-deposit characteristics and normal tissue sparing. It is a technique that can be integrated with systemic therapy and surgical progress. International guidelines (National Comprehensive Cancer Network or NCCN guidelines) currently recommend the use of IOERT in cases of close surgical margins and residual disease. We report the ESTRO/ACROP recommendations for performing IOERT in unresected pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felipe A Calvo
- Department of Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain; School of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Marco Krengli
- Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Translation Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Jose M Asencio
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Madrid, Spain; Facultad de Medicina, Univ. Complutense de Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Serrano
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), Madrid, Spain; Facultad de Medicina, Univ. Complutense de Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Falk Roeder
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, Landeskrankenhaus, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Robert Krempien
- Department of Radiotherapy, Helios Hospital Berlin-Buch, Germany
| | - Frank W Hensley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Xie T, Wang X, Li M, Tong T, Yu X, Zhou Z. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a radiomics nomogram outperforms clinical model and TNM staging for survival estimation after curative resection. Eur Radiol 2020; 30:2513-2524. [PMID: 32006171 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06600-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2019] [Revised: 11/15/2019] [Accepted: 11/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify a CT-based radiomics nomogram for survival prediction in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS A total of 220 patients (training cohort n = 147; validation cohort n = 73) with PDAC were enrolled. A total of 300 radiomics features were extracted from CT images. And the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm were applied to select features and develop a radiomics score (Rad-score). The radiomics nomogram was constructed by multivariate regression analysis. Nomogram discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness were evaluated. The association of the Rad-score and recurrence pattern in PDAC was evaluated. RESULTS The Rad-score was significantly associated with PDAC patient's disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (both p < 0.001 in two cohorts). Incorporating the Rad-score into the radiomics nomogram resulted in better performance of the survival prediction than that of the clinical model and TNM staging system. In addition, the radiomics nomogram exhibited good discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness in both the training and validation cohorts. There was no association between the Rad-score and recurrence pattern. CONCLUSIONS The radiomics nomogram integrating the Rad-score and clinical data provided better prognostic prediction in resected PDAC patients, which may hold great potential for guiding personalized care for these patients. The Rad-score was not a predictor of the recurrence pattern in resected PDAC patients. KEY POINTS • The Rad-score developed by CT radiomics features was significantly associated with PDAC patients' prognosis. • The radiomics nomogram integrating the Rad-score and clinical data has value to permit non-invasive, low-cost, and personalized evaluation of prognosis in PDAC patients. • The radiomics nomogram outperformed clinical model and the TNM staging system in terms of survival estimation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiansong Xie
- Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, No.270, Dongan Rd, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China
| | - Xuanyi Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Menglei Li
- Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, No.270, Dongan Rd, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China
| | - Tong Tong
- Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, No.270, Dongan Rd, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaoli Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhengrong Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China. .,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, No.270, Dongan Rd, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China. .,Department of Radiology, Minhang Branch of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|