Focused Ultrasound Surveillance of Lymph Nodes Following Lymphoscintigraphy Without Sentinel Node Biopsy: A Useful and Safe Strategy in Elderly or Frail Melanoma Patients

Ultrasound Surveillance in Melanoma Management: Bridging Diagnostic Promise with Real-World Adherence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound surveillance has become the new standard of care in stage III melanoma after the 2017 Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial II (MSLT-II) demonstrated non-inferior 3-year survival compared with complete lymph node dissection.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to quantify diagnostic performance and adherence rates of ultrasound surveillance for melanoma locoregional metastasis, offering insights into real-world applicability.

METHODS

Conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we systematically searched the Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from inception until 11 October 2023. All primary studies that reported data on the diagnostic performance or adherence rates to ultrasound surveillance in melanoma were included. R statistical software was used for data synthesis and analysis. Sensitivity and specificity were aggregated across studies using the meta-analytic method for diagnostic tests outlined by Rutter and Gatsonis. Adherence rates were calculated as the ratio of patients fully compliant to planned follow-up to those who were not.

RESULTS

A total of 36 studies including 18,273 patients were analysed, with a mean age of 56.6 years and a male-to-female ratio of 1:1.11. The median follow-up duration and frequency was 36 and 4 months, respectively. The pooled sensitivity of ultrasound examination was 0.879 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.878-0.879) and specificity was 0.969 (95% CI 0.968-0.970), representing a diagnostic odds ratio of 224.5 (95% CI 223.1-225.9). Ultrasound examination demonstrated a substantial improvement in absolute sensitivity over clinical examination alone, with a number needed to screen (NNS) of 2.95. The overall adherence rate was 77.0% (95% CI 76.0-78.1%), with significantly lower rates in the United States [US] (p <  0.001) and retrospective studies (p <  0.001).

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound is a powerful diagnostic tool for locoregional melanoma metastasis. However, the real applicability to surveillance programmes is limited by low adherence rates, especially in the US. Further studies should seek to address this adherence gap.

Impact of an Online Risk Calculator for Sentinel Node Positivity on Management of Patients with T1 and T2 Melanomas

BACKGROUND

Predicting which patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) T1-T2 melanomas will have a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) is challenging. Melanoma Institute Australia (MIA) developed an internationally validated SLN metastatic risk calculator. This study evaluated the nomogram's impact on T1-T2 melanoma patient management at MIA.

METHODS

SLN biopsy (SLNB) rates were compared for the pre- and post-nomogram periods of 1 July 2018-30 June 2019 and 1 August 2020-31 July 2021, respectively.

RESULTS

Overall, 850 patients were identified (pre-nomogram, 383; post-nomogram, 467). SLNB was performed in 29.0% of patients in the pre-nomogram group and 34.5% in the post-nomogram group (p = 0.091). The overall positivity rate was 16.2% in the pre-nomogram group and 14.9% in the post-nomogram group (p = 0.223). SLNB was performed less frequently in T1a melanoma patients in the pre-nomogram group (1.1%, n = 2/177) than in the post-nomogram group (8.6%, n = 17/198) [p ≤ 0.001]. This increase was particularly for melanomas with a risk score ≥ 5%, with an SLN positivity rate of 11.8% in the post-nomogram group (p = 0.004) compared with zero. For T1b melanomas with a risk score of > 10%, the SLNB rate was 40.0% (8/20) pre-nomogram and 75.0% (12/16) post-nomogram (p = 0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

In this specialized center, the SLN risk calculator appears to influence practice for melanomas previously considered low risk for metastasis, with increased use of SLNB for T1a and higher-risk T1b melanomas. Further evaluation is required across broader practice settings. Melanoma management guidelines could be updated to incorporate the availability of nomograms to better select patients for SLNB than previous criteria.

The limited value of sentinel lymph node biopsy in lentigo maligna melanoma: A nomogram based on the results of 29 years of the nationwide dutch pathology registry (PALGA)

BACKGROUND

Lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM) predominantly presents in the head and neck of the elderly. The value of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for LMM patients remains to be determined, as the reported average yield of positive lymph nodes is less than 10%. In this nationwide cohort study, we wanted to identify LMM patients with an increased risk of SLNB-positivity.

METHODS

LMM with an SLNB indication according to the 8th AJCC melanoma guidelines were retrospectively identified from the nationwide network and registry of histo- and cytopathology in the Netherlands (PALGA). A penalized (LASSO) logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the optimal combination of clinicopathological factors to predict a positive SLNB.

RESULTS

Between 1991 and 2020, 1989 LMM patients met our inclusion criteria. SLNB was performed in 16.7% (n = 333) and was positive in 7.5% (25/333). The false-negative rate was 21.9%. Clinically detectable regional lymph node (LN) metastases were found in 1.3% (n = 25). Clinicopathological characteristics best predictive for SLNB-positivity (Odds ratio; 95% CI) were age (0.95; 0.91-0.99), ulceration 1.59 (0.44-4.83), T4-stage (1.81; 0.43-6.2), male sex (1.97; 0.79-5.27), (lymph)angioinvasion (5.07; 0.94-23.31), and microsatellites (7.23; 1.56-32.7) (C-statistic 0.75). During follow-up, regional LN recurrences were detected in 4.2% (83/1989) of patients, of which the majority (74/83) had no evidence of regional LN metastases at baseline.

CONCLUSION

Our findings confirm the limited SLNB-positivity in LMM patients. Based on the identified high-risk clinicopathological features, a nomogram was developed to predict the risk of a positive SLNB.

Prognostic Significance and Management of Sentinel Nodes in the Triangular Intermuscular Space of Patients with Melanoma

BACKGROUND

The clinical significance of sentinel nodes (SNs) in the triangular intermuscular space (TIS) of patients with melanoma is poorly understood. This study aimed to determine their incidence and positivity rate, and to report their management and patient outcomes.

METHODS

This was a single-institution retrospective cohort study of patients with unilateral or bilateral TIS SNs on lymphoscintigraphy treated between 1992 and 2017. Recurrence-free survival was analyzed.

RESULTS

Lymphoscintigraphy identified TIS SNs in 266 patients. They were bilateral in 17 patients. Of the 2296 patients with a melanoma on the upper back, 259 (11%) had TIS SNs. Procurement of SNs was not attempted in 122 (43%) of the 283 cases and failed in 11 cases (7%). An SN was successfully retrieved from the TIS in 145 patients (53%) and contained metastasis in 18 of 150 TIS SNs. This was the only positive SN in 12 patients (8%), upstaging all of them. Of the 18 patients with a positive SN in the TIS, 9 (50%) underwent completion axillary lymph node dissection, but no additional involved nodes were found in any of these patients. Recurrence in the TIS was observed in six patients (5%), none of whom had their TIS SN surgically pursued previously.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymphoscintigraphy showed TIS SNs in 11% of patients with melanomas on their upper back. In such cases, retrieval of TIS SNs is required for accurate staging and to minimize the risk of TIS recurrence.

Follow-up of primary melanoma patients with high risk of recurrence: recommendations based on evidence and consensus

In spite of the good prognosis of patients with early-stage melanoma, there is a substantial proportion of them that develop local or distant relapses. With the introduction of targeted and immune therapies for advanced melanoma, including at the adjuvant setting, early detection of recurrent melanoma and/or second primary lesions is crucial to improve clinical outcomes. However, there is a lack of universal guidelines regarding both frequency of surveillance visits and diagnostic imaging and/or laboratory evaluations. In this article, a multidisciplinary expert panel recommends, after careful review of relevant data in the field, a consensus- and experience-based follow-up strategy for melanoma patients, taking into account prognostic factors and biomarkers and the high-risk periods and patterns of recurrence in each (sub) stage of the disease. Apart from the surveillance intensity, healthcare professionals should focus on patients' education to perform regular self-examinations of the skin and palpation of lymph nodes.

Recent developments in head and neck melanoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an overview of recently published articles covering melanoma management of the head and neck region.

RECENT FINDINGS

Melanoma management represents a rapidly evolving field. The advent of immunotherapy has led to significant changes in diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance for these patients. Invasive interventions including completion lymph node dissection have been largely replaced with increased surveillance driven by robust data showing no significant difference in overall survival. Studies have explored various treatment regimens that offer improved outcomes with the least adverse events, with a recent trend towards neoadjuvant therapy. Research has also shifted towards better understanding genetics and biomarkers that influence response to these medications. The best means to both identify and monitor these changes is being explored. As our understanding of this complex disease process continues to grow, prognosis in patients suffering with melanoma should continue to improve.

SUMMARY

The expansion of immunotherapy use in melanoma management has led to significantly improved prognosis in diagnosed patients. Present research is largely focused on better understanding the ideal patient populations, dosing, and surveillance for these therapies. Data from these studies will be crucial in better staging and treating patients with melanoma.

Melanoma Radiological Surveillance: A Review of Current Evidence and Clinical Challenges

Melanoma is a common cancer in both young and older populations in many western countries. Rates of melanoma diagnosis worldwide are increasing. With the introduction of both targeted and immunotherapies there have been dramatic improvements in the care of patients with metastatic melanoma. With these new therapies being increasingly offered to patients with stage III metastatic melanoma and stage IV disease, radiological surveillance of melanoma has become a widely used method of monitoring melanoma patients for early locoregional and distant metastasis. However, concerns have been raised about risk of false positive results, which patients to consider radiological surveillance for, and at what intervals to do so. To date, there are no published review articles on the topic of radiological surveillance in melanoma patients identified in the MEDLINE database. A comprehensive literature review was performed by searching the MEDLINE database to review all published works on this topic. This article aims to present an extensive review of literature surrounding radiological surveillance in melanoma patients, a discussion of controversies, and recommendations for surveillance modalities.