Breastfeeding and Breast Cancer: Managing Lactation in Survivors and Women with a New Diagnosis

Cancer in pregnancy - The obstetrical management

Cancer in pregnancy, defined as a cancer diagnosed during pregnancy, is a rare but severe condition presenting both clinical and ethical challenges. During the last two decades a paradigm shift has occurred towards recommending similar staging and treatment regimens of pregnant and non-pregnant cancer patients. This strategy is a result of an increasing number of reassuring reports on chemotherapy treatment in pregnancy after the first trimester. The management of cancer in pregnancy should be managed in a multidisciplinary team where staging, oncological treatment, social and mental care, timing of delivery, and follow-up of the infant should be planned. Due to the rarity, centralization is recommended to allow experience accumulation. Furthermore, national and international advisory boards are supportive when there is a lack of expertise.

Lactation Education for Surgeons: American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) Survey Demonstrates Strong Member Interest in Expanded Training

BACKGROUND

The availability and extent of breastfeeding-specific surgical training has not been previously described. We aimed to survey breast surgeons on their lactation education and desire for additional knowledge.

METHODS

Members of the American Society of Breast Surgeons were invited via email to anonymously complete an electronic survey from 27 October 2021 to 23 January 2022. The survey content included demographic information, sources of lactation education, and desired topics and methods for further training. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

A total of 2698 surveys were delivered and 542 (20.1%) completed. While nearly all respondents (99%) reported treating lactating patients at least once or twice per year, 78% reported that their training was inadequate. The most frequently cited sources of lactation information were peer-to-peer informal knowledge sharing (50%) and personal experience with breastfeeding (44%). Nearly all respondents (99%) agreed that formal lactation education would benefit breast surgeons. Specific topics of interest included management of patients with complications of lactation (48%), management of lactating patients with a new diagnosis of breast cancer (47%), and counseling patients with pregnancy-associated breast cancer who desire to breastfeed (46%). The most frequently recommended educational formats included presentation at a national conference (60%), evidence-based management guidelines (58%), webinar (55%), and workshop/course (47%).

CONCLUSION

Breast surgeons self-report minimal formal training in the management of benign and malignant breast disease in lactating patients and strong desire for expanded education. Development of clinical practice guidelines and additional educational content for surgeons should be considered to meet the needs of this patient population.

Long-Term Effects of Breast Cancer Therapy and Care: Calm after the Storm?

Breast cancer is still a lethal disease and the leading cause of death in women, undermining patients' survival and quality of life. Modern techniques of surgery and radiotherapy allow for the obtaining of good results in terms of survival, however they cause long-term side effects that persist over time, such as lymphedema and neuropathy. Similarly, the advent of new therapies such as endocrine therapy revolutionized breast cancer outcomes, but side effects are still present even in years of follow-up after cure. Besides the side effects of medical and surgical therapy, breast cancer is a real disruption in patients' lives considering quality of life-related aspects such as the distortion of body image, the psychological consequences of the diagnosis, and the impact on family dynamics. Therefore, the doctor-patient relationship is central to providing the best support both during treatment and afterwards. The aim of this review is to summarize the consequences of medical and surgical treatment on breast cancer patients and to emphasize the importance of early prevention of side effects to improve patients' quality of life.

Effects of Continuous Care Combined with Evidence-Based Nursing on Mental Status and Quality of Life and Self-Care Ability in Patients with Liver from Breast Cancer: A Single-Center Randomized Controlled Study

Objective

To explore the multidisciplinary collaborative extended care combined with EBN to improve breast cancer liver metastasis patients' psychological status and self-care ability.

Background

In the past ten years, the number of breast cancer patients with liver metastases has increased year by year, becoming a global public health problem. Studies have shown that 30% of breast cancer patients with liver metastases show varying degrees of anxiety and depression, and their quality of life is significantly lower than that of the normal population. Multidisciplinary collaborative continuous care can improve the prognosis of breast cancer treatment to a certain extent and is the key to meeting the needs of cancer patients.

Materials and Methods

The clinical data of 96 patients with liver metastases from breast cancer were selected as the study subjects and divided into a comparison group and an observation group of 48 cases each according to a random number table. Among them, the comparison group implemented evidence-based nursing (EBN) and the observation group implemented multidisciplinary collaborative extended care based on the comparison group. The effects of psychological status, quality of life, self-care ability, and sleep quality were compared between the two groups before and after nursing care.

Results

After nursing, the sleep quality scores, increased awakening scores, sleep quality that shows weakness because important things are not steady or strong scores, and night terrors scores of the two groups of breast cancer patients with liver the spread of diseases through the body were very much improved, and the sleep quality scores of the instance of watching, noticing, or making a statement group were much lower than those of the comparison group (P < 0.05). After nursing, the fear and stress-related score, depression score, tiredness and distress score, and anger score of the two groups of breast cancer patients with liver (the spread of diseases through the body) were very much improved, and the mental state score of the instance of watching, noticing, or making a statement group was much lower than that of the comparison group (P < 0.05). The scores of self-care skills, self-responsibility, health knowledge, and self-idea of patients in the instance of watching, noticing, or making a statement group after nursing were higher than those in the comparison group (P < 0.05). After nursing, the scores of mental energy, social interaction, emotional restriction, and mental status of patients in (instance of watching, noticing, or making a statement) were much higher than those in the comparison group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Multidisciplinary collaborative continuous nursing combined with EBN can effectively improve the sleep quality and psychological state of patients with breast cancer and liver metastases and improve self-care ability.

Breastfeeding is Possible: A Systematic Review on the Feasibility and Challenges of Breastfeeding Among Breast Cancer Survivors of Reproductive Age

BACKGROUND

Breastfeeding is the biologically normative mode of feeding human infants, and reduces the risk of breast cancer for mothers. This systematic review assesses engagement in breastfeeding and the factors associated with breastfeeding among breast cancer survivors.

METHODS

An online literature search was performed using the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsychInfo, and Web of Science databases. Inclusion criteria were original research articles written in English, published in peer-reviewed journals from 1 January 1990 to 25 November 2019, and included data on breast cancer survivors who attempted breastfeeding.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included in the systematic review. Between 7.7 and 90.9% of women attempted breastfeeding. Breastfeeding among participants varied from a few weeks to approximately 2 years. Common factors leading to breastfeeding were use of the contralateral breast, support from others, lactation counseling and advice from an International Board-Certified Lactation Consultant, being motivated to breastfeed, frequent feedings, and use of galactagogues. Common barriers were medical counseling against breastfeeding, insufficient milk production, lack of support, refusal of the infant to breastfeed from the treated breast, and being tired from relying on one breast.

CONCLUSIONS

Breastfeeding from the unaffected breast is feasible for some breast cancer survivors. Successful breastfeeding may require multilevel support and expert advice.

ABM Clinical Protocol #34: Breast Cancer and Breastfeeding

A central goal of The Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine is the development of clinical protocols for managing common medical problems that may impact breastfeeding success. These protocols serve only as guidelines for the care of breastfeeding mothers and infants and do not delineate an exclusive course of treatment or serve as standards of medical care. Variations in treatment may be appropriate according to the needs of an individual patient.

Radiotherapy in Pregnancy-Associated Breast Cancer

Breast radiotherapy during pregnancy is a matter of debate as both the efficacy of treatment and the safety of the developing fetus should be considered. Currently there is not enough data to support the safety of in-utero exposure to radiation even with modern radiotherapy techniques. So it is highly recommended that breast radiotherapy is postponed to after delivery, though it might be considered in very selected patients according to risk-benefit assessment.