Prognostic Impact of Ventral Versus Dorsal Tumor Location After Total Mesorectal Excision of Rectal Cancer

Significance of dorsal bladder neck involvement in predicting the progression of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer

OBJECTIVES

Accurately predicting of progression is important for patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). We previously reported that bladder neck involvement (BNI) was significantly associated with progression of NMIBC. In this study, we evaluated the prognostic significance of the detailed BNI location in NMIBC patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 651 patients diagnosed with primary NMIBC at a single center between 2000 and 2018. Using the detailed BNI location, patients were divided into the following three groups: dorsal BNI (BNId; 4 to 8 o'clock position), ventral BNI (BNIv; 8 to 4 o'clock but not 4 to 8 o'clock position), and non-BNI group. Both time to progression to muscle-invasive disease and distant metastasis was compared among the three groups. A prognostic model was developed and its discriminative ability was evaluated.

RESULTS

Dorsal bladder neck involvement and BNIv were observed in 43 (6.6%) and 36 (5.5%) patients, respectively. During a median follow-up of 61 months, 35 (5.4%) patients progressed. The cumulative incidence at 5 years was 12%, 0%, and 5.0% in BNId, BNIv, and non-BNI groups, respectively. On multivariate analysis, BNId was a significant and independent risk factor for progression, tumor stage pT1, and histologic grade G3. One point was assigned to each factor, and patients were classified into four well-stratified prognostic groups based on the total score.

CONCLUSION

Dorsal bladder neck involvement was an independent and significant risk factor for progression in primary NMIBC. Our simple and practical prognostic model including BNId is easy to use and may help selecting the optimal treatment and its timing.

Impact of circumferential tumor location of mid to low rectal cancer on oncologic outcomes after preoperative chemoradiotherapy

Purpose

Some studies have suggested that circumferential tumor location (CTL) of rectal cancer may affect oncological outcomes. However, studies after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) are rare. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of CTL on oncologic outcomes of patients with mid to low rectal cancer who received preoperative CRT.

Methods

Patients with mid to low rectal cancer who underwent total mesorectal excision after CRT from January 2013 to December 2018 were included in this retrospective study. The impact of CTL on the pathological circumferential resection margin (CRM) status, local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) was analyzed.

Results

Of the 381 patients, 98, 70, 127, and 86 patients were categorized into the anterior, posterior, lateral, and circumferential tumor groups, respectively. Tumor location was not significantly associated with the pathological CRM involvement (anterior, 12.2% vs. posterior, 14.3% vs. lateral, 11.0% vs. circumferential, 17.4%; P = 0.232). Univariate analyses revealed no correlation between CTL and 3-year LRFS (93.0% vs. 89.1% vs. 91.5% vs. 88%, P = 0.513), 3-year DFS (70.3% vs. 70.2% vs. 75.3% vs. 75.7%, P = 0.832), and 5-year OS (74.7% vs. 78.0% vs. 83.9% vs. 78.2%, P = 0.204). Multivariate analysis identified low rectal cancer and pathological CRM involvement as independent risk factors for all survival outcomes (all P < 0.05).

Conclusion

CTL of rectal cancer after preoperative CRT was not significantly associated with the pathological CRM status, recurrence, and survival.

Effect of Tumor Location on Outcome After Laparoscopic Low Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

BACKGROUND

Dissection of the distal anterolateral aspect of the mesorectum remains a surgical challenge for low rectal cancer, posing a higher risk of residual mesorectum, which might lead to the increased incidence of local recurrence for patients with anterior wall involvement.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the effect of tumor location on outcome after laparoscopic low rectal cancer surgery.

DESIGN

This is a single-center, retrospective study.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at West China Hospital in China.

PATIENTS

Patients with low rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic total mesorectal excision from 2011 to 2016 were enrolled. Patients were divided into anterior and nonanterior groups according to tumor location. Propensity score matching analysis was used to reduce the selection bias.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary end point was local recurrence. The secondary end points included overall survival, disease-free survival, and the positive rate of circumferential resection margin.

RESULTS

A total of 404 patients were included, and 176 pairs were generated by propensity score matching analysis. Multivariate analysis showed that anterior location was an independent risk factor of local recurrence (HR, 12.6; p = 0.006), overall survival (HR, 3.0; p < 0.001), and disease-free survival (HR, 2.3; p = 0.001). For patients with clinical stage II/III or T3/4, anterior location remained a prognostic factor for higher local recurrence and poorer survival. Local recurrence was rare in patients with clinical stage II/III (1.4%) or T3/4 (1.5%) tumors that were not located anteriorly.

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by its retrospective nature.

CONCLUSIONS

Anterior location is an independent risk factor of local recurrence, overall survival, and disease-free survival for low rectal cancer. More strict and selective use of neoadjuvant therapy should be considered for patients who have clinical stage II/III or T3/4 tumors that are not located anteriorly. A larger cohort study is warranted to validate the prognostic role of anterior location for low rectal cancer. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B622.

IMPACTO DE LA LOCALIZACIN DEL TUMOR EN EL RESULTADO POSTERIOR A CIRUGA LAPAROSCPICA DE CNCER DE RECTO INFERIOR UN PUNTAJE DE PROPENSIN POR ANLISIS DE CONCORDANCIA

ANTECEDENTES:La disección de la cara anterolateral distal del mesorrecto sigue siendo un desafío quirúrgico en el cáncer de recto inferior, constituyendo un alto riesgo de mesorrecto residual, que podría ocasionar una mayor incidencia de recurrencia local en pacientes con compromiso de la pared anterior.OBJETIVO:El objetivo del estudio fue evaluar el efecto de la localización del tumor en el resultado posterior a la cirugía laparoscópica de cáncer de recto inferior.DISEÑO:Estudio restrospectivo de un único centro.ÁMBITO:El estudio se realizó en el West China Hospital en China.PACIENTES:Pacientes con cáncer de recto inferior que se sometieron a excisión mesorrectal total laparoscópica entre 2011 y 2016. Los pacientes se dividieron en grupos, anterior y no anterior, según la localización del tumor. Se utilizó un puntaje de propensión por análisis de concordancia para reducir el sesgo de selección.PRINCIPALES VARIABLES EVALUADAS:El objetivo principal fue la recurrencia local. Los objetivos secundarios incluyeron la sobrevida global, la sobrevida libre de enfermedad y la tasa de positividad del margen de resección circunferencial.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron un total de 404 pacientes y se generaron 176 pares mediante un puntaje de propensión por análisis de concordancia. El análisis multivariado mostró que la localización anterior era un factor de riesgo independiente de recidiva local (HR = 12,6, p = 0,006), sobrevida global (HR = 3,0, p <0,001) y sobrevida libre de enfermedad (HR = 2,3, p = 0,001). En pacientes con estadio clínico II /III o T3/4, la ubicación anterior continuó como un factor pronóstico para una mayor recurrencia local y una menor sobrevida. La recidiva local fue excepcional en pacientes con tumores en estadio clínico II / III (1,4%) o T3 / 4 (1,5%) que no estaban localizados hacia anterior.LIMITACIONES:Este estudio estuvo limitado por su carácter retrospectivo.CONCLUSIONES:La localización anterior es un factor de riesgo independiente de recidiva local, sobrevida global y sobrevida libre de enfermedad para el cáncer de recto inferior. Se debe considerar un uso más estricto y selectivo de la terapia neoadyuvante para pacientes en estadio clínico II / III o T3 /4 de tumores que no se localizan hacia anterior. Se justifica un estudio de cohorte más grande para validar el impacto pronóstico de una ubicación anterior del cáncer de recto inferior. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B622. (Traducción-Dr. Lisbeth Alarcon-Bernes).

Development of the 'PREDICT' score through a systematic review and meta-analysis of the predictive parameters for locoregional recurrence after total mesorectal excision

BACKGROUND

Despite robust management techniques, locoregional recurrence rates of rectal cancer are still significant. Although offering intensive follow-up has been shown to be beneficial in the early detection, it can be resource consuming. Having a robust knowledge of risk factors of locoregional recurrence will help in identification of patients who actually need intensive follow-up programs. This review aimed to identify the factors that can predict locoregional recurrence after Total mesorectal excision (TME).

METHODS

We systematically reviewed PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane for relevant articles with no date restrictions while language was restricted to English. We only included articles that had either provided Hazards ratio (HR)/odds ratio (OR) or provided enough data that allowed calculation of HR/OR specifically for rectal cancer. Articles were deemed eligible if they included patients undergoing (TME).

RESULTS

Seventeen studies (18,605 patients) published between 2002 and 2019 were included. A total of 699 patients developed locoregional recurrence at a median time of 25.2 months after surgery. There were eight significant predictors evaluated by more than one study; T3-T4 stage, circumferential resection margin, lymphovascular invasion, mucinous histology, N1-N2 stage, positive distal resection margin, Tumor < 5 cm from anal verge, and lack of neoadjuvant radiotherapy. A scoring system was developed based on the weight and pooled OR/HR of each predictor.

CONCLUSION

Using predictive factors identified in our review in context of scoring system may help in the early detection of locoregional recurrence after TME. This may help in tailoring the application of intensive follow-up programs.