1
|
Boesl MA, Brown N, Bleicher J, Call T, Lambert DH, Lambert LA. Continuous Wound Irrigation and Intraoperative Methadone Decreases Opioid Use and Shortens Length of Stay After CRS/HIPEC. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:3742-3749. [PMID: 38300404 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-14900-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Epidural analgesia is resource and labor intense and may limit postoperative management options and delay discharge. This study compared postoperative outcomes after cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) with epidural analgesia versus continuous wound infusion system (CWIS) with/without intraoperative methadone. METHODS A single-institution, retrospective chart review was performed including all patients undergoing open CRS/HIPEC from 2018 to 2021. Patient demographics, surgical characteristics, length of stay, and in-hospital analgesic use were reviewed. In-hospital opioid exposure in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) was calculated. Multivariate analysis (MVA) for mean total and daily opioid exposure was conducted. RESULTS A total of 157 patients were included. Fifty-three (34%) had epidural analgesia, 96 (61%) had CWIS, and 79 (50%) received methadone. Length of stay was significantly shorter with CWIS + methadone versus epidural (7 vs. 8 days, p < 0.01). MVA showed significantly lower mean total and daily opioid exposure with CWIS+methadone versus epidural (total: 252.8 ± 17.7 MME vs. 486.8 ± 86.6 MME; odds ratio [OR] 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.98, p = 0.04; Daily: 32.8 ± 2.0 MME vs. 51.9 ± 5.7 MME, OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.52-0.99, p ≤ 0.05). The CWIS-only group (n = 17) had a significantly lower median oral opioid exposure versus epidural (135 MME vs. 7.5 MME, p < 0.001) and longer length of stay versus CWIS + methadone (9 vs. 7 days, p = 0.04), There were no CWIS or methadone-associated complications and one epidural abscess. CONCLUSIONS CWIS + methadone safely offers better pain control with less in-hospital opioid use, shorter length of stay, and decreased resource utilization compared with epidural analgesia in patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus A Boesl
- Department of General Surgery, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Noah Brown
- Department of General Surgery, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Josh Bleicher
- Department of General Surgery, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Tyler Call
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Donald H Lambert
- Department of Anesthesiology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Laura A Lambert
- Department of General Surgery, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yue TM, Sun BJ, Xu N, Ohkuma R, Fowler C, Lee B. Improved Postoperative Pain Management Outcomes After Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol for Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:3769-3777. [PMID: 38466484 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15120-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis is promising but has potential for significant morbidity and prolonged hospitalization. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a standardized protocol designed to optimize perioperative care. This study describes trends in epidural and opioid use after implementing ERAS for CRS-HIPEC at a tertiary academic center. METHODS A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC from January 2020 to September 2023 was conducted. ERAS was implemented in February 2022. Medication and outcomes data were compared before and after ERAS initiation. All opioids were converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). RESULTS A total of 136 patients underwent CRS-HIPEC: 73 (54%) pre- and 63 (46%) post-ERAS. Epidural usage increased from 63% pre-ERAS to 87% post-ERAS (p = 0.001). Compared with those without epidurals, patients with epidurals had decreased total 7-day oral and intravenous (IV) opioid requirements (45 MME vs. 316 MME; p < 0.001). There was no difference in 7-day opioid totals between pre- and post-ERAS groups. After ERAS, more patients achieved early ambulation (83% vs. 53%; p < 0.001), early diet initiation (81% vs. 25%; p < 0.001), and early return of bowel function (86% vs. 67%; p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS ERAS implementation for CRS-HIPEC was associated with increased epidural use, decreased oral and IV opioid use, and earlier bowel function return. Our study demonstrates that epidural analgesia provides adequate pain control while significantly decreasing oral and IV opioid use, which may promote gastrointestinal recovery postoperatively. These findings support the implementation of an ERAS protocol for effective pain management in patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany M Yue
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA
| | - Beatrice J Sun
- Section of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA
| | - Nova Xu
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA
| | - Rika Ohkuma
- Section of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA
| | - Cedar Fowler
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA
| | - Byrne Lee
- Section of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Solsky I, Patel A, Valenzuela CD, Russell G, Perry K, Duckworth K, Votanopoulos KI, Shen P, Levine EA. Quality-of-Life Outcomes for Patients Taking Opioids and Psychotropic Medications Before Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:577-593. [PMID: 37891454 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14215-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) on quality of life (QoL) for patients taking opioids and psychotropic medications preoperatively is unclear. METHODS This study retrospectively reviewed a CRS-HIPEC single-center prospectively maintained database for 2012-2016. Demographics and clinical data on opioids/psychotropic medication use were collected via chart review. The study collected QoL outcomes at baseline, then 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively via the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), Brief Pain Inventory, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy, and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey. Differences in QoL between the groups were calculated using repeated measures analysis of variance regression. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed. RESULTS Of 388 patients, 44.8% were taking opioids/psychotropic medications preoperatively. At baseline, those taking opioids/psychotropic medications preoperatively versus those not taking these medications had significantly worse QoL. By 1 year postoperatively, the QoL measures did not differ significantly except for emotional functioning (e.g., no medications vs. opioids/psychotropic medications: CES-D, 5.6 vs. 10.1). Median survival did not differ significantly (opioids/psychotropic medications vs. no medications: 52.3 vs. 60.6 months; p = 0.66). At 1 year after surgery, a greater percentage of patients were taking opioids, psychotropic medications, or both than at baseline (63.2% vs. 44.8%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Despite worse baseline QoL, patients who took opioids/psychotropic medications had QoL scores 1 year postoperatively similar to the scores of those who did not except in the emotional domains. These data point to the potential utility of a timed psychosocial intervention to enhance emotional adaptation and further support the role of CRS-HIPEC in improving QoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Solsky
- Surgical Oncology Service, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Ana Patel
- Surgical Oncology Service, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | | | - Gregory Russell
- Surgical Oncology Service, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Kathleen Perry
- Surgical Oncology Service, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Katie Duckworth
- Surgical Oncology Service, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | | | - Perry Shen
- Surgical Oncology Service, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
- Section of Surgical Oncology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Edward A Levine
- Surgical Oncology Service, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
- Section of Surgical Oncology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sun BJ, Yue TM, Xu N, Fowler C, Lee B. Impact of Successful Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol for Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:8156-8165. [PMID: 37684372 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14222-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) are complex operations for the treatment of peritoneal metastases. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are intended to standardize preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative pathways, with the goal of improving patient care. This study describes feasibility and outcomes after implementing an ERAS protocol for CRS/HIPEC at a tertiary academic center. METHODS A single-institution experience of CRS/HIPEC was reviewed from January 2020 to March 2023. Patients were categorized according to whether they underwent CRS/HIPEC before or after ERAS initiation. Outcomes and protocol adherence were evaluated. RESULTS A total of 115 CRS/HIPEC operations were included-74 before and 41 after ERAS implementation. Median age was younger in the post-ERAS group, whereas sex, comorbidities, peritoneal carcinomatosis index, operation performed, and operative time were similar between groups. The most common primary cancer sites were gynecologic (40%), appendiceal (24%), and colorectal (22%). Adherence to all postoperative ERAS components was 76%. More post-ERAS patients ambulated by postoperative day (POD) 1 (90% vs. 54%; p < 0.001), tolerated liquid diet by POD 2 (88% vs. 32%; p < 0.001), and had foley removed by POD 3 (86% vs. 43%; p < 0.001). There was a trend toward decreased length of stay in the post-ERAS cohort (7 vs. 8 days; p = 0.092), with no difference in major complications, intensive care unit admission, or 30-day readmission. CONCLUSIONS Despite the heterogeneity of CRS/HIPEC operations, implementing an ERAS protocol for our patients was feasible and resulted in postoperative outcomes and adherence comparable with that of other major abdominal surgeries. This supports the potential for success in ERAS programs for CRS/HIPEC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beatrice J Sun
- Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Tiffany M Yue
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Nova Xu
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Cedar Fowler
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Byrne Lee
- Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sun BJ, Daniel SK, Lee B. The Role of Prophylactic and Adjuvant Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) in Prevention of Peritoneal Metastases in Advanced Colorectal Cancer. J Clin Med 2023; 12:6443. [PMID: 37892582 PMCID: PMC10607874 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12206443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a locoregional therapy that may be combined with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) to treat patients with colorectal cancer and peritoneal metastases (PM). In recent years, three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have investigated the role of prophylactic or adjuvant HIPEC in preventing the development of PM in patients with high-risk colorectal cancer: PROPHYLOCHIP and COLOPEC evaluated adjuvant HIPEC, and HIPECT4 studied concurrent HIPEC and CRS. Although PROPHYLOCHIP and COLOPEC were negative trials, a great deal may be learned from their methodology, outcome measures, and patient selection criteria. HIPECT4 is the first RCT to show a clinical benefit of HIPEC in high-risk T4 colorectal cancer, demonstrating improved locoregional disease control with the addition of HIPEC to CRS with no increase in the rate of complications. This review critically examines the strengths and limitations of each major trial and discusses their potential impact on the practice of HIPEC. Several additional ongoing clinical trials also seek to investigate the role of HIPEC in preventing PM in advanced colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Byrne Lee
- Section of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; (B.J.S.); (S.K.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Khan A, Beaumont A, Laing E, Guerra G, Jain A, Warrier S, Heriot A. Parenteral nutrition after cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal malignancy: Should it be administered routinely? Clin Nutr ESPEN 2023; 57:487-493. [PMID: 37739696 DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2023.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is complex abdominal surgery that is used to treat peritoneal malignancy. CRS is associated with major morbidity and efforts to address this include optimisation of perioperative care. There is variation in international protocols on the nutritional management after CRS, in particular whether parenteral nutrition (PN) should be routinely or selectively administered. HYPOTHESIS/AIM This study assessed parenteral nutrition use, factors associated with PN requirement and nutritional outcomes in a centre that selectively uses PN after CRS. METHODS/INTERVENTIONS A retrospective analysis was undertaken on patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery ± hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) at Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre between 1st January 2015 and 31st December 2020 using data entered into a prospectively maintained database. Patient characteristics, nutritional status, oncological parameters, operative details and postoperative outcome data were retrieved. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-squared test and continuous data was compared using a non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-test. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of requiring PN and postoperative weight change over admission. RESULTS A total of 222 patients who had CRS between were included (mean age 56 years; female 61.3%). Preoperative nutritional characteristics of participants included a mean body mass index (BMI) of 27.6 kg/m2 and the majority (77.9%) were not at nutritional risk pre-operatively with a Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) score of category A. A high proportion of patients had surgery for colonic adenocarcinoma (58.1%), received HIPEC (87.4%) and achieved complete cytoreduction (82%). Postoperative parenteral nutrition was required for 65 patients (29.3%). The most frequent indication for PN was postoperative ileus (63.1%) with the mean (SD) time to commencing PN being postoperative day 5. Factors associated with the requirement for postoperative PN included preoperative albumin (OR 0.89; p = 0.015), weight loss >5% of body weight in the 6 months prior to admission (OR 2.2; p = 0.05), higher PCI score (OR 1.048; p = 0.005), number of anastomoses completed (OR 1.766; p = 0.017) and development of any postoperative complication (OR 2.71; p = 0.009). PN use was not associated with postoperative weight change. CONCLUSION Most patients undergoing CRS did not require post-operative PN. Nutritional and operative factors may identify patients who are likely to need PN after surgery. Selective use of PN did not impact on postoperative weight change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayman Khan
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Australia.
| | - Anna Beaumont
- Nutrition and Speech Pathology Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Erin Laing
- Nutrition and Speech Pathology Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Glen Guerra
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Australia
| | - Anshini Jain
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Australia
| | - Satish Warrier
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Australia
| | - Alexander Heriot
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Somashekhar SP, Deo S, Thammineedi SR, Chaturvedi H, Mandakukutur Subramanya G, Joshi R, Kothari J, Srinivasan A, Rohit KC, Ray M, Prajapati B, Guddahatty Nanjappa H, Ramalingam R, Fernandes A, Ashwin KR. Enhanced recovery after surgery in cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: national survey of peri-operative practice by Indian society of peritoneal surface malignancies. Pleura Peritoneum 2023; 8:91-99. [PMID: 37304161 PMCID: PMC10249752 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2022-0198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives The Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program is designed to achieve faster recovery by maintaining pre-operative organ function and reducing stress response following surgery. A two part ERAS guidelines specific for Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) was recently published with intent of extending the benefit to patients with peritoneal surface malignancies. This survey was performed to examine clinicians' knowledge, practice and obstacles about ERAS implementation in patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC. Methods Requests to participate in survey of ERAS practices were sent to 238 members of Indian Society of Peritoneal Surface malignancies (ISPSM) via email. They were requested to answer a 37-item questionnaire on elements of preoperative (n=7), intraoperative (n=10) and postoperative (n=11) practices. It also queried demographic information and individual attitudes to ERAS. Results Data from 164 respondents were analysed. 27.4 % were aware of the formal ERAS protocol for CRS and HIPEC. 88.4 % of respondents reported implementing ERAS practices for CRS and HIPEC either, completely (20.7 %) or partially (67.7 %). The adherence to the protocol among the respondents were as follows: pre operative (55.5-97.6 %), intra operative (32.6-84.8 %) and post operative (25.6-89 %). While most respondents considered implementation of ERAS for CRS and HIPEC in the present format, 34.1 % felt certain aspects of perioperative practice have potential for improvement. The main barriers to implementation were difficulty in adhering to all elements (65.2 %), insufficient evidence to apply in clinical practice (32.4 %), safety concerns (50.6 %) and administrative issues (47.6 %). Conclusions Majority agreed the implementation of ERAS guidelines is beneficial but are followed by HIPEC centres partially. Efforts are required to overcome barriers like improving certain aspects of perioperative practice to increase the adherence, confirming the benefit and safety of protocol with level I evidence and solving administrative issues by setting up dedicated multi-disciplinary ERAS teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Suryanarayana Deo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | | | | | | | - Rama Joshi
- Gynaecological Oncology, Fortis Memorial Research Institute, Gurgaon, New Delhi, India
| | | | | | - Kumar C. Rohit
- Aster International Institute of Oncology,Aster hospital, Bengaluru, India
| | - Mukurdipi Ray
- Department of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | | | | | - Rajagopalan Ramalingam
- Surgical Oncology, Basavatarakam Indo-American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Hyderabad, India
| | - Aaron Fernandes
- Aster International Institute of Oncology,Aster hospital, Bengaluru, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kim HC, Park J, Oh J, Kim M, Park EJ, Baik SH, Song Y. Analgesic effects of combined transversus abdominis plane block and intramuscular electrical stimulation in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Surg 2023; 109:1199-1207. [PMID: 36999805 PMCID: PMC10389336 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the analgesic efficacy of a four-quadrant transversus abdominis plane (4QTAP) block and a combination of 4QTAP block with needle electrical twitch and intramuscular electrical stimulation (NETOIMS) in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Eighty-one patients who underwent CRS followed by HIPEC were included in this study. Patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: group 1 (intravenous patient-controlled analgesia, control group), group 2 (preoperative 4QTAP block), and group 3 (preoperative 4QTAP block and postoperative NETOIMS). The primary study endpoint was the pain score assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS: 0, no pain; 10, worst imaginable pain) on postoperative day (POD) 1. RESULTS The VAS pain score on POD 1 was significantly lower in group 2 than in group 1 (6.0±1.7 and 7.6±1.9, P =0.004), whereas that in group 3 was significantly lower than that in groups 1 and 2 ( P <0.001 and P =0.004, respectively). Opioid consumption and nausea and vomiting incidence during POD 7 were significantly lower in group 3 than in groups 1 and 2. Gait speed and peak cough flow on POD 4 and 7, as well as the quality of recovery (QoR)-40 score on POD 4, were significantly higher in group 3 than in groups 1 and 2. CONCLUSIONS The combination of a 4QTAP block with NETOIMS provided more effective analgesia than a 4QTAP block alone after CRS, followed by HIPEC, and enhanced functional restoration and quality of recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun-Chang Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute
| | - Jinyoung Park
- Department of Rehabilitation, Gangnam Severance Hospital
| | - Jinyoung Oh
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Minjae Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
| | - Eun Jung Park
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul
| | - Seung Hyuk Baik
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul
| | - Young Song
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Robella M, Tonello M, Berchialla P, Sciannameo V, Ilari Civit AM, Sommariva A, Sassaroli C, Di Giorgio A, Gelmini R, Ghirardi V, Roviello F, Carboni F, Lippolis PV, Kusamura S, Vaira M. Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Program for Patients with Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery with or without HIPEC: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030570. [PMID: 36765534 PMCID: PMC9913706 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Revised: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program refers to a multimodal intervention to reduce the length of stay and postoperative complications; it has been effective in different kinds of major surgery including colorectal, gynaecologic and gastric cancer surgery. Its impact in terms of safety and efficacy in the treatment of peritoneal surface malignancies is still unclear. A systematic review and a meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the effect of ERAS after cytoreductive surgery with or without HIPEC for peritoneal metastases. MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar and Cochrane Database were searched from January 2010 and December 2021. Single and double-cohort studies about ERAS application in the treatment of peritoneal cancer were considered. Outcomes included the postoperative length of stay (LOS), postoperative morbidity and mortality rates and the early readmission rate. Twenty-four studies involving 5131 patients were considered, 7 about ERAS in cytoreductive surgery (CRS) + HIPEC and 17 about cytoreductive alone; the case histories of two Italian referral centers in the management of peritoneal cancer were included. ERAS adoption reduced the LOS (-3.17, 95% CrI -4.68 to -1.69 in CRS + HIPEC and -1.65, 95% CrI -2.32 to -1.06 in CRS alone in the meta-analysis including 6 and 17 studies respectively. Non negligible lower postoperative morbidity was also in the meta-analysis including the case histories of two Italian referral centers. Implementation of an ERAS protocol may reduce LOS, postoperative complications after CRS with or without HIPEC compared to conventional recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuela Robella
- Unit of Surgical Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, 10060 Torino, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-338-382-4104
| | - Marco Tonello
- Advanced Surgical Oncology Unit, Surgical Oncology of the Esophagus and Digestive Tract, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Paola Berchialla
- Center for Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health (C-BEPH), Deptartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Torino, 10124 Torino, Italy
| | - Veronica Sciannameo
- Center for Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health (C-BEPH), Deptartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Torino, 10124 Torino, Italy
| | | | - Antonio Sommariva
- Advanced Surgical Oncology Unit, Surgical Oncology of the Esophagus and Digestive Tract, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Cinzia Sassaroli
- Abdominal Oncology Department, Fondazione Giovanni Pascale, IRCCS, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Andrea Di Giorgio
- Surgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Roberta Gelmini
- SC Chirurgia Generale d’Urgenza ed Oncologica, AOU Policlinico di Modena, 41125 Modena, Italy
| | - Valentina Ghirardi
- UOC Ovarian Carcinoma Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Franco Roviello
- Unit of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Surgery, and Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
| | - Fabio Carboni
- Peritoneal Tumours Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Shigeki Kusamura
- Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Unit, Fondazione Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - Marco Vaira
- Unit of Surgical Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, 10060 Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Charleux-Muller D, Fabacher T, Romain B, Meyer N, Brigand C, Delhorme JB. Implementation of an enhanced recovery program for complete cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in a referral center: a case control prospective study. Pleura Peritoneum 2023; 8:11-18. [PMID: 37020473 PMCID: PMC10067553 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2022-0133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Current recommendations regarding enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) after complete cytoreductive surgery (CCRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are based on a low level of evidence. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of implementing an adapted ERP for CCRS and HIPEC in a referral center.
Methods
We conducted a study with a prospective group of 44 patients (post-ERP group) who underwent CCRS with HIPEC between July 2016 and June 2018, the period during which ERP was implemented. This group was compared to a second retrospective group of 21 patients who underwent CCRS with HIPEC between June 2015 and June 2016, during which ERP was not yet implemented (pre-ERP group).
Results
The ERP compliance rate was 65% in the post-ERP group. The hospital length of stay (HLS) was shorter in the post-ERP group: 24.9 days (IQR 11–68, pre-ERP group) vs. 16.1 days (IQR 6–45, post-ERP group), as was the major morbidity rate (pre-ERP group=33.3% vs. post-ERP group=20.5%). The nasogastric tube, urinary catheter and abdominal drains were all retrieved faster in the post-ERP group.
Conclusions
The implementation of an adapted ERP after CCRS with HIPEC procedures reduces morbidity and shortens the HLS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diane Charleux-Muller
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery , Hautepierre Hospital, Strasbourg University Hospital , Strasbourg , France
| | - Thibaut Fabacher
- Department of Public Health, Biostatistic laboratory , Strasbourg University Hospital , Strasbourg , France
| | - Benoit Romain
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery , Hautepierre Hospital, Strasbourg University Hospital , Strasbourg , France
- INSERM Unit 1113 , IRFAC , Strasbourg , France
| | - Nicolas Meyer
- Department of Public Health, Biostatistic laboratory , Strasbourg University Hospital , Strasbourg , France
| | - Cécile Brigand
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery , Hautepierre Hospital, Strasbourg University Hospital , Strasbourg , France
| | - Jean-Baptiste Delhorme
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery , Hautepierre Hospital, Strasbourg University Hospital , Strasbourg , France
- INSERM Unit 1113 , IRFAC , Strasbourg , France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wajekar AS, Solanki SL, Patil VP. Postoperative complications and critical care management after cytoreduction surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: A systematic review of the literature. World J Crit Care Med 2022; 11:375-386. [PMID: 36439322 PMCID: PMC9693907 DOI: 10.5492/wjccm.v11.i6.375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a comprehensive treatment option performed for peritoneal surface malignancies. Postoperatively almost all patients are transferred to the intensive care unit electively.
AIM To describe the common and rare postoperative complications, postoperative mortality and their critical care management after CRS-HIPEC.
METHODS The authors assessed 54 articles for eligibility. Full text assessment identified 14 original articles regarding postoperative complications and critical care management for inclusion into the final review article.
RESULTS There is an exaggerated metabolic and inflammatory response after surgery which may be termed as physiological in view of the nature of surgery combined with the use of heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy with/out early postoperative intravenous chemotherapy. The expected postoperative course is further discussed. CRS-HIPEC is a complex procedure with some life-threatening complications in the immediate postoperative period, reported morbidity rates between 12%-60% and a mortality rate of 0.9%-5.8%. Over the years, since its inception in the 1980s, postoperative morbidity and survival have significantly improved. The commonest postoperative surgical complications and systemic toxicity due to chemotherapy as reported in the last decade are discussed.
CONCLUSION CRS-HIPEC is associated with a varying rate of postoperative complications including postoperative deaths and needs early suspicion and intensive care monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anjana S Wajekar
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sohan Lal Solanki
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India
| | - Vijaya P Patil
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jian C, Zhou Z, Guan S, Fang J, Chen J, Zhao N, Bao H, Li X, Cheng X, Zhu W, Yang C, Shu X. Can an incomplete ERAS protocol reduce postoperative complications compared with conventional care in laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer? A multicenter observational cohort and propensity score-matched analysis. Front Surg 2022; 9:986010. [PMID: 36090330 PMCID: PMC9458933 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.986010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The patients undergoing laparoscopic radical colorectomy in many Chinese hospitals do not achieve high compliance with the ERAS (enhanced recovery programs after surgery) protocol. Methods The clinical data from 1,258 patients were collected and divided into the non-ERAS and incomplete ERAS groups. Results A total of 1,169 patients were screened for inclusion. After propensity score-matched analysis (PSM), 464 pairs of well-matched patients were generated for comparative study. Incomplete ERAS reduced the incidence of postoperative complications (p = 0.002), both mild (6.7% vs. 10.8%, p = 0.008) and severe (3.2% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.008). Statistically, incomplete ERAS reduced indirect surgical complications (27,5.8% vs. 59, 12.7) but not local complications (19,4.1% vs. 19, 4.1%). The subgroup analysis of postoperative complications revealed that all patients benefited from the incomplete ERAS protocol regardless of sex (male, p = 0.037, 11.9% vs. 17.9%; female, p = 0.010, 5.9% vs. 14.8%) or whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered (neoadjuvant chemotherapy, p = 0.015, 7.4% vs. 24.5%; no neoadjuvant chemotherapy, p = 0.018, 10.2% vs. 15.8%). Younger patients (<60 year, p = 0.002, 7.6% vs. 17.5%) with a low BMI (<22.84, 9.4% vs. 21.1%, p < 0.001), smaller tumor size (<4.0 cm, 8.1% vs. 18.1%, p = 0.004), no fundamental diseases (8.8% vs. 17.0%, p = 0.007), a low ASA score (1/2, 9.7% vs. 16.3%, p = 0.004), proximal colon tumors (ascending/transverse colon, 12.2% vs. 24.3%, p = 0.027), poor (6.1% vs. 23.7%, p = 0.012)/moderate (10.3% vs. 15.3%, p = 0.034) tumor differentiation and no preoperative neoadjuvant radiotherapy (10.3% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.004) received more benefit from the incomplete ERAS protocol. Conclusion The incomplete ERAS protocol decreased the incidence of postoperative complications, especially among younger patients (<60 year) with a low BMI (<22.84), smaller tumor size (<4.0 cm), no fundamental diseases, low ASA score (1/2), proximal colon tumors (ascending/transverse colon), poor/moderate differentiation and no preoperative neoadjuvant radiotherapy. ERAS should be recommended to as many patients as possible, although some will not exhibit high compliance. In the future, the core elements of ERAS need to be identified to improve the protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenxing Jian
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Department of Emergency Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Putian University, Teaching Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Putian, China
| | - Zili Zhou
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Shen Guan
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital and Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jianying Fang
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Putian University, Teaching Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Putian, China
| | - Jinhuang Chen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Department of Emergency Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Ning Zhao
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Department of Emergency Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Haijun Bao
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Department of Emergency Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xianguo Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Department of Emergency Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xukai Cheng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Department of Emergency Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Wenzhong Zhu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Department of Emergency Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Chunkang Yang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital and Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Xiaogang Shu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Department of Emergency Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Association of Patient Controlled Analgesia and Total Inpatient Opioid Use After Pancreatectomy. J Surg Res 2022; 275:244-251. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.02.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Revised: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
14
|
Schwartz PB, Stahl CC, Vidri RJ, Leverson GE, Puckett Y, Zafar SN, Varley P, Ronnekleiv-Kelly SM, Al-Niaimi A, Weber SM, Abbott DE. Rethinking Routine Intensive Care After Cytoreductive Surgery With Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: The Fiscal Argument. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:6606-6614. [PMID: 35672624 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11967-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are frequently admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for mitigation of potential complications, although ICU length of stay (LOS) is a significant driver of cost. This study asked whether a fiscal argument could be made for the selective avoidance of ICU admission after CRS/HIPEC. METHODS Prospective data for select low-risk patients (e.g., lower peritoneal cancer index [PCI]) admitted to the intermediate care unit (IMC) instead of the ICU after CRS/HIPEC were matched with a historic cohort routinely admitted to the ICU. Cohort comparisons and the impact of the intervention on cost were assessed. RESULTS The study matched 81 CRS/HIPEC procedures to form a cohort of 49 pre- and 15 post-intervention procedures for patients with similar disease burdens (mean PCI, 8 ± 6.7 vs. 7 ± 5.1). The pre-intervention patients stayed a median of 1 day longer in the ICU (1 day [IQR, 1-1 day] vs. 0 days [IQR, 0-0 days]) and had a longer LOS (8 days [IQR, 7-11 days] vs. 6 days [IQR, 5.5-9 days]). Complications and complication severity did not differ statistically. The median total hospital cost was lower after intervention ($30,845 [IQR, $30,181-$37,725] vs. $41,477 [IQR, $33,303-$51,838]), driven by decreased indirect fixed cost ($8984 [IQR, $8643-$11,286] vs. $14,314 [IQR, $12,206-$18,266]). In a weighted multiple variable linear regression analysis, the intervention was associated with a savings of $2208.68 per patient. CONCLUSIONS Selective admission to the IMC after CRS/HIPEC was associated with $2208.68 in savings per patient without added risk. In this era of cost-conscious practice of medicine, these data highlight an opportunity to decrease cost by more than 5% for patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick B Schwartz
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
| | - Christopher C Stahl
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Roberto J Vidri
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Glen E Leverson
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Yana Puckett
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Syed N Zafar
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Patrick Varley
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Sean M Ronnekleiv-Kelly
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Ahmed Al-Niaimi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Sharon M Weber
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Daniel E Abbott
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Flood MP, Narasimhan V, Waters PS, Kong JC, Ramsay R, Michael M, Tie J, McCormick JJ, Warrier SK, Heriot AG. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal peritoneal metastases in an elderly population: outcomes from a single centre. ANZ J Surg 2022; 92:2192-2198. [PMID: 35531885 DOI: 10.1111/ans.17761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Revised: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prevalence of elderly patients with resectable colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM) is increasing. This study aimed to compare short and long-term outcomes of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for CRPM in patients above and below 70 years of age. METHODS This was a retrospective, 10-year analysis of 90-day major morbidity and mortality, and long-term survival. RESULTS Thirty-two (21.3%) of 150 consecutive patients who underwent CRS and HIPEC during the study period were aged 70 and older. PCI (P = 0.04), perioperative chemotherapy use (P < 0.01) and organ resections (rectum P = 0.04, diaphragm P = 0.03) were less in the over 70 group. There was no significant differences in major morbidity (P = 0.19) and mortality (P = 0.32). There was also no difference in 5-year overall survival (OS) (≥70: 26% vs. <70: 39%; P = 0.68) and disease-free survival (DFS) (≥70: 25% vs. <70: 14%; P = 0.22). Age above 70 was not independently associated with worse OS (HR 1.55, P = 0.20) and DFS (HR 1.07, P = 0.81). CONCLUSION The surgical management of CRPM appears safe and feasible in this elderly population. Appropriate selection of elderly patients for such radical intervention is reinforced by the comparable survival with those under 70.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael P Flood
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Vignesh Narasimhan
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Peadar S Waters
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Joseph C Kong
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Robert Ramsay
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michael Michael
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Division of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jeanne Tie
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Division of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jacob J McCormick
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Satish K Warrier
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Alexander G Heriot
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tejedor A, Bijelic L, Deiros C, Pujol E, Bassas E, Fernanz J, Bernat MJ. Feasibility and effectiveness of opioid-free anesthesia in cytoreductive surgery with or without heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy. J Surg Oncol 2022; 125:1277-1284. [PMID: 35218579 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Revised: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) provides analgesia minimizing opioids. OFA has not been evaluated in cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with or without heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy. We aim to evaluate OFA feasibility and effectiveness in CRS. METHODS Retrospective cohort study of adult patients (84) undergoing CRS in a tertiary center from May 2020 until June 2021. Predefined protocols for either opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) or OFA were followed. RESULTS OFA protocol patients (41) had better mean pain scores (1 ± 0.8 vs. 2 ± 1; p = 0.00) despite the avoidance of intravenous and epidural fentanyl intraoperatively (220 ± 104 and 194 ± 73 µg, respectively, in OBA vs. 0; p = 0.00). Postoperative epidural levobupivacaine was also lower in the OFA group (575 ± 192 vs. 706 ± 346 mg; p = 0.034) despite the lack of epidural fentanyl without difference in duration (4.3 ± 1.2 vs. 4 ± 1.2 days; p = 0.22). Morphine consumption was very low (4.1 ± 10 vs. 1.7 ± 5 mg; p = 0.16). Intraoperative hypertensive events and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were higher for OBA (43) (30.2% vs. 7.3%; p = 0.01% and 69.8% vs. 34.1%; p = 0.001, respectively). Postoperative epidural fentanyl was independently associated with PONV (p = 0.004). There was no difference in total complications or length of stay. CONCLUSION OFA is feasible, safe, and offers optimal pain control while minimizing the use of opioids in CRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Tejedor
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Sant Joan Despí Moisès Broggi, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lana Bijelic
- Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Unit, Department of Surgery, Hospital Sant Joan Despí Moisès Broggi, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carmen Deiros
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Sant Joan Despí Moisès Broggi, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Elisenda Pujol
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Sant Joan Despí Moisès Broggi, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eva Bassas
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Sant Joan Despí Moisès Broggi, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jesús Fernanz
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Sant Joan Despí Moisès Broggi, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria José Bernat
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Sant Joan Despí Moisès Broggi, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Contemporary Management of Locally Advanced and Recurrent Rectal Cancer: Views from the PelvEx Collaborative. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14051161. [PMID: 35267469 PMCID: PMC8909015 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Revised: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Pelvic exenteration is a complex operation performed for locally advanced and recurrent pelvic cancers. The goal of surgery is to achieve clear margins, therefore identifying adjacent or involved organs, bone, muscle, nerves and/or vascular structures that may need resection. While these extensive resections are potentially curative, they can be associated with substantial morbidity. Recently, there has been a move to centralize care to specialized units, as this facilitates better multidisciplinary care input. Advancements in pelvic oncology and surgical innovation have redefined the boundaries of pelvic exenterative surgery. Combined with improved neoadjuvant therapies, advances in diagnostics, and better reconstructive techniques have provided quicker recovery and better quality of life outcomes, with improved survival This article provides highlights of the current management of advanced pelvic cancers in terms of surgical strategy and potential future developments.
Collapse
|
18
|
Analgesia for Gynecologic Oncologic Surgeries: A Narrative Review. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2022; 26:1-13. [PMID: 35118596 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-022-00998-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Gynecologic oncologic malignancies are amongst the most common cancers affecting women across the world. This narrative review focuses on the current state of evidence around optimal perioperative pain management of patients undergoing surgeries for gynecologic malignancies with a specific focus on cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). RECENT FINDINGS Recent improvements in postoperative pain management following all types of gynecologic procedures, including minimally invasive, open-abdominal, or CRS + HIPEC, have been implemented through enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols. These protocols encompass the use of preemptive analgesia, neuraxial and regional techniques, local anesthetic infiltration, and multimodal analgesia. The severity of postoperative pain varies for minimally invasive cancer surgery to open debulking procedures. Therefore, an individualized perioperative analgesic plan is critical depending on the surgical approach. For CRS + HIPEC, neuraxial techniques such as thoracic epidurals and opioid sparing multimodal analgesics have shown efficacy in the perioperative period. However, future research is needed as many of these patients develop chronic pain with very limited research done in this realm.
Collapse
|
19
|
Song J, Choi N, Kang M, Ji SM, Kim DW, Kwon MA. Analgesic effects of ultrasound-guided four-quadrant transabdominal plane block in patients with cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul) 2022; 17:75-86. [PMID: 35139610 PMCID: PMC8841264 DOI: 10.17085/apm.21094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Postoperative pain occurring after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is difficult to control because of extensive surgical injuries and long incisions. We assessed whether the addition of a four-quadrant transabdominal plane (4Q-TAP) block could help in analgesic control. Methods Seventy-two patients scheduled to undergo elective CRS with HIPEC and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) were enrolled. The patients received 4Q-TAP blocks in a 10 ml mixture of 2% lidocaine and 0.75% ropivacaine per site (4Q-TAP group, n = 36) or normal saline (control group, n = 33). Oxycodone in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and pethidine or tramadol in the ward were used as rescue analgesics. The primary outcome was less than 3 times of rescue analgesic administration (%) in the ward for 5 postoperative days. Secondary endpoints included oxycodone requirement in PACU, fentanyl doses of IV PCA, morphine milligram equivalent (MME) of total opioid use, hospital stay, and postoperative complications. Results During 5 postoperative days, there was no difference in pain scores and total rescue analgesic administration between two groups. However, the use of oxycodone in PACU (P = 0.011), fentanyl requirement in IV PCA (P = 0.029), and MME/kg of total opioid use (median, 2.35 vs. 3.21 mg/kg, P = 0.009) were significantly smaller in the 4Q-TAP group. Hospital stay and incidence of postoperative morbidity were similar in both groups. Conclusions The 4Q-TAP block enhanced multimodal analgesia and decreased opioid requirements in patients with CRS with HIPEC, but did not change postoperative recovery outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaegyok Song
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Dankook University Hospital, Cheonan, Korea
| | - Nayoung Choi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Dankook University Hospital, Cheonan, Korea
| | - Minji Kang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Dankook University Hospital, Cheonan, Korea
| | - Sung Mi Ji
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Dankook University Hospital, Cheonan, Korea
| | - Dong-wook Kim
- Department of Surgery, Dankook University Hospital, Cheonan, Korea
| | - Min A Kwon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Dankook University Hospital, Cheonan, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Implementation of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion. Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2021; 25:133-139. [PMID: 34667440 PMCID: PMC8506428 DOI: 10.5114/wo.2021.107441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim of the study To investigate the feasibility of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for patients with primary peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) undergoing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (HIPEC) based on the length of hospital stay (LOS), return of bowel function, the incidence of postoperative complications, and quality of life (QLQ) analysis. Material and methods The study included a total of 37 patients with primary PC of different origin, who underwent cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC. Patients were divided into 2 groups: Group I (nonERAS) – 20 patients and Group II (ERAS) – 17 patients. Results The median LOS in Group I (nonERAS) (12.35 ± 3.9) was longer than in Group II (ERAS) (6.8 ± 1.9) (p < 0.01). The use of the ERAS protocol significantly contributed to the faster return of bowel function (peristalsis and stool) in the postoperative period (p < 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the ERAS and nonERAS groups, which supports its clinical safety. Improved QLQ according to the obtained data has also been achieved due to the introduction of the principles of the ERAS protocol. Conclusions The obtained results prove the expediency and feasibility of the implementation of the ERAS protocol among patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery in combination with HIPEC.
Collapse
|
21
|
Bhandoria G, Solanki SL, Bhavsar M, Balakrishnan K, Bapuji C, Bhorkar N, Bhandarkar P, Bhosale S, Divatia JV, Ghosh A, Mahajan V, Peedicayil A, Nath P, Sinukumar S, Thambudorai R, Seshadri RA, Bhatt A. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): a cross-sectional survey. Pleura Peritoneum 2021; 6:99-111. [PMID: 34676283 PMCID: PMC8482448 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2021-0117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been questioned in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with/without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal malignancies. This survey was performed to study clinicians' practice about ERAS in patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC. METHODS An online survey, comprising 76 questions on elements of prehabilitation (n=11), preoperative (n=8), intraoperative (n=16) and postoperative (n=32) management, was conducted. The respondents included surgeons, anesthesiologists, and critical care specialists. RESULTS The response rate was 66% (136/206 clinicians contacted). Ninety-one percent of respondents reported implementing ERAS practices. There was encouraging adherence to implement the prehabilitation (76-95%), preoperative (50-94%), and intraoperative (55-90%) ERAS practices. Mechanical bowel preparation was being used by 84.5%. Intra-abdominal drains usage was 94.7%, intercostal drains by 77.9% respondents. Nasogastric drainage was used by 84% of practitioners. The average hospital stay was 10 days as reported by 50% of respondents. A working protocol and ERAS checklist have been designed, based on the results of our study, following recent ERAS-CRS-HIPEC guidelines. This protocol will be prospectively validated. CONCLUSIONS Most respondents were implementing ERAS practices for patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC, though as an extrapolation of colorectal and gynecological guidelines. The adoption of postoperative practices was relatively low compared to other perioperative practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geetu Bhandoria
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Command Hospital, Pune, India
| | - Sohan Lal Solanki
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Mrugank Bhavsar
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zydus Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
| | | | | | - Nitin Bhorkar
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Saifee Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | | | - Sameer Bhosale
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Jehangir Hospital, Pune, India
| | - Jigeeshu V. Divatia
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Anik Ghosh
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Tata Medical Centre, Kolkata, India
| | - Vikas Mahajan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Apollo Hospital, Chennai, India
| | - Abraham Peedicayil
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | - Praveen Nath
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Kumaran Hospital, Chennai, India
| | - Snita Sinukumar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Jehangir Hospital, Pune, India
| | - Robin Thambudorai
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Medical Centre, Kolkata, India
| | | | - Aditi Bhatt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Zydus Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kurreck A, Gronau F, Alberto Vilchez ME, Abels W, Enghard P, Brandl A, Francis R, Föhre B, Lojewski C, Pratschke J, Thuss-Patience P, Modest D, Rau B, Feldbrügge L. Sodium Thiosulfate Reduces Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery Plus Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy with Cisplatin: A Single-Center Observational Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:152-162. [PMID: 34350529 PMCID: PMC8677645 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10508-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Background Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in combination with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) represents a multimodal treatment concept for patients with peritoneal surface malignancies. The use of intraperitoneal cisplatin (CDDP) is associated with a risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). The aim of this study is to evaluate the protective effect of perioperative sodium thiosulfate (STS) administration on kidney function in patients undergoing CRS and CDDP-based HIPEC. Patients and Methods We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of all patients who underwent CRS and CDDP-based HIPEC at our hospital between March 2017 and August 2020. Patients were stratified according to the use of sodium thiosulfate (STS vs. no STS). We compared kidney function and clinical outcome parameters between both groups and determined risk factors for postoperative AKI on univariate and multivariate analysis. AKI was classified according to acute kidney injury network (AKIN) criteria. Results Of 238 patients who underwent CRS and CDDP-based HIPEC, 46 patients received STS and 192 patients did not. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics. In patients who received STS, a lower incidence (6.5% vs. 30.7%; p = 0.001) and severity of AKI (p = 0.009) were observed. On multivariate analysis, the use of STS (OR 0.089, p = 0.001) remained an independent kidney-protective factor, while arterial hypertension (OR 5.283, p < 0.001) and elevated preoperative urea serum level (OR 5.278, p = 0.032) were predictors for postoperative AKI. Conclusions The present data suggest that STS protects patients from AKI caused by CRS and CDDP-based HIPEC. Further prospective studies are needed to validate the benefit of STS among kidney-protective strategies. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-10508-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annika Kurreck
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Gronau
- Department of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Miguel Enrique Alberto Vilchez
- Department of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wiltrud Abels
- Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Philipp Enghard
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Brandl
- Digestive Unit, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Roland Francis
- Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bettina Föhre
- Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Lojewski
- Department of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Thuss-Patience
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dominik Modest
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Beate Rau
- Department of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Linda Feldbrügge
- Department of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Mao F, Huang Z. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Surg 2021; 8:713171. [PMID: 34368219 PMCID: PMC8336690 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.713171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a promising approach for the management of peritoneal carcinomatosis, but is associated with significant morbidity and prolonged hospital stay. Herein, we review the impact of Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol on length of stay (LOS) and early complications in patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis. Methods: PubMed and Embase were searched for studies comparing ERAS protocol with control for CRS + HIPEC. Mean difference (MD) and risk ratios (RR) were calculated for LOS and complications respectively. Results: Six retrospective studies were included. Meta-analysis indicated statistically significant reduction in LOS with ERAS (MD: −2.82 95% CI: −3.79, −1.85 I2 = 29% p < 0.00001). Our results demonstrated significantly reduced risk of Calvien Dindo grade III/IV complications with the use of ERAS protocol as compared to the control group (RR: 0.60 95% CI: 0.41, 0.87 I2 = 0% p = 0.007). Pooled analysis of limited studies demonstrated no statistically significant difference in the risk of reoperation (RR: 1.04 95% CI: 0.54, 2.03 I2 = 50% p = 0.90) readmission (RR: 0.55 95% CI: 0.21, 1.49 I2 = 0% p = 0.24), acute kidney injury (RR: 0.55 95% CI: 0.28, 1.10 I2 = 0% p = 0.09) or mortality (RR: 0.62 95% CI: 0.17, 2.26 I2 = 0% p = 0.46) between the study groups. Conclusion: For CRS + HIPEC, ERAS is associated with significantly reduced LOS along with lower incidence of complications. Limited data suggest that use of ERAS protocol is not associated with increased readmission, reoperation, and mortality rates in these patients. There is a need for randomized controlled trials to corroborate the current evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Mao
- Department of Thyroid/Vascular Surgery, Huzhou Cent Hospital, Affiliated Cent Hospital HuZhou University, Huzhou, China
| | - Zhenmin Huang
- Department of Galactophore/General Surgery, Huzhou Cent Hospital, Affiliated Cent Hospital HuZhou University, Huzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Harji D, Mauriac P, Bouyer B, Berard X, Gille O, Salut C, Rullier E, Celerier B, Robert G, Denost Q. The feasibility of implementing an enhanced recovery programme in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:3194-3201. [PMID: 34736803 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Revised: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pelvic exenteration (PE) is a complex operative procedure, reserved for patients with locally advanced and recurrent pelvic malignancies. PE is associated with a high index of post-operative morbidity. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programmes have been successful in improving postoperative outcomes, however, its application in PE has not been studied. The aim of our study is to assess the feasibility and short-term impact of ERAS on PE. METHODS A dedicated PE ERAS programme was developed reflecting the complexity of differing subtypes of PE. A prospective cohort study was undertaken to evaluate the feasibility of implementing our PE ERAS between 2016 and 2020. The primary endpoint of this study was overall compliance with the ERAS programme. RESULTS 145 patients were enrolled into our PE ERAS programme, with 86 (56.2%) patients undergoing a soft tissue PE, 27 (17.6%) a vascular PE and 32 (20.9%) a bony PE. The median overall compliance to the PE ERAS programme was 70% (IQR 55.5-88.8). There were no observed differences between overall compliance to the PE ERAS programme between different subtypes of PE (p = 0.60). Patients with higher compliance with the PE ERAS programme had a shorter LoS (p < 0.001), less post-operative morbidity (p < 0.001), reduced severity of Clavien-Dindo grade of morbidity (p < 0.001) and fewer readmissions (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS The principles of ERAS can be readily applied to patients undergoing PE, with high adherence to the ERAS programme associated with improved clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deena Harji
- Département de Chirurgie Colorectal, Hôpital Haut-Lévèque, 1 Avenue Magellan, 33604, Pessac, CHU Bordeaux, France
| | - Paul Mauriac
- Département de Chirurgie Colorectal, Hôpital Haut-Lévèque, 1 Avenue Magellan, 33604, Pessac, CHU Bordeaux, France.
| | - Benjamin Bouyer
- Département de Chirurgie Rachidienne, Hôpital Pellegrin, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux, CHU Bordeaux, France.
| | - Xavier Berard
- Département de Chirurgie Vasculaire, Hôpital Pellegrin, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux, CHU Bordeaux, France
| | - Olivier Gille
- Département de Chirurgie Rachidienne, Hôpital Pellegrin, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux, CHU Bordeaux, France.
| | - Cécile Salut
- Département D'imagerie Diagnostique et Interventionnelle, Hôpital Haut-Lévèque, 1 Avenue Magellan, 33604, Pessac, CHU Bordeaux, France.
| | - Eric Rullier
- Département de Chirurgie Colorectal, Hôpital Haut-Lévèque, 1 Avenue Magellan, 33604, Pessac, CHU Bordeaux, France.
| | - Bertrand Celerier
- Département de Chirurgie Colorectal, Hôpital Haut-Lévèque, 1 Avenue Magellan, 33604, Pessac, CHU Bordeaux, France.
| | - Grégoire Robert
- Département D'urologie, Hôpital Pellegrin, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076, Bordeaux, CHU Bordeaux, France.
| | - Quentin Denost
- Département de Chirurgie Colorectal, Hôpital Haut-Lévèque, 1 Avenue Magellan, 33604, Pessac, CHU Bordeaux, France.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Shen W, Wu Z, Wang Y, Sun Y, Wu A. Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol versus standard of care on postoperative Acute Kidney Injury (AKI): A meta-analysis. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0251476. [PMID: 34015002 PMCID: PMC8136724 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common postoperative complication with an incidence of nearly 15%. Relatively balanced fluid management, flexible use of vasoactive drugs, multimodal analgesia containing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are fundamental to ERAS protocols. However, these basic tenants may lead to an increased incidence of postoperative AKI. METHODS A search was done in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and reference lists to identify relevant studies from inception until May 2020 to be included in this study. Effects were summarized using pooled risk ratios (RRs), mean differences (MDs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (Cls) with random effect model. Heterogeneity assessment, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias were performed. RESULTS A systematic review of nineteen cohort studies covering 17,205 patients, comparing impact of ERAS with conventional care on postoperative AKI was performed. Notably, the ERAS regimen did not increase the incidence of postoperative AKI compared with standard care (RR: 1.21; 95% CI: 0.96 to 1.52; I2 = 53%). Both goal-directed fluid therapy (RR: 1.26; 95% CI: 0.99-1.61; I2 = 55%) and restrictive fluid management (RR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.57-1.98; I2 = 60%) had no significant effect on the incidence of postoperative AKI. There was no significant statistical difference between different AKI diagnostic criteria (P = 0.43; I2 = 0%). ERAS group had significantly shorter hospital stay (MD: -1.54; 95% CI: -1.91 to -1.17; I2 = 66%). There was no statistical difference in 30-day readmission rate (RR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.80 to 1.20; I2 = 42%), 30-day reoperation rate (RR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.71 to 1.34; I2 = 42%) and mortality (RR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.59 to 1.11; I2 = 0%) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis suggests that ERAS protocols do not increase readmission or reoperation rates and mortality while significantly reducing LOS. Most importantly, the ERAS protocol was shown to have no promoting effect on the incidence of postoperative AKI. Even GDFT and restrictive fluid management cannot avoid the occurrence of postoperative AKI, and the ERAS protocol is still worth recommending and its safety is further confirmed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Whenzhen Shen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zehao Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yunlu Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yi Sun
- Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Anshi Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Dhiman A, Fenton E, Whitridge J, Belanski J, Petersen W, Macaraeg S, Rangrass G, Shergill A, Micic D, Eng OS, Turaga K. Guide to Enhanced Recovery for Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgery: ERAS for Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery with or Without HIPEC. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:6955-6964. [PMID: 33954868 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09973-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
ERAS protocols may reduce length of stay and return to full functional recovery after cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC. Prehabilitation programs and post-operative goal directed pathways, along with other essential components of ERAS are discussed with supporting evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankit Dhiman
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, MC 5094, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Emily Fenton
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, MC 5094, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Jeffrey Whitridge
- University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jennifer Belanski
- University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Whitney Petersen
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, MC 5094, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Sarah Macaraeg
- University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Govind Rangrass
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Dejan Micic
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Oliver S Eng
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, MC 5094, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Kiran Turaga
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, MC 5094, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Li ZE, Lu SB, Kong C, Sun WZ, Wang P, Zhang ST. Comparative short-term outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program and non-ERAS traditional care in elderly patients undergoing lumbar arthrodesis: a retrospective study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021; 22:283. [PMID: 33731057 PMCID: PMC7968191 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04166-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program is an evidence-based improvement over non-ERAS traditional care. The aim of the present study was to analyze the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of an ERAS program in patients over 70 years undergoing lumbar arthrodesis by comparison with non-ERAS traditional care. Methods During January 2018 to December 2018, patients enrolled received non-ERAS traditional care, while the ERAS program was implemented from January to December 2019. Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, surgical data and postoperative recovery parameters were collected from all patients. Postoperative pain scores were evaluated by visual analog scales (VAS). The clinical outcomes were length of stay (LOS), postoperative complications and postoperative pain scores. Compliance results were also collected. Result A total of 127 patients were enrolled, including 67 patients in the non-ERAS traditional care group and 60 patients in the ERAS group. The demographic characteristics and comorbidities of the two groups showed no significant differences. The LOS of patients treated with ERAS program (13.6 ± 4.0 days) was significantly less than that of patients treated with non-ERAS traditional care (15.6 ± 3.9 days) (p = 0.034). Complication rate was 8.3% in the ERAS group versus 20.9% in the non-ERAS traditional care group (p = 0.048). VAS (back) in the ERAS group was significantly lower on postoperative day (POD) 1 and POD2. Postoperative recovery parameters were improved in the ERAS group. The overall compliance with the ERAS program was 94%. Conclusions Based on our results, ERAS program is safer and more effective for elderly patients over 70 undergoing lumbar arthrodesis than non-ERAS traditional care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhong-En Li
- Department of Orthopedics, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Beijing, China.,Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Shi-Bao Lu
- Department of Orthopedics, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. .,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Beijing, China.
| | - Chao Kong
- Department of Orthopedics, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Beijing, China.,Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Wen-Zhi Sun
- Department of Orthopedics, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Beijing, China.,Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Peng Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Beijing, China.,Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Si-Tao Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Cata JP, Fournier K, Corrales G, Owusu-Agyemang P, Soliz J, Bravo M, Wilks J, Van Meter A, Hernandez M, Gottumukkala V. The Impact of Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Versus Four Quadrant Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Quality of Recovery After Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Surgery: A Single-Center, Noninferiority, Randomized, Controlled Trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:5297-5310. [PMID: 33534044 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09622-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recovery after CRS-HIPEC influenced by several factors, including pain and opioid consumption. We hypothesized that 4Q-TAP blocks provide not inferior quality of recovery compared with TEA after CRS-HIPEC. We conducted a randomized, controlled trial to determine whether 4-quadrant transversus abdominis plane (4Q-TAP) block analgesia was noninferior to thoracic epidural (TEA) among patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS HIPEC). METHODS Patients 18 years or older who underwent a CRS-HIPEC surgery were randomly assigned to have either TEA or 4Q-TAP blocks. The primary outcome of this study was the change in quality of recovery 2 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes included quality of recovery on Days 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 30 postoperatively, opioid consumption, pain intensity, length of stay, and postoperative complications. Analyses were performed on a per-protocol basis. RESULTS Sixty-eight patients were included in the analysis. The difference between 4Q-TAP and TEA in the mean QoR-15 change from surgery at postoperative Days 1, 2, and 3 was 0.80 (P = 0.004), -4.5 (P = 0.134), and 3.4 (P = 0.003), respectively. All differences through postoperative day 30 were significantly within the noninferiority boundary of -10 except at postoperative Day 2 (P = 0.134). Length of stay, opioid-related adverse events, and frequency and grade of complications were not significantly different between TEA and 4Q-TAP patients. CONCLUSIONS Despite the significantly higher use of opioids after CRS-HIPEC in patients with 4Q-TAP blocks, their short-term quality of recovery was not inferior to those treated with TEA. Patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC can be effectively managed with 4Q-TAP blocks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan P Cata
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 409, Houston, TX, 77005, USA. .,Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Keith Fournier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - German Corrales
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 409, Houston, TX, 77005, USA.,Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Pascal Owusu-Agyemang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 409, Houston, TX, 77005, USA.,Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Joseph Soliz
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 409, Houston, TX, 77005, USA
| | - Mauro Bravo
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 409, Houston, TX, 77005, USA.,Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jonathan Wilks
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 409, Houston, TX, 77005, USA
| | - Antoinette Van Meter
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 409, Houston, TX, 77005, USA
| | - Mike Hernandez
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vijay Gottumukkala
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 409, Houston, TX, 77005, USA.,Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group, Houston, TX, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
White B, Dahdaleh F, Naffouje SA, Kothari N, Berg J, Wiemann W, Salti GI. Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery on Postoperative Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:5265-5272. [PMID: 33469794 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09476-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have been associated with significant morbidity and increased hospital length of stay (LOS). The authors report their experience after implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program for CRS-HIPEC. METHODS Outcomes were analyzed before and after ERAS implementation. The components of ERAS included preoperative carbohydrate loading, goal-directed fluid management, multimodal pain management, minimization of narcotic use, avoidance of nasogastric tubes, and early mobilization and feeding. RESULTS Of 168 procedures, 88 (52%) were in the pre-ERAS group and 80 (48%) were in the post-ERAS group. The two groups did not differ in terms of age, sex, comorbidities, peritoneal carcinomatosis index scores, completeness of cytoreduction, or operative time. The ERAS patients received fewer fluids intraoperatively (mean, 4.2 vs 6.4 L; p < 0.01). The mean LOS was 7.9 days post-ERAS compared with 10.0 days pre-ERAS (p = 0.015). Clavien-Dindo complications classified as grade ≥ 3 were lower after ERAS (23.7% vs 38.6%; p = 0.04). Moreover, the readmission rates remained the same (16.2% vs 13.6%; p = 0.635). CONCLUSIONS Implementation of an ERAS program for patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC is feasible and not associated with an increase in overall major complications or readmissions. These data support incorporation of ERAS protocols for CRS-HIPEC procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley White
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The University of Illinois at Chicago, 840 South Wood Street, M/C 820, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Fadi Dahdaleh
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Edward-Elmhurst Health, Naperville, IL, USA
| | - Samer A Naffouje
- Department of Surgical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Neerav Kothari
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jessica Berg
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Edward-Elmhurst Health, Naperville, IL, USA
| | - Wendy Wiemann
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Edward-Elmhurst Health, Naperville, IL, USA
| | - George I Salti
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The University of Illinois at Chicago, 840 South Wood Street, M/C 820, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. .,Department of Surgical Oncology, Edward-Elmhurst Health, Naperville, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Dahdaleh FS, White B, Salti GI. ASO Author Reflections: Enhanced Recovery After CRS/HIPEC-An Opportunity to Meet Quality Standards. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:5273-5274. [PMID: 33417118 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09529-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Fadi S Dahdaleh
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Edward-Elmhurst Health, Naperville, IL, USA.
| | - Bradley White
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - George I Salti
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Edward-Elmhurst Health, Naperville, IL, USA.,Department of General Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Wiseman JT, Abdel-Misih S, Beal EW, Zaidi MY, Staley CA, Grotz T, Leiting J, Fournier K, Lee AJ, Dineen S, Powers B, Veerapong J, Baumgartner JM, Clarke C, Patel SH, Dhar V, Hendrix RJ, Lambert L, Abbott DE, Pokrzywa C, Raoof M, Eng O, Fackche N, Greer J, Pawlik TM, Cloyd JM. A multi-institutional analysis of Textbook Outcomes among patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal surface malignancies. Surg Oncol 2020; 37:101492. [PMID: 33465587 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Revised: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While recent studies have introduced the composite measure of a textbook outcome (TO) for measuring postoperative outcomes, the incidence of a TO has not been characterized among patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM). STUDY DESIGN All patients who underwent CRS ± hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) between 1999 and 2017 from 12 institutions were included. A TO was defined as the absence of any of the following criteria: completeness of cytoreduction >1, reoperation within 90-days, readmission within 90-days, mortality within 90-days, any grade ≥2 complication, hospital stay >75th percentile, and non-home discharge. RESULTS Among 1904 patients who underwent CRS, only 30.9% achieved a TO while 69.1% failed to achieve a TO most commonly because of postoperative complications. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with achieving a TO were age <65 years (OR: 1.5), albumin ≥3.5 g/dl (OR: 5.7), receipt of HIPEC (OR: 4.5), PCI ≤14 (OR: 2.2), intravenous fluid volume ≤10,000 ml (OR: 2.1), blood loss ≤1000 ml (OR: 4.2) and operative time <7 h (OR: 1.9); while receipt of neoadjuvant therapy (OR: 0.7) and liver resection (OR: 0.4) were associated with not achieving a TO (all p < 0.05). TO was associated with improved overall survival (median 159 months vs 56 months, p < 0.01) even after controlling for confounders on Cox regression (hazard ratio: 2.5, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION Among patients undergoing CRS ± HIPEC for PSM, failure to achieve a TO is common and independently associated with worse overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason T Wiseman
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
| | | | - Eliza W Beal
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | | | - Travis Grotz
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Keith Fournier
- Department of Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrew J Lee
- Department of Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sean Dineen
- Department of Surgery, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Benjamin Powers
- Department of Surgery, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jula Veerapong
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Joel M Baumgartner
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Callisia Clarke
- Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Sameer H Patel
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Vikrom Dhar
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Ryan J Hendrix
- Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Laura Lambert
- Department of Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Daniel E Abbott
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Courtney Pokrzywa
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Mustafa Raoof
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Oliver Eng
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Nadege Fackche
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jonathan Greer
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Martin RC, Marshall BM, Philips P, Egger M, McMasters KM, Scoggins CR. Enhanced recovery after surgery is safe for cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Am J Surg 2020; 220:1428-1432. [PMID: 32921403 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.08.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Revised: 07/19/2020] [Accepted: 08/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is an effective, aggressive approach to treating intraperitoneal carcinomatosis. This study aimed to test the efficacy/safety of an enhanced recovery (ERAS) program after CRS-HIPEC surgery. METHODS Review of an IRB-approved prospectively maintained HIPEC database from 2003 to 2019. Adverse events and outcomes related to the primary operation were noted. RESULTS 125 HIPEC procedures performed met inclusion criteria, with 20 treated through ERAS. There was an improvement in LOS (ERAS: 9, 6.0-28.0; non-ERAS: 11.0, 6.0-45.1, P = 0.5), a significant reduction in opioid use during hospitalization (ERAS Total Morphine Equivalents 156 vs Non-ERAS of 856, p < 0.001), and a significant reduction in discharge opioid requirements (ERAS 55% of patients, non-ERAS 97%, p < 0.02). CONCLUSION ERAS for CRS-HIPEC is safe, while maintaining quality outcomes, and leads to significant reductions in hospital opioid use and discharge narcotic usage. Our experience supports the full implementation of an ERAS protocol for HIPEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Cg Martin
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, USA.
| | - Bryce M Marshall
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, USA
| | - Prejesh Philips
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, USA
| | - Michael Egger
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, USA
| | - Kelly M McMasters
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, USA
| | - Charles R Scoggins
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hübner M, Kusamura S, Villeneuve L, Al-Niaimi A, Alyami M, Balonov K, Bell J, Bristow R, Guiral DC, Fagotti A, Falcão LFR, Glehen O, Lambert L, Mack L, Muenster T, Piso P, Pocard M, Rau B, Sgarbura O, Somashekhar SP, Wadhwa A, Altman A, Fawcett W, Veerapong J, Nelson G. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) with or without hyperthermic IntraPEritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations - Part I: Preoperative and intraoperative management. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 46:2292-2310. [PMID: 32873454 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.07.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Revised: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have been shown to considerably reduce complications, length of stay and costs after most of surgical procedures by standardised application of best evidence-based perioperative care. The aim was to elaborate dedicated recommendations for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) ± hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in a two-part series of guidelines based on expert consensus. The present part I of the guidelines highlights preoperative and intraoperative management. METHODS The core group assembled a multidisciplinary panel of 24 experts involved in peritoneal surface malignancy surgery representing the fields of general surgery (n = 12), gynaecological surgery (n = 6), and anaesthesia (n = 6). Experts systematically reviewed and summarized the available evidence on 72 identified perioperative care items, following the GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development, evaluation) system. Final consensus (defined as ≥50%, or ≥70% of weak/strong recommendations combined) was reached by a standardised 2-round Delphi process, regarding the strength of recommendations. RESULTS Response rates were 100% for both Delphi rounds. Quality of evidence was evaluated high, moderate low and very low, for 15 (21%), 26 (36%), 29 (40%) and 2 items, respectively. Consensus was reached for 71/72(98.6%) items. Strong recommendations were defined for 37 items, No consensus could be reached regarding the preemptive use of fresh frozen plasma. CONCLUSION The present ERAS recommendations for CRS±HIPEC are based on a standardised expert consensus process providing clinicians with valuable guidance. There is an urgent need to produce high quality studies for CRS±HIPEC and to prospectively evaluate recommendations in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Hübner
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, University of Lausanne (UNIL), Switzerland.
| | - Shigeki Kusamura
- Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Laurent Villeneuve
- Clinical Research and Epidemiological Unit, Department of Public Health, Lyon University Hospital, EA 3738, University of Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Ahmed Al-Niaimi
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, USA
| | - Mohammad Alyami
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Konstantin Balonov
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, USA
| | - John Bell
- Department of Anesthesiology, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK
| | - Robert Bristow
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecologic Oncology, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, USA
| | - Delia Cortés Guiral
- Department of General Surgery (Peritoneal Surface Surgical Oncology). University Hospital Principe de Asturias, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Luiz Fernando R Falcão
- Discipline of Anesthesiology, Pain and Critical Care Medicine, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Olivier Glehen
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Lyon University Hospital, EA 3738, University of Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Laura Lambert
- Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Program, Section of Surgical Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Lloyd Mack
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Tino Muenster
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine. Hospital Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Pompiliu Piso
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Hospital Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Marc Pocard
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Lariboisière University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Beate Rau
- Department of Surgery, Campus Virchow-Klinikum and Charité Campus Mitte, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
| | - Olivia Sgarbura
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute Montpellier (ICM), University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - S P Somashekhar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Manipal Hospital, Bengaluru, India
| | - Anupama Wadhwa
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Alon Altman
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - William Fawcett
- Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
| | - Jula Veerapong
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Gregg Nelson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Lustosa RJC, Batista TP, Carneiro VCG, Badiglian-Filho L, Costa RLÚR, Lopes A, Sarmento BJDEQ, Lima JTDEO, Mello MJGDE, LeÃo CS. Quality of life in a phase 2 trial of short-course hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) at interval debulking surgery for high tumor burden ovarian cancer. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 47:e20202534. [PMID: 32667582 DOI: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20202534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION to evaluate the effect of short-course (i.e.: 30 minutes) HIPEC on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in our feasibility study; NCT02249013. METHODS a prespecified secondary end-point of our open-label, multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial on safety and efficacy was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30, version 3.0). Patients were required to complete the HRQoL questionnaire at baseline, after HIPEC, and after the end of the treatment. Changes of HRQoL over time were assessed by median scores for each domain and analyzed by Friedman`s test at a significant two-sided level of 0.05. RESULTS fifteen patients with high tumor burden EOC were recruited from our public health system between February 2015 and July 2019. A baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire and at least one follow-up questionnaire was received from all of the patients. No significant difference over time in the QLQC30 summary scores was observed (p>0.05). The transitory impairment on patients HRQoL immediately after the short-course HIPEC trended to return to baseline at the end of the multimodal treatment. CONCLUSIONS we found no significant impairment of short-course HIPEC on patients HRQoL into the context of our comprehensive treatment protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto JosÉ Costa Lustosa
- Departamento de Cirurgia, Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira, Recife, PE, Brazil
| | - Thales Paulo Batista
- Departamento de Cirurgia, Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira, Recife, PE, Brazil
| | - VandrÉ Cabral Gomes Carneiro
- Departamento de Cirurgia / Oncologia, Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira, Recife, PE, Brazil
| | | | | | - AndrÉ Lopes
- Departamento de Ginecologia, Instituto Brasileiro de Controle do Câncer, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | | | | | | | - Cristiano Souza LeÃo
- Departamento de Cirurgia, Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira, Recife, PE, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Schwartz PB, Abbott DE. ASO Author Reflections: Predictors of Fiscal Outcomes in CRS-HIPEC and Opportunities for Improvement. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:4929-4930. [PMID: 32418080 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08598-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick B Schwartz
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Daniel E Abbott
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
A Review of Enhanced Recovery Protocols in Pelvic Surgery. CURRENT BLADDER DYSFUNCTION REPORTS 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s11884-020-00582-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
37
|
Schwartz PB, Stahl CC, Vande Walle KA, Pokrzywa CJ, Cherney Stafford LM, Aiken T, Barrett J, Acher AW, Leverson G, Ronnekleiv-Kelly S, Weber SM, Abbott DE. What Drives High Costs of Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC: Patient, Provider or Tumor? Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:4920-4928. [PMID: 32415351 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08583-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is utilized for peritoneal malignancies and is associated with significant resource use. To address potentially modifiable factors contributing to excessive cost, we sought to determine predictors of high cost of care for patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC. METHODS An institutional CRS/HIPEC database was queried for adult patients from 2014 to 2018. Cost was defined as cost for the index hospitalization, and high-cost cases were defined as > 75th percentile for cost. Bivariate analyses for cost were performed, and all significant tumor, patient, and surgeon-specific variables were entered in a linear regression for cost. A separate linear regression was performed for length of stay (LOS). RESULTS In total, 59 patients underwent 61 CRS/HIPEC procedures. The median direct variable cost was $20,509 (16,395-25,240). Median length of stay (LOS) was 8 (7-11.5) days and ICU stay was 1 (1-1.5) day. LOS, length of ICU stay and operative time were predictive of cost. Factors associated with increased LOS were Clavien-Dindo grade II complications and ostomy creation. Patient-related factors, including age and BMI, tumor-related factors, such as PCI and CCR, and surgeon were not predictive of cost nor LOS. DISCUSSION Our results, the first to identify predictors of high cost of CRS/HIPEC-related care in the US, reveal cost was largely related to length and intensity of care. In turn, these drivers were influenced by complications and operative factors. Future work will focus on identifying an appropriate ERAS protocol following CRS/HIPEC and selection of those patients that may avoid routine ICU admission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick B Schwartz
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Christopher C Stahl
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Kara A Vande Walle
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Courtney J Pokrzywa
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Linda M Cherney Stafford
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Taylor Aiken
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - James Barrett
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Alexandra W Acher
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Glen Leverson
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Sean Ronnekleiv-Kelly
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Sharon M Weber
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Daniel E Abbott
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Pletcher E, Gleeson E, Labow D. Peritoneal Cancers and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. Surg Clin North Am 2020; 100:589-613. [PMID: 32402303 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2020.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is an aggressive, potentially curative approach used to treat locoregional disease associated with primary and secondary malignancies of the peritoneum. It involves resection of all macroscopic disease larger than 2.5 mm, followed by instillation of hyperthermic chemotherapy directly into the peritoneum for higher drug exposure to microscopic disease. In select patients with primary peritoneal mesothelioma, pseudomyxoma peritonei, colorectal adenocarcinoma, appendiceal adenocarcinoma, or ovarian cancer, with no extra-abdominal metastasis and limited involvement of the peritoneum, the procedure can be performed to increase overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Pletcher
- Surgery Department, Mount Sinai West and Morningside, 425 West 59th Street, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10019, USA
| | - Elizabeth Gleeson
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Mount Sinai Hospital, 19 East 98th Street, Suite 7A, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Daniel Labow
- Surgery Department, Mount Sinai Hospital, Mount Sinai West and Morningside, 425 West 59th Street, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10019, USA.
| |
Collapse
|