Incidental Gallbladder Cancer: Permission to Operate

Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for gallbladder papillary adenocarcinoma

Background

Gallbladder papillary adenocarcinoma (GBPA) is an uncharacteristically gallbladder cancer subtype. Although some studies have shown that the prognosis of GBPA patients is significantly better than that of gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GBA) and gallbladder mucinous adenocarcinoma (GBMA) due to its rarity, there is a lack of large sample studies necessary to confirm the clinical characteristics and survival rate of GBPA. Therefore, this study aimed to describe the clinicopathological characteristics affecting survival in GBPA. This data was then used to establish a prognostic nomogram for GBPA.

Methods

The data of patients diagnosed with gallbladder cancer between 2004 to 2015 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The clinical features and survival of patients with GBPA were compared with those of GBA and GBMA after balancing the baseline characteristics using propensity score matching (PSM). Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were used to identify the prognostic factors for GBPA. Subsequently, the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) nomograms were established to predict GBPA prognosis. The performance and discrimination of the nomogram were measured using concordance index (C-index), calibration curves, receptor operating characteristic curves(ROC), and decision curve analysis (DCA) was applied to examine the net benefit of tients with GBPA, 5798 patients with GBA, and 223 patients with GBMA. The mean 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rates for GBPA were 81.3%, 58.8%, and 49.1%, respectively, while the mean 1-, 3- and 5-year CSS rates were 85.0%, 68.1%, and 61.0%, respectively. The median OS rates was 58 months (95% CI: 43-88), while the median CSS was not reached. The PSM analysis showed a differ statistically significantly in the OS between GBPA and GBA. However, there has no statistically difference in CSS. Conversely, the OS and CSS between GBPA and GBMA have statistically significant differences. Age, marital, T stage, and M stage were strongly linked to the prognosis for OS, while T-stage, M-stage, and surgery were significantly associated with the prognosis for CSS in GBPA patients. The AUC for the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 0.722 (95%CI: 0.630-0.813), 0.728 (95%CI: 0.665-0.790), and 0.706 (95%CI: 0.641-0.771), respectively. The AUC for the 1-, 3-, and 5-year CSS were 0.749 (95%CI: 0.659-0.840), 0.698 (95%CI: 0.627-0.770), and 0.665 (95%CI: 0.594-0.735), respectively. The C-indices for the OS and CSS nomograms were 0.701 (95% CI: 0.634-0.744) and 0.651 (95% CI: 0.598-0.703), respectively. The calibration curves showed that the nomograms were well consistency. The DCA showed that compared with the TNM system, the nomogram models had a significant positive net benefit in survival prediction.

Conclusion

GBPA has distinct clinicopathological characteristics and survival compared to other gallbladder carcinomas. The established nomogram provided a better prediction of survival for GBPA patients than the traditional TNM models.

Successful multimodality treatment of metastatic gallbladder cancer: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Gallbladder cancer is the most common malignant tumor in the biliary system, and it is characterized by high aggressiveness and an extremely poor prognosis. Current treatment for advanced gallbladder cancer remains unsatisfactory. Here, we report a patient with advanced gallbladder cancer who was cured by multidisciplinary treatment.

CASE SUMMARY

A 73-year-old male presented to our hospital with right abdominal pain for 3 d and was diagnosed with stage IVB gallbladder cancer with multiple liver metastases, peritoneum metastasis, diaphragm metastasis and lymph node metastases. The patient initially received chemotherapy, targeted therapy, ¹²⁵I seed implantation and immunotherapy, as there were no specific indications for radical surgery. During these palliative therapies, the level of tumor markers gradually decreased but remained higher than the normal level, lymph node metastases gradually disappeared, and liver metastasis was gradually limited to the left liver. Finally, the patient received radical surgery with left hepatectomy, radical lymphadenectomy and partial diaphragmatic resection. To date, the patient has survived for more than six years posttreatment, the levels of tumor markers are normal, and imaging examinations show no signs of tumor recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Currently, the prognosis of advanced gallbladder cancer remains unsatisfactory. A single treatment method is not sufficient for patients with advanced gallbladder cancer. Multidisciplinary individualized treatment is essential and should be utilized for advanced gallbladder cancer patients to further improve prognosis.

Current management of incidental gallbladder cancer: A review

Early-stage gallbladder cancer (GBC) is mostly discovered incidentally by the pathologist after cholecystectomy for a presumed benign disease. It is the most common malignancy of the biliary tract with a variable incidence rate all over the World. The majority of patients with GBC remain asymptomatic for a long time and diagnosis is usually late when the disease is at an advanced stage. Radical surgery consisting in resection of the gallbladder liver bed and regional lymph nodes seems to be the best treatment option for incidental GBC. However, recurrence rates after salvage surgery are still high and the addition of neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy may improve outcomes. The aim of the present review is to evaluate current literature for advances in management of incidental GBC, with particular focus on staging techniques and surgical options.