1
|
Ding X, Qi LX, Sun DY. Differences in insomnia-related self-reported outcomes among elderly hospitalized patients. World J Psychiatry 2024; 14:686-694. [PMID: 38808082 PMCID: PMC11129157 DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v14.i5.686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Revised: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Insomnia is among the most common sleep disorders worldwide. Insomnia in older adults is a social and public health problem. Insomnia affects the physical and mental health of elderly hospitalized patients and can aggravate or induce physical illnesses. Understanding subjective feelings and providing reasonable and standardized care for elderly hospitalized patients with insomnia are urgent issues. AIM To explore the differences in self-reported outcomes associated with insomnia among elderly hospitalized patients. METHODS One hundred patients admitted to the geriatric unit of our hospital between June 2021 and December 2021 were included in this study. Self-reported symptoms were assessed using the Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS), Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7), Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15), Memorial University of Newfoundland Scale of Happiness (MUNSH), Barthel Index Evaluation (BI), Morse Fall Scale (MFS), Mini-Mental State Examination, and the Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36). Correlation coefficients were used to analyze the correlation between sleep quality and self-reported symptoms. Effects of insomnia was analyzed using Logistic regression analysis. RESULTS Nineteen patients with AIS ≥ 6 were included in the insomnia group, and the incidence of insomnia was 19% (19/100). The remaining 81 patients were assigned to the non-insomnia group. There were significant differences between the two groups in the GDA-7, GDS-15, MUNSH, BI, MFS, and SF-36 items (P < 0.05). Patients in the insomnia group were more likely to experience anxiety, depression, and other mental illnesses, as well as difficulties with everyday tasks and a greater risk of falling (P < 0.05). Subjective well-being and quality of life were poorer in the insomnia group than in the control group. The AIS scores positively correlated with the GAD-7, GDS-15, and MFS scores in elderly hospitalized patients with insomnia (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that GDS-15 ≥ 5 was an independent risk factor for insomnia in elderly hospitalized patients (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION The number of self-reported symptoms was higher among elderly hospitalized patients with insomnia. Therefore, we should focus on the main complaints of patients to meet their care needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xia Ding
- Department of Gangzha General Medical Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong 226000, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Ling-Xia Qi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong 226000, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Dong-Yun Sun
- Department of Ophthalmic Surgery Room, The Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong 226000, Jiangsu Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Diao K, Lei X, He W, Jagsi R, Giordano SH, Smith GL, Caudle A, Shen Y, Peterson SK, Smith BD. Racial and Ethnic Differences in Long-Term Adverse Radiation Therapy Effects Among Breast Cancer Survivors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:626-631. [PMID: 37751792 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.09.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Breast and skin changes are underrecognized side effects of radiation therapy for breast cancer, which may have long-term implications for quality of life (QOL). Racial and ethnic disparities in breast cancer outcomes, including long-term QOL differences after breast radiation therapy, are poorly understood. METHODS AND MATERIALS We conducted a cross-sectional survey study of patients from the Texas Cancer Registry who received diagnoses of stage 0-II breast cancer from 2009 to 2014 and treated with lumpectomy and radiation therapy; 2770 patients were sampled and 631 responded (23%). The BREAST-Q Adverse Effects of Radiation overall score and subindices measured the effect of radiation therapy on breast tissue. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated associations of demographic and treatment characteristics with outcomes. RESULTS The median age was 57 years (IQR, 48-65), median time from diagnosis to survey response 9 years (IQR, 7-10), and the cohort included 62 Asian American or Pacific Islander (9.8%), 11 American Indian or Alaskan Native (AIAN) (1.7%), 161 Black (25.5%), 144 Hispanic (22.8%), and 253 White (40.1%) patients. Mean BREAST-Q Adverse Effects of Radiation score was worse for AIAN patients (-22.2; 95% CI, -39.9 to -4.6; P = .01), Black patients (-10.8; 95% CI, -16.1 to -5.5; P < .001), and Hispanic patients (-7.8; 95% CI, -13.0 to -2.5; P = .004) compared with White patients, age <50 compared with ≥65 (effect size -8.6; 95% CI, -14.0 to -3.2; P = .002), less than a college education (-5.8; 95% CI, -10.0 to -1.6; P = .01), bra cup size of D/E versus A/B (-5.3; 95% CI, -9.9 to -0.65; P = .03), and current smokers (-11.3; 95% CI, -18.3 to -4.2; P = .002). AIAN, Black, and Hispanic patients reported worse changes in skin pigmentation, telangiectasias, dryness, soreness, and/or irritation compared with White patients. CONCLUSIONS AIAN, Black, and Hispanic patients reported substantially worse long-term breast and skin QOL outcomes after radiation therapy. Additional work is needed to understand these differences and how to alleviate them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Diao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Xiudong Lei
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Weiguo He
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Reshma Jagsi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Sharon H Giordano
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Grace L Smith
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Abigail Caudle
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yu Shen
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Susan K Peterson
- Department of Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Benjamin D Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ryan JF, Lesniak DM, Cordeiro E, Campbell SM, Rajaee AN. Surgeon Factors Influencing Breast Surgery Outcomes: A Scoping Review to Define the Modern Breast Surgical Oncologist. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:4695-4713. [PMID: 37036590 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13472-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Modern breast surgical oncology incorporates many aspects of care including preoperative workup, surgical management, and multidisciplinary collaboration to achieve favorable oncologic outcomes and high patient satisfaction. However, there is variability in surgical practice and outcomes. This review aims to identify modifiable surgeon factors influencing breast surgery outcomes and provide a definition of the modern breast surgical oncologist. METHODS A systematic literature search with additional backward citation searching was conducted. Studies describing modifiable surgeon factors with associated breast surgery outcomes such as rates of breast conservation, sentinel node biopsy, re-excision, complications, acceptable esthetic outcome, and disease-free and overall survival were included. Surgeon factors were categorized for qualitative analysis. RESULTS A total of 91 studies met inclusion criteria describing both modifiable surgeon factor and outcome data. Four key surgeon factors associated with improved breast surgery outcomes were identified: surgical volume (45 studies), use of oncoplastic techniques (41 studies), sub-specialization in breast surgery or surgical oncology (9 studies), and participation in professional development activities (5 studies). CONCLUSIONS On the basis of the literature review, the modern breast surgical oncologist has a moderate- to high-volume breast surgery practice, understands the use and application of oncoplastic breast surgery, engages in additional training opportunities, maintains memberships in relevant societies, and remains up to date on key literature. Surgeons practicing in breast surgical oncology can target these modifiable factors for professional development and quality improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna F Ryan
- Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - David M Lesniak
- Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Erin Cordeiro
- Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Sandra M Campbell
- John W. Scott Health Sciences Library, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - A Nikoo Rajaee
- Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hanson SE, Lei X, Roubaud MS, DeSnyder SM, Caudle AS, Shaitelman SF, Hoffman KE, Smith GL, Jagsi R, Peterson SK, Smith BD. Long-term Quality of Life in Patients With Breast Cancer After Breast Conservation vs Mastectomy and Reconstruction. JAMA Surg 2022; 157:e220631. [PMID: 35416926 PMCID: PMC9008558 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.0631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Importance Treatment options for early breast cancer include breast-conserving surgery with radiation therapy (RT) or mastectomy and breast reconstruction without RT. Despite marked differences in these treatment strategies, little is known with regard to their association with long-term quality of life (QOL). Objective To evaluate the association of treatment with breast-conserving surgery with RT vs mastectomy and reconstruction without RT with long-term QOL. Design, Setting, and Participants This comparative effectiveness research study used data from the Texas Cancer Registry for women diagnosed with stage 0-II breast cancer and treated with breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy and reconstruction between 2006 and 2008. The study sample was mailed a survey between March 2017 and April 2018. Data were analyzed from August 1, 2018 to October 15, 2021. Exposures Breast-conserving surgery with RT or mastectomy and reconstruction without RT. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was satisfaction with breasts, measured with the BREAST-Q patient-reported outcome measure. Secondary outcomes included BREAST-Q physical well-being, psychosocial well-being, and sexual well-being; health utility, measured using the EuroQol Health-Related Quality of Life 5-Dimension, 3-Level questionnaire; and local therapy decisional regret. Multivariable linear regression models with weights for treatment, age, and race and ethnicity tested associations of the exposure with outcomes. Results Of 647 patients who responded to the survey (40.0%; 356 had undergone breast-conserving surgery, and 291 had undergone mastectomy and reconstruction), 551 (85.2%) confirmed treatment with breast-conserving surgery with RT (n = 315) or mastectomy and reconstruction without RT (n = 236). Among the 647 respondents, the median age was 53 years (range, 23-85 years) and the median time from diagnosis to survey was 10.3 years (range, 8.4-12.5 years). Multivariable analysis showed no significant difference between breast-conserving surgery with RT (referent) and mastectomy and reconstruction without RT in satisfaction with breasts (effect size, 2.71; 95% CI, -2.45 to 7.88; P = .30) or physical well-being (effect size, -1.80; 95% CI, -5.65 to 2.05; P = .36). In contrast, psychosocial well-being (effect size, -8.61; 95% CI, -13.26 to -3.95; P < .001) and sexual well-being (effect size, -10.68; 95% CI, -16.60 to -4.76; P < .001) were significantly worse with mastectomy and reconstruction without RT. Health utility (effect size, -0.003; 95% CI, -0.03 to 0.03; P = .83) and decisional regret (effect size, 1.32; 95% CI, -3.77 to 6.40; P = .61) did not differ by treatment group. Conclusions and Relevance The findings support equivalence of breast-conserving surgery with RT and mastectomy and reconstruction without RT with regard to breast satisfaction and physical well-being. However, breast-conserving surgery with RT was associated with clinically meaningful improvements in psychosocial and sexual well-being. These findings may help inform preference-sensitive decision-making for women with early-stage breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Summer E Hanson
- Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Xiudong Lei
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Margaret S Roubaud
- Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Sarah M DeSnyder
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Abigail S Caudle
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Simona F Shaitelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Karen E Hoffman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Grace L Smith
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.,Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Reshma Jagsi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Susan K Peterson
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Benjamin D Smith
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.,Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tang A, Mooney CM, Mittal A, Dzubnar JM, Knopf KB, Khoury AL. High Compliance With Choosing Wisely Breast Surgical Guidelines at a Safety-Net Hospital. J Surg Res 2021; 272:96-104. [PMID: 34953372 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.09.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 08/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Professional organizations recently set guidelines for avoiding surgeries of low utility and overutilization for the Choosing Wisely campaign. These include re-excision for invasive cancer close to margins, double mastectomy in patients with unilateral breast cancer, axillary lymph node dissection in patients with limited nodal disease, and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients ≥70 years with early-stage breast cancer. Variable adherence to these recommendations led us to evaluate implementation rates of low-value surgical guidelines at a safety-net hospital. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed breast cancer patients who underwent surgery from 2015 to 2020. Each patient was assessed for eligibility for omission of the listed surgeries. Trends were evaluated by cohorts before and after a fellowship-trained breast surgeon joined the faculty in 2018. Outcomes were compared using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS Among 195 patients, none underwent re-excision for close margins of invasive cancer. Only 6.7% of patients (3/45) received contralateral mastectomy and 1.8% of eligible patients (3/169) received axillary lymph node dissection. Overall, 60% of patients ≥ 70 years with stage 1 hormone-positive breast cancer (9/15) received SLNB. There was a downward trend from 71% of eligible patients receiving SLNB in 2015-2018 to 50% in 2019-2020. CONCLUSIONS De-implementation of traditional surgical practices, deemed as low-value care, toward newer guidelines is achievable even at community hospitals serving a low socioeconomic community. By avoiding overtreatment, hospitals can achieve effective resource allocation which allow for social distributive justice among patients with breast cancer and ensure strategic use of scarce health economic resources while preserving patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annie Tang
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, East Bay - Highland Hospital, Oakland, California
| | - Colin M Mooney
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, East Bay - Highland Hospital, Oakland, California
| | - Ananya Mittal
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, East Bay - Highland Hospital, Oakland, California
| | - Jessica M Dzubnar
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, East Bay - Highland Hospital, Oakland, California
| | - Kevin B Knopf
- Department of Medicine, Alameda Health System - Highland Hospital, Oakland, California
| | - Amal L Khoury
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, East Bay - Highland Hospital, Oakland, California.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Baker JL, Dizon DS, Wenziger CM, Streja E, Thompson CK, Lee MK, DiNome ML, Attai DJ. "Going Flat" After Mastectomy: Patient-Reported Outcomes by Online Survey. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:2493-2505. [PMID: 33393025 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09448-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Going Flat movement aims to increase awareness and acceptance of mastectomy alone as a viable option for patients. Little is known about motivations and satisfaction with surgical outcomes in this population. METHODS An online survey was administered to 931 women who had a history of uni- or bilateral mastectomy for treatment of breast cancer or elevated breast cancer risk without current breast mound reconstruction. Satisfaction with outcome and surgeon support for the patient experience were characterized using 5-level scaled scores. RESULTS Mastectomy alone was the first choice for 73.7% of the respondents. The top two reasons for going flat were desire for a faster recovery and avoidance of a foreign body placement. Overall, the mean scaled satisfaction score was 3.72 ± 1.17 out of 5. In the multivariable analysis, low level of surgeon support for the decision to go flat was the strongest predictor of a satisfaction score lower than 3 (odds ratio [OR], 3.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.59-5.72; p < 0.001). Dissatisfaction also was more likely among respondents reporting a body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg/m2 or higher (OR, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.76-4.27; p < 0.001) and those undergoing a unilateral procedure (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.29-3.09; p = 0.002). Greater satisfaction was associated with receiving adequate information about surgical options (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.32-0.69; p < 0.0001) and having a surgeon with a specialized breast surgery practice (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.38-0.81; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS Most patients undergoing mastectomy alone are satisfied with their surgical outcome. Surgeons may optimize patient experience by recognizing and supporting a patient's decision to go flat.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Baker
- Department of Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Don S Dizon
- Brown University and the Lifespan Cancer Institute, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Cachet M Wenziger
- Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Elani Streja
- Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Carlie K Thompson
- Department of Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Minna K Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Maggie L DiNome
- Department of Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Deanna J Attai
- Department of Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- UCLA Health Burbank Breast Care, Burbank, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Arabandi P, Slade AN, Sutton AL, McGuire KP, Sheppard V. Racial differences in the relationship between surgical choice and subsequent patient-reported satisfaction outcomes among women with early-stage hormone-positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 183:459-466. [PMID: 32676991 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05784-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2019] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The last fifteen years has seen a rising proportion of women who are eligible for breast conserving therapy (BCT) choosing mastectomy despite equivalent survival in early-stage breast cancer. We aim to explore potential racial differences in the association of surgical choice with subsequent patient-reported satisfaction outcomes. METHODS Women who were within one year of diagnosis with hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer were asked the Short Version of Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-18), which assesses their overall satisfaction with their medical care. We conducted bivariate analyses, including paired t-tests, to clarify differences in these patient-reported factors by surgical choice and race. Multivariable linear regression models were used to adjust for clinical and demographic control variables. RESULTS For the sample of 279 women who underwent definitive surgery, women who received a mastectomy had lower levels of overall satisfaction, 71 vs. 75 (out of 90) (p = .001). In stratifying this relationship by race, the difference in total satisfaction score was largest among Black women (69 among mastectomy patients vs. 75 among BCT patients; p = 0.016). On multivariable linear regression, Black race and mastectomy status (together) exhibited a significantly large negative association with total satisfaction score, with negative associations across all domains of the PSQ-18. CONCLUSION Despite the high prevalence of mastectomy among Black women with early-stage, HR-positive breast cancer, this population is more likely to report lower levels of patient satisfaction compared to patients receiving BCT. These findings suggest there may be potential racial differences in the psychosocial consequences of surgical choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prudvi Arabandi
- Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Alexander N Slade
- Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, VA, USA.
| | - Arnethea L Sutton
- Department of Health Behavior & Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Kandace P McGuire
- Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Vanessa Sheppard
- Department of Health Behavior & Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Diao K, Smith BD. ASO Author Reflections: Impact of Surgical Subspecialization in Breast Cancer-The Case for Fellowship Training. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:1023-1024. [PMID: 31965367 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08214-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Diao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Benjamin D Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. .,Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|