1
|
Dalton JC, Crowell KA, Ntowe KW, van den Bruele AB, DiNome ML, Rosenberger LH, Thomas SM, Wang T, Hwang ES, Plichta JK. Utility of Axillary Staging in Older Patients with HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15812-w. [PMID: 39014162 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15812-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 07/01/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The utility of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in older patients remains controversial. Advancements in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-directed therapy have revolutionized disease response rates and prognosis, supporting efforts to re-evaluate the utility of SLNB. We aimed to assess the differences in treatment and overall survival (OS) in older patients with HER2-positive breast cancer based on SLNB. METHODS Using the National Cancer Database (2010-2020), patients ≥ 70 years of age diagnosed with cT1-2/cN0/M0, HER2-positive breast cancer were identified. Logistic regression assessed associations with SLNB, systemic therapy, and radiation. Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify factors associated with OS. Analyses were stratified by treatment sequence, i.e. upfront surgery or neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) followed by surgery. RESULTS Of the 17,609 patients included, 94% underwent upfront surgery (n = 16,492) and the remaining underwent NAT (n = 1117). Those who underwent SLNB were more likely to receive adjuvant therapy, irrespective of nodal status {upfront surgery/systemic therapy (odds ratio [OR] 2.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.17-3.67); upfront surgery/radiation (OR 3.97, 95% CI 3.03-5.21); NAT/radiation (OR 5.69, 95% CI 1.83-17.69)}. The breast pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was highest among the hormone receptor (HR)-negative/HER2-positive subtype (50.0%), of which none were found to be ypN+. Comorbidity burden was associated with significantly lower rates of adjuvant systemic therapy and worse OS. CONCLUSIONS Patients who underwent SLNB, regardless of pN status, were more likely to receive adjuvant therapy. Nodal positivity is exceedingly rare for patients with a breast pCR following NAT, especially among the HR-negative/HER2-positive subtype. It is reasonable to consider omission of SLNB in select subgroups of older patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliet C Dalton
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Koumani W Ntowe
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Astrid Botty van den Bruele
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Maggie L DiNome
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Laura H Rosenberger
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Samantha M Thomas
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ton Wang
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - E Shelley Hwang
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jennifer K Plichta
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chung SH, Cassidy MR. ASO Author Reflections: Male Breast Cancer and Axillary Lymph Node Dissection: Time to Rethink the Algorithm? Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:5619-5620. [PMID: 37191857 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13627-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie H Chung
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael R Cassidy
- Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chung SH, de Geus SWL, Shewmaker G, Romatoski KS, Drake FT, Ko NY, Merrill AL, Hirsch AE, Tseng JF, Sachs TE, Cassidy MR. Axillary Lymph Node Dissection is Associated with Improved Survival Among Men with Invasive Breast Cancer and Sentinel Node Metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:5610-5618. [PMID: 37204557 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13475-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Male breast cancer (MBC) is rare, and management is extrapolated from trials that enroll only women. It is unclear whether contemporary axillary management based on data from landmark trials in women may also apply to men with breast cancer. This study aimed to compare survival in men with positive sentinel lymph nodes after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone versus complete axillary dissection (ALND). PATIENTS AND METHODS Using the National Cancer Database, men with clinically node-negative, T1 and T2 breast cancer and 1-2 positive sentinel nodes who underwent SLNB or ALND were identified from 2010 to 2020. Both 1:1 propensity score matching and multivariate regression were used to identify patient and disease variables associated with ALND versus SLNB. Survival between ALND and SLNB were compared using Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS A total of 1203 patients were identified: 61.1% underwent SLNB alone and 38.9% underwent ALND. Treatment in academic centers (36.1 vs. 27.7%; p < 0.0001), 2 positive lymph nodes on SLNB (32.9 vs. 17.3%, p < 0.0001) and receipt or recommendation of chemotherapy (66.5 vs. 52.2%, p < 0.0001) were associated with higher likelihood of ALND. After propensity score matching, ALND was associated with superior survival compared with SLNB (5-year overall survival of 83.8 vs. 76.0%; log-rank p = 0.0104). DISCUSSION The results of this study suggest that among patients with early-stage MBC with limited sentinel lymph node metastasis, ALND is associated with superior survival compared with SLNB alone. These findings indicate that it may be inappropriate to extrapolate the results of the ACOSOG Z0011 and EORTC AMAROS trials to MBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie H Chung
- Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Susanna W L de Geus
- Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Grant Shewmaker
- Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kelsey S Romatoski
- Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Frederick T Drake
- Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Naomi Y Ko
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrea L Merrill
- Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ariel E Hirsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jennifer F Tseng
- Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Teviah E Sachs
- Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael R Cassidy
- Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Male Breast Cancer. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-022-00466-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
|
5
|
He Y, Gao X, Wu J, Li X, Ma Z. Effect of Breast conservation therapy vs mastectomy on overall survival and breast cancer-specific survival among men with stage I-II breast cancer: Analysis of SEER, 2000-2018. Clin Breast Cancer 2022; 22:410-417. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
6
|
Chamseddine RS, Wang C, Yin K, Wang J, Singh P, Zhou J, Robson ME, Braun D, Hughes KS. Penetrance of male breast cancer susceptibility genes: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021; 191:31-38. [PMID: 34642874 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06413-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Several male breast cancer (MBC) susceptibility genes have been identified, but the MBC risk for individuals with a pathogenic variant in each of these genes (i.e., penetrance) remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review of studies reporting the penetrance of MBC susceptibility genes to better summarize current estimates of penetrance. METHODS A search query was developed to identify MBC-related papers indexed in PubMed/MEDLINE. A validated natural language processing method was applied to identify papers reporting penetrance estimates. These penetrance studies' bibliographies were reviewed to ensure comprehensiveness. We accessed the potential ascertainment bias for each enrolled study. RESULTS Fifteen penetrance studies were identified from 12,182 abstracts, covering five purported MBC susceptibility genes: ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and PALB2. Cohort (n = 6, 40%) and case-control (n = 5, 33%) studies were the two most common study designs, followed by family-based (n = 3, 20%), and a kin-cohort study (n = 1, 7%). Seven of the 15 studies (47%) adjusted for ascertainment adequately and therefore the MBC risks reported by these seven studies can be considered applicable to the general population. Based on these seven studies, we found pathogenic variants in ATM, BRCA2, CHEK2 c.1100delC, and PALB2 show an increased risk for MBC. The association between BRCA1 and MBC was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION This work supports the conclusion that pathogenic variants in ATM, BRCA2, CHEK2 c.1100delC, and PALB2 increase the risk of MBC, whereas pathogenic variants in BRCA1 may not be associated with increased MBC risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reem S Chamseddine
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Ar-Rayyan, Qatar
| | - Cathy Wang
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kanhua Yin
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jin Wang
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. .,Department of Breast Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, China.
| | - Preeti Singh
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jingan Zhou
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of General Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Mark E Robson
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Danielle Braun
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kevin S Hughes
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kuerer HM, Blair SL. The Virtual Scientific Sessions from the American Society of Breast Surgeons During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:4585-4587. [PMID: 32812104 PMCID: PMC7433665 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08946-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Henry M Kuerer
- Division of Surgery, Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. .,Department of General Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
| | - Sarah L Blair
- Division of Surgery, Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of General Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Plichta JK. ASO Author Reflections: What is the Most Appropriate Surgical Management for Men with Breast Cancer? Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:697-698. [PMID: 32720045 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08951-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer K Plichta
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. .,Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|