Axillary Management in Women with Early Breast Cancer and Limited Sentinel Node Metastasis: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis of Real-World Evidence in the Post-ACOSOG Z0011 Era

Current axillary management of patients with early breast cancer and low-volume nodal disease undergoing primary surgery: results of a United Kingdom national practice survey

PURPOSE

UK NICE guidelines recommend axillary node clearance (ANC) should be performed in all patients with biopsy-proven node-positive breast cancer having primary surgery. There is, however, increasing evidence such extensive surgery may not always be necessary. Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) may be an effective alternative in patients with low-volume nodal disease who are clinically node negative (cN0) but have abnormal nodes detected radiologically. This survey aimed to explore current management of this group to inform feasibility of a future trial.

METHODS

An online survey was developed to explore current UK management of patients with low-volume axillary disease and attitudes to a future trial. The survey was distributed via breast surgery professional associations and social media from September to November 2022. One survey was completed per unit and simple descriptive statistics used to summarise the results.

RESULTS

51 UK breast units completed the survey of whom 78.5% (n = 40) reported performing ANC for all patients with biopsy-proven axillary nodal disease having primary surgery. Only 15.7% of units currently performed TAD either routinely (n = 6, 11.8%) or selectively (n = 2, 3.9%). There was significant uncertainty (83.7%, n = 36/43) about the optimal surgical management of these patients. Two-thirds (n = 27/42) of units felt an RCT comparing TAD and ANC would be feasible.

CONCLUSIONS

ANC remains standard of care for patients with low-volume node-positive breast cancer having primary surgery in the UK, but considerable uncertainty exists regarding optimal management of this group. This survey suggests an RCT comparing the outcomes of TAD and ANC may be feasible.

Using MammaPrint on core needle biopsy to guide the need for axillary staging during breast surgery

BACKGROUND

At present, the only opportunity to omit axillary staging is with Choosing Wisely criteria for women ages >70 y with cT1 2N0 estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer. However, many women are diagnosed when pathologic node status-negative, raising the question of additional opportunities to omit sentinel lymph node biopsy. We sought to investigate the association between MammaPrint, a genomic test that estimates estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer recurrence risk, and pathologic node status, with the aim that low-risk MammaPrint could be considered for omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy if associated with pathologic node status-negative.

METHODS

A single-institution database was queried for all women with cT1 2N0 estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative invasive breast cancer with breast surgery as their first treatment and MammaPrint performed from 2020 to 2021. Patient and tumor factors, including MammaPrint score, were compared with axillary node status for correlation.

RESULTS

A total of 668 women met inclusion criteria, with a median age of 66 y. MammaPrint was low-risk luminal A in 481 (72%) and high-risk luminal B in 187 (28%). At the time of breast surgery, 588 (88%) had sentinel lymph node biopsy, 27 (4%) had axillary lymph node dissection, and 53 (7.9%) had no axillary staging. Most women in both the pathologic node status-negative and pathologic node status-positive cohorts had low-risk MammaPrint (355 [73.3%] pathologic node status-negative vs 91 [69.5%] pathologic node status-positive), and women with low-risk MammaPrint did not have a significantly lower risk of pathologic node status-positive (P = .377).

CONCLUSION

Low-risk MammaPrint does not predict lower risk of pathologic node status-positive breast cancer. Based on our results, genomic testing does not appear to provide additional personalization for the ability to omit sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients outside of the Choosing Wisely guidelines.

Axillary management in patients with clinical node-negative early breast cancer and positive sentinel lymph node: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The omission of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or axillary radiation (AxRT) remains controversial in patients with clinical node-negative early breast cancer and a positive sentinel lymph node.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive review by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases (up to November 2023). Our primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional recurrence (LRR), and axillary recurrence (AR).

Results

We included 26 studies encompassing 145,548 women with clinical node-negative early breast cancer and positive sentinel lymph node. Pooled data revealed no significant differences between ALND and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone in terms of OS (hazard ratio [HR]0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-1.08, p=0.84), DFS (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.90-1.19, p=0.61), LRR (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.45-1.20, p=0.31), and AR (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.99-1.03, p=0.35). Similarly, no significant differences were observed between AxRT and SLNB alone for OS (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.32-1.02, p=0.06) and DFS (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.26-1.05, p=0.07). When comparing AxRT and ALND, a trend towards higher OS was observed the AxRT group (HR 0.08, 95% CI 0.67-1.15), but the difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.35, I2 = 0%). Additionally, no significant differences significance observed for DFS or AR (p=0.13 and p=0.73, respectively) between the AxRT and ALND groups.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that survival and recurrence rates are not inferior in patients with clinical node-negative early breast cancer and a positive sentinel lymph node who receive SLNB alone compared to those undergoing ALND or AxRT.

Efficacy and safety comparison between axillary lymph node dissection with no axillary surgery in patients with sentinel node-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to study the evidence on the efficacy and safety of omitting axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for patients with clinically node-negative but sentinel lymph node (SLN)-positive breast cancer using all the available evidence.

METHODS

The Embase, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases were searched through February 25, 2023. Original trials that compared only the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with ALND as the control group for patients with clinically node-negative but SLN-positive breast cancer were included. The primary outcomes were axillary recurrence rate, total recurrence rate, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Meta-analyses were performed to compare the odds ratio (OR) in rates and the hazard ratios (HR) in time-to-event outcomes between both interventions. Based on different study designs, tools in the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool were used for randomized trials and the risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions to assess the risk of bias for each included article. Funnel plots and Egger's test were used for the publication's bias assessment.

RESULTS

In total, 30 reports from 26 studies were included in the systematic review (9 reports of RCTs, 21 reports of retrospective cohort studies). According to our analysis, omitting ALND in patients with clinically node-negative but SLN-positive breast cancer had a similar axillary recurrence rate (OR = 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.76-1.20), DFS (HR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.89-1.16), and OS (HR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.92-1.03), but caused a significantly lower incidence of adverse events and benefited in locoregional recurrence rate (OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.59-0.97) compared with ALND.

CONCLUSION

For patients with clinically node-negative but SLN-positive breast cancer (no matter the number of the positive SLN), this review showed that SLNB alone had a similar axillary recurrence rate, DFS, and OS, but caused a significantly lower incidence of adverse events and showed a benefit for the locoregional recurrence compared with ALND. An OS benefit was found in the Macro subset that used SLNB alone versus complete ALND. Therefore, omitting ALND is feasible in this setting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

CRD 42023397963.

Is Routine Intraoperative Frozen Section Analysis of Sentinel Lymph Nodes Necessary in Every Early-Stage Breast Cancer?

Purpose

Clinical application of the ACOSOG Z0011 trial results allows clinically node-negative breast cancer patients who meet criteria to avoid axillary dissection even when 1–2 sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) are positive for metastatic disease. Intraoperative frozen section (iFS) analyses of SLNs were thought to reduce re-operation rates despite variable reported sensitivity and possibility of a false negative result. This study evaluated the rate of re-operations prevented by SLN iFS in a tertiary care hospital in Bangkok, Thailand, over a 6-year time-frame.

Patients and Methods

From April 2016 to April 2022, 1284 sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) procedures were performed. Of these, 214 cases were breast-conserving surgery in accordance with the ACOSOG criteria with concomitant usage of iFS. Clinicopathological features of these cases were collected and analyzed. Re-operation rates prevented by the additional intervention were reported.

Results

Only five additional operations were prevented with the usage of 214 iFS. The discordance rate between frozen and permanent sections in terms of presence of metastatic disease and number of total lymph nodes was around 15%. Tumor staging, node staging, Nottingham histologic grading and lymphovascular invasion are significant predictors of SLN metastasis.

Conclusion

iFS results in a very low prevention rate for follow-up ALND in patients with preoperative clinically negative axillary nodes and is associated with a non-negligible discordance rate with permanent sections. Our study suggests iFS may be avoided in most cases of early-stage clinically and radiographically node-negative breast cancer patients. Doing so may reduce surgical costs and total operative time without a significant impact on the overall quality of treatment and standard of care.

Early Blood Flow Abnormalities in Axillary and Brachial Arteries Precede the Onset of Persistent Lymphedema in Women Treated Surgically for Breast Cancer

Background: surgery to treat breast cancer (BC) is associated with upper limb (UL) lymphedema, which in some cases may become permanent. It is uncertain whether lymphedema results from injury to either lymphatic or blood vessels, or to both. Methods and Results: a cohort of 200 BC patients was examined 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Axillary and brachial blood vessels were evaluated using Doppler Ultrasound, and patients had their UL examined for lymphedema at each visit. Patients who developed lymphedema 24 months after surgery presented with higher mean flow velocity (MFV) and end diastolic velocity (EDV) in both axillary (MFV = 13.57 vs. 10.7 cm/s, p = 0.02; EDV = 5.62 vs. 3.47 cm/s; p = 0.004) and brachial (MFV = 11.44 vs. 8.74 cm/s; p = 0.03; EDV = 5.08 vs. 3.04; p = 0.04) arteries as early as 1 month after surgery. Similar associations were found 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Early abnormalities of the resistive and pulsatility indexes were also significantly associated with persistent lymphedema. EDV measured 1 month after surgery had the best performance to detect patients who will later develop long-term lymphedema, (sensitivity = 73.7%; specificity = 71.2%; negative predictive value = 57.6%). Conclusion: vascular abnormalities precede and are possible causal factors for UL lymphedema in BC patients.

Efficacy of different sentinel lymph node biopsy protocols in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis

The sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is highly protocolized in other cancers, however, this is not the case for oral squamous cell carcinoma patients, hence our objective was to evaluate the different protocols published. A specific study protocol was designed and subsequently registered on PROSPERO (Ref. CRD42021279217). Twenty‐three articles were included in the meta‐analysis. The grouped sensitivity of the SNB was 82% (95% CI: 0.74–0.88), and the grouped specificity was 100% (95% CI: 0.99–1.00). The use of other radiotracers other than pre‐operative lopamidol showed higher values of sensitivity of 82.80% (95% CI: 76.90%–87.50%; p < 0.001). The use of the blue dye stain showed higher sensitivity values of 85.60% (95% CI: 71.90%–93.20%), compared to sensitivity values of 77.50% when it was not used (95% CI: 69.10%–84.20%) (p < 0.001). Diagnostic rates are variable and they were significantly better when 99mTc was used in all its variations and accompanied by the blue dye staining.

A novel nomogram and risk classification system for predicting lymph node metastasis of breast mucinous carcinoma: A SEER-based study

BACKGROUND

Mucinous breast cancer (MBC) is a rare disease, and patients with lymph node metastasis (LNM) have a poor prognosis. We aimed to explore the predictive factors of LNM and to construct a nomogram for predicting the risk of LNM and to identify the suitable axillary surgery for patients with diverse risks.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Chi-square and rank-sum tests were used to analyze the differences between groups. Survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. Independent factor identification and nomogram construction were performed with logistic regression analysis. The nomogram was qualified with a discrimination and calibration plot. Propensity score matching was performed to balance the disparities between groups.

RESULTS

Patients with metastatic lymph nodes have a worse prognosis. Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that tumor size, grade, and age were independent risk factors for LNM. The nomogram constructed with these three factors can predict the risk of LNM with high accuracy (AUC: 0.767, 95% CI: 0.697-0.838) and good calibration. Based on the nomogram, a risk classification system satisfactorily stratified the patients into 3 groups with diverse risks of LNM. In the low-risk group, there were no significant differences between sentinel lymph node biopsy and no axillary surgery. In the middle- and high-risk groups, both SLNB and axillary lymph node dissection were superior to no axillary surgery, with similar survival benefits.

CONCLUSIONS

The nomogram based on tumor size, grade, and age could conveniently and accurately predict the risk of LNM in MBC and assist clinicians in optimizing surgical strategies.

Omitting SLNB in Breast Cancer: Is a Nomogram the Answer?

BACKGROUNDS

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is standard care as a staging procedure in patients with invasive breast cancer. The axillary recurrence rate, even after positive SLNB, is low. This raises serious doubts regarding the clinical value of SLNB in early breast cancer. The purpose of this study is to select patients with low suspected axillary burden in whom SLNB might be omitted.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 2015 primary breast cancer patients between 2007 and 2015, with 982 patients allocated to the training and 961 to the validation cohort. Variables associated with nodal disease were analyzed and used to build a nomogram for predicting nodal disease.

RESULTS

A total of 32.8% of patients had macrometastatic disease. A predictive model was constructed based on age, cN0, morphology, grade, multifocality, and tumor size with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.83. Considering a false-negative rate of 5%, 32.8% of patients could be spared axillary surgery. In a subanalysis of patients with relatively favorable characteristics, 26.8% had less than 5% chance of macrometastases.

CONCLUSIONS

We present a model with excellent predictive value that can select one-third of patients in whom SLNB is deemed not necessary because of less than 5% chance of nodal involvement. Whether missing 1 in 20 patients with macrometastatic disease is worthwhile balanced against preventing side-effects of the SLN procedure remains to be established. A number of ongoing large prospective trials evaluating the outcome of omitting SLNB are awaited. Meanwhile, this nomogram may be used for individual decision-making.

Sentinel node involvement with or without completion axillary lymph node dissection: treatment and pathologic results of randomized SERC trial

Based on results of clinical trials, completion ALND (cALND) is frequently not performed for patients with breast conservation therapy and one or two involved sentinel nodes (SN) by micro- or macro-metastases. However, there were limitations despite a conclusion of non-inferiority for cALND omission. No trial had included patients with SN macro-metastases and total mastectomy or with >2 SN macro-metastases. The aim of the study was too analyze treatment delivered and pathologic results of patients included in SERC trial. SERC trial is a multicenter randomized non-inferiority phase-3 trial comparing no cALND with cALND in cT0-1-2, cN0 patients with SN ITC (isolated tumor cells) or micro-metastases or macro-metastases, mastectomy or breast conservative surgery. We randomized 1855 patients, 929 to receive cALND and 926 SLNB alone. No significant differences in patient’s and tumor characteristics, type of surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) were observed between the two arms. Rates of involved SN nodes by ITC, micro-metastases, and macro-metastases were 5.91%, 28.12%, and 65.97%, respectively, without significant difference between two arms for all criteria. In multivariate analysis, two factors were associated with higher positive non-SN rate: no AC versus AC administered after ALND (OR = 3.32, p < 0.0001) and >2 involved SN versus ≤2 (OR = 3.45, p = 0.0258). Crude rates of positive NSN were 17.62% (74/420) and 26.45% (73/276) for patient’s eligible and non-eligible to ACOSOG-Z0011 trial. No significant differences in patient’s and tumor characteristics and treatment delivered were observed between the two arms. Higher positive-NSN rate was observed for patients with AC performed after ALND (17.65% for SN micro-metastases, 35.22% for SN macro-metastases) in comparison with AC administered before ALND.

Survival and recurrence with or without axillary dissection in patients with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis

To evaluate overall survival and locoregional recurrence between patients with invasive breast tumours and sentinel node metastasis undergoing sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) alone and those undergoing complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed the medical records of patients with invasive breast carcinoma who underwent lumpectomy at a public university hospital in Brazil between 2008 and 2018. We evaluated the overall survival and the locoregional recurrence using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses, respectively. Overall, 97 participants who underwent lumpectomy were enroled; 41 in the ALND group, and 56 in the SLND group, according to Z0011 criteria. Only 17% of the patients in the ALND group had an additional biopsy-proven axillary disease, and 83% were treated with complete dissection unnecessarily. The 5-year survival rates were 80.1% and 87.5% for SLND and ALND, respectively (p = 0.376). Locoregional recurrence was rare (1.7% and 7.3% in the SLND and ALND, respectively; p = 0.3075). Overall survival and locoregional recurrence were similar between the two groups. The de-escalation of ALND to SLND in women with metastasis in the sentinel lymph node treated with conservative surgery and radiotherapy that meet the Z0011 criteria is feasible even in developing countries.

Axillary management based on American college of surgeons oncology group Z0011 criteria makes it possible to omit intraoperative diagnosis of sentinel lymph nodes in early breast cancer patients

The ACOSOG Z0011 trial has resulted in the omission of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in early breast cancer patients with one or two metastatic sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). There has been increasing interest in the necessity of intraoperative assessment of SLNs in patients treated based on the Z0011 criteria. We evaluated the utility of intraoperative assessment in these eligible patients. A total of 1396 patients were treated following the Z0011 criteria from April 2012 to December 2019. We examined the proportion and clinicopathological features of patients who underwent ALND due to three or more metastatic SLNs and the sensitivity of intraoperative assessment. Only 16 (1.1%) patients had three or more metastatic SLNs diagnosed by intraoperative assessment, and they immediately underwent ALND. Of the clinicopathological factors, high clinical tumor stage (p = 0.002) and high Ki-67 labeling index value (p = 0.056) were more likely to be associated with the presence of three or more metastatic SLNs. The major independent risk factor for three or more metastatic SLNs was high clinical tumor stage (OR 3.94 [95% CI 1.42-11.0]; p = 0.009). Intraoperative assessment had low sensitivity (70.5%) and a high false-negative rate (29.5%) in detecting SLN metastases. The main finding of our study was the small proportion of patients who required ALND due to three or more metastatic SLNs according to the Z0011 criteria. The Z0011 strategy enables intraoperative assessment of SLNs to be omitted in early breast cancer patients.