1
|
Mollaoğlu MC, Karabacak U, Bostancı ME, Seven TE, Karadayı K. Is extereme cytoreductive surgery beneficial to survival ın malignant peritoneal mesothelioma? Acta Chir Belg 2024; 124:281-289. [PMID: 38294331 DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2024.2301806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Malign peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is an uncommon disease that is difficult to treat. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) are the gold standards for treating MPM. Sometimes extreme cytoreductive surgery (eCRS) is required to achieve complete cytoreduction, which is one of the most important prognostic factors. There is limited information in the literature about the contribution of eCRS in patients with MPM. In this study, we aimed to investigate the impact of eCRS on survival and perioperative outcomes. METHODS The Department of Surgical Oncology at Cumhuriyet University database was retrospectively reviewed for MPM patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC between January 2004 and December 2018. Patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC were divided into eCRS and less extensive CRS (leCRS) groups. A resection of ≥5 organs or ≥3 small bowel anastomoses were defined as eCRS. Both groups were compared regarding survival, demographic information, and perioperative outcomes. RESULTS A total of 31 patients were included. eCRS-HIPEC was used in 15 patients. Complete cytoreduction (CC score 0/1) was achieved in all 31 patients. Compared to leCRS, the eCRS group had a longer median length of stay, longer intensive care unit stay, a higher median peritoneal cancer index (PCI), higher intraoperative blood loss, more frequent occurrence of any complication, and a longer operative time (all p values < 0.001). Clavien Dindo 3-4 complications, ASA, and gender were similar in both groups of patients (p > 0.05). It was found that there was no significant difference between the OS of the eCRS and leCRS groups (37.5 vs. 42.8 months, p = 0.895). CONCLUSIONS Rates of serious complications and morbidity are similar in patients undergoing eCRS compared to leCRS. In patients with high PCI and multiorgan involvement, complete cytoreduction can be achieved by performing eCRS, and survival results equivalent to those with low PCI can be achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Murat Can Mollaoğlu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Maltepe Medical Park Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Ufuk Karabacak
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Sivas Numune Hospital, Sivas, Turkey
| | | | - Turan Eray Seven
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey
| | - Kürşat Karadayı
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Grillo-Marín C, Antón-Rodríguez C, Prieto L, Ortega-Pérez G, González-Moreno S. Nephrotoxicity Associated with Cytoreductive Surgery Combined with Cisplatin-Based Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Malignant Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2024; 13:3793. [PMID: 38999359 PMCID: PMC11242517 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13133793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2024] [Revised: 06/14/2024] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Cisplatin is employed in hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for peritoneal surface malignancies (PSMs). The main concern regarding intraperitoneal cisplatin administration is nephrotoxicity. Numerous reports in this context are available. Our objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess cisplatin-based HIPEC-related nephrotoxicity (CHRN). Methods: A systematic literature review on CHRN after CRS for the treatment of PSMs was performed. The literature search was carried out using Medline, Cochrane, and Embase. The last day of the search was 23 October 2023. PRISMA guidelines were used. A meta-analysis was then conducted. The main endpoint was the incidence of acute and chronic renal impairment after CHRN. Secondary endpoints included the potential impact of several clinical variables on the primary endpoint and a critical appraisal of the different renal impairment scales employed. Results: Our study included 26 articles with a total sample of 1473 patients. The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) was 18.6% (95% CI: 13.6-25%, range of true effects 3-59%). For chronic kidney disease, it was 7% (95% CI: 3-15.3%, range of true effects 1-53%). The variables that statistically influenced these results were the scale used to measure renal insufficiency, the use of nephroprotective agents, and the presence of pre-existing renal disease. Conclusions: The reported incidence of renal impairment following cisplatin-based HIPEC is highly variable. The incidence of renal failure obtained in this meta-analysis should be used as a reference for subsequent reports on this topic. Further prospective studies are warranted to establish optimal and standardized management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristián Grillo-Marín
- Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Calle Joaquín Rodrigo 1, 28222 Majadahonda, Spain;
- Unidad de Apoyo a la Investigación, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria M-515, km 1, 800, 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain; (C.A.-R.); (L.P.)
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid Spain Foundation, Calle Arturo Soria 270, 28033 Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina Antón-Rodríguez
- Unidad de Apoyo a la Investigación, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria M-515, km 1, 800, 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain; (C.A.-R.); (L.P.)
| | - Lola Prieto
- Unidad de Apoyo a la Investigación, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria M-515, km 1, 800, 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain; (C.A.-R.); (L.P.)
| | - Gloria Ortega-Pérez
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peritoneal Surface Oncology Program, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Calle Arturo Soria 270, 28033 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Santiago González-Moreno
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peritoneal Surface Oncology Program, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Calle Arturo Soria 270, 28033 Madrid, Spain;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Falla-Zuniga LF, Sardi A, King MC, Lopez-Ramirez F, Barakat P, Nieroda C, Diaz-Montes T, Gushchin V. Peritoneal metastases from rare ovarian cancer treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC). Pleura Peritoneum 2024; 9:15-22. [PMID: 38558871 PMCID: PMC10980981 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2023-0019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives There are limited treatment options and no consensus on the management of advanced rare ovarian malignancies. Rare ovarian malignancies can present with peritoneal metastases (PM), featuring a similar presentation to more common ovarian subtypes. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is an effective treatment for PM of non-gynecologic origin and, recently, epithelial ovarian cancer. We evaluated the feasibility of CRS/HIPEC in the management of PM from rare ovarian malignancies and report postoperative outcomes on these patients. Methods A retrospective review of a single center, prospective database (1994-2021) was performed to identify patients with rare ovarian malignancies treated with CRS/HIPEC. Clavien-Dindo 90-day morbidity/mortality and Kaplan-Meier overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed. Results Of 44 patients identified, 28 underwent CRS/HIPEC. Six were aborted due to extensive disease. Histologic subtypes included: clear cell (5/28, 17.9 %), endometrioid (5/28, 17.9 %), granulosa cell (3/28, 10.7 %), low-grade serous (6/28, 21.4 %), mesonephric (1/28, 3.6 %), mucinous (6/28, 21.4 %), and small cell (2/28, 7.1 %) carcinomas. Eight (28.6 %) patients had primary and 20 (71.4 %) had recurrent disease. Median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 21 (IQR: 6-29). Complete cytoreduction (<2.5 mm residual disease) was achieved in 27/28 (96.4 %). Grade III/IV complications occurred in 9/28 (32.1 %) with one (3.6 %) mortality. After a median follow-up of 65.8 months, 20 patients were alive. Five-year OS and PFS were 68.5 and 52.6 %, respectively. Conclusions In patients with PM from rare ovarian malignancies, CRS/HIPEC is feasible and has an acceptable safety profile. Longer follow-up and multicenter trials are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Armando Sardi
- Surgical Oncology, Institute for Cancer Care at Mercy, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mary Caitlin King
- Surgical Oncology, Institute for Cancer Care at Mercy, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Felipe Lopez-Ramirez
- Surgical Oncology, Institute for Cancer Care at Mercy, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Philipp Barakat
- Surgical Oncology, Institute for Cancer Care at Mercy, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Carol Nieroda
- Surgical Oncology, Institute for Cancer Care at Mercy, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Teresa Diaz-Montes
- Gynecological Oncology, The Lya Segall Ovarian Cancer Institute, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Vadim Gushchin
- Surgical Oncology, Institute for Cancer Care at Mercy, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Valenzuela CD, Solsky IB, Erali RA, Forsythe SD, Mangieri CW, Mainali BB, Russell G, Perry KC, Votanopoulos KI, Shen P, Levine EA. Long-Term Survival in Patients Treated with Cytoreduction and Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Mesothelioma at a Single High-Volume Center. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:2666-2675. [PMID: 36754945 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-13061-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare diagnosis with a dismal prognosis if untreated. Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is shown to significantly improve survival. Our institution is uniquely positioned to report long-term outcomes in MPM with CRS-HIPEC, due to our robust peritoneal surface disease program existing over the past three decades. METHODS Our prospectively maintained, single-institution database of CRS-HIPEC cases was reviewed, identifying 111 consecutive patients with MPM over 28 years (1993-2021). Prognostic, operative, and pathologic factors were reviewed. Overall survival (OS) and conditional survival (CS) analyses were performed. RESULTS The average age was 55.1 years; 58.6% of patients were male; 17 of 111 patients (15.3%) had a second CRS-HIPEC. At first CRS-HIPEC, the average PCI score was 18.7, and the perfusate drugs were platinum-based (72.1%) and mitomycin C (27.9%). The resection status at first CRS-HIPEC was R2a (46.4%), followed by R0-1 (29.1%), and R2b-c (24.5%). Median OS was 3.3 years for the entire cohort, with 75th and 25th percentiles at 10.7 months and 10.6 years. Median CS was improved if patients survived to the 1-year postoperative mark (4.9 years, p < 0.01) and trended toward further improvement with each passing year. If 3-year postoperative survival was achieved, the median CS improved to 6.1 years. CONCLUSIONS This represents one of the largest and lengthiest, single-center, longitudinal, case series of peritoneal mesothelioma treated with CRS-HIPEC. The OS suggests efficacy for CRS-HIPEC for MPM. Long-term survival improves significantly after patients achieve the 1-year, postoperative mark.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristian D Valenzuela
- Surgical Oncology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Ian B Solsky
- Surgical Oncology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Richard A Erali
- Surgical Oncology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Steven D Forsythe
- Surgical Oncology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Christopher W Mangieri
- Surgical Oncology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Bigyan B Mainali
- Surgical Oncology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Gregory Russell
- Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Kathleen C Perry
- Surgical Oncology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | | | - Perry Shen
- Surgical Oncology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Edward A Levine
- Surgical Oncology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Li CY, Kennedy T, Alexander HR. Treatment of Patients with Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11071891. [PMID: 35407498 PMCID: PMC8999919 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11071891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma is a rare malignancy arising from the serosa of the peritoneal cavity. It is diagnosed based on suspicious findings on cross sectional imaging and a tissue biopsy showing confirmatory histologic and immunohistochemical features. The disease is hallmarked by its propensity to progress mainly in the peritoneal cavity. In selected patients, surgical cytoreduction and hyperthermic intra-operative peritoneal chemotherapy has become the initial preferred treatment and is associated with provide prolonged in many patients. Systemic chemotherapy using a couplet of cisplatin or gemcitabine with pemetrexed has modest response rates and duration of response. Expression of PD-L1 has been demonstrated in peritoneal mesothelioma tumors and there has been significant interest in the use of check point blockade targeted against PD-L1 in this clinical setting. Future clinical research using a combination of check point blockade with surgical cytoreduction is a high clinical priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Y. Li
- Department of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Timothy Kennedy
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA;
| | - Henry Richard Alexander
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA;
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Limitations of laparoscopy to assess the peritoneal cancer index and eligibility for cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC in peritoneal metastasis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407:1667-1675. [PMID: 35112142 PMCID: PMC8809494 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02455-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to determine the value of laparoscopy to assess the intra-abdominal tumor extent and predict complete cytoreduction. METHODS All patients at our department in the period from 2017 to 2021 that underwent laparoscopy to assess peritoneal metastasis and subsequent open exploration with the intention to perform cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with HIPEC were retrospectively identified in a continuously maintained database. RESULTS Forty-three patients were analyzed. Peritoneal cancer index (PCI) determination by laparoscopy compared to open surgery was overestimated in five patients (11.6%), identical in eleven patients (25.6%), and underestimated in 27 patients (62.8%). PCI differences were independent of surgeons, tumor entities, and prior chemotherapy. Thirty-four patients (79.1%) were determined eligible for CRS with HIPEC during open exploration, whereas nine patients (20.9%) underwent a non-therapeutic laparotomy. Complete or almost complete cytoreduction was achieved in 33 patients (76.7%). In one patient, completeness of cytoreduction was not documented. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrate a moderate agreement according to weighted Cohen's kappa analysis of PCI values calculated during laparoscopy and subsequent open exploration for CRS with HIPEC. Uncertainty of PCI assessment should therefore be kept in mind when performing laparoscopy in patients with peritoneal metastasis.
Collapse
|
7
|
Roife D, Powers BD, Zaidi MY, Staley CA, Cloyd JM, Ahmed A, Grotz T, Leiting J, Fournier K, Lee AJ, Veerapong J, Baumgartner JM, Clarke C, Patel SH, Hendrix RJ, Lambert L, Abbott DE, Pokrzywa C, Lee B, Blakely A, Greer J, Johnston FM, Laskowitz D, Dessureault S, Dineen SP. CRS/HIPEC with Major Organ Resection in Peritoneal Mesothelioma Does not Impact Major Complications or Overall Survival: A Retrospective Cohort Study of the US HIPEC Collaborative. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:4996-5004. [PMID: 33073341 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09232-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION CRS/HIPEC is thought to confer a survival advantage for patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM). However, the impact of nonperitoneal organ resection is not clearly defined. We evaluated the impact of major organ resection (MOR) on postoperative outcomes and overall survival (OS). PATIENTS AND METHODS The US HIPEC collaborative database (2000-2017) was reviewed for MPM patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC. MOR was defined as total or partial resection of diaphragm, stomach, spleen, pancreas, small bowel, colon, rectum, kidney, ureter, bladder, and/or uterus. MOR was categorized as 0, 1, or 2+ organs. RESULTS A total of 174 patients were identified. Median PCI was 16 (3-39). The distribution of patients with MOR-0, MOR-1, and MOR-2+ was 94, 45, and 35 patients, respectively. MOR-1 and MOR-2+ groups had a higher frequency of any complication compared with MOR-0 (57.8%, 74.3%, and 48.9%, respectively, p = 0.035), but Clavien 3/4 complications were similar. Median length of stay was slightly higher in the MOR-1 and MOR-2+ groups (10 and 11 days) compared with the MOR-0 cohort (9 days, p = 0.005). Incomplete cytoreduction, ASA class 4, and male gender were associated with increased mortality on unadjusted analysis; however, their impact on OS was attenuated on multivariable analysis. MOR was not associated with OS based on these data (MOR-1: HR 1.67, 95% CI 0.59-4.74; MOR-2+ : HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.22-2.69). CONCLUSIONS MOR was not associated with an increase in major complications or worse OS in patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for MPM and should be considered, if necessary, to achieve complete cytoreduction for MPM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Roife
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA.,Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, USA
| | - Benjamin D Powers
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA.,Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, USA
| | - Mohammad Y Zaidi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, USA
| | - Charles A Staley
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, USA
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, USA
| | - Ahmed Ahmed
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, USA
| | - Travis Grotz
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - Jennifer Leiting
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - Keith Fournier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Andrew J Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Jula Veerapong
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, USA
| | - Joel M Baumgartner
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, USA
| | - Callisia Clarke
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA
| | - Sameer H Patel
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, USA
| | - Ryan J Hendrix
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, USA
| | - Laura Lambert
- Department of Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Daniel E Abbott
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA
| | - Courtney Pokrzywa
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA
| | - Byrne Lee
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, USA
| | - Andrew Blakely
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, USA
| | - Jonathan Greer
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Danielle Laskowitz
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA
| | - Sophie Dessureault
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA.,Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, USA
| | - Sean P Dineen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA. .,Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, USA.
| |
Collapse
|