Systematic Versus Lobe-Specific Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy for Hypermetabolic Lung Cancer

The Clinical Outcomes of Thoracoscopic Versus Open Lobectomy for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer After Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Multi-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The safety and efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgical (VATS) versus open lobectomy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following neoadjuvant therapy remained controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of VATS with those of open lobectomy for NSCLC after neoadjuvant therapy.

METHODS

Patients who had undergone VATS or open lobectomy for NSCLC following neoadjuvant therapy in nine hospitals in China from July 2014 to July 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The clinical characteristics and overall survival (OS) of patients were analyzed using Cox regression models and propensity score matching.

RESULTS

We identified 685 patients, 436 (63.6%) who had undergone VATS lobectomy and 249 (36.4%) who had undergone open lobectomy. Patients who had undergone VATS lobectomy tended to have had fewer nodes removed than those who had undergone open lobectomy. However, compared with open group, the VATS group had a better perioperative outcome, such as smaller blood loss volumes and shorter postoperative stays. The groups had a similar operation durations and postoperative complications, and there was a nonsignificant difference between their 30-day mortality rates. After propensity score matching, there was no significant different between the OS of the groups, and only postoperative adjuvant therapy was associated with worse OS.

CONCLUSION

This multi-center analysis of patients with NSCLC who had undergone surgery subsequent to neoadjuvant therapy reveals that VATS lobectomy tended to have a better perioperative outcome, and have a similar OS compared to open lobectomy. These findings suggest that VATS lobectomy is appropriate for NSCLC following neoadjuvant therapy.

A Shift in Paradigm: Selective Lymph Node Dissection for Minimizing Oversurgery in Early Stage Lung Cancer

Systematic lymph node dissection has been widely accepted and turned into a standard procedure for lung cancer surgery. In recent years, the concept of "minimal invasive surgery (MIS)" has greatly changed the surgical paradigm of lung cancer. Previous studies revealed that excessive dissection of lymph nodes without metastases had uncertain clinical benefit. Meanwhile, it leads to the elevated risk of postoperative complications including chylothorax and laryngeal nerve injury. In addition, dissection of nonmetastatic lymph nodes may disturb systematic immunity, resulting in the secondary effect on primary tumor or latent metastases. The past decades have witnessed the innovative strategies such as lobe-specific lymph node dissection and selective lymph node dissection. On the basis of evolution of lymph node dissection strategy, we discuss the negative effects of excessive nonmetastatic lymph node dissection and summarize the recent advances in the optimized dissection strategies, hoping to provide unique perspectives on the future directions.

Lymph node metastasis in cancer progression: molecular mechanisms, clinical significance and therapeutic interventions

Lymph nodes (LNs) are important hubs for metastatic cell arrest and growth, immune modulation, and secondary dissemination to distant sites through a series of mechanisms, and it has been proved that lymph node metastasis (LNM) is an essential prognostic indicator in many different types of cancer. Therefore, it is important for oncologists to understand the mechanisms of tumor cells to metastasize to LNs, as well as how LNM affects the prognosis and therapy of patients with cancer in order to provide patients with accurate disease assessment and effective treatment strategies. In recent years, with the updates in both basic and clinical studies on LNM and the application of advanced medical technologies, much progress has been made in the understanding of the mechanisms of LNM and the strategies for diagnosis and treatment of LNM. In this review, current knowledge of the anatomical and physiological characteristics of LNs, as well as the molecular mechanisms of LNM, are described. The clinical significance of LNM in different anatomical sites is summarized, including the roles of LNM playing in staging, prognostic prediction, and treatment selection for patients with various types of cancers. And the novel exploration and academic disputes of strategies for recognition, diagnosis, and therapeutic interventions of metastatic LNs are also discussed.

Radioisotope-Guided Excision of Mediastinal Lymph Nodes in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma: Feasibility and Clinical Impact

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative localisation of nodal disease in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can be challenging. Lymph node localisation via radiopharmaceuticals is used in many conditions; we tested the feasibility of this approach in NSCLC.

METHODS

NSCLC patients were prospectively recruited. Intraoperative peri-tumoral injections of [99mTc]Tc-albumin nanocolloids were performed, followed by removing the tumour and locoregional lymph nodes. These were examined ex vivo with a gamma probe and labelled sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) if they showed any activity or non-sentinel lymph nodes (nSLNs) if they did not. Thereafter, the surgical field was scanned with the probe; any further radioactive lymph node was removed and labelled as "extra" SLNs (eSLNs). All specimens were sent to histology, and metastatic status was recorded.

RESULTS

48 patients were enrolled, and 290 nodal stations were identified: 179 SLNs, 87 nSLNs, and 24 eSLNs. A total of 44 nodal metastases were identified in 22 patients, with 36 of them (82%) located within SLNs. Patients with nSLNs metastases had at least a co-existing positive SLN. No metastases were found in eSLNs.

CONCLUSIONS

The technique shows high sensitivity for intraoperative nodal metastases identification. This information could allow selective lymphadenectomies in low-risk patients or more aggressive approaches in high-risk patients.

Clinical Benefits of Lobe-Specific Lymph Node Dissection in Surgery for NSCLC: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction

The impact of lobe-specific lymph node dissection (LS-LND) in surgery for NSCLC remains controversial compared with that of systematic lymph node dissection (S-LND). This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between the two strategies, including postoperative complications, and to explain the advantages of LS-LND.

Methods

We searched for studies comparing LS-LND and S-LND up to April 14, 2022, using PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. The primary outcomes were overall survival and recurrence-free survival. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications, such as arrhythmia, chylothorax, and pneumonia. We evaluated the risk of bias and assessed the evidence quality using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach.

Results

A total of 13 studies, including one randomized controlled trial and 12 retrospective studies with 11,522 patients who underwent curative resections for lung cancer, were included. The results indicated that LS-LND had favorable overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73-0.87) but no difference in recurrence-free survival (HR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.84-1.09) on comparison with S-LND. In terms of postoperative complications, patients undergoing LS-LND had a lower rate of chylothorax (risk ratio [RR] = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.35-0.85) and arrhythmia (RR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.57-0.97) than patients undergoing S-LND, but the risk of postoperative pneumonia was not different. The overall quality of evidence was low to moderate owing to the risk of bias related to heterogeneous study populations.

Conclusions

Patients undergoing LS-LND had a comparable and favorable long-term prognosis and a lower rate of postoperative complications. Nevertheless, further standardized studies are necessary to improve the quality of evidence.

Is It Time to Cross the Pillars of Evidence in Favor of Segmentectomies in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer?

In the debate on lobectomy versus segmentectomy for the treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), currently, we have reached two pillars of knowledge, like Jachim and Boaz, which have encompassed the actual boundary of the literature published up until now [...]