Thoracoscopic Wedge Resection Versus Segmentectomy for cT1N0 Lung Adenocarcinoma

Lobar or sublobar resection of peripheral stage I non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We aim to highlight two recent clinical trials that have altered the approach of the management of stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

The JCOG 0802 and CALGB 140503 trials demonstrated that sublobar resection is noninferior to lobectomy for overall and disease-free survival in patients with stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer.

SUMMARY

Since 1962, lobectomy has been deemed the gold standard treatment for operable lung cancer. However, two recent clinical trials have demonstrated that, for select patients, sublobar resection is oncologically noninferior; results, which are leading us into a new era for the surgical management of lung cancer. Notwithstanding the progress made by these studies and the opportunities that have been put forth, questions remain. This review aims at reviewing the results of both trials and to discuss future perspectives for the surgical treatment of lung cancer.

Sublobar Resection of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Wedge Resection vs. Segmentectomy

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death. The mainstay treatment for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly in the early stages, is surgical resection. Traditionally, lobectomy has been considered the gold-standard technique. Sublobar resection includes segmentectomy and wedge resection. Compared to lobectomy, these procedures have been viewed as a compromise procedure, reserved for those with poor cardiopulmonary function or who are poor surgical candidates for other reasons. However, with the advances in imaging and surgical techniques, the subject of sublobar resection as a curative treatment is being revisited. Many studies have now shown segmentectomy to be equivalent to lobectomy in patients with small (<2.0 cm), peripheral NSCLC. However, there is a mix of evidence when it comes to wedge resection and its suitability as a curative procedure. At this time, until more data can be found, segmentectomy should be considered before wedge resection for patients with early-stage NSCLC.

Treatment strategies for stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: A SEER-based population study

BACKGROUND

There are various therapeutic methods for treating stage IA (T1N0M0) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but no studies have systematically assessed multiple treatments to determine the most effective therapy.

METHODS

Stage IA NSCLC patient data collected between 2004 and 2018 were gathered from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Treatment modalities included observation, chemotherapy alone (CA), radiation alone (RA), radiation+chemotherapy (RC), surgery alone (SA), surgery+chemotherapy (SC), surgery+radiation (SR) and surgery+radiation+chemotherapy (SRC). Comparisons were made of overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) among patients based on different therapeutic methods by survival analysis.

RESULTS

Ultimately, 89147 patients with stage IA NSCLC between 2004 and 2018 were enrolled in this study. The order of multiple treatment modalities based on the hazard ratio (HR) for OS for the entire cohort revealed the following results: SA (HR: 0.20), SC (HR: 0.25), SR (HR: 0.42), SRC (HR: 0.46), RA (HR: 0.56), RC (HR: 0.72), CA (HR: 0.91) (P<0.001), and observation (HR: Ref). The SA group had the best OS and LCSS, and similar results were found in most subgroup analyses (all P<0.001). The order of surgical modalities based on the HR for OS for the entire cohort revealed the following results: lobectomy (HR: 0.32), segmentectomy (HR: 0.41), wedge resection (HR: 0.52) and local tumor destruction (HR: Ref). Lobectomy had the best effects on OS and LCSS, and similar results were found in all subgroup analyses (all P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

SA appeared to be the optimal treatment modality for patients with stage IA NSCLC, and lobectomy was associated with the best prognosis. There may be some indication and selection bias in our study, and the results of this study should be confirmed in a prospective study.

Comparison of early patient-reported outcomes between uniportal thoracoscopic segmentectomy and wedge resection for peripheral small-sized non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Analysis of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) offers valuable insights into distinguishing the effects of closely related medical procedures from the patient's perspective. In this study we compared symptom burden in patients undergoing uniportal thoracoscopic segmentectomy and wedge resection for peripheral small-sized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

This study included patients with peripheral NSCLC from an ongoing longitudinal prospective cohort study (CN-PRO-Lung 3) who underwent segmentectomy or wedge resection with tumor diameter ≤ 2 cm and consolidation tumor ratio (CTR) ≤ 0.5. PROs data were collected using the Perioperative Symptom Assessment for Lung Surgery questionnaire pre-operatively, daily post-surgery up to the fourth hospitalization day, and weekly post-discharge up to the fourth week. Propensity score matching and a generalized estimation equation model were employed to compare symptom severity. In addition, short-term clinical outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

In total, data of 286 patients (82.4%) undergoing segmentectomy and 61 patients (17.6%) undergoing wedge resection were extracted from the cohort. No statistically significant differences were found in the proportion of moderate-to-severe symptoms and mean scores for pain, cough, shortness of breath, disturbed sleep, fatigue, drowsiness, and distress during the 4-day postoperative hospitalization or the 4-week post-discharge period before or after matching (all p > 0.05). Compared with segmentectomy, wedge resection showed better short-term clinical outcomes, including shorter operative time (p = 0.001), less intraoperative bleeding (p = 0.046), and lower total hospital costs (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The study findings indicate that uniportal thoracoscopic segmentectomy and wedge resection exert similar early postoperative symptom burden in patients with peripheral NSCLC (tumor diameter ≤ 2 cm and CTR ≤ 0.5).

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not applicable.

CT-Based Deep-Learning Model for Spread-Through-Air-Spaces Prediction in Ground Glass-Predominant Lung Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Sublobar resection is strongly associated with poor prognosis in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma, with the presence of tumor spread through air spaces (STAS). Thus, preoperative prediction of STAS is important for surgical planning. This study aimed to develop a STAS deep-learning (STAS-DL) prediction model in lung adenocarcinoma with tumor smaller than 3 cm and a consolidation-to-tumor (C/T) ratio less than 0.5.

METHODS

The study retrospectively enrolled of 581 patients from two institutions between 2015 and 2019. The STAS-DL model was developed to extract the feature of solid components through solid components gated (SCG) for predicting STAS. The STAS-DL model was assessed with external validation in the testing sets and compared with the deep-learning model without SCG (STAS-DLwoSCG), the radiomics-based model, the C/T ratio, and five thoracic surgeons. The performance of the models was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), accuracy and standardized net benefit of the decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

The study evaluated 458 patients (institute 1) in the training set and 123 patients (institute 2) in the testing set. The proposed STAS-DL yielded the best performance compared with the other methods in the testing set, with an AUC of 0.82 and an accuracy of 74%, outperformed the STAS-DLwoSCG with an accuracy of 70%, and was superior to the physicians with an AUC of 0.68. Moreover, STAS-DL achieved the highest standardized net benefit compared with the other methods.

CONCLUSION

The proposed STAS-DL model has great potential for the preoperative prediction of STAS and may support decision-making for surgical planning in early-stage, ground glass-predominant lung adenocarcinoma.

Extent of surgical resection for radiologically subsolid T1N0 invasive lung adenocarcinoma: When is a wedge resection acceptable?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether wedge resection (WR) was appropriate for the patients with peripheral T1 N0 solitary subsolid invasive lung adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with peripheral T1N0 solitary subsolid invasive lung adenocarcinoma who received sublobar resection were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathologic characteristics, 5-year recurrence-free survival, and 5-year lung cancer-specific overall survival were analyzed. Cox regression model was used to elucidate risk factors for recurrence.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-eight patients receiving WR and 1245 patients receiving segmentectomy were included. The mean follow-up time was 36.87 ± 16.21 months. Five-year recurrence-free survival following WR was 96.89% for patients with ground-glass nodule (GGN) ≤2 cm and 0.25< consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR) ≤0.5, not statistically different from 100% for those with GGN≤2 cm and CTR ≤0.25 (P = .231). The 5-year recurrence-free survival was 90.12% for patients with GGN between 2 and 3 cm and CTR ≤0.5, significantly lower than that of patients with GGN ≤2 cm and CTR ≤0.25 (P = .046). For patients with GGN≤2 cm and 0.25

CONCLUSIONS

WR might be appropriate for patients with invasive lung adenocarcinoma appearing as peripheral GGN ≤2 cm and CTR ≤0.5, but inappropriate for those with invasive lung adenocarcinoma appearing as peripheral GGN between 2 and 3 cm and CTR ≤0.5.

Collapse

Key Words

• lung invasive adenocarcinoma
• segmentectomy
• sublobar resection
• subsolid nodule
• wedge resection

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Retrospective Studies
• Neoplasm Staging
• Pneumonectomy/adverse effects
• Adenocarcinoma of Lung/diagnostic imaging
• Adenocarcinoma of Lung/surgery
• Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging
• Lung Neoplasms/surgery

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Chao Zhang Department of Thoracic Surgery and State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Institute of Thoracic Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Yunjian Pan Department of Thoracic Surgery and State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Institute of Thoracic Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Hang Li Department of Thoracic Surgery and State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Institute of Thoracic Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Yang Zhang Department of Thoracic Surgery and State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Institute of Thoracic Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Bin Li Department of Thoracic Surgery and State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Institute of Thoracic Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Yiliang Zhang Department of Thoracic Surgery and State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Institute of Thoracic Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Xiaoyang Luo Department of Thoracic Surgery and State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Institute of Thoracic Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Longsheng Miao Department of Thoracic Surgery and State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Institute of Thoracic Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Longfei Ma Department of Thoracic Surgery and State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Institute of Thoracic Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Sufeng Chen Department of Thoracic Surgery and State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Institute of Thoracic Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Hong Hu Department of Thoracic Surgery and State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Institute of Thoracic Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Yihua Sun Department of Thoracic Surgery and State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Institute of Thoracic Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Yawei Zhang Department of Thoracic Surgery and State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Institute of Thoracic Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Jiaqing Xiang Department of Thoracic Surgery and State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Institute of Thoracic Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Shengping Wang Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
Yajia Gu Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
Yuan Li Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
Xuxia Shen Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
Zezhou Wang Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Cancer Prevention, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
Ting Ye Department of Thoracic Surgery and State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Institute of Thoracic Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Haiquan Chen Department of Thoracic Surgery and State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Institute of Thoracic Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Collapse

Prediction of Surgical Outcome by Tumor Volume Doubling Time via Stereo Imaging Software in Early Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Volume doubling time (VDT) has been proven to be a powerful predictor of lung cancer progression. In non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving sublobar resection, the discussion of correlation between VDT and surgery was absent. We proposed to investigate the surgical outcomes according to VDT.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 96 cases post sublobar resection from 2012 to 2018, collecting two chest CT scans preoperatively of each case and calculating the VDT. The receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed to identify the optimal cut-off point of VDTs as 133 days. We divided patients into two groups: VDT < 133 days and VDT ≥ 133 days. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed for comparative purposes.

RESULTS

Univariable and multivariable analyses revealed that the consolidation and tumor diameter ratio was the factor of overall survival (OS), and VDT was the only factor of disease-free survival (DFS). The five year OS rates of patients with VDTs ≥ 133 days and VDTs < 133 days, respectively, were 89.9% and 71.9%, and the five year DFS rates were 95.9% and 61.5%.

CONCLUSION

As VDT serves as a powerful prognostic predictor and provides an essential role in planning surgical procedures, the evaluation of VDT preoperatively is highly suggested.

Prognostic value of consolidation-to-tumor ratio on computed tomography in NSCLC: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although several studies have confirmed the prognostic value of the consolidation to tumor ratio (CTR) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there still remains controversial about it.

METHODS

We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases from inception to April, 2022 for eligible studies that reported the correlation between CTR and prognosis in NSCLC. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were extracted and pooled to assess the overall effects. Heterogeneity was estimated by I² statistics. Subgroup analysis based on the cut-off value of CTR, country, source of HR and histology type was conducted to detect the sources of heterogeneity. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 12.0.

RESULTS

A total of 29 studies published between 2001 and 2022 with 10,347 patients were enrolled. The pooled results demonstrated that elevated CTR was associated with poorer overall survival (HR = 1.88, 95% CI 1.42-2.50, P < 0.01) and disease-free survival (DFS)/recurrence-free survival (RFS)/progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.27-1.59, P < 0.01) in NSCLC. According to subgroup analysis by the cut-off value of CTR and histology type, both lung adenocarcinoma and NSCLC patients who had a higher CTR showed worse survival. Subgroup analysis stratified by country revealed that CTR was a prognostic factor for OS and DFS/RFS/PFS in Chinese, Japanese, and Turkish patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In NSCLC patients with high CTR, the prognosis was worse than that with low CTR, indicating that CTR may be a prognostic factor.

Development of the semi-dry dot-blot method for intraoperative detecting micropapillary component in lung adenocarcinoma based on proteomics analysis

BACKGROUND

Micropapillary (MIP) component was a major concern in determining surgical strategy in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). We sought to develop a novel method for detecting MIP component during surgery.

METHODS

Differentially expressed proteins between MIP-positive and MIP-negative LUAD were identified through proteomics analysis. The semi-dry dot-blot (SDB) method which visualises the targeted protein was developed to detect MIP component.

RESULTS

Cellular retinoic acid-binding protein 2 (CRABP2) was significantly upregulated in MIP-positive LUAD (P < 0.001), and the high CRABP2 expression zone showed spatial consistency with MIP component. CRABP2 expression was also associated with decreased recurrence-free survival (P < 0.001). In the prospective cohort, the accuracy and sensitivity of detecting MIP component using SDB method by visualising CRABP2 were 82.2% and 72.7%, which were comparable to these of pathologist. Pathologist with the aid of SDB method would improve greatly in diagnostic accuracy (86.4%) and sensitivity (78.2%). In patients with minor MIP component (≤5%), the sensitivity of SDB method (63.6%) was significantly higher than pathologist (45.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative examination of CRABP2 using SDB method to detect MIP component reached comparable performance to pathologist, and SDB method had notable superiority than pathologist in detecting minor MIP component.

Sub-Lobar Resection: The New Standard of Care for Early-Stage Lung Cancer

The Lung Cancer Study Group previously established lobectomy as the standard of care for treatment of clinical T1N0 NSCLC. Advances in imaging technology and refinements in staging have prompted a re-investigation to determine the non-inferiority of sub-lobar resections to lobectomies. Two recent randomized studies, JCOG 0802 and CALGB 140503, are reviewed here in the context of LCSG 0821. The studies confirm non-inferiority for sub-lobar resection (wedge or segmentectomy) compared to lobectomy for peripheral T1N0 NSCLC less than or equal to 2 cm. Sub-lobar resection should therefore be considered the new standard of care in this sub-set of patients with NSCLC.

Clinicopathological Features and Significance of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation in Surgically Resected Early-Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma

The clinicopathological presentation of early-stage lung adenocarcinoma patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations has been seldom studied. Our study enrolled patients with stage I and II lung adenocarcinoma between January 2014 and December 2017 at the National Taiwan University Hospital. Clinicopathological features and prognosis were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed depending on EGFR mutation status. EGFR mutations were detected in 622 (60%) out of 1034 patients. Compared to the group without EGFR mutations, the group with EGFR mutations had more patients above 65 years of age (p < 0.001), more non-lepidic histological subtypes (p < 0.001), higher CEA levels (p = 0.044), higher grade of pleural (p = 0.02) and lymphovascular (p = 0.001) invasion, higher histological grade (p < 0.001), and a more advanced pathological stage (p = 0.022). In multivariate analysis, there was no significant difference in PFS or OS between the EGFR mutant and wild-type groups. In subtype analysis, the tumors with an L858R mutation had a more lepidic predominant histological type (p = 0.019) and less lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.011). No significant differences in PFS or OS were detected between the exon 19 deletion and L858R mutation groups. In early-stage lung adenocarcinoma, EGFR mutation may be considered as a treatment response predictor for tyrosine kinase inhibitors, instead of a predictor of clinical prognosis.