Prognostic Significance of Stratification Using Pathological Stage and Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Remarkable response as a new indicator for endoscopic evaluation of local efficacy of non-surgical treatments for esophageal cancer

In Japan, standard of care of the patients with resectable esophageal cancer is neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by esophagectomy. Patients unfitted for surgery or with unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer are generally indicated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Local disease control is undoubtful important for the management of patients with esophageal cancer, therefore endoscopic evaluation of local efficacy after non-surgical treatments must be essential. The significant shrink of primary site after NAC has been reported as a good indicator of pathological good response as well as favorable survival outcome after esophagectomy. And patients who could achieve remarkable shrink to T1 level after CRT had favorable outcomes with salvage surgery and could be good candidates for salvage endoscopic treatments. Based on these data, "Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer, 12th edition" defined the new endoscopic criteria "remarkable response (RR)", that means significant volume reduction after treatment, with the subjective endoscopic evaluation are proposed. In addition, the finding of local recurrence (LR) at primary site after achieving a CR was also proposed in the latest edition of Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer. The findings of LR are also important for detecting candidates for salvage endoscopic treatments at an early timing during surveillance after CRT. The endoscopic evaluation would encourage us to make concrete decisions for further treatment indications, therefore physicians treating patients with esophageal cancer should be well-acquainted with each finding.

Characterization of residual cancer by comparison of a pair of organoids established from a patient with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgery is a standard approach for management of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Patients who do not respond well to NAC have a poor prognosis. Despite extensive research, the mechanisms of chemoresistance in ESCC remain largely unknown. Here, we established paired tumor organoids-designated as PreNAC-O and PostNAC-O-from one ESCC patient before and after NAC, respectively. Although the two organoids did not exhibit significant differences in proliferation, morphology or drug sensitivity in vitro, the tumorigenicity of PostNAC-O in vivo was significantly higher than that of PreNAC-O. Xenografts from PreNAC-O tended to exhibit keratinization, while those from PostNAC-O displayed conspicuous necrotic areas. The tumorigenicity of PostNAC-O xenografts during the chemotherapy was comparable to that of PreNAC-O without treatment. Furthermore, the gene expression profiles of the xenografts suggested that expression of genes involved in the EMT and/or hypoxia response might be related to the tumorigenicity of PostNAC-O. Our data suggested that the tumorigenicity of residual cancer had been enhanced, outweighing the effects of chemotherapy, rather than being attributable to intrinsic chemoresistance. Further studies are required to clarify the extent to which residual cancers share a common mechanism similar to that revealed here.

Microscopic venous invasion is a predictor of prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing ineffective neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery is Japan's most effective treatment modality for advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, the prognosis is not as expected. This study aimed to examine prognostic factors in patients with pathologically ineffective neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by curative esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma between December 2008 and July 2021. The patients were divided into the neoadjuvant chemotherapy effective group and the neoadjuvant chemotherapy ineffective group according to the pathological diagnosis. Clinicopathological data, prognosis, and recurrence were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 143 patients (121 males, 22 females; median age, 67 years) were included in this study. Of these, 34 patients were classified into the effective group and the remaining 109 patients were assigned to the ineffective group. The ineffective group had significantly worse overall survival and recurrence-free survival than the effective group (p = 0.0192 and p = 0.0070, respectively). In the ineffective group, multivariate analysis demonstrated that microscopic venous invasion was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (hazard ratio 2.44; 95% confidence interval 1.13-5.30) and recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio 2.43; 95% confidence interval 1.24-4.73).

CONCLUSIONS

Microscopic venous invasion was associated with poor survival and cancer recurrence in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy ineffective group of patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Clinical predictors of early postoperative recurrence after radical esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer has a high incidence rate of early postoperative recurrence and death. This study aimed to identify the clinical and pathological features in early recurrence cases and to confirm the usefulness of prediction using these factors for effective adjuvant therapy and postoperative surveillance.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty five patients who developed postoperative recurrence after undergoing radical esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer were classified into two groups as follows: those with early recurrence at ≤ 6 months and those with nonearly recurrence at > 6 months after surgery. After identifying related factors of early recurrence, usefulness of these factors for prediction were examined in all patients with and without recurrence.

RESULTS

The analysis cohort consisted of 43 and 82 patients in the early and nonearly recurrence groups, respectively. In multivariate analysis, factors associated with early recurrence were higher initial levels of tumor markers (squamous cell carcinoma [SCC] ≥ 1.5 ng/ml in tumors, except for adenocarcinoma, and carcinoembryonic antigen [CEA] ≥ 5.0 ng/ml in adenocarcinoma) and higher venous invasion (v), i.e., ≥ 2 (p = 0.040 and p = 0.004, respectively). The usefulness of these two factors for recurrence prediction was confirmed in 378 patients, including 253 patients without recurrence. Patients with at least one of the two factors had significantly higher early recurrence rates than those without any factors in pStages II and III (odds ratio [OR], 6.333; p = 0016 and OR, 4.346; p = 0.008, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Early recurrence of thoracic esophageal cancer (i.e., during ≤ 6 months after esophagectomy) was associated with higher initial tumor marker levels and pathological findings of v ≥ 2. The combination of these two factors is useful as a simple and critical predictor of early postoperative recurrence.

Neoadjuvant Triplet Chemotherapy with Docetaxel, Cisplatin plus 5-Fluorouracil versus Docetaxel, Cisplatin plus S-1 for Advanced Esophageal Squamous cell Carcinoma: Propensity Score Matched Analysis

INTRODUCTION

This study examines whether neoadjuvant docetaxel, cisplatin plus S-1 (DCS) therapy is superior to docetaxel, cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (DCF) therapy for resectable advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with resectable advanced ESCC at our hospital between January 2010 and December 2019 underwent either neoadjuvant DCF therapy or DCS therapy, followed by radical esophagectomy. Prior to August 2014, we usually used neoadjuvant DCF therapy; we then completely transitioned to using neoadjuvant DCS therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 144 patients received one of these triplet regimens as neoadjuvant chemotherapy: DCF therapy to 67 patients and DCS therapy to 77 patients. After propensity score matching, 55 patients in each group were selected as matched cohorts. There was no significant difference between the groups in complete response (DCF = 7.3%, DCS = 9.1%) or in partial response (DCF = 45.4%, DCS = 52.7%). The pathological response rate was 23.8% for grade 2 and 18.2% for grade 3 in the DCF group, compared with 30.9% and 14.5% in the DCS group. Independent predictive factors for recurrence-free survival were poor clinical response and pathological response ≤1b. Independent prognostic factors for overall survival were poor clinical response, anastomotic leakage, and pathological response ≤1b. Duration of hospital stays in the DCS group was significantly shorter than those of the DCF group (6.0 vs. 15.0 days, p < 0.001). Expenses of drug and hospitalization for the neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the DCS group were also significantly lower than those of the DCF group (265.7 vs. 550.3 USD, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant DCS therapy for resectable advanced ESCC did not result in significantly higher clinical and pathological response than neoadjuvant DCF therapy. However, neoadjuvant DCS therapy for resectable ESCC required comparatively shorter hospital stays and incurred lower costs, making it an attractive therapeutic option.

Association of sarcopenia with relative dose intensity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in older patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer: A retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Sarcopenia impacts the toxicity of chemotherapy in patients with cancer, but there is little information on the association of sarcopenia with the relative dose intensity (RDI) of chemotherapy. We investigated the association of sarcopenia with RDI of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in older patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients aged ≥65 years who underwent curative esophagectomy after NAC for LAEC between 2016 and 2020. Skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) was calculated from computed tomography images at the L3 level. Sarcopenia was defined using the Youden index of SMI. Average RDI was calculated from delivered-dose intensity and standard-dose intensity of all drugs. The cutoff point of low average RDI was defined as <85%. The multivariate logistic regression model was used for the endpoint.

RESULTS

We analyzed 188 patients with a mean age of 71.3 years. The cutoff points of sarcopenia for low average RDI were defined as 42.81 cm2/m2 in males and 37.48 cm2/m2 in females. Sarcopenia significantly affected low average RDI, adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, drug regimen, clinical stage, and creatinine clearance (adjusted odds ratio: 2.195, 95% confidence interval: 1.107-4.411, p = 0.024). Compared with the non-sarcopenia patients, the sarcopenia patients with low average RDI had a higher rate of dose reduction, delayed, or discontinuation after the first cycle because of neutropenia (45% vs. 38%), and decreased performance status (11% vs. 0%).

DISCUSSION

Sarcopenia predicted low average RDI (<85%) of NAC in older patients with LAEC. In the future, the information about the mechanism of association of sarcopenia with RDI will progress the development of intervention strategy and novel supportive care.

Patient-Derived Ex Vivo Cultures and Endpoint Assays with Surrogate Biomarkers in Functional Testing for Prediction of Therapeutic Response

Prediction of therapeutic outcomes is important for cancer patients in order to reduce side effects and improve the efficacy of anti-cancer drugs. Currently, the most widely accepted method for predicting the efficacy of anti-cancer drugs is gene panel testing based on next-generation sequencing. However, gene panel testing has several limitations. For example, only 10% of cancer patients are estimated to have druggable mutations, even if whole-exome sequencing is applied. Additionally, even if optimal drugs are selected, a significant proportion of patients derive no benefit from the indicated drug treatment. Furthermore, most of the anti-cancer drugs selected by gene panel testing are molecularly targeted drugs, and the efficacies of cytotoxic drugs remain difficult to predict. Apart from gene panel testing, attempts to predict chemotherapeutic efficacy using ex vivo cultures from cancer patients have been increasing. Several groups have retrospectively demonstrated correlations between ex vivo drug sensitivity and clinical outcome. For ex vivo culture, surgically resected tumor tissue is the most abundant source. However, patients with recurrent or metastatic tumors do not usually undergo surgery, and chemotherapy may be the only option for those with inoperable tumors. Therefore, predictive methods using small amounts of cancer tissue from diagnostic materials such as endoscopic, fine-needle aspirates, needle cores and liquid biopsies are needed. To achieve this, various types of ex vivo culture and endpoint assays using effective surrogate biomarkers of drug sensitivity have recently been developed. Here, we review the variety of ex vivo cultures and endpoint assays currently available.

Multi-omics analysis uncovers tumor ecosystem dynamics during neoadjuvant toripalimab plus nab-paclitaxel and S-1 for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a single-center, open-label, single-arm phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy as a neoadjuvant therapy have been applied to the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the optimal regimen needs to be further explored, particularly for older patients, and the mechanisms by which the immune checkpoint inhibitor combined with chemotherapy modulates the evolution of ESCC are unknown.

METHODS

In this single-arm phase 2 trial, patients with resectable (stage II/III/IV without metastasis) ESCC were enrolled and received nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab) paclitaxel for two cycles and oral S-1 for 2 weeks, combined with intravenous toripalimab for two cycles before surgery. Combination postoperative adjuvant therapy was administered. The primary outcome was the major pathological response (MPR). Secondary outcomes included pathological complete response (pCR), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), improvement in Stooler's dysphagia score and degree of daily living ability (dADL). Biopsies and plasma pre- and post-neoadjuvant therapy were performed using whole-exome sequencing, transcriptome sequencing, immunohistochemistry (IHC) for PD-L1, multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) and proximity extension assay technology (PEA) for 92 proteins.

FINDINGS

From November 2019 to July 2021, 60 patients were enrolled. After neoadjuvant therapy, R0 resection was achieved in 55 (98.21%) patients. MPR was identified in 27 patients (49.09%), and 16 patients (29.09%) achieved pCR. Patients with PR, SD and PD were 37 (61.67%), 21 (35.00%) and 2 (3.33%), respectively. The overall staging, Stooler dysphagia scores and dADL were significantly decreased after treatment. 11 patients (18.3%) experienced grade ≥3 AEs. Compared to PD-L1-Low patients, PD-L1-High patients had a significantly higher ratio of PR. During therapy, the tumor mutation burden (TMB) and tumor neoantigen burden (TNB) were significantly decreased in patients with PR. Differential clonal evolution within tumors was demonstrated by analysis of intratumoral heterogeneity. Transcriptome analyses revealed that the infiltration of CD4+ T lymphocytes at baseline was associated with clinical outcome. During therapy, CD8+ T cells and CD4+ T cells were increased in all patients; however, exhausted cells, nTregs and iTregs were significantly increased in patients with non-MPR. Protein analyses revealed that the levels of IFN-γ, Gal.1 and LAMP3 can predict the clinical benefit. In addition, the expression of CD83, TNFRSF4, TNFSF14, VEGFR2, ADA, ARG1, and HO-1 was associated with serious AEs. More importantly, the integration of CD4+ T cells with plasma protein of IFN-γ, Gal.1 or LAMP3 could further distinguish responders from non-responders.

INTERPRETATION

In this study, neoadjuvant therapy with toripalimab, nab-paclitaxel and S-1 was less toxic and showed promising antitumor activity in patients with resectable ESCC. Changes in the genome, transcriptome, PD-L1 expression and serum proteins were comprehensively analyzed and correlated with clinical outcomes, which provides insight into the mechanism of action of toripalimab combined with nab-paclitaxel and S-1 in patients with ESCC.

FUNDING

This study was funded by Major projects of the ministry of science and technology of the 13th five-year plan of China [grant number: 2018ZX09201013].

Impact of Perineural Invasion and Preexisting Type 2 Diabetes on Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (neoCRT) followed by surgery is the cornerstone treatment strategy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Despite this high- intensity multimodality therapy, most patients still experience recurrences and metastases, especially those who do not achieve a pathological complete response (pCR) after neoCRT. Here, we focused on identifying poor prognostic factors. In this retrospective cohort study; we enrolled 140 patients who completed neoCRT plus surgery treatment sequence with no interval metastasis. Overall, 45 of 140 patients (32.1%) achieved a pCR. The overall survival, disease-free survival (DFS), and metastasis-free survival was significantly better in patients with a pCR than in patients with a non-pCR. In the non-pCR subgroup, the presence of perineural invasion (PNI) and preexisting type 2 diabetes (T2DM) were two factors adversely affecting DFS. After adjusting for other factors, multivariate analysis showed that the hazard ratio (HR) was 2.354 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.240-4.467, p = 0.009) for the presence of PNI and 2.368 (95% CI 1.351-4.150, p = 0.003) for preexisting T2DM. Patients with a combination of both factors had the worst survival. In conclusion, PNI and preexisting T2DM may adversely affect the prognosis of patients with ESCC receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Prognostic Impact from the Loss of Skeletal Muscle Mass During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Older Patients with Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

In older adults, skeletal muscle mass is an important factor for health and prognosis. The loss of SMM during neoadjuvant therapy affects the prognosis of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. However, information is limited regarding this possibility in older patients. This study aimed to establish the prognostic impact of SMM loss during neoadjuvant chemotherapy on older patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. Patients age 65 years or older had undergone R0 curative esophagectomy after NAC. The skeletal muscle mass index before and after NAC was calculated from computed tomography images. The percentage change in the SMI during NAC (SMI%) was calculated from the SMI before and after NAC.

RESULTS

The study analyzed 150 patients with a mean age of 71.1 ± 3.7 years. The mean value of the SMI was 42.7 ± 7.2 cm²/m² before NAC, and the SMI% was - 6.4% ± 5.9%. The cutoff of SMI% for overall survival was defined by the log-rank test as - 12%. The Cox proportional hazard model showed that major loss of the SMI (≥ 12%) significantly influenced OS (hazard ratio, 2.490; 95% confidence interval, 1.121-5.529; p = 0.025) independently of age, sex, pathologic T and N factors, or treatment regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

Major SMI loss has an impact on OS after R0 curative esophagectomy for older patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer.