1
|
Cannas S, Vollmer CM. Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer-What Is Totality? JAMA Surg 2024; 159:828-829. [PMID: 38656533 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.0419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
This article discusses the meaning of the word total in relation to total neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuele Cannas
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Charles M Vollmer
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Domagała-Haduch M, Gorzelak-Magiera A, Michalecki Ł, Gisterek-Grocholska I. Radiochemotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:3291-3300. [PMID: 38920733 PMCID: PMC11202861 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31060250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2024] [Revised: 05/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Despite the advancements made in oncology in recent years, the treatment of pancreatic cancer remains a challenge. Five-year survival rates for this cancer do not exceed 10%. Among the reasons contributing to poor treatment outcomes are the oligosymptomatic course of the tumor, diagnostic difficulties due to the anatomical location of the organ, and the unique biological features of pancreatic cancer. The mainstay of treatment for resectable cancer is surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. For unresectable and metastatic cancers, chemotherapy remains the primary method of treatment. At the same time, for about thirty years, there have been attempts to improve treatment outcomes by using radiotherapy combined with systemic treatment. Unlike chemotherapy, radiotherapy has no established place in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. This paper addresses the topic of radiotherapy in pancreatic cancer as a valuable method that can improve treatment outcomes alongside chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Małgorzata Domagała-Haduch
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Silesia, 40-514 Katowice, Poland; (A.G.-M.); (Ł.M.); (I.G.-G.)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jethwa KR, Kim E, Berlin J, Anker CJ, Tchelebi L, Abood G, Hallemeier CL, Jabbour S, Kennedy T, Kumar R, Lee P, Sharma N, Small W, Williams V, Russo S. Executive Summary of the American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for Neoadjuvant Therapy for Nonmetastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Systematic Review and Guidelines. Am J Clin Oncol 2024; 47:185-199. [PMID: 38131628 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000001076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
For patients with locoregionally confined pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), margin-negative surgical resection is the only known curative treatment; however, the majority of patients are not operable candidates at initial diagnosis. Among patients with resectable disease who undergo surgery alone, the 5-year survival remains poor. Adjuvant therapies, including systemic therapy or chemoradiation, are utilized as they improve locoregional control and overall survival. There has been increasing interest in the use of neoadjuvant therapy to obtain early control of occult metastatic disease, allow local tumor response to facilitate margin-negative resection, and provide a test of time and biology to assist with the selection of candidates most likely to benefit from radical surgical resection. However, limited guidance exists regarding the relative effectiveness of treatment options. In this systematic review, the American Radium Society multidisciplinary gastrointestinal expert panel convened to develop Appropriate Use Criteria evaluating the evidence regarding neoadjuvant treatment for patients with PDAC, including surgery, systemic therapy, and radiotherapy, in terms of oncologic outcomes and quality of life. The evidence was assessed using the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, and Study (PICOS) design framework and "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses" 2020 methodology. Eligible studies included phases 2 to 3 trials, meta-analyses, and retrospective analyses published between January 1, 2012 and December 30, 2022 in the Ovid Medline database. A summary of recommendations based on the available literature is outlined to guide practitioners in the management of patients with PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krishan R Jethwa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
| | - Ed Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Jordan Berlin
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Christopher J Anker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT
| | - Leila Tchelebi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead
| | | | | | | | - Timothy Kennedy
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Rachit Kumar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sibley Memorial Hospital, Washington DC
| | - Percy Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Navesh Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, WellSpan Cancer Center, York, PA
| | - William Small
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL
| | - Vonetta Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY
| | - Suzanne Russo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Del Chiaro M, Sugawara T, Karam SD, Messersmith WA. Advances in the management of pancreatic cancer. BMJ 2023; 383:e073995. [PMID: 38164628 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-073995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer remains among the malignancies with the worst outcomes. Survival has been improving, but at a slower rate than other cancers. Multimodal treatment, including chemotherapy, surgical resection, and radiotherapy, has been under investigation for many years. Because of the anatomical characteristics of the pancreas, more emphasis on treatment selection has been placed on local extension into major vessels. Recently, the development of more effective treatment regimens has opened up new treatment strategies, but urgent research questions have also become apparent. This review outlines the current management of pancreatic cancer, and the recent advances in its treatment. The review discusses future treatment pathways aimed at integrating novel findings of translational and clinical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Del Chiaro
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Toshitaka Sugawara
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sana D Karam
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Wells A Messersmith
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Al-Mansor E, Mahoney M, Chenard-Poirier M, Ramjeesingh R, Nair V, Kennedy E, Locke G, Welch S, Berry S, Couture F, Elimova E, Pollett A, Mahmud A, Wilson B, Armstrong D, Falkson C, Asmis T, Vickers M, Goodwin R. Eastern Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference 2023. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:8172-8185. [PMID: 37754508 PMCID: PMC10527697 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30090593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The annual Eastern Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference 2023 was held in Quebec City, Quebec 2-4 February 2023. The purpose of the conference was to develop consensus statements on emerging and evolving treatment paradigms. Participants included Canadian medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, pathologists and surgical oncologists from across Ontario, Quebec, and the Atlantic provinces. Consensus statements were developed following rapid review presentations and discussion of available literature. The recommendations proposed here represent the consensus opinions of physicians involved in the care of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies who participated in this meeting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Essa Al-Mansor
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada (R.G.)
| | - Meghan Mahoney
- Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s, NL A1B 3V6, Canadac
| | | | - Ravi Ramjeesingh
- Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada
| | - Vimoj Nair
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada (R.G.)
| | - Erin Kennedy
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada; (E.K.)
| | - Gordon Locke
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada (R.G.)
| | - Stephen Welch
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada;
| | - Scott Berry
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 5P9, Canada; (S.B.)
| | - Felix Couture
- CHU de Québec—Université Laval, Québec, QC G1R 2J6, Canada (F.C.)
| | - Elena Elimova
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
| | - Aaron Pollett
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada; (E.K.)
| | - Aamer Mahmud
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 5P9, Canada; (S.B.)
| | - Brooke Wilson
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 5P9, Canada; (S.B.)
| | - Dawn Armstrong
- Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, St. John’s, NL A1B 3V6, Canadac
| | - Conrad Falkson
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 5P9, Canada; (S.B.)
| | - Timothy Asmis
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada (R.G.)
| | - Michael Vickers
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada (R.G.)
| | - Rachel Goodwin
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada (R.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
van Dam JL, Verkolf EMM, Dekker EN, Bonsing BA, Bratlie SO, Brosens LAA, Busch OR, van Driel LMJW, van Eijck CHJ, Feshtali S, Ghorbani P, de Groot DJA, de Groot JWB, Haberkorn BCM, de Hingh IH, van der Holt B, Karsten TM, van der Kolk MB, Labori KJ, Liem MSL, Loosveld OJL, Molenaar IQ, Polée MB, van Santvoort HC, de Vos-Geelen J, Wumkes ML, van Tienhoven G, Homs MYV, Besselink MG, Wilmink JW, Groot Koerkamp B. Perioperative or adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX for resectable pancreatic cancer (PREOPANC-3): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:728. [PMID: 37550634 PMCID: PMC10405377 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11141-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical resection followed by adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil with leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) is currently the standard of care for patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. The main concern regarding adjuvant chemotherapy is that only half of patients actually receive adjuvant treatment. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, on the other hand, guarantees early systemic treatment and may increase chemotherapy use and thereby improve overall survival. Furthermore, it may prevent futile surgery in patients with rapidly progressive disease. However, some argue that neoadjuvant therapy delays surgery, which could lead to progression towards unresectable disease and thus offset the potential benefits. Comparison of perioperative (i.e., neoadjuvant and adjuvant) with (only) adjuvant administration of mFOLFIRINOX in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) is needed to determine the optimal approach. METHODS This multicenter, phase 3, RCT will include 378 patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with a WHO performance status of 0 or 1. Patients are recruited from 20 Dutch centers and three centers in Norway and Sweden. Resectable pancreatic cancer is defined as no arterial contact and ≤ 90 degrees venous contact. Patients in the intervention arm are scheduled for 8 cycles of neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX followed by surgery and 4 cycles of adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX (2-week cycle of oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, irinotecan 150 mg/m2 at day 1, followed by 46 h continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil 2400 g/m2). Patients in the comparator arm start with surgery followed by 12 cycles of adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX. The primary outcome is overall survival by intention-to-treat. Secondary outcomes include progression-free survival, resection rate, quality of life, adverse events, and surgical complications. To detect a hazard ratio of 0.70 with 80% power, 252 events are needed. The number of events is expected to be reached after the inclusion of 378 patients in 36 months, with analysis planned 18 months after the last patient has been randomized. DISCUSSION The multicenter PREOPANC-3 trial compares perioperative mFOLFIRINOX with adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical Trials: NCT04927780. Registered June 16, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J L van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E M M Verkolf
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E N Dekker
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B A Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - S O Bratlie
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - L A A Brosens
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - O R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - L M J W van Driel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C H J van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Feshtali
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - P Ghorbani
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - D J A de Groot
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - J W B de Groot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Isala Oncology Center, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - B C M Haberkorn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I H de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - B van der Holt
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - T M Karsten
- Department of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M B van der Kolk
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - K J Labori
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - M S L Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - O J L Loosveld
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - I Q Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M B Polée
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - H C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J de Vos-Geelen
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, GROW, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - M L Wumkes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands
| | - G van Tienhoven
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Radiation Oncology, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Y V Homs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J W Wilmink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Liang TZ, Katz MHG, Prakash LR, Chatterjee D, Wang H, Kim M, Tzeng CWD, Ikoma N, Wolff RA, Zhao D, Koay EJ, Maitra A, Kundu S, Wang H. Comparative Analyses of the Clinicopathologic Features of Short-Term and Long-Term Survivors of Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Pancreatoduodenectomy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3231. [PMID: 37370842 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15123231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is increasingly used to treat patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Patients with PDAC often show heterogenous responses to NAT with variable clinical outcomes, and the clinicopathologic parameters associated with these variable outcomes remain unclear. In this study, we systematically examined the clinicopathologic characteristics of 60 short-term survivors (overall survival < 15 months) and 149 long-term survivors (overall survival > 60 months) and compared them to 352 intermediate-term survivors (overall survival: 15-60 months) of PDAC who received NAT and pancreatoduodenectomy. We found that the short-term survivor group was associated with male gender (p = 0.03), tumor resectability prior to NAT (p = 0.04), poorly differentiated tumor histology (p = 0.006), more positive lymph nodes (p = 0.04), higher ypN stage (p = 0.002), and higher positive lymph node ratio (p = 0.03). The long-term survivor group had smaller tumor size (p = 0.001), lower ypT stage (p = 0.001), fewer positive lymph nodes (p < 0.001), lower ypN stage (p < 0.001), lower positive lymph node ratio (p < 0.001), lower rate of lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.001) and perineural invasion (p < 0.001), better tumor response grading (p < 0.001), and less frequent recurrence/metastasis (p < 0.001). The ypN stage is an independent predictor of both short-term and long-term survivors by multivariate logistic regression analyses. In addition, tumor differentiation was also an independent predictor for short-term survivors, and tumor response grading and perineural invasion were independent predictors for long-term survivors. Our results may help to plan and select post-operative adjuvant therapy for patients with PDAC who received NAT and pancreatoduodenectomy based on the pathologic data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Z Liang
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Laura R Prakash
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Deyali Chatterjee
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Hua Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Michael Kim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Naruhiko Ikoma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Robert A Wolff
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Dan Zhao
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Eugene J Koay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Anirban Maitra
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Suprateek Kundu
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Huamin Wang
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tong YT, Lai Z, Katz MHG, Prakash LR, Wang H, Chatterjee D, Kim M, Tzeng CWD, Lee JE, Ikoma N, Rashid A, Wolff RA, Zhao D, Koay EJ, Maitra A, Wang H. Prognosticators for Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Who Received Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel Therapy and Pancreatectomy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15092608. [PMID: 37174073 PMCID: PMC10177033 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GemNP) therapies are increasingly used to treat patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, limited data are available on their clinicopathologic prognosticators. We examined the clinicopathologic factors and survival of 213 PDAC patients who received FOLFIRINOX with 71 patients who received GemNP. The FOLFIRINOX group was younger (p < 0.01) and had a higher rate of radiation (p = 0.049), higher rate of borderline resectable and locally advanced disease (p < 0.001), higher rate of Group 1 response (p = 0.045) and lower ypN stage (p = 0.03) than the GemNP group. Within FOLFIRINOX group, radiation was associated with decreased lymph node metastasis (p = 0.01) and lower ypN stage (p = 0.01). The tumor response group, ypT, ypN, LVI and PNI, correlated significantly with both DFS and OS (p < 0.05). Patients with the ypT0/T1a/T1b tumor had better DFS (p = 0.04) and OS (p = 0.03) than those with ypT1c tumor. In multivariate analysis, the tumor response group and ypN were independently prognostic factors for DFS and OS (p < 0.05). Our study demonstrated that the FOLFIRINOX group was younger and had a better pathologic response than the GemNP group and that the tumor response group, ypN, ypT, LVI and PNI, are significant prognostic factors for survival in these patients. Our results also suggest that the tumor size of 1.0 cm is a better cut off for ypT2. Our study highlights the importance of systemic pathologic examination and the reporting of post-treatment pancreatectomies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Tat Tong
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Zongshan Lai
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Laura R Prakash
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Hua Wang
- Department Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Deyali Chatterjee
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Michael Kim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Naruhiko Ikoma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Asif Rashid
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Robert A Wolff
- Department Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Dan Zhao
- Department Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Eugene J Koay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Anirban Maitra
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Huamin Wang
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
de Scordilli M, Michelotti A, Zara D, Palmero L, Alberti M, Noto C, Totaro F, Foltran L, Guardascione M, Iacono D, Ongaro E, Fasola G, Puglisi F. Preoperative treatments in borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer: current evidence and new perspectives. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2023; 186:104013. [PMID: 37116817 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2022] [Revised: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Surgery is the only curative treatment for non-metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, but less than 20% of patients present a resectable disease at diagnosis. Treatment strategies and disease definition for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) vary in the different cancer centres. Preoperative chemotherapy (CT) is the standard of care for both BRPC and LAPC patients, however literature data are still controversial concerning the type, dose and duration of the different CT regimens, as well as regarding the integration of radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiation (CRT) in the therapeutic algorithm. In this unsettled debate, we aimed at focusing on the therapeutic regimens currently in use and relative literature data, to report international trials comparing the available therapeutic options or explore the introduction of new pharmacological agents, and to analyse possible new scenarios in microenvironment evaluation before and after neoadjuvant therapies or in patients' selection at a molecular level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco de Scordilli
- Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy.
| | - Anna Michelotti
- Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy; Department of Oncology, ASUFC University Hospital of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
| | - Diego Zara
- Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy.
| | - Lorenza Palmero
- Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy.
| | - Martina Alberti
- Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy; Department of Oncology, ASUFC University Hospital of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
| | - Claudia Noto
- Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy.
| | - Fabiana Totaro
- Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy.
| | - Luisa Foltran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy.
| | - Michela Guardascione
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy.
| | - Donatella Iacono
- Department of Oncology, ASUFC University Hospital of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
| | - Elena Ongaro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy.
| | - Gianpiero Fasola
- Department of Oncology, ASUFC University Hospital of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
| | - Fabio Puglisi
- Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yao W, Chen X, Fan B, Zeng L, Zhou Z, Mao Z, Shen Q. Multidisciplinary team diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer: Current landscape and future prospects. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1077605. [PMID: 37007078 PMCID: PMC10050556 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1077605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023] Open
Abstract
The pathogenesis of pancreatic cancer has not been completely clear, there is no highly sensitive and specific detection method, so early diagnosis is very difficult. Despite the rapid development of tumor diagnosis and treatment, it is difficult to break through in the short term and the overall 5-year survival rate of pancreatic cancer is less than 8%. In the face of the increasing incidence of pancreatic cancer, in addition to strengthening basic research, exploring its etiology and pathogenesis, it is urgent to optimize the existing diagnosis and treatment methods through standard multidisciplinary team (MDT), and formulate personalized treatment plan to achieve the purpose of improving the curative effect. However, there are some problems in MDT, such as insufficient understanding and enthusiasm of some doctors, failure to operate MDT according to the system, lack of good communication between domestic and foreign peers, and lack of attention in personnel training and talent echelon construction. It is expected to protect the rights and interests of doctors in the future and ensure the continuous operation of MDT. To strengthen the research on the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer, MDT can try the Internet +MDT mode to improve the efficiency of MDT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weirong Yao
- Department of Oncology, Jiangxi Provincial People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, China
| | - Xiaoliang Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Jiangxi Provincial People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, China
| | - Bin Fan
- Department of Radiology, Jiangxi Provincial People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, China
| | - Lin Zeng
- Department of Oncology, Jiangxi Provincial People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, China
| | - Zhiyong Zhou
- Department of Oncology, Jiangxi Provincial People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, China
| | - Zhifang Mao
- Department of Oncology, Jiangxi Provincial People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, China
| | - Qinglin Shen
- Department of Oncology, Jiangxi Provincial People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, China
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Jiangxi Provincial People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, China
- *Correspondence: Qinglin Shen,
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wu HY, Li JW, Li JZ, Zhai QL, Ye JY, Zheng SY, Fang K. Comprehensive multimodal management of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: Current status and progress. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15:142-162. [PMID: 36896309 PMCID: PMC9988647 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i2.142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) is a complex clinical entity with specific biological features. Criteria for resectability need to be assessed in combination with tumor anatomy and oncology. Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for BRPC patients is associated with additional survival benefits. Research is currently focused on exploring the optimal NAT regimen and more reliable ways of assessing response to NAT. More attention to management standards during NAT, including biliary drainage and nutritional support, is needed. Surgery remains the cornerstone of BRPC treatment and multidisciplinary teams can help to evaluate whether patients are suitable for surgery and provide individualized management during the perioperative period, including NAT responsiveness and the selection of surgical timing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong-Yu Wu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China
| | - Jin-Wei Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Liuzhou 545000, Guangxi Province, China
| | - Jin-Zheng Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China
| | - Qi-Long Zhai
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China
| | - Jing-Yuan Ye
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China
| | - Si-Yuan Zheng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China
| | - Kun Fang
- Department of Surgery, Yinchuan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Yinchuan 750000, Ningxia, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fawaz A, Abdel-Rahman O. Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Challenges for Clinical Management. Cancer Manag Res 2022; 14:3589-3598. [PMID: 36597515 PMCID: PMC9805723 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s340719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a significant worldwide health problem with a poor prognosis. A borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR-PDAC) is a tumor with limited vascular involvement that is technically resectable but with a high risk of positive margins (R1 resection). Objective To identify the current challenges that exist in the management of BR-PDAC. Methods A review of the literature was conducted to identify articles discussing the definitions and management of BR-PDAC. Key Findings Several anatomic definitions of BR-PDAC exist, and there is significant heterogeneity in their utilization across published trials. To improve the odds of a margin negative (R0) resection, a neoadjuvant treatment approach involving chemotherapy with or without radiation is currently preferred. While supporting the efficacy of a neoadjuvant approach in BR-PDAC, the largest published randomized trials have utilized older gemcitabine-based regimens. Recently published Phase II evidence and meta-analyses have supported the use of modern multi-agent regimens such as FOLFIRINOX. The utility of adding radiation to a chemotherapy backbone remains in question. Due to remnant fibrosis and edema following neoadjuvant therapy, accurately selecting patients for resection based on a restaging CT scan is challenging. Furthermore, the role of adjuvant therapy in BR-PDAC patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy needs to be defined. Conclusion Though progress has been made, the optimal management of BR-PDAC is uncertain. Phase III trials utilizing modern chemotherapeutic regimens are needed to establish a standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Fawaz
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Omar Abdel-Rahman
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada,Correspondence: Omar Abdel-Rahman, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Cross, Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2, Canada, Tel +1 780-432-8290, Email
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kikuchi K, Umemura A, Nitta H, Katagiri H, Nishiya M, Uesugi N, Sugai T, Imanari K, Sasaki A. A case of pathological complete response with liposomal irinotecan + 5-FU/LV for unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Surg Case Rep 2022; 8:192. [PMID: 36205833 PMCID: PMC9547044 DOI: 10.1186/s40792-022-01549-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pancreatic cancer has one of the worst prognoses of any all cancers. 5-FU/leucovorin + irinotecan + oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX), gemcitabine (GEM) plus nab-paclitaxel regimens have been recognized as global-standard, first-line treatments for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) + 5-FU/LV regimen is now included in treatment guidelines as a recommended and approved option for use in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer that has progressed after GEM-based therapy and who have a suitable performance status and comorbidity profile. There is no report that nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV regimen was significantly effective, and we will report it because we experienced this time. Case presentation A 69-year-old man presented with epigastric pain, and a contrast computed tomography (CT) revealed an enhanced mass lesion measuring 33 × 27 mm on the pancreatic body with encasement of the common hepatic artery (CHA) and the splenic vein. An endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration was performed and demonstrated cytology consistent with adenocarcinoma. Therefore, we diagnosed the patient with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer. The patient received the GEM and S-1 regimen; however, the adverse event was relatively severe. Then, 11 cycles of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV regimen were administered. A CT scan revealed that the tumor had shrunk to 18 × 7 mm in diameter with encasement of the CHA. The encasement of the splenic vein had disappeared, without any distant metastases. From this post-chemotherapy evaluation and intraoperative frozen section of around the celiac artery, gastroduodenal artery and pancreas stump confirmed absence of tumor cells, we performed distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection. A histological examination of the surgical specimen revealed no evidence of residual adenocarcinoma, consistent with a pathological complete response to treatment. Conclusions We present the first case of a pathological complete response with nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV for unresectable, locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In the future, nal-IRI may become a key drug for pancreatic cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Kikuchi
- grid.411790.a0000 0000 9613 6383Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University, 2-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba, Iwate 028-3695 Japan
| | - Akira Umemura
- grid.411790.a0000 0000 9613 6383Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University, 2-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba, Iwate 028-3695 Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Nitta
- grid.411790.a0000 0000 9613 6383Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University, 2-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba, Iwate 028-3695 Japan
| | - Hirokatsu Katagiri
- grid.411790.a0000 0000 9613 6383Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University, 2-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba, Iwate 028-3695 Japan
| | - Masao Nishiya
- grid.411790.a0000 0000 9613 6383Department of Molecular Diagnostic Pathology, Iwate Medical University, 2-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba, Iwate 028-3695 Japan
| | - Noriyuki Uesugi
- grid.411790.a0000 0000 9613 6383Department of Molecular Diagnostic Pathology, Iwate Medical University, 2-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba, Iwate 028-3695 Japan
| | - Tamotsu Sugai
- grid.411790.a0000 0000 9613 6383Department of Molecular Diagnostic Pathology, Iwate Medical University, 2-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba, Iwate 028-3695 Japan
| | - Keisuke Imanari
- grid.411790.a0000 0000 9613 6383Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Iwate Medical University, 2-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba, Iwate 028-3695 Japan
| | - Akira Sasaki
- grid.411790.a0000 0000 9613 6383Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University, 2-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba, Iwate 028-3695 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
[ 68Ga]FAPI-PET/CT for radiation therapy planning in biliary tract, pancreatic ductal adeno-, and adenoidcystic carcinomas. Sci Rep 2022; 12:16261. [PMID: 36171444 PMCID: PMC9519639 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20447-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Biliary-tract-carcinomas (BTC), pancreatic-ductal-adenocarcinomas (PDAC) and adenoidcystic-carcinomas (AC) have in common that they are traditionally treated with large clinical-target-volumes (CTV). The aim of this study is to examine the impact of pretreatment-[68Ga]FAPI-PET/CT on target-volume-definition and posttreatment-[68Ga]FAPI-PET/CT-response-assessment for BTC-, PDAC- and AC-patients referred to radiation-therapy. All consecutive BTC-, PDAC-, and AC-patients who received pretreatment-[68Ga]FAPI-PET/CT±[18F]FDG-PET/CT were included from 01.01.2020 to 01.03.2022. MTV and SUVmax were separately generated based on [68Ga]FAPI- and [18F]FDG-PET/CT-images. A [68Ga]FAPI- and [18F]FDG-based-CTV was defined. Treatment-plans were compared. Treatment-response was reassessed by a second [68Ga]FAPI-PET/CT and [18F]FDG-PET/CT after treatment-completion. Intermodality comparison of lesion-to-background-ratios [SUVmax_lesion/SUVmean_background] for individual timepoints t1 and t2 revealed significant higher values for [68Ga]FAPI compared to [18F]FDG (t1, p = 0.008; t2, p = 0.005). Intermodality comparison of radiation-therapy-plans showed that [68Ga]FAPI-based planning resulted in D100% = 97.2% and V95% = 98.8% for the [18F]FDG-MTV. [18F]FDG-based-planning resulted in D100% = 35.9% and V95% = 78.1% for [68Ga]FAPI-MTV. [18F]FDG-based-planning resulted only in 2 patients in V95% > 95% for [68Ga]FAPI-MTV, and in 1 patient in D100% > 97% for [68Ga]FAPI-MTV. GTV-coverage in terms of V95% was 76.4% by [18F]FDG-based-planning and 99.5% by [68Ga]FAPI-based-planning. Pretreatment [68Ga]FAPI-PET/CT enhances radiation-treatment-planning in this particular group of patients. While perilesional and tumoral follow-up [18F]FDG-uptake behaved uniformly, perilesional and tumoral reaction may differ in follow-up [68Ga]FAPI-imaging. Complementary [68Ga]FAPI- and [18F]FDG-imaging enhance treatment-response-assessment.
Collapse
|
15
|
Janssen QP, van Dam JL, Prakash LR, Doppenberg D, Crane CH, van Eijck CHJ, Ellsworth SG, Jarnagin WR, O'Reilly EM, Paniccia A, Reyngold M, Besselink MG, Katz MHG, Tzeng CWD, Zureikat AH, Groot Koerkamp B, Wei AC. Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy After (m)FOLFIRINOX for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A TAPS Consortium Study. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2022; 20:783-791.e1. [PMID: 35830887 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.7008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The value of neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) after 5-fluorouracil with leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan, with or without dose modifications [(m)FOLFIRINOX], for patients with borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is uncertain. METHODS We conducted an international retrospective cohort study including consecutive patients with BR PDAC who received (m)FOLFIRINOX as initial treatment (2012-2019) from the Trans-Atlantic Pancreatic Surgery Consortium. Because the decision to administer RT is made after chemotherapy, patients with metastases or deterioration after (m)FOLFIRINOX or a performance score ≥2 were excluded. Patients who received RT after (m)FOLFIRINOX were matched 1:1 by nearest neighbor propensity scores with patients who did not receive RT. Propensity scores were calculated using sex, age (≤70 vs >70 years), WHO performance score (0 vs 1), tumor size (0-20 vs 21-40 vs >40 mm), tumor location (head/uncinate vs body/tail), number of cycles (1-4 vs 5-8 vs >8), and baseline CA 19-9 level (≤500 vs >500 U/mL). Primary outcome was overall survival (OS) from diagnosis. RESULTS Of 531 patients who received neoadjuvant (m)FOLFIRINOX for BR PDAC, 424 met inclusion criteria and 300 (70.8%) were propensity score-matched. After matching, median OS was 26.2 months (95% CI, 24.0-38.4) with RT versus 32.8 months (95% CI, 25.3-42.0) without RT (P=.71). RT was associated with a lower resection rate (55.3% vs 72.7%; P=.002). In patients who underwent a resection, RT was associated with a comparable margin-negative resection rate (>1 mm) (70.6% vs 64.8%; P=.51), more node-negative disease (57.3% vs 37.6%; P=.01), and more major pathologic response with <5% tumor viability (24.7% vs 8.3%; P=.006). The OS associated with conventional and stereotactic body RT approaches was similar (median OS, 25.7 vs 26.0 months; P=.92). CONCLUSIONS In patients with BR PDAC, neoadjuvant RT following (m)FOLFIRINOX was associated with more node-negative disease and better pathologic response in patients who underwent resection, yet no difference in OS was found. Routine use of RT cannot be recommended based on these data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quisette P Janssen
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;,Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jacob L van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Laura R Prakash
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Deesje Doppenberg
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christopher H Crane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Casper H J van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Susannah G Ellsworth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - William R Jarnagin
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Eileen M O'Reilly
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and
| | - Alessandro Paniccia
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Marsha Reyngold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alice C Wei
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Turner KM, Delman AM, Kharofa JR, Smith MT, Choe KA, Olowokure O, Wilson GC, Patel SH, Sohal D, Ahmad SA. Radiation therapy in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: A review. Surgery 2022; 172:284-290. [PMID: 35034793 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Revised: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer constitutes a complex clinical entity, presenting the clinician with a locally aggressive disease that has a proclivity for distant spread. The benefits of radiation therapy, such as improved local control and improved survival, have been questioned. In this review we seek to summarize the existing evidence on radiation therapy in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer and highlight future areas of research. METHODS A comprehensive review of PubMed for clinical studies reporting outcomes in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer was performed in June 2021, with an emphasis placed on prospective studies. RESULTS Radiologic "downstaging" in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer is a rare event, although some evidence shows increased clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy over radiation therapy. Margin status seems to be equivalent between regimens that use neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone and regimens that include neoadjuvant radiation therapy. Local control in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer is likely improved with radiation therapy; however, the benefit of improved local control in a disease marked by systemic failure has been questioned. Although some studies have shown improved survival with radiation therapy, differences in the delivery and tolerance of chemotherapy between the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting confound these results. When the evidence is evaluated as a whole, there is no clear survival benefit of radiation therapy in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. CONCLUSION Once considered a staple of therapy, the role of radiation therapy in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer is evolving as systemic therapy regimens continues to improve. Increased clinical understanding of disease phenotype and response are needed to accurately tailor therapy for individual patients and to improve outcomes in this complex patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin M Turner
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH
| | - Aaron M Delman
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH
| | - Jordan R Kharofa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH
| | - Milton T Smith
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH
| | - Kyuran A Choe
- Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH
| | - Olugbenga Olowokure
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH
| | - Gregory C Wilson
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH; Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH
| | - Sameer H Patel
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH; Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH
| | - Davendra Sohal
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH
| | - Syed A Ahmad
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH; Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Labori KJ. Short-Course or Total Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer - Current Status and Future Perspectives. Front Surg 2022; 9:839339. [PMID: 35548190 PMCID: PMC9082635 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.839339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Neoadjuvant therapy improves overall survival compared with a surgery-first approach in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC). Evidence of higher quality is required to determine whether neoadjuvant therapy has potential benefits and improves survival for patients with resectable pancreatic cancer (RPC). Most randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have explored short-course neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SNT), but total neoadjuvant chemotherapy (TNT) is now the experimental arm of ongoing RCTs. This article reviews the current status of SNT and TNT in RPC and BRPC, and provides perspectives of future challenges and research directions in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Knut Jørgen Labori
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Janssen QP, van Dam JL, Doppenberg D, Prakash LR, van Eijck CHJ, Jarnagin WR, O’ Reilly EM, Paniccia A, Besselink MG, Katz MHG, Tzeng CWD, Wei AC, Zureikat AH, Groot Koerkamp B. FOLFIRINOX as Initial Treatment for Localized Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis by the Trans-Atlantic Pancreatic Surgery Consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst 2022; 114:695-703. [PMID: 35157075 PMCID: PMC9086789 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djac018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Large pragmatic studies of patients who received 5-fluorouracil with leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin ([m]FOLFIRINOX) as initial treatment for localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are lacking. This study aimed to provide realistic estimates of oncologic outcomes in these patients. METHODS This international retrospective cohort study included all consecutive patients presenting with localized PDAC who received at least 1 cycle of (m)FOLFIRINOX as initial treatment in 5 referral centers from the United States and the Netherlands (2012-2019). Primary outcome was median overall survival (OS), calculated from the date of tissue diagnosis, assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Log-rank test was used to compare OS between groups. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to assess prognostic baseline factors for OS. All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS Overall, 1835 patients were included, of whom 958 (52.2%) had locally advanced (LA), 531 (28.9%) had borderline resectable (BR), and 346 (18.9%) had potentially resectable (PR) PDAC. The median number of (m)FOLFIRINOX cycles was 6 (interquartile range = 4-8). Subsequent treatment included second chemotherapy (12.9%), radiotherapy (49.0%), and resection (37.9%). The resection rate was 17.6% for LA, 53.1% for BR, and 70.5% for PR PDAC (P < .001). The margin-negative resection rate (>1 mm) was 55.2% for LA, 62.6% for BR, and 79.2% for PR PDAC (P < .001). The median OS was 18.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 17.7 to 19.9 months) for LA, 23.2 months (95% CI = 21.0 to 25.7 months) for BR, and 31.2 months (95% CI = 26.2 to 36.6 months) for PR PDAC (P < .001). The median OS for 695 patients who underwent a resection was 38.3 months (95% CI = 36.1 to 42.0 months). Independent prognostic factors at baseline for worse OS were more advanced stage, worse performance status, baseline carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 > 500 U/mL, and body mass index ≤18.5 kg/m2. CONCLUSIONS This large international cohort study provides realistic estimates of resection rates and survival in patients with LA, BR, and PR PDAC who started (m)FOLFIRINOX treatment in PDAC referral centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quisette P Janssen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jacob L van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Deesje Doppenberg
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Laura R Prakash
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Casper H J van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - William R Jarnagin
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eileen M O’ Reilly
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alessandro Paniccia
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alice C Wei
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pecorelli N, Licinio AW, Guarneri G, Aleotti F, Crippa S, Reni M, Falconi M, Balzano G. Prognosis of Upfront Surgery for Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies. Front Oncol 2022; 11:812102. [PMID: 35083158 PMCID: PMC8784375 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.812102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The rate of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasing, but upfront resection is still offered to most patients with resectable or borderline resectable disease. Encouraging data reported in adjuvant chemotherapy trials prompts surgeons towards upfront surgery, but such trials are subject to a significant selection bias. This systematic review aims to summarize available high-quality evidence regarding survival of patients treated with upfront surgery for PDAC. METHODS Pubmed, Cochrane, and Web of Science Databases were interrogated for prospective studies published between 2000 and 2021 that included at least a cohort of patients treated with upfront surgery for resectable or borderline resectable PDAC. The Cochrane Collaboration's risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB-2) was used to assess risk of bias in all randomized studies. Patient weighted median overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated. RESULTS Overall, 8,341 abstracts were screened, 17 reports were reviewed in full text, and finally 5 articles and 1 conference abstract underwent data extraction. Included studies were published between 2014 and 2021. All studies were RCTs comparing different neoadjuvant treatment strategies to upfront surgery. Three studies included only resectable PDAC patients, two studies recruited patients with resectable and borderline resectable disease, and one study selected only borderline resectable patients. A total of 439 patients were included in the upfront resection cohorts of the 6 studies, ranging between 20 to 180 patients per study. The weighted median OS after upfront surgery was 18.8 (95% CI 12.4 - 20.6) months. Median DFS was 9 (95% CI 1.6 - 12.5) months. Resection rate was 74.5% (range 65-90%). Adjuvant treatment was initiated in 68% (range 43-77%) of resected patients. CONCLUSIONS High-quality data for PDAC patients undergoing upfront surgery is scarce. Meta-analysis from the included studies showed a significantly shorter OS and DFS compared to recently published studies focusing on adjuvant combination chemotherapy, suggesting that the latter may overestimate survival due to the exclusion of most patients scheduled for upfront surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolò Pecorelli
- Faculty of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.,Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alice W Licinio
- Faculty of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Guarneri
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Aleotti
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Crippa
- Faculty of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.,Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Reni
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Faculty of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.,Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianpaolo Balzano
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Georges P, Doussot A. Comment on: local control and survival after induction chemotherapy and ablative radiation versus resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with vascular involvement. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2021; 10:672-674. [PMID: 34760970 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-21-336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Pauline Georges
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology - Liver Transplantation Unit, CHU Besancon, Besancon, France
| | - Alexandre Doussot
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology - Liver Transplantation Unit, CHU Besancon, Besancon, France
| |
Collapse
|