1
|
Kim HH, Nguyen NH, Yang CJ, Tam MS, Leung AM, Attaluri V. Outcomes of Simultaneous Versus Staged Resection for Stage IV Colorectal Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastases. Am Surg 2024; 90:2367-2373. [PMID: 38567700 DOI: 10.1177/00031348241244632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/05/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Management of stage IV colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases remains debated, as colorectal and liver resections can be performed simultaneously or staged apart. OBJECTIVE This study aims to determine any demographic or outcome differences between simultaneous and staged resection. PARTICIPANTS Retrospective review was performed on patients diagnosed with synchronous colorectal primary and liver metastases within Southern California Kaiser Permanente (KP) hospitals between 2010 and 2020. Patients with other metastases on diagnosis or those who did not receive both primary and liver resections were excluded. Demographic and outcome data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS Of the 113 patients who met criteria, 72 (63.7%) received simultaneous and 41 (36.3%) received staged resection. Demographic data were comparable between simultaneous and staged resection, respectively, including median age of diagnosis, sex, and race. Both groups had similar median length of stay, percentage of major colorectal resection, and percentage of major liver resection. Both groups also had similar rates of radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy. There were no statistically significant difference in complications rates, median follow-up time, median overall survival, and median disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS Practice patterns within Southern California KP hospitals favor minor colorectal and liver resections. However, there were no significant differences in demographics, treatment rates, or outcomes between simultaneous and staged resection. While not statistically significant, our findings of a 11.9% higher major liver resection rate and 7.5-month longer median disease-free survival in the staged resection group may benefit from further study with higher power datasets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harry H Kim
- Department of Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Nghiem H Nguyen
- Department of Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Claire J Yang
- Department of Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Michael S Tam
- Department of Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anna M Leung
- Department of Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Vikram Attaluri
- Department of Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jain AJ, Schultz K, Brainerd MJ, Murimwa GZ, Fleming AM, Fackche N, Bilir E, Chiba A, Martin AN, Singh P, Childers CP, Freidman LR, Zafar N, Abdelsattar Z, Cortina C, Stewart C, Cowher MD, Ganai S, Merck B, Nandakumar G, Pandalai PK, Narayan RR, Ahmad SA. The Top Ten Annals of Surgical Oncology Original Articles on Twitter/X: 2020-2023. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15936-z. [PMID: 39138773 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15936-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2024] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024]
Abstract
Social media has become omnipresent in society, especially given that it enables the rapid and widespread communication of news, events, and information. Social media platforms have become increasingly used by numerous surgical societies to promote meetings and surgical journals to increase the visibility of published content. In September 2020, Annals of Surgical Oncology (ASO) established its Social Media Committee (SMC), which has worked to steadily increase the visibility of published content on social media platforms, namely X (formerly known as Twitter). The purpose of this review is to highlight the 10 ASO original articles with the most engagement on X, based on total number of mentions, since the founding of the SMC. These articles encompass a wide variety of topics from various oncologic disciplines including hepatopancreatobiliary, breast, and gynecologic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anish J Jain
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Kurt Schultz
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Micah J Brainerd
- Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Akron General, Akron, OH, USA
| | - Gilbert Z Murimwa
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Andrew M Fleming
- Department of Surgery, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Nadege Fackche
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Esra Bilir
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Die Klinik in Preetz, Preetz, Germany
| | - Akiko Chiba
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Allison N Martin
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Puneet Singh
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christopher P Childers
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lindsay R Freidman
- Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Nabeel Zafar
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Zaid Abdelsattar
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Stritch School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Chandler Cortina
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Camille Stewart
- Division of Surgical Oncology, CommonSpirit Associated Surgeons St. Anthony, Lakewood, CO, USA
| | - Michael D Cowher
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Sabha Ganai
- Department of Surgery, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, USA
| | - Belen Merck
- Departamento de Cirugía, Universidad Cardenal Herrera CEU, Alfara del Patriarca, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Prakash K Pandalai
- Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Raja R Narayan
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Syed A Ahmad
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Siriwardena AK. Evidence-based management of the patient with synchronous colorectal cancer and liver metastases. Surg Open Sci 2024; 20:203-204. [PMID: 39140103 PMCID: PMC11320597 DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2024] [Accepted: 07/19/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ajith K. Siriwardena
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Machairas N, Di Martino M, Primavesi F, Underwood P, de Santibanes M, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Urban I, Tsilimigras DI, Siriwardena AK, Frampton AE, Pawlik TM. Simultaneous resection for colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases: current state-of-the-art. J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 28:577-586. [PMID: 38583912 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.01.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 01/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A large proportion of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) presents with synchronous colorectal liver metastases (sCRLM) at diagnosis. Surgical approaches for patients with sCRLM have evolved over the past decades. Simultaneous resection (SR) of CRC and sCRLM for selected patients has emerged as a safe and efficient alternative approach to traditional staged resections. METHODS A comprehensive review of the literature was performed using MEDLINE/PubMed and Web of Science databases with the end of search date October 30, 2023. The MeSH terms "simultaneous resections" and "combined resections" in combination with "colorectal liver metastases," "colorectal cancer," "liver resection," and "hepatectomy" were searched in the title and/or abstract. RESULTS SRs aim to achieve maximal tumor clearance, minimizing the risk of disease progression and optimizing the potential for long-term survival. Improvements in perioperative care, advances in surgical techniques, and a better understanding of patient selection criteria have collectively contributed to reducing morbidity and mortality associated with these complex procedures. Several studies have demonstrated that SR are associated with reduced overall length of stay and lower costs with comparable morbidity and long-term outcomes. In light of these outcomes, the proportion of patients undergoing SR for CRC and sCRLM has increased substantially over the past 2 decades. CONCLUSION For patients with sCRLM, SR represents an attractive alternative to the traditional staged approach and should be selectively used; however, the decision on whether to proceed with a simultaneous versus staged approach should be individualized based on several patient- and disease-related factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaos Machairas
- Second Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece
| | - Marcello Di Martino
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy; Department of Surgery, University Maggiore Hospital della Carita, Novara, Italy
| | - Florian Primavesi
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, HPB Centre, Salzkammergutklinikum Hospital, Vöcklabruck, Austria
| | - Patrick Underwood
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Martin de Santibanes
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Liver and Transplant Unit, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Iveta Urban
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, HPB Centre, Salzkammergutklinikum Hospital, Vöcklabruck, Austria
| | - Diamantis I Tsilimigras
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio, United States
| | - Ajith K Siriwardena
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester M13 9WL, United Kingdom
| | - Adam E Frampton
- HPB Surgical Unit, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom; Section of Oncology, Surrey Cancer Research Institute, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The Leggett Building, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio, United States; Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Siriwardena AK, Serrablo A, Fretland ÅA, Wigmore SJ, Ramia-Angel JM, Malik HZ, Stättner S, Søreide K, Zmora O, Meijerink M, Kartalis N, Lesurtel M, Verhoef C, Balakrishnan A, Gruenberger T, Jonas E, Devar J, Jamdar S, Jones R, Hilal MA, Andersson B, Boudjema K, Mullamitha S, Stassen L, Dasari BVM, Frampton AE, Aldrighetti L, Pellino G, Buchwald P, Gürses B, Wasserberg N, Gruenberger B, Spiers HVM, Jarnagin W, Vauthey JN, Kokudo N, Tejpar S, Valdivieso A, Adam R. The multi-societal European consensus on the terminology, diagnosis and management of patients with synchronous colorectal cancer and liver metastases: an E-AHPBA consensus in partnership with ESSO, ESCP, ESGAR, and CIRSE. HPB (Oxford) 2023; 25:985-999. [PMID: 37471055 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.05.360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2023] [Revised: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Contemporary management of patients with synchronous colorectal cancer and liver metastases is complex. The aim of this project was to provide a practical framework for care of patients with synchronous colorectal cancer and liver metastases with a focus on terminology, diagnosis and management. METHODS This project was a multi-organisational, multidisciplinary consensus. The consensus group produced statements which focused on terminology, diagnosis and management. Statements were refined during an online Delphi process and those with 70% agreement or above were reviewed at a final meeting. Iterations of the report were shared by electronic mail to arrive at a final agreed document comprising twelve key statements. RESULTS Synchronous liver metastases are those detected at the time of presentation of the primary tumour. The term "early metachronous metastases" applies to those absent at presentation but detected within 12 months of diagnosis of the primary tumour with "late metachronous metastases" applied to those detected after 12 months. Disappearing metastases applies to lesions which are no longer detectable on MR scan after systemic chemotherapy. Guidance was provided on the recommended composition of tumour boards and clinical assessment in emergency and elective settings. The consensus focused on treatment pathways including systemic chemotherapy, synchronous surgery and the staged approach with either colorectal or liver-directed surgery as first step. Management of pulmonary metastases and the role of minimally invasive surgery was discussed. CONCLUSIONS The recommendations of this contemporary consensus provide information of practical value to clinicians managing patients with synchronous colorectal cancer and liver metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alejandro Serrablo
- Department of Surgery, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | - Stephen J Wigmore
- Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplant Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Jose M Ramia-Angel
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Spain
| | - Hassan Z Malik
- Liver Surgery Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Stefan Stättner
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Salzkammergutklinikum, Vöcklabruck, Austria
| | - Kjetil Søreide
- Department of Surgery, Bergen University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Oded Zmora
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Shamir Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Martijn Meijerink
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Anita Balakrishnan
- Cambridge Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Thomas Gruenberger
- Department of Surgery, HPB Center, Health Network Vienna, Clinic Favoriten and Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Eduard Jonas
- Department of Surgery, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town
| | - John Devar
- Department of Surgery, Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Saurabh Jamdar
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - Robert Jones
- Liver Surgery Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Bodil Andersson
- Department of Surgery, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Karim Boudjema
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Pontchaillou, Rennes, France
| | | | - Laurents Stassen
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Bobby V M Dasari
- Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Adam E Frampton
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Department of Surgery, Vita Salute San Raffaele University & IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Vall D'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona UAB, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Pamela Buchwald
- Department of Surgery, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Bengi Gürses
- Department of Radiology, Koc University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Nir Wasserberg
- Department of Surgery, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Israel
| | - Birgit Gruenberger
- Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Landesklinikum Wiener Neustadt, Lower Austria, Austria
| | - Harry V M Spiers
- Cambridge Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - William Jarnagin
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | | | - Norihiro Kokudo
- Department of Surgery, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | - René Adam
- Hepatobiliary and Transplant Unit, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Maki H, Ayabe RI, Nishioka Y, Konishi T, Newhook TE, Tran Cao HS, Chun YS, Tzeng CWD, You YN, Vauthey JN. Hepatectomy Before Primary Tumor Resection as Preferred Approach for Synchronous Liver Metastases from Rectal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:5390-5400. [PMID: 37285096 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13656-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For patients with synchronous liver metastases (LM) from rectal cancer, a consensus on surgical sequencing is lacking. We compared outcomes between the reverse (hepatectomy first), classic (primary tumor resection first), and combined (simultaneous hepatectomy and primary tumor resection) approaches. METHODS A prospectively maintained database was queried for patients with rectal cancer LM diagnosed before primary tumor resection who underwent hepatectomy for LM from January 2004 to April 2021. Clinicopathological factors and survival were compared between the three approaches. RESULTS Among 274 patients, 141 (51%) underwent the reverse approach; 73 (27%), the classic approach; and 60 (22%), the combined approach. Higher carcinoembryonic antigen level at LM diagnosis and higher number of LM were associated with the reverse approach. Combined approach patients had smaller tumors and underwent less complex hepatectomies. More than eight cycles of pre-hepatectomy chemotherapy and maximum diameter of LM > 5 cm were independently associated with worse overall survival (OS) (p = 0.002 and 0.027, respectively). Although 35% of reverse-approach patients did not undergo primary tumor resection, OS did not differ between groups. Additionally, 82% of incomplete reverse-approach patients ultimately did not require diversion during follow-up. RAS/TP53 co-mutation was independently associated with lack of primary resection with the reverse approach (odds ratio: 0.16, 95% CI 0.038-0.64, p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS The reverse approach results in survival similar to that of combined and classic approaches and may obviate primary rectal tumor resections and diversions. RAS/TP53 co-mutation is associated with a lower rate of completion of the reverse approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harufumi Maki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Reed I Ayabe
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yujiro Nishioka
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Tsuyoshi Konishi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Timothy E Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Hop S Tran Cao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yun Shin Chun
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Y Nancy You
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yaqub S, Margonis GA, Søreide K. Staged or Simultaneous Surgery for Colon or Rectal Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastases: Implications for Study Design and Clinical Endpoints. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15072177. [PMID: 37046837 PMCID: PMC10093596 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15072177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023] Open
Abstract
In patients presenting with colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases, the disease burden related to the liver metastasis is the driving cause of limited longevity and, eventually, risk of death. Surgical resection is the potentially curative treatment for colorectal cancer liver metastases. In the synchronous setting where both the liver metastases and the primary tumor are resectable with a relative low risk, the oncological surgeon and the patient may consider three potential treatment strategies. Firstly, a "staged" or a "simultaneous" surgical approach. Secondly, for a staged strategy, a 'conventional approach' will suggest removal of the primary tumor first (either colon or rectal cancer) and plan for liver surgery after recovery from the first operation. A "Liver first" strategy is prioritizing the liver resection before resection of the primary tumor. Planning a surgical trial investigating a two-organ oncological resection with highly variable extent and complexity of resection as well as the potential impact of perioperative chemo(radio)therapy makes it difficult to find the optimal primary endpoint. Here, we suggest running investigational trials with carefully chosen composite endpoints as well as embedded risk-stratification strategies to identify subgroups of patients who may benefit from simultaneous surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheraz Yaqub
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, 0372 Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, 0450 Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Kjetil Søreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, 4011 Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, 5021 Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Spiers HVM, Jegatheeswaran S, Siriwardena AK. A comparison of the simultaneous, liver-first and colorectal-first strategies for surgical treatment of synchronous colorectal liver metastases. HPB (Oxford) 2023:S1365-182X(23)00072-2. [PMID: 36907720 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Harry V M Spiers
- Cambridge Regional Hepato-pancreato-biliary Unit, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sinnamon AJ, Luo E, Xu A, Zhu S, Denbo JW, Fleming JB, Anaya DA. Simultaneous Hepatic and Visceral Resection: Preoperative Risk Stratification and Implications on Return to Intended Oncologic Therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:1772-1783. [PMID: 36418800 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12834-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Sequence of therapies for synchronous liver metastasis (LM) is complex, with data supporting individualized approaches, although no guiding tools are currently available. We assessed the impact of simultaneous hepatic and visceral resections (SHVR) on textbook outcome (TO) and return to intended oncologic therapy (RIOT), and provide risk-stratification tools to guide individualized decision making and counseling. METHODS Patients with synchronous LM undergoing hepatectomy ± SHVR were included (2015-2021). Primary and secondary outcomes were TO and RIOT (days), respectively. Using multivariable modeling, a risk score for TO was developed. Decision tree analysis using recursive partitioning was performed for hierarchical risk stratification. The associations between SHVR, TO, and RIOT were examined. RESULTS Among 533 patients identified, 124 underwent SHVR. TO overall was 71.7%; 79.2% in the non-SHVR group and 46.8% in the SHVR group (p < 0.001). SHVR was the strongest predictor of non-TO (right colon/small bowel: odds ratio [OR] 4.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.65-8.08; left colon/rectum: OR 6.09, 95% CI 2.59-14.3; stomach/pancreas: OR 6.69, 95% CI 1.46-30.7; multivisceral: OR 10.9, 95% CI 3.03-39.5). A composite score was developed yielding three risk strata for TO (score 0-2: 89% vs. score 3-5: 67% vs. score ≥ 6: 37%; p < 0.001). Decision tree analysis was congruent, identifying SHVR as the most important determinant of TO. In patients with colorectal LM, SHVR was associated with delayed time to RIOT (p = 0.004); the risk-stratification tool for TO was equally predictive of RIOT (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS SHVR is associated with reduced likelihood of TO and in turn delayed RIOT. As SHVR is increasingly performed in order to consolidate cancer care, patient selection considering these different outcomes is critical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Sinnamon
- Section of Hepatobiliary Tumors, Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA. .,University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA.
| | - Eric Luo
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Aileen Xu
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Sarah Zhu
- Section of Hepatobiliary Tumors, Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jason W Denbo
- Section of Hepatobiliary Tumors, Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jason B Fleming
- Section of Hepatobiliary Tumors, Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Daniel A Anaya
- Section of Hepatobiliary Tumors, Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sijberden JP, Zimmitti G, Conci S, Russolillo N, Masetti M, Cipriani F, Lanari J, Görgec B, Benedetti Cacciaguerra A, Rotellar F, D’Hondt M, Edwin B, Sutcliffe RP, Dagher I, Efanov M, López-Ben S, Primrose JN, Giuliante F, Spinelli A, Chand M, Alvarez S, Langella S, Nicosia S, Ruzzenente A, Vivarelli M, Cillo U, Aldrighetti L, Jovine E, Ferrero A, Guglielmi A, Besselink MG, Abu Hilal M. Simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases: what determines the risk of unfavorable outcomes? An international multicenter retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2023; 109:244-254. [PMID: 37093069 PMCID: PMC10389225 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/12/2022] [Indexed: 04/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of a simultaneous resection (SIMR) in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases (sCRLM) has increased over the past decades. However, it remains unclear when a SIMR is beneficial and when it should be avoided. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was therefore to compare the outcomes of a SIMR for sCRLM in different settings, and to assess which factors are independently associated with unfavorable outcomes. METHODS To perform this retrospective cohort study, patients with sCRLM undergoing SIMR (2004-2019) were extracted from an international multicenter database, and their outcomes were compared after stratification according to the type of liver and colorectal resection performed. Factors associated with unfavorable outcomes were identified through multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS Overall, 766 patients were included, encompassing colorectal resections combined with a major liver resection (n=122), minor liver resection in the anterolateral (n=407), or posterosuperior segments ('Technically major', n=237). Minor and technically major resections, compared to major resections, were more often combined with a rectal resection (29.2 and 36.7 vs. 20.5%, respectively, both P=0.003) and performed fully laparoscopic (22.9 and 23.2 vs. 6.6%, respectively, both P = 0.003). Major and technically major resections, compared to minor resections, were more often associated with intraoperative transfusions (42.9 and 38.8 vs. 20%, respectively, both P = 0.003) and unfavorable incidents (9.6 and 9.8 vs. 3.3%, respectively, both P≤0.063). Major resections were associated, compared to minor and technically major resections, with a higher overall morbidity rate (64.8 vs. 50.4 and 49.4%, respectively, both P≤0.024) and a longer length of stay (12 vs. 10 days, both P≤0.042). American Society of Anesthesiologists grades ≥3 [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.671, P=0.015] and undergoing a major liver resection (aOR: 1.788, P=0.047) were independently associated with an increased risk of severe morbidity, while undergoing a left-sided colectomy was associated with a decreased risk (aOR: 0.574, P=0.013). CONCLUSIONS SIMR should primarily be reserved for sCRLM patients in whom a minor or technically major liver resection would suffice and those requiring a left-sided colectomy. These findings should be confirmed by randomized studies comparing SIMR with staged resections.
Collapse
|
11
|
Kazi M, Patkar S, Patel P, Kunte A, Desouza A, Saklani A, Goel M. Simultaneous resection of synchronous colorectal liver metastasis: Feasibility and development of a prediction model. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2023; 27:40-48. [PMID: 36168272 PMCID: PMC9947373 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.22-043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds/Aims Timing of resection for synchronous colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) has been debated for decades. The aim of the present study was to assess the feasibility of simultaneous resection of CRLM in terms of major complications and develop a prediction model for safe resections. Methods A retrospective single-center study of synchronous, resectable CRLM, operated between 2013 and 2021 was conducted. Upper limit of 95% confidence interval (CI) of major complications (≥ grade IIIA) was set at 40% as the safety threshold. Logistic regression was used to determine predictors of morbidity. Prediction model was internally validated by bootstrap estimates, Harrell's C-index, and correlation of predicted and observed estimates. Results Ninety-two patients were operated. Of them, 41.3% had rectal cancers. Major hepatectomy (≥ 4 segments) was performed for 25 patients (27.2%). Major complications occurred in 20 patients (21.7%, 95% CI: 13.8%-31.5%). Predictors of complications were the presence of comorbidities and major hepatectomy (area under the ROC curve: 0.692). Unacceptable level of morbidity (≥ 40%) was encountered in patients with comorbidities who underwent major hepatectomy. Conclusions Simultaneous bowel and CRLM resection appear to be safe. However, caution should be exercised when combining major liver resections with bowel resection in patients with comorbid conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mufaddal Kazi
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India,Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Shraddha Patkar
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India,Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India,Corresponding author: Shraddha Patkar, MS, MCh Division of Gastrointestinal and Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai 400012, India Tel: +91-2224177000, E-mail: ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8489-6825
| | - Prerak Patel
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India,Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Aditya Kunte
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India,Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Ashwin Desouza
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India,Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Avanish Saklani
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India,Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Mahesh Goel
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India,Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chan AKC, Siriwardena AK. Practical Implications of KRAS Mutation Status and Sidedness of Primary Tumour in Patients with Colorectal Cancer and Synchronous Liver Metastases: A Subset Analysis of the CoSMIC Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14194833. [PMID: 36230756 PMCID: PMC9563113 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14194833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Revised: 09/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with colorectal cancer presenting with synchronous liver metastases have less favourable outcomes than those with primary-only disease. There is evidence of different genetic mutational signatures according to the sidedness of the primary tumour. KRAS mutations are key driver mutations in colorectal cancer progression. This post hoc analysis of the previously reported CoSMIC inception cohort explores the association between primary tumour sidedness and KRAS mutational status on the outcome of patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases. Patients diagnosed with synchronous disease were recruited between April 2014 and March 2017 and, after exclusions, 83 patients undergoing colorectal primary KRAS mutation testing constituted the final study population. Data were collected prospectively on demographic profiles, treatment, and outcomes. Twenty-one patients (25%) had right-sided tumours and 62 (75%) had left-sided tumours, with 46 (55%) and 37 (45%) exhibiting wildtype and mutated KRAS, respectively. There was no difference in distribution of liver metastases by KRAS status (unilobar vs. bi-lobar; p = 0.58; Fisher’s Exact test) and no difference in 5-year survival according to KRAS mutation status (Log-rank test, p = 0.82) or tumour sidedness (p = 0.16). In summary, in this cohort of patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases, neither KRAS mutation status nor tumour sidedness influenced survival.
Collapse
|