Survival Nomogram for Young Breast Cancer Patients Based on the SEER Database and an External Validation Cohort

Identifying subtypes and developing prognostic models based on N6-methyladenosine and immune microenvironment related genes in breast cancer

Breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent cancer in women globally. The tumor microenvironment (TME), comprising epithelial tumor cells and stromal elements, is vital for breast tumor development. N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification plays a key role in RNA metabolism, influencing its various aspects such as stability and translation. There is a notable link between m6A methylation and immune cells in the TME, although this relationship is complex and not fully deciphered. In this research, BC expression and clinicopathological data from TCGA were scrutinized to assess expression profiles, mutations, and CNVs of 31 m6A genes and immune microenvironment-related genes, examining their correlations, functions, and prognostic impacts. Lasso and Cox regression identified prognostic genes for constructing a nomogram. Single-cell analyses mapped the distribution and patterns of these genes in BC cell development. We investigated associations between gene-derived risk scores and factors like immune infiltration, TME, checkpoints, TMB, CSC indices, and drug response. As a complement to computational analyses, in vitro experiments were conducted to confirm these expression patterns. We included 31 m6A regulatory genes and discovered a correlation between these genes and the extent of immune cell infiltration. Subsequently, a 7-gene risk score was generated, encompassing HSPA2, TAP1, ULBP2, CXCL1, RBP1, STC2, and FLT3. It was observed that the low-risk group exhibited better overall survival (OS) in BC, with higher immune scores but lower tumor mutational burden (TMB) and cancer stem cell (CSC) indices, as well as lower IC50 values for commonly used drugs. To enhance clinical applicability, age and stage were incorporated into the risk score, and a more comprehensive nomogram was constructed to predict OS. This nomogram was validated and demonstrated good predictive performance, with area under the curve (AUC) values for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS being 0.848, 0.807, and 0.759, respectively. Our findings highlight the profound impact of prognostic-related genes on BC immune response and prognostic outcomes, suggesting that modulation of the m6A-immune pathway could offer new avenues for personalized BC treatment and potentially improve clinical outcomes.

Development and validation of a nomogram for breast cancer-related lymphedema

To establish and validate a predictive model for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) among Chinese patients to facilitate individualized risk assessment. We retrospectively analyzed data from breast cancer patients treated at a major single-center breast hospital in China. From 2020 to 2022, we identified risk factors for BCRL through logistic regression and developed and validated a nomogram using R software (version 4.1.2). Model validation was achieved through the application of receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), a calibration plot, and decision curve analysis (DCA), with further evaluated by internal validation. Among 1485 patients analyzed, 360 developed lymphedema (24.2%). The nomogram incorporated body mass index, operative time, lymph node count, axillary dissection level, surgical site infection, and radiotherapy as predictors. The AUCs for training (N = 1038) and validation (N = 447) cohorts were 0.779 and 0.724, respectively, indicating good discriminative ability. Calibration and decision curve analysis confirmed the model's clinical utility. Our nomogram provides an accurate tool for predicting BCRL risk, with potential to enhance personalized management in breast cancer survivors. Further prospective validation across multiple centers is warranted.

Renewable risk assessment of heterogeneous streaming time-to-event cohorts

The analysis of streaming time-to-event cohorts has garnered significant research attention. Most existing methods require observed cohorts from a study sequence to be independent and identically sampled from a common model. This assumption may be easily violated in practice. Our methodology operates within the framework of online data updating, where risk estimates for each cohort of interest are continuously refreshed using the latest observations and historical summary statistics. At each streaming stage, we introduce parameters to quantify the potential discrepancy between batch-specific effects from adjacent cohorts. We then employ penalized estimation techniques to identify nonzero discrepancy parameters, allowing us to adaptively adjust risk estimates based on current data and historical trends. We illustrate our proposed method through extensive empirical simulations and a lung cancer data analysis.

Development and validation of nomograms for predicting survival in small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases: a SEER population-based analysis

OBJECTIVE

To develop prognostic nomograms for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) probabilities in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients with brain metastasis (BM).

METHODS

SCLC patients with BM from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2010-2015) were randomly allocated to training (n=1771) and validation (n=757) cohorts. Independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS were determined using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses in the training cohort, and prognostic nomograms for OS and CSS were constructed based on these factors. The efficacy of the nomograms was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUCs), calibration curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), net reclassification index (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), with the TNM staging model as a comparator.

RESULTS

Multivariate Cox analysis identified age, sex, race, tumor size, N staging, and presence of liver/bone/lung metastases, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy as independent prognostic factors for both OS and CSS. Prognostic nomograms were developed based on these factors. In both the training and validation cohorts, the AUC values of the nomograms for OS and CSS were significantly above 0.7, surpassing those for TNM staging. Calibration curves demonstrated a high degree of concordance between predicted and actual survival. The constructed nomograms showed superior clinical utility compared to the TNM staging system, as evidenced by NRI, IDI, and DCA.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study successfully developed and validated prognostic nomograms for SCLC patients with BM, providing valuable tools for oncologists to enhance prognosis evaluation and guide clinical decision-making.

Construction of a novel nomogram for predicting overall survival in patients with Siewert type II AEG based on LODDS: a study based on the seer database and external validation

Background

In recent years, the incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) has been rapidly increasing globally. Despite advances in the diagnosis and treatment of AEG, the overall prognosis for AEG patients remains concerning. Therefore, analyzing prognostic factors for AEG patients of Siewert type II and constructing a prognostic model for AEG patients is important.

Methods

Data of primary Siewert type II AEG patients from the SEER database from 2004 to 2015 were obtained and randomly divided into training and internal validation cohort. Additionally, data of primary Siewert type II AEG patients from the China Medical University Dandong Central Hospital from 2012 to 2018 were collected for external validation. Each variable in the training set underwent univariate Cox analysis, and variables with statistical significance (p < 0.05) were added to the LASSO equation for feature selection. Multivariate Cox analysis was then conducted to determine the independent predictive factors. A nomogram for predicting overall survival (OS) was developed, and its performance was evaluated using ROC curves, calibration curves, and decision curves. NRI and IDI were calculated to assess the improvement of the new prediction model relative to TNM staging. Patients were stratified into high-risk and low-risk groups based on the risk scores from the nomogram.

Results

Age, Differentiation grade, T stage, M stage, and LODDS (Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes)were independent prognostic factors for OS. The AUC values of the ROC curves for the nomogram in the training set, internal validation set, and external validation set were all greater than 0.7 and higher than those of TNM staging alone. Calibration curves indicated consistency between the predicted and actual outcomes. Decision curve analysis showed moderate net benefit. The NRI and IDI values of the nomogram were greater than 0 in the training, internal validation, and external validation sets. Risk stratification based on the nomogram's risk score demonstrated significant differences in survival rates between the high-risk and low-risk groups.

Conclusion

We developed and validated a nomogram for predicting overall survival (OS) in patients with Siewert type II AEG, which assists clinicians in accurately predicting mortality risk and recommending personalized treatment strategies.

Development and Validation of a Prognostic Nomogram for Breast Cancer Patients With Multi-Organ Metastases: An Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program Database

BACKGROUND

Multi-organ metastases represent a substantial life-threatening risk for breast cancer (BC) patients. Nonetheless, the current dearth of assessment tools for patients with multi-organ metastatic BC adversely impacts their evaluation.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of BC patients with multi-organ metastases using data from the SEER database from 2010 to 2019. The patients were randomly allocated into a training cohort and a validation cohort in a 7:3 ratio. Univariate COX regression analysis, the LASSO, and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify independent prognostic factors in the training set. Based on these factors, a nomogram was constructed to estimate overall survival (OS) probability for BC patients with multi-organ metastases. The performance of the nomogram was evaluated using C-indexes, ROC curves, calibration curves, decision curve analysis (DCA) curves, and the risk classification system for validation.

RESULTS

A total of 3626 BC patients with multi-organ metastases were included in the study, with 2538 patients in the training cohort and 1088 patients in the validation cohort. Age, grade, metastasis location, surgery, chemotherapy, and subtype were identified as significant independent prognostic factors for OS in BC patients with multi-organ metastases. A nomogram for predicting 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS was constructed. The evaluation metrics, including C-indexes, ROC curves, calibration curves, and DCA curves, demonstrated the excellent predictive performance of the nomogram. Additionally, the risk grouping system effectively stratified BC patients with multi-organ metastases into distinct prognostic categories.

CONCLUSION

The developed nomogram showed high accuracy in predicting the survival probability of BC patients with multi-organ metastases, providing valuable information for patient counseling and treatment decision making.

Development and validation of a random survival forest model for predicting long-term survival of early-stage young breast cancer patients based on the SEER database and an external validation cohort

Young breast cancer (YBC) patients often face a poor prognosis, hence it's necessary to construct a model that can accurately predict their long-term survival in early stage. To realize this goal, we utilized data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases between January 2010 and December 2020, and meanwhile, enrolled an independent external cohort from Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital. The study aimed to develop and validate a prediction model constructed using the Random Survival Forest (RSF) machine learning algorithm. By applying the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression analysis, we pinpointed key prognostic factors for YBC patients, which were used to create a prediction model capable of forecasting the 3-year, 5-year, 7-year, and 10-year survival rates of YBC patients. The RSF model constructed in the study demonstrated exceptional performance, achieving C-index values of 0.920 in the training set, 0.789 in the internal validation set, and 0.701 in the external validation set, outperforming the Cox regression model. The model's calibration was confirmed by Brier scores at various time points, showcasing its excellent accuracy in prediction. Decision curve analysis (DCA) underscored the model's importance in clinical application, and the Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) plots highlighted the importance of key variables. The RSF model also proved valuable in risk stratification, which has effectively categorized patients based on their survival risks. In summary, this study has constructed a well-performed prediction model for the evaluation of prognostic factors influencing the long-term survival of early-stage YBC patients, which is significant in risk stratification when physicians handle YBC patients in clinical settings.

Predictors of cancer-specific survival and overall survival among patients aged ≥60 years with lung adenocarcinoma using the SEER database

OBJECTIVE

We developed a simple, rapid predictive model to evaluate the prognosis of older patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Demographic characteristics and clinical information of patients with lung adenocarcinoma aged ≥60 years were retrospectively analyzed using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data. We built nomograms of overall survival and cancer-specific survival using Cox single-factor and multi-factor regression. We used the C-index, calibration curve, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) to evaluate performance of the nomograms.

RESULTS

We included 14,117 patients, divided into a training set and validation set. We used the chi-square test to compare baseline data between groups and found no significant differences. We used Cox regression analysis to screen out independent prognostic factors affecting survival time and used these factors to construct the nomogram. The ROC curve, calibration curve, C-index, and DCA curve were used to verify the model. The final results showed that our predictive model had good predictive ability, and showed better predictive ability compared with tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging. We also achieved good results using data of our center for external verification.

CONCLUSION

The present nomogram could accurately predict prognosis in older patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

Predictive value of HTS grade in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma undergoing radical resection: a multicenter study from China

BACKGROUND

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a highly malignant tumor with a poor prognosis. This study aimed to investigate whether Hemoglobin, Albumin, Lymphocytes, and Platelets (HALP) score and Tumor Burden Score (TBS) serves as independent influencing factors following radical resection in patients with ICC. Furthermore, we sought to evaluate the predictive capacity of the combined HALP and TBS grade, referred to as HTS grade, and to develop a prognostic prediction model.

METHODS

Clinical data for ICC patients who underwent radical resection were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were first used to find influencing factors of prognosis for ICC. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were then used to find the optimal cut-off values for HALP score and TBS and to compare the predictive ability of HALP, TBS, and HTS grade using the area under these curves (AUC). Nomogram prediction models were constructed and validated based on the results of the multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Among 423 patients, 234 (55.3%) were male and 202 (47.8) were aged ≥ 60 years. The cut-off value of HALP was found to be 37.1 and for TBS to be 6.3. Our univariate results showed that HALP, TBS, and HTS grade were prognostic factors of ICC patients (all P < 0.05), and ROC results showed that HTS had the best predictive value. The Kaplan-Meier curve showed that the prognosis of ICC patients was worse with increasing HTS grade. Additionally, multivariate regression analysis showed that HTS grade, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), tumor differentiation, and vascular invasion were independent influencing factors for Overall survival (OS) and that HTS grade, CA19-9, CEA, vascular invasion and lymph node invasion were independent influencing factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS) (all P < 0.05). In the first, second, and third years of the training group, the AUCs for OS were 0.867, 0.902, and 0.881, and the AUCs for RFS were 0.849, 0.841, and 0.899, respectively. In the first, second, and third years of the validation group, the AUCs for OS were 0.727, 0.771, and 0.763, and the AUCs for RFS were 0.733, 0.746, and 0.801, respectively. Through the examination of calibration curves and using decision curve analysis (DCA), nomograms based on HTS grade showed excellent predictive performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Our nomograms based on HTS grade had excellent predictive effects and may thus be able to help clinicians provide individualized clinical decision for ICC patients.

Prediction model of adnexal masses with complex ultrasound morphology

Background

Based on the ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system (O-RADS), we constructed a nomogram model to predict the malignancy potential of adnexal masses with sophisticated ultrasound morphology.

Methods

In a multicenter retrospective study, a total of 430 subjects with masses were collected in the adnexal region through an electronic medical record system at the Fourth Hospital of Harbin Medical University during the period of January 2019-April 2023. A total of 157 subjects were included in the exception validation cohort from Harbin Medical University Tumor Hospital. The pathological tumor findings were invoked as the gold standard to classify the subjects into benign and malignant groups. All patients were randomly allocated to the validation set and training set in a ratio of 7:3. A stepwise regression analysis was utilized for filtering variables. Logistic regression was conducted to construct a nomogram prediction model, which was further validated in the training set. The forest plot, C-index, calibration curve, and clinical decision curve were utilized to verify the model and assess its accuracy and validity, which were further compared with existing adnexal lesion models (O-RADS US) and assessments of different types of neoplasia in the adnexa (ADNEX).

Results

Four predictors as independent risk factors for malignancy were followed in the preparation of the diagnostic model: O-RADS classification, HE4 level, acoustic shadow, and protrusion blood flow score (all p < 0.05). The model showed moderate predictive power in the training set with a C-index of 0.959 (95%CI: 0.940-0.977), 0.929 (95%CI: 0.884-0.974) in the validation set, and 0.892 (95%CI: 0.843-0.940) in the external validation set. It showed that the predicted consequences of the nomogram agreed well with the actual results of the calibration curve, and the novel nomogram was clinically beneficial in decision curve analysis.

Conclusion

The risk of the nomogram of adnexal masses with complex ultrasound morphology contained four characteristics that showed a suitable predictive ability and provided better risk stratification. Its diagnostic performance significantly exceeded that of the ADNEX model and O-RADS US, and its screening performance was essentially equivalent to that of the ADNEX model and O-RADS US classification.

Exploring the most appropriate lymph node staging system for node-positive breast cancer patients and constructing corresponding survival nomograms

BACKGROUND

The lymph node (LN) status is a crucial prognostic factor for breast cancer (BC) patients. Our study aimed to compare the predictive capabilities of three different LN staging systems in node-positive BC patients and develop nomograms to predict overall survival (OS).

METHODS

We enrolled 71,213 eligible patients from the SEER database, and 667 cases from our hospital were used for external validation. All patients were divided into two groups based on the number of removed lymph nodes (RLNs). The prognostic abilities of pN stage, positive LN ratio (LNR), and log odds of positive LN (LODDS) were compared using the C-indexes and AUC values. LASSO regression was performed to identify significant factors associated with prognosis and develop corresponding nomogram models.

RESULTS

Our study found that LNR had superior predictive performance compared to pN and LODDS among patients with RLNs < 10, while pN performed better in patients with RLNs ≥ 10. In the training set, the nomogram models exhibited excellent clinical applicability, as evidenced by the C-indexes, ROC curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis curves. Moreover, the nomogram classification accurately differentiated risk subgroups and improved discrimination. These results were externally validated in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSION

Physicians should select different LN staging systems based on the number of RLNs. Our novel nomograms demonstrated excellent performance in both internal and external validations, which may assist in patient counseling and guide treatment decision-making.

Construction and validation of a SEER-based prognostic nomogram for young and middle-aged males patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common digestive tumor, and we aimed to develop and validate nomogram models, predicting the overall survival (OS) of young and middle-aged male patients with HCC.

METHODS

We extracted eligible data from relevant patients between 2000 and 2017 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. In addition, randomly divided all patients into two groups (training and validation = 7:3). The nomogram was established using effective risk factors based on univariate and multivariate analysis. The area under the time-dependent curve, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the effective performance of the nomogram. The risk stratifications of the nomogram and the AJCC criteria-based tumor stage were compared.

RESULTS

11 variables were selected by univariate and multivariate analysis to establish the nomogram of HCC. The AUC values of 3, 4, and 5 years of the time-ROC curve are 0.858, 0.862 and 0.859 for the training cohort, and 0.858, 0.877 and 0.869 for the validation cohort, respectively, indicating that the nomogram has a good ability of discrimination. The calibration plots showed favorable consistency between the prediction of the nomogram and actual observations in both the training and validation cohorts. In addition, the decision curve DCA showed that the nomogram was clinically useful and had better discriminative ability to recognize patients at high risk than the AJCC criteria-based tumor stage.

CONCLUSION

Prognostic nomogram of young and middle-aged male patients with HCC was developed and validated to help clinicians evaluate the prognosis of patients.

Risk factors and survival prediction of young breast cancer patients with liver metastases: a population-based study

Background

The risk and prognosis of young breast cancer (YBC) with liver metastases (YBCLM) remain unclear. Thus, this study aimed to determine the risk and prognostic factors in these patients and construct predictive nomogram models.

Methods

This population-based retrospective study was conducted using data of YBCLM patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2010 and 2019. Multivariate logistic and Cox regression analyses were used to identify independent risk and prognostic factors, which were used to construct the diagnostic and prognostic nomograms. The concordance index (C-index), calibration plot, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to assess the performances of the established nomogram models. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to balance the baseline characteristics between the YBCLM patients and non-young patients with BCLM when comparing overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

Results

A total of 18,275 YBC were identified, of whom 400 had LM. T stage, N stage, molecular subtypes, and bone, lung, and brain metastases were independent risk factors for LM developing in YBC. The established diagnostic nomogram showed that bone metastases contributed the most risk of LM developing, with a C-index of 0.895 (95% confidence interval 0.877-0.913) for this nomogram model. YBCLM had better survival than non-young patients with BCLM in unmatched and matched cohorts after propensity score matching analysis. The multivariate Cox analysis demonstrated that molecular subtypes, surgery and bone, lung, and brain metastases were independently associated with OS and CSS, chemotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for OS, and marital status and T stage were independent prognostic factors for CSS. The C-indices for the OS- and CSS-specific nomograms were 0.728 (0.69-0.766) and 0.74 (0.696-0.778), respectively. The ROC analysis indicated that these models had excellent discriminatory power. The calibration curve also showed that the observed results were consistent with the predicted results. DCA showed that the developed nomogram models would be effective in clinical practice.

Conclusion

The present study determined the risk and prognostic factors of YBCLM and further developed nomograms that can be used to effectively identify high-risk patients and predict survival outcomes.

Risk factors and nomogram-based prediction of the risk of limb weakness in herpes zoster

Background

Limb weakness is a less common complication of herpes zoster (HZ). There has been comparatively little study of limb weakness. The aim of this study is to develop a risk nomogram for limb weakness in HZ patients.

Methods

Limb weakness was diagnosed using the Medical Research Council (MRC) muscle power scale. The entire cohort was assigned to a training set (from January 1, 2018 to December 30, 2019, n = 169) and a validation set (from October 1, 2020 to December 30, 2021, n = 145). The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis method and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to identify the risk factors of limb weakness. A nomogram was established based on the training set. The discriminative ability and calibration of the nomogram to predict limb weakness were tested using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). A validation set was used to further assess the model by external validation.

Results

Three hundred and fourteen patients with HZ of the extremities were included in the study. Three significant risk factors: age (OR = 1.058, 95% CI: 1.021–1.100, P = 0.003), VAS (OR = 2.013, 95% CI: 1.101–3.790, P = 0.024), involving C6 or C7 nerve roots (OR = 3.218, 95% CI: 1.180–9.450, P = 0.027) were selected by the LASSO regression analysis and the multivariable logistic regression analysis. The nomogram to predict limb weakness was constructed based on the three predictors. The area under the ROC was 0.751 (95% CI: 0.673–0.829) in the training set and 0.705 (95% CI: 0.619–0.791) in the validation set. The DCA indicated that using the nomogram to predict the risk of limb weakness would be more accurate when the risk threshold probability was 10–68% in the training set and 15–57% in the validation set.

Conclusion

Age, VAS, and involving C6 or C7 nerve roots are potential risk factors for limb weakness in patients with HZ. Based on these three indicators, our model predicted the probability of limb weakness in patients with HZ with good accuracy.

Nomograms for Predicting the Risk and Prognosis of Liver Metastases in Pancreatic Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis

The liver is the most prevalent location of distant metastasis for pancreatic cancer (PC), which is highly aggressive. Pancreatic cancer with liver metastases (PCLM) patients have a poor prognosis. Furthermore, there is a lack of effective predictive tools for anticipating the diagnostic and prognostic techniques that are needed for the PCLM patients in current clinical work. Therefore, we aimed to construct two nomogram predictive models incorporating common clinical indicators to anticipate the risk factors and prognosis for PCLM patients. Clinicopathological information on pancreatic cancer that referred to patients who had been diagnosed between the years of 2004 and 2015 was extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses and a Cox regression analysis were utilized to recognize the independent risk variables and independent predictive factors for the PCLM patients, respectively. Using the independent risk as well as prognostic factors derived from the multivariate regression analysis, we constructed two novel nomogram models for predicting the risk and prognosis of PCLM patients. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the consistency index (C-index), and the calibration curve were then utilized to establish the accuracy of the nomograms’ predictions and their discriminability between groups. Using a decision curve analysis (DCA), the clinical values of the two predictors were examined. Finally, we utilized Kaplan–Meier curves to examine the effects of different factors on the prognostic overall survival (OS). As many as 1898 PCLM patients were screened. The patient’s sex, primary site, histopathological type, grade, T stage, N stage, bone metastases, lung metastases, tumor size, surgical resection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were all found to be independent risks variables for PCLM in a multivariate logistic regression analysis. Using a multivariate Cox regression analysis, we discovered that age, histopathological type, grade, bone metastasis, lung metastasis, tumor size, and surgery were all independent prognostic variables for PCLM. According to these factors, two nomogram models were developed to anticipate the prognostic OS as well as the risk variables for the progression of PCLM in PCLM patients, and a web-based version of the prediction model was constructed. The diagnostic nomogram model had a C-index of 0.884 (95% CI: 0.876–0.892); the prognostic model had a C-index of 0.686 (95% CI: 0.648–0.722) in the training cohort and a C-index of 0.705 (95% CI: 0.647–0.758) in the validation cohort. Subsequent AUC, calibration curve, and DCA analyses revealed that the risk and predictive model of PCLM had high accuracy as well as efficacy for clinical application. The nomograms constructed can effectively predict risk and prognosis factors in PCLM patients, which facilitates personalized clinical decision-making for patients.

Nomograms for Predicting Disease-Free Survival Based on Core Needle Biopsy and Surgical Specimens in Female Breast Cancer Patients with Non-Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

PURPOSE

While a pathologic complete response (pCR) is regarded as a surrogate endpoint for pos-itive outcomes in breast cancer (BC) patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), fore-casting the prognosis of non-pCR patients is still an open issue. This study aimed to create and evaluate nomogram models for estimating the likelihood of disease-free survival (DFS) for non-pCR patients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 607 non-pCR BC patients was conducted (2012-2018). After converting continuous variables to categorical variables, variables entering the model were progressively identified by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, and then pre-NAC and post-NAC nomogram models were developed. Regarding their discrimination, ac-curacy, and clinical value, the performance of the models was evaluated by internal and external validation. Two risk assessments were performed for each patient based on two models; patients were separated into different risk groups based on the calculated cut-off values for each model, including low-risk (assessed by the pre-NAC model) to low-risk (assessed by the post-NAC model), high-risk to low-risk, low-risk to high-risk, and high-risk to high-risk groups. The DFS of different groups was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Both pre-NAC and post-NAC nomogram models were built with clinical nodal (cN) status and estrogen receptor (ER), Ki67, and p53 status (all p < 0.05), showing good discrimination and calibration in both internal and external validation. We also assessed the performance of the two models in four subtypes, with the tri-ple-negative subtype showing the best prediction. Patients in the high-risk to high-risk subgroup have significantly poorer survival rates (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Two robust and effective nomo-grams were developed to personalize the prediction of DFS in non-pCR BC patients treated with NAC.

Lymph node ratio is a superior predictor in surgically treated early-onset pancreatic cancer

Background

The prognostic performance of four lymph node classifications, the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) N stage, lymph node ratio (LNR), log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS), and examined lymph nodes (ELN) in early-onset pancreatic cancer (EOPC) remains unclear.

Methods

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was searched for patients with EOPC from 2004 to 2016. 1048 patients were randomly divided into training (n = 733) and validation sets (n = 315). The predictive abilities of the four lymph node staging systems were compared using the Akaike information criteria (AIC), receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC), and C-index. Multivariate Cox analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors. A nomogram based on lymph node classification with the strongest predictive ability was established. The nomogram’s precision was verified by the C-index, calibration curves, and AUC. Kaplan–Meier analysis and log-rank tests were used to compare differences in survival at each stage of the nomogram.

Results

Compared with the 8th N stage, LODDS, and ELN, LNR had the highest C-index and AUC and the lowest AIC. Multivariate analysis showed that N stage, LODDS, LNR were independent risk factors associated with cancer specific survival (CSS), but not ELN. In the training set, the AUC values for the 1-, 3-, and 5-year CSS of the nomogram were 0.663, 0.728, and 0.760, respectively and similar results were observed in the validation set. In addition, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed that the nomogram was also an important factor in the risk stratification of EOPC.

Conclusion

We analyzed the predictive power of the four lymph node staging systems and found that LNR had the strongest predictive ability. Furthermore, the novel nomogram prognostic staging mode based on LNR was also an important factor in the risk stratification of EOPC.