Machine Learning-Based Epigenetic Classifiers for Axillary Staging of Patients with ER-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Investigating the effects of artificial intelligence on the personalization of breast cancer management: a systematic study

BACKGROUND

Providing appropriate specialized treatment to the right patient at the right time is considered necessary in cancer management. Targeted therapy tailored to the genetic changes of each breast cancer patient is a desirable feature of precision oncology, which can not only reduce disease progression but also potentially increase patient survival. The use of artificial intelligence alongside precision oncology can help physicians by identifying and selecting more effective treatment factors for patients.

METHOD

A systematic review was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases in September 2023. We performed the search strategy with keywords, namely: Breast Cancer, Artificial intelligence, and precision Oncology along with their synonyms in the article titles. Descriptive, qualitative, review, and non-English studies were excluded. The quality assessment of the articles and evaluation of bias were determined based on the SJR journal and JBI indices, as well as the PRISMA2020 guideline.

RESULTS

Forty-six studies were selected that focused on personalized breast cancer management using artificial intelligence models. Seventeen studies using various deep learning methods achieved a satisfactory outcome in predicting treatment response and prognosis, contributing to personalized breast cancer management. Two studies utilizing neural networks and clustering provided acceptable indicators for predicting patient survival and categorizing breast tumors. One study employed transfer learning to predict treatment response. Twenty-six studies utilizing machine-learning methods demonstrated that these techniques can improve breast cancer classification, screening, diagnosis, and prognosis. The most frequent modeling techniques used were NB, SVM, RF, XGBoost, and Reinforcement Learning. The average area under the curve (AUC) for the models was 0.91. Moreover, the average values for accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and precision were reported to be in the range of 90-96% for the models.

CONCLUSION

Artificial intelligence has proven to be effective in assisting physicians and researchers in managing breast cancer treatment by uncovering hidden patterns in complex omics and genetic data. Intelligent processing of omics data through protein and gene pattern classification and the utilization of deep neural patterns has the potential to significantly transform the field of complex disease management.

Construction and validation of a gene expression classifier to predict immunotherapy response in primary triple-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) improve clinical outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. However, a subset of patients does not respond to treatment. Biomarkers that show ICI predictive potential in other solid tumors, such as levels of PD-L1 and the tumor mutational burden, among others, show a modest predictive performance in patients with TNBC.

METHODS

We built machine learning models based on pre-ICI treatment gene expression profiles to construct gene expression classifiers to identify primary TNBC ICI-responder patients. This study involved 188 ICI-naïve and 721 specimens treated with ICI plus chemotherapy, including TNBC tumors, HR+/HER2- breast tumors, and other solid non-breast tumors.

RESULTS

The 37-gene TNBC ICI predictive (TNBC-ICI) classifier performs well in predicting pathological complete response (pCR) to ICI plus chemotherapy on an independent TNBC validation cohort (AUC = 0.86). The TNBC-ICI classifier shows better performance than other molecular signatures, including PD-1 (PDCD1) and PD-L1 (CD274) gene expression (AUC = 0.67). Integrating TNBC-ICI with molecular signatures does not improve the efficiency of the classifier (AUC = 0.75). TNBC-ICI displays a modest accuracy in predicting ICI response in two different cohorts of patients with HR + /HER2- breast cancer (AUC = 0.72 to pembrolizumab and AUC = 0.75 to durvalumab). Evaluation of six cohorts of patients with non-breast solid tumors treated with ICI plus chemotherapy shows overall poor performance (median AUC = 0.67).

CONCLUSION

TNBC-ICI predicts pCR to ICI plus chemotherapy in patients with primary TNBC. The study provides a guide to implementing the TNBC-ICI classifier in clinical studies. Further validations will consolidate a novel predictive panel to improve the treatment decision-making for patients with TNBC.

Development and validation of a radiogenomics model to predict axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer integrating MRI with transcriptome data: A multicohort study

Introduction

To develop and validate a radiogenomics model for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) in breast cancer compared to a genomics and radiomics model.

Methods

This retrospective study integrated transcriptomic data from The Cancer Genome Atlas with matched MRI data from The Cancer Imaging Archive for the same set of 111 patients with breast cancer, which were used as the training and testing groups. Fifteen patients from one hospital were enrolled as the external validation group. Radiomics features were extracted from dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI of breast cancer, and genomics features were derived from differentially expressed gene analysis of transcriptome data. Boruta was used for genomics and radiomics data dimension reduction and feature selection. Logistic regression was applied to develop genomics, radiomics, and radiogenomics models to predict ALNM. The performance of the three models was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curves and compared by the Delong test.

Results

The genomics model was established by nine genomics features, and the radiomics model was established by three radiomics features. The two models showed good discrimination performance in predicting ALNM in breast cancer, with areas under the curves (AUCs) of 0.80, 0.67, and 0.52 for the genomics model and 0.72, 0.68, and 0.71 for the radiomics model in the training, testing and external validation groups, respectively. The radiogenomics model integrated with five genomics features and three radiomics features had a better performance, with AUCs of 0.84, 0.75, and 0.82 in the three groups, respectively, which was higher than the AUC of the radiomics model in the training group and the genomics model in the external validation group (both P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The radiogenomics model combining radiomics features and genomics features improved the performance to predict ALNM in breast cancer.

Cancer Genomics

In the past decade, genomics has fundamentally changed our view of cancer biology, allowing comprehensive analyses of mutations, copy number alterations, structural variants, gene expression and DNA methylation profiles in large-scale studies across different cancer types. Efforts like The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) have fostered international collaborations for cancer genomic analyses and have generated public databases that give scientists around the world access to thoroughly curated data, which have been extensively used as a tool for further hypothesis driven research on several aspects of cancer biology. In parallel, some of these findings are being translated into specific clinical benefits for cancer patients. In this review, we provide a brief historical description of the evolution of international public cancer genome projects and related databases, as well as we discuss about their impact on general cancer research.