Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer In the Elderly: Are We Accomplishing Our Treatment Goals?

Life-Threatening Hematoma in an Elderly Breast Cancer Patient Undergoing Chemotherapy

The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in older patients is increasing. However, chemotherapy should be administered considering the medical comorbidities of the patients and the toxicity of chemotherapeutic agents. Here, we present a case of abdominal wall hematoma with spontaneous inferior epigastric artery injury caused by coughing in a 70-year-old woman who was treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Abdominal computed tomography demonstrated an abdominal wall hematoma with active bleeding. However, angiography with selective embolization of the right inferior epigastric artery and the right internal mammary artery was performed successfully. Scheduled chemotherapy was discontinued over concerns of rebleeding and breast-conserving surgery was performed. When deciding on chemotherapy for older patients, attention should be paid to the various complications.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Endocrine Therapy for Older Patients with Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer: Comparison of Approaches

BACKGROUND

Benefits of a pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant therapy are well established, yet outcomes for older women are understudied. We sought to examine the pCR and overall survival (OS) rates of women with estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer across age groups.

METHODS

Women diagnosed with cT1-4, N0-3, M0, ER+/HER2- breast cancer (2010-2018) who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) or neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) followed by surgery were selected from the National Cancer Database and categorized by age. Differences were tested, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the association of response with OS after adjustment for covariates.

RESULTS

In the 43,009-patient cohort, 84.8% received NACT and 15.2% received NET. Of those aged ≥ 70 (N = 5623), 51.0% received NACT, and 49.0% received NET. Compared with younger women receiving NACT, older women were less likely to have a breast or nodal pCR [no pCR by age: 85.1% (≥ 70 years) vs 82.2% (50-69 years) vs 77.7% (< 50 years), p < 0.001]. Rates of pCR were similarly low for all women receiving NET [no pCR by age: 95.6% (≥ 70 years) vs 95% (50-69 years) vs 96% (< 50 years), p = 0.06]. After adjustment, pCR after NACT was not associated with OS for older patients, but better survival outcomes were noted for older patients achieving pCR after NET.

CONCLUSION

For women with ER+/HER2- breast cancer, pCR rates after NACT are lower in older women compared with younger women, and are equally low after NET for all women. However, pCR after NET is associated with improved OS among older women, unlike pCR after NACT.