1
|
Aalam SMM, Nguyen LV, Ritting ML, Kannan N. Clonal tracking in cancer and metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2024; 43:639-656. [PMID: 37910295 DOI: 10.1007/s10555-023-10149-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
The eradication of many cancers has proven challenging due to the presence of functionally and genetically heterogeneous clones maintained by rare cancer stem cells (CSCs), which contribute to disease progression, treatment refractoriness, and late relapse. The characterization of functional CSC activity has necessitated the development of modern clonal tracking strategies. This review describes viral-based and CRISPR-Cas9-based cellular barcoding, lineage tracing, and imaging-based approaches. DNA-based cellular barcoding technology is emerging as a powerful and robust strategy that has been widely applied to in vitro and in vivo model systems, including patient-derived xenograft models. This review also highlights the potential of these methods for use in the clinical and drug discovery contexts and discusses the important insights gained from such approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Long Viet Nguyen
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Megan L Ritting
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Nagarajan Kannan
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
- Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
- Center for Regenerative Biotherapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guo N, Zhou Q, Chen X, Zeng B, Wu S, Zeng H, Sun F. Circulating tumor DNA as prognostic markers of relapsed breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER CENTER 2024; 4:63-73. [PMID: 39036387 PMCID: PMC11256521 DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2024.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Revised: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasingly being used as a potential prognosis biomarker in patients of breast cancer. This review aims to assess the clinical value of ctDNA in outcome prediction in breast cancer patients throughout the whole treatment cycle. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and clinical trials.gov were searched from January 2016 to May 2022. Conference abstracts published in last three years were also included. The following search terms were used: ctDNA OR circulating tumor DNA AND breast cancer OR breast carcinoma. Only studies written in English languages were included. The following pre-specified criteria should be met for inclusion: (1) observational studies (prospective or retrospective), randomized control trials, case-control studies and case series studies; (2) patients with breast cancer; (3) ctDNA measurement; (4) clinical outcome data such as objective response rate (ORR), pathological complete response (pCR), relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and so on. The random-effect model was preferred considering the potential heterogeneity across studies. The primary outcomes included postoperative short-term outcomes (ORR and pCR) and postoperative long-term outcomes (RFS, OS, and relapse). Secondary outcomes focused on ctDNA detection rate. Results A total of 30 studies, comprising of 19 cohort studies, 2 case-control studies and 9 case series studies were included. The baseline ctDNA was significantly negatively associated with ORR outcome (Relative Risk [RR] = 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50-0.83), with lower ORR in the ctDNA-positive group than ctDNA-negative group. ctDNA during neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) treatment was significantly associated with pCR outcomes (Odds Ratio [OR] = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.04-0.54). The strong association between ctDNA and RFS or relapse outcome was significant across the whole treatment period, especially after the surgery (RFS: Hazard Ratio [HR] = 6.74, 95% CI: 3.73-12.17; relapse outcome: RR = 7.11, 95% CI: 3.05-16.53), although there was heterogeneity in these results. Pre-operative and post-operative ctDNA measurements were significantly associated with OS outcomes (pre-operative: HR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.12-3.70; post-operative: HR = 6.03, 95% CI: 1.31-27.78). Conclusions In this review, ctDNA measurements at different timepoints are correlated with evaluation indexes at different periods after treatment. The ctDNA can be used as an early potential postoperative prognosis biomarker in breast cancer, and also as a reference index to evaluate the therapeutic effect at different stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Na'na Guo
- Hebei Province Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Qingxin Zhou
- Tianjin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiaowei Chen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Baoqi Zeng
- Department of Science and Education, Peking University Binhai Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Shanshan Wu
- Clinical Epidemiology and EBM Unit, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Hongmei Zeng
- National Central Cancer Registry, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Feng Sun
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory of Major Disease Epidemiology, Ministry of Education (Peking University), Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Langenfeld SJ, Davis BR, Vogel JD, Davids JS, Temple LKF, Cologne KG, Hendren S, Hunt S, Garcia Aguilar J, Feingold DL, Lightner AL, Paquette IM. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Rectal Cancer 2023 Supplement. Dis Colon Rectum 2024; 67:18-31. [PMID: 37647138 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000003057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sean J Langenfeld
- Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Bradley R Davis
- Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Jon D Vogel
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | | | - Larissa K F Temple
- Colorectal Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Kyle G Cologne
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Samantha Hendren
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Steven Hunt
- Department of Surgery, Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Julio Garcia Aguilar
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daniel L Feingold
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Amy L Lightner
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Ian M Paquette
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Approaches to Clinical Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Possibilities and Limitations. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15041323. [PMID: 36831665 PMCID: PMC9953905 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
In the surgical oncology field, the change from a past radical surgery to an organ preserving surgery is a big trend. In muscle-invasive bladder cancer treatment, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy (RC) is the standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients eligible for cisplatin. There is a growing interest in bladder preserving strategies after NAC because good oncologic outcome has been reported for pathologic complete response (pCR) patients after NAC, and many studies have continued to discuss whether bladder preservation treatment is possible for these patients. However, in actual clinical practice, decision-making should be determined according to clinical staging and there is a gap that cannot be ignored between clinical complete response (cCR) and pCR. Currently, there is a lack in a uniform approach to post-NAC restaging of MIBC and a standardized cCR definition. In this review, we clarify the gap between cCR and pCR at the current situation and focus on emerging strategies in bladder preservation in selected patients with MIBC who achieve cCR following NAC.
Collapse
|
5
|
Gianni C, Palleschi M, Merloni F, Bleve S, Casadei C, Sirico M, Di Menna G, Sarti S, Cecconetto L, Mariotti M, De Giorgi U. Potential Impact of Preoperative Circulating Biomarkers on Individual Escalating/de-Escalating Strategies in Early Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:96. [PMID: 36612091 PMCID: PMC9817806 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 12/18/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The research on non-invasive circulating biomarkers to guide clinical decision is in wide expansion, including the earliest disease settings. Several new intensification/de-intensification strategies are approaching clinical practice, personalizing the treatment for each patient. Moreover, liquid biopsy is revealing its potential with multiple techniques and studies available on circulating biomarkers in the preoperative phase. Inflammatory circulating cells, circulating tumor cells (CTCs), cell-free DNA (cfDNA), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), and other biological biomarkers are improving the armamentarium for treatment selection. Defining the escalation and de-escalation of treatments is a mainstay of personalized medicine in early breast cancer. In this review, we delineate the studies investigating the possible application of these non-invasive tools to give a more enlightened approach to escalating/de-escalating strategies in early breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caterina Gianni
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, 47014 Meldola, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gögenur M, Lindbjerg Andersen C, Gögenur I. ASO Author Reflections: Is ctDNA Detection an Accurate Measure of the Risk of Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Treatment? Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:8675. [PMID: 35930114 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12378-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mikail Gögenur
- Center for Surgical Science, Zealand University Hospital Køge, Lykkebækvej 1, 4600, Køge, Denmark.
| | - Claus Lindbjerg Andersen
- Danish Colorectal Cancer Group, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ismail Gögenur
- Center for Surgical Science, Zealand University Hospital Køge, Lykkebækvej 1, 4600, Køge, Denmark.,Danish Colorectal Cancer Group, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|