1
|
Peters I, Marchetti C, Scambia G, Fagotti A. New windows of surgical opportunity for gynecological cancers in the era of targeted therapies. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024; 34:352-362. [PMID: 38438181 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Precision medicine through molecular profiling has taken a prominent role in the treatment of solid tumors and it is widely expected that this will continue to expand. With respect to gynecological cancers, a major change has particularly been observed in the treatment landscape of epithelial ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancers. Regarding the former, maintenance therapy with either poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) and/or bevacizumab has become an indispensable treatment option following the traditional combination of cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy. Considering endometrial cancer, the molecular classification system has now been incorporated into virtually every guideline available and molecular-directed treatment strategies are currently being researched, presumably leading to a further transformation of its treatment paradigm. After all, treatment with immune-checkpoint inhibitors that target the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) receptor has already been shown to significantly improve disease outcomes in these patients, especially in those with mismatch repair deficient, microsatellite stability-high (MMRd-MSI-H) disease. Similarly, in recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer patients, these agents elicited improved survival rates when being added to platinum-based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab. Interestingly, implications of these targeted therapies for surgical management have been touched on to a minor extent, but are at least as intriguing. This review therefore aims to address the wide-ranging opportunities the molecular tumor characteristics and their corresponding targeted therapies have to offer for the surgical management of epithelial ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancers, both in the primary and recurrent setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inge Peters
- Department of Woman's and Child Health and Public Health Sciences, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudia Marchetti
- Department of Woman's and Child Health and Public Health Sciences, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Department of Woman's and Child Health and Public Health Sciences, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Department of Woman's and Child Health and Public Health Sciences, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
De Jong D, Otify M, Chen I, Jackson D, Jayasinghe K, Nugent D, Thangavelu A, Theophilou G, Laios A. Survival and Chemosensitivity in Advanced High Grade Serous Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients with and without a BRCA Germline Mutation: More Evidence for Shifting the Paradigm towards Complete Surgical Cytoreduction. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2022; 58:medicina58111611. [PMID: 36363568 PMCID: PMC9699274 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58111611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2022] [Revised: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Approximately 10−15% of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) cases are related to BRCA germline mutations. Better survival rates and increased chemosensitivity are reported in patients with a BRCA 1/2 germline mutation. However, the FIGO stage and histopathological entity may have been confounding factors. This study aimed to compare chemotherapy response and survival between patients with and without a BRCA 1/2 germline mutation in advanced HGSOC receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Materials and Methods: A cohort of BRCA-tested advanced HGSOC patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery following NACT was analyzed for chemotherapy response and survival. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy served as a vehicle to assess chemotherapy response on biochemical (CA125), histopathological (CRS), biological (dissemination), and surgical (residual disease) levels. Univariate and multivariate analyses for chemotherapy response and survival were utilized. Results: Thirty-nine out of 168 patients had a BRCA ½ germline mutation. No differences in histopathological chemotherapy response between the patients with and without a BRCA ½ germline mutation were observed. Survival in the groups of patients was comparable Irrespective of the BRCA status, CRS 2 and 3 (HR 7.496, 95% CI 2.523−22.27, p < 0.001 & HR 4.069, 95% CI 1.388−11.93, p = 0.011), and complete surgical cytoreduction (p = 0.017) were independent parameters for a favored overall survival. Conclusions: HGSOC patients with or without BRCA ½ germline mutations, who had cytoreductive surgery, showed comparable chemotherapy responses and subsequent survival. Irrespective of BRCA status, advanced-stage HGSOC patients have a superior prognosis with complete surgical cytoreduction and good histopathological response to chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diederick De Jong
- ESGO Center of Excellence for Advanced Ovarian Cancer Surgery, Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Mohamed Otify
- ESGO Center of Excellence for Advanced Ovarian Cancer Surgery, Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Inga Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - David Jackson
- Department of Medical Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Kelum Jayasinghe
- ESGO Center of Excellence for Advanced Ovarian Cancer Surgery, Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - David Nugent
- ESGO Center of Excellence for Advanced Ovarian Cancer Surgery, Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Amudha Thangavelu
- ESGO Center of Excellence for Advanced Ovarian Cancer Surgery, Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Georgios Theophilou
- ESGO Center of Excellence for Advanced Ovarian Cancer Surgery, Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Alexandros Laios
- ESGO Center of Excellence for Advanced Ovarian Cancer Surgery, Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +44-(0)-1132068251
| |
Collapse
|