Recurrence is Not Associated with Margin Status in Phyllodes Tumor

Margin Width and Local Recurrence in Patients with Phyllodes Tumors of the Breast

BACKGROUND

Optimal surgical margin width for patients with phyllodes tumors (PTs) of the breast remains debated. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of margin width on long-term local recurrence risk.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a single-institution retrospective review of patients with confirmed PT treated from 2008-2015. Margins were defined as positive (ink on tumor), narrow (no tumor at inked margin but < 10mm), or widely free (>/= 10mm). LR rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Among 117 female patients, histology included 55 (47%) benign, 29 (25%) borderline, and 33 (28%) malignant PT. Final margins were positive in 16 (14%), narrow in 32 (27%), widely free in 64 (55%), and unknown in 5 (4%) patients. Compared with margins > 10 mm, patients with positive and narrow margins had a higher LR risk [HR 10.57 (95% CI 2.48-45.02) and HR 5.66 (95% CI 1.19-26.99), respectively]. Among benign PTs, the 10-year LR-free rates were 100%, 94%, and 66% for widely negative, narrow, and positive margins, respectively (p = 0.056). For borderline/malignant PT, the 10-year LR-free rates were 93% and 57% for widely negative and narrow margins, respectively (p = 0.02), with no difference in LR between narrow and positive margin groups (p = 1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

For benign PTs, a margin of no ink on tumor appears sufficient to optimize local control. In patients with borderline or malignant PTs, achieving a wide surgical margin may remain important as narrower margins were associated with LR rates comparable to those with positive margins.

Postoperative surgical margin results of the phyllodes tumors from a tertiary hospital

OBJECTIVE

Phyllodes tumors in the breast are exceptionally uncommon fibroepithelial tumors. In the literature, they are typically categorized as benign phyllodes tumor, borderline phyllodes tumor, and malignant phyllodes tumor. This study aims to assess and present the clinical and surgical outcomes of patients diagnosed with phyllodes tumor.

METHODS

The outcomes of patients aged 18 years and above diagnosed with phyllodes tumor between 2006 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped as benign phyllodes tumor and borderline/malignant phyllodes tumor and compared by clinical and surgical results.

RESULTS

Of all 57 patients with phyllodes tumor, 64.9% (n=37) were benign phyllodes tumor and 35.1% (n=20) were borderline/malignant phyllodes tumor [22.8% (n=13) borderline phyllodes tumor and 12.3% (n=7) malignant phyllodes tumor]. When the patients were divided into two groups as benign phyllodes tumor and borderline/malignant phyllodes tumor and compared, our cumulative (total) recurrence rate was 14.0%, with final surgical margin width between groups [(0

CONCLUSION

Phyllodes tumors of the breast can be followed up with a narrow negative surgical margin (0 mm Collapse

Key Words

• breast
• phyllodes tumor
• neoplasm
• recurrence

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Phyllodes Tumor/surgery
• Phyllodes Tumor/pathology
• Female
• Margins of Excision
• Breast Neoplasms/surgery
• Breast Neoplasms/pathology
• Adult
• Retrospective Studies
• Middle Aged
• Tertiary Care Centers
• Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology
• Young Adult
• Treatment Outcome
• Postoperative Period
• Mastectomy/methods
• Aged
• Adolescent

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Fatih Dal University of Health Sciences, Turkish Ministry of Health, İstanbul Training and Research Hospital, Department of General Surgery – İstanbul, Turkey
Semiha Battal Havare University of Health Sciences, Turkish Ministry of Health, İstanbul Training and Research Hospital, Department of Medical Pathology – İstanbul, Turkey

Collapse

Surgical margins and prognosis of borderline and malignant phyllodes tumors

PURPOSE

To investigate the optimal surgical margin and prognostic risk factors for borderline and malignant phyllodes tumors (PTs).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with borderline and malignant PTs at our hospital from 2011 to 2022. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were employed to analyze the effects of various variables on local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

This study comprised 150 patients, 85 classified as borderline and 65 as malignant. During a median follow-up of 66 months (range: 3-146 months), 34 cases (22.7%) experienced local recurrence, 9 cases (6.0%) exhibited distant metastasis, and 7 cases (4.7%) resulted in death. Irrespective of the histological subtypes, patients with surgical margins ≥ 1 cm exhibit significantly higher 5-year LRFS and 5-year DFS rates compared to those with margins < 1 cm. Among patients with initial margins < 1 cm, LRFS (P = 0.004) and DFS (P = 0.003) were improved in patients reoperated to achieve margins ≥ 1 cm. Surgical margin < 1 cm (HR = 2.567, 95%CI 1.137-5.793, P = 0.023) and age < 45 years (HR = 2.079, 95%CI 1.033-4.184, P = 0.040) were identified as independent risk factors for LRFS. Additionally, surgical margin < 1 cm (HR = 3.074, 95%CI 1.622-5.826, P = 0.001) and tumor size > 5 cm (HR = 2.719, 95%CI 1.307-5.656, P = 0.007) were determined to be independent risk factors for DFS.

CONCLUSIONS

A negative surgical margin of at least 1 cm (with secondary resection if necessary) should be achieved for borderline and malignant PTs. Tumor size > 5 cm and age < 45 years were predictive of recurrence, suggesting multiple therapy modalities may be considered for these high-risk patients.