NEO-GAP: A Single-Arm, Phase II Feasibility Trial of Neoadjuvant Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, and Nab-Paclitaxel for Resectable, High-Risk Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Molecular Testing and Targeted Therapies in Hepatobiliary Cancers: A Review

Importance

Hepatobiliary cancers are heterogeneous and molecularly complex. Recent advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) have enhanced the understanding of their molecular landscape and enabled deployment of biomarker-based gene- and immune-targeted therapies. This review examines the role of molecular testing and targeted therapies in these malignant neoplasms.

Observations

Patients with hepatobiliary cancers have poor outcomes. Precision oncology studies have shown that while many common molecular alterations are not currently targetable in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a large number of actionable alterations characterize biliary tract cancers (BTCs), with several therapies now approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. Immunotherapy is increasingly adopted in clinical practice, either as monotherapy or combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy, for both HCC and BTCs. Moreover, multiple solid cancer tumor-agnostic therapies are approved (larotrectinib, entrectinib, and repotrectinib for NTRK fusions; selpercatinib for RET fusions; dabrafenib and trametinib combination for BRAF V600E mutations; dostarlimab or pembrolizumab for tumors with high microsatellite instability and pembrolizumab for tumor mutation burden ≥10 mutations/megabase), highlighting the need for NGS as well as ERBB2 (formerly HER2) immunohistochemistry (IHC) (with the recent approval of solid tissue-agnostic deruxtecan trastuzumab for ERBB2-positive [IHC 3+] cancer) across cancers. N-of-1 clinical trials using customized drug combinations matched to the tumor's molecular profile have yielded encouraging results and provide a promising framework for future clinical trial design.

Conclusions and Relevance

Molecular testing and gene- and immune-targeted therapies are transforming hepatobiliary cancer treatment. Tumor-agnostic and N-of-1 clinical trials have challenged traditional clinical trial paradigms and provide the foundation for truly personalized oncology for patients with these aggressive cancers. Further work is needed to determine how to leverage these novel approaches into the management of operable disease.

Upfront surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Prediction of futility using artificial intelligence

OBJECTIVE

We sought to identify patients at risk of "futile" surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using an artificial intelligence (AI)-based model based on preoperative variables.

METHODS

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients who underwent resection between 1990 and 2020 were identified from a multi-institutional database. Futility was defined either as mortality or recurrence within 12 months of surgery. Various machine learning and deep learning techniques were used to develop prediction models for futile surgery.

RESULTS

Overall, 827 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients were included. Among 378 patients (45.7%) who had futile surgery, 297 patients (78.6%) developed intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma recurrence and 81 patients (21.4%) died within 12 months of surgical resection. An ensemble model consisting of multilayer perceptron and gradient boosting classifiers that used 10 preoperative factors demonstrated the highest accuracy, with areas under receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.830 (95% confidence interval 0.798-0.861) and 0.781 (95% confidence interval 0.707-0.853) in the training and testing cohorts, respectively. The model displayed sensitivity and specificity of 64.5% and 80.0%, respectively, with positive and negative predictive values of 73.1% and 72.7%, respectively. Radiologic tumor burden score, serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9, and direct bilirubin levels were the factors most strongly predictive of futile surgery. The artificial intelligence-based model was made available online for ease of use and clinical applicability (https://altaf-pawlik-icc-futilityofsurgery-calculator.streamlit.app/).

CONCLUSION

The artificial intelligence ensemble model demonstrated high accuracy to identify patients preoperatively at high risk of undergoing futile surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Artificial intelligence-based prediction models can provide clinicians with reliable preoperative guidance and aid in avoiding futile surgical procedures that are unlikely to provide patients long-term benefits.

Recent advances in systemic therapy for advanced biliary tract cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis using reconstructed RCT survival data

Background & Aims

Gemcitabine/cisplatin (GemCis) was the long-standing first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs). Following positive results from the TOPAZ-01 and KEYNOTE-966 trials, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy are now the standard of care. We aim to compare the efficacy of first-line therapies for advanced BTCs.

Methods

Our systematic review included studies from five databases focusing on English-language articles published between January 2010 and June 2024. We included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that featured GemCis in a treatment arm for treatment-naive adults with advanced BTCs. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival. We conducted a one-stage meta-analysis using reconstructed survival data, Cox-based models, and restricted mean survival time (RMST).

Results

After screening 8,797 studies, 17 RCTs were selected, involving a total of 4,584 patients. Of these, 2,140 (46.7%) received GemCis. The majority (68.9%) were diagnosed with intrahepatic or extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and 80% had metastatic disease at the time of treatment. The pooled median OS in the GemCis group was 11.6 months (95% CI 11.3-12.2 months). GemCis plus pembrolizumab (hazard ratio [HR] 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-0.99; p <0.001), GemCis plus durvalumab (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99; p = 0.015), GemCis plus S-1 (HR 0.97 95% CI 0.95-0.99; p <0.001), and GemCis plus nab-paclitaxel (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.98-0.99; p <0.001) demonstrated superior OS compared with GemCis alone. These combinations also showed increases in RMST by +1.1, +2.5, +2.8, and +2.1 months, respectively. In terms of progression-free survival, GemCis with ICIs (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.78-0.94; p <0.001), GemCis plus S-1 (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-0.99; p = 0.003), and GemCis plus nab-paclitaxel (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99; p <0.001) also demonstrated superiority, with corresponding RMST increases of +0.7, +1.9, and +2.5 months, respectively.

Conclusions

Despite incremental advancements, a breakthrough in advanced BTC treatment remains elusive. Further improvements in treatment efficacy may require biomarker identification to optimize combinational therapies for better patient selection.

Impact and implications

This study analyzed recent RCTs, including KEYNOTE-966, TOPAZ-1, NIFE, and SWOG 1815, involving 4,584 patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. A meta-analysis of 17 treatment arms, using reconstructed survival data, confirmed the modest survival benefit of GemCis plus ICIs, supporting its guideline adoption. The findings, however, highlight the need for biomarker identification and better patient selection.

Finding the Right Partner: Triplet Therapy for First-Line Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.

SWOG S1815: A Phase III Randomized Trial of Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, and Nab-Paclitaxel Versus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Newly Diagnosed, Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers

PURPOSE

SWOG S1815 was a randomized, open label phase III trial, evaluating gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel, and cisplatin (GAP) versus gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) in patients with newly diagnosed advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs).

METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed locally advanced unresectable or metastatic BTC, including intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC) and gallbladder carcinoma (GBC), were randomly assigned 2:1 to either GAP (gemcitabine 800 mg/m2, cisplatin 25 mg/m2, and nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 intravenously once per day on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle) or GC (gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 and cisplatin 25 mg/m2 intravenously once per day on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle).

RESULTS

Among 452 randomly assigned participants, 441 were eligible and analyzable, 67% with ICC, 16% with GBC, and 17% with ECC. There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between GAP versus GC. Median OS with GAP was 14.0 months (95% CI, 12.4 to 16.1) and 13.6 months with GC (95% CI, 9.7 to 16.6); hazard ratio (HR), 0.91 (95% CI, 0.72 to 1.14); P = .41. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was similar between groups with median PFS for GAP being 7.5 months (95% CI, 6.4 to 8.5) versus 6.3 months for GC (95% CI, 4.4 to 8.2); HR, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.71 to 1.12); P = .32. In exploratory subset analyses, the OS and PFS benefits of GAP versus GC treatment were greater in locally advanced disease compared with metastatic disease, although not statistically significant (interaction P = .14 for OS and P = .17 for PFS). Moreover, GAP versus GC showed greater improvement in PFS among participants with GBC than those with ICC or ECC (interaction P = .01), but not OS (interaction P = .28).

CONCLUSION

The addition of a taxane in the GAP regimen to the standard gemcitabine-cisplatin regimen did not improve OS in newly diagnosed BTC. More toxicity was encountered with GAP versus GC.

Management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a review for clinicians

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is an aggressive liver malignancy that arises from second-order biliary epithelial cells. Its incidence is gradually increasing worldwide. Well-known risk factors have been described, although in many cases, they are not identifiable. Treatment options are continuously expanding, but the prognosis of iCCA remains dismal. R0 liver resection remains the only curative treatment, but only a limited number of patients can benefit from it. Frequently, major hepatectomies are needed to completely remove the tumour. This could contraindicate surgery or increase postoperative morbidity in patients with chronic liver disease and small remnant liver volume. In cases of anticipated inadequate future liver remnant, regenerative techniques may be used to expand resectability. The role and extent of lymphadenectomy in iCCA are still matters of debate. Improvements in iCCA diagnosis and better understanding of genetic profiles might lead to optimized surgical approaches and drug therapies. The role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies is broadening, gaining more and more acceptance in clinical practice. Combining surgery with locoregional therapies and novel drugs, such as checkpoint-inhibitors and molecular-targeted molecules, might improve treatment options and survival rates. Liver transplantation, after very poor initial results, is now receiving attention for the treatment of patients with unresectable very early iCCA (i.e. <2 cm) in cirrhotic livers, showing survival outcomes comparable to those of hepatocellular carcinoma. Ongoing prospective protocols are testing the efficacy of liver transplantation for patients with unresectable, advanced tumours confined to the liver, with sustained response to neoadjuvant treatment. In such a continuously changing landscape, the aim of our work is to review the state-of-the-art in the surgical and medical treatment of iCCA.

Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Ratio in Intrahepatic and Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinomas

Background/Objectives. Lymph Node Ratio (LNR) is increasingly recognized as an important prognostic factor in various cancer types, with the potential to enhance patient stratification for intrahepatic (ICC) and extrahepatic (ECC) cholangiocarcinoma. The study aimed to assess the impact of LNR on survival in surgically resected patients with ICC and ECC. Methods. This was a retrospective analysis of National Cancer Database (2004-2020) included ICC and ECC (excluding distal bile duct) patients who underwent primary site resection with adequate lymphadenectomy (≥4 LNs excised). Exclusions comprised age < 18 years, distant metastasis, or incomplete key data. LNR was calculated as the ratio of positive LNs to total examined LNs. Survival probabilities were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression. Results. The inclusion criteria were met by 954 patients with ICC and 1607 patients with ECC. In patients with ICC, the median OS time was 62.7 months in LNR0 group, 40.8 months in LNR < 30%, and 25.2 months in LNR ≥ 30% (p < 0.001). In ICC, 3-year OS was 69.3%, 54.6%, and 34% for LNR 0, LNR < 30%, and LNR ≥ 30%, respectively (p < 0.05). When adjusted for age, sex, Charlson-Deyo score, histology, surgical margins, chemo- and radiotherapy using Cox regression, LNR < 30% and LNR ≥ 30% were associated with worse OS in patients with ICC (HR 2.1 (95% CI 1.6-2.7) and HR 2.94 (95% CI 2.3-3.8)) and ECC (HR 2.1 (95% CI 1.8-2.5) and HR 3 (95% CI 2.4-3.7)). Conclusions. It is well-known that LN-negative patients have significantly better survival than LN-positive patients with ICC and ECC. This study strongly demonstrates that survival prognosis can be further stratified based on LNR for ICC and ECC patients and that it is not simply a binary factor.

Exploring the effects of gut microbiota on cholangiocarcinoma progression by patient-derived organoids

BACKGROUND

Recent research indicates a role of gut microbiota in development and progression of life-threatening diseases such as cancer. Carcinomas of the biliary ducts, the so-called cholangiocarcinomas, are known for their aggressive tumor biology, implying poor prognosis of affected patients. An impact of the gut microbiota on cholangiocarcinoma development and progression is plausible due to the enterohepatic circulation and is therefore the subject of scientific debate, however evidence is still lacking. This review aimed to discuss the suitability of complex cell culture models to investigate the role of gut microbiota in cholangiocarcinoma progression.

MAIN BODY

Clinical research in this area is challenging due to poor comparability of patients and feasibility reasons, which is why translational models are needed to understand the basis of tumor progression in cholangiocarcinoma. A promising approach to investigate the influence of gut microbiota could be an organoid model. Organoids are 3D cell models cultivated in a modifiable and controlled condition, which can be grown from tumor tissue. 3D cell models are able to imitate physiological and pathological processes in the human body and thus contribute to a better understanding of health and disease.

CONCLUSION

The use of complex cell cultures such as organoids and organoid co-cultures might be powerful and valuable tools to study not only the growth behavior and growth of cholangiocarcinoma cells, but also the interaction with the tumor microenvironment and with components of the gut microbiota.

[Prognostic factors and preoperative therapy in resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma]

OBJECTIVE

To identify prognostic factors and role of preoperative therapy for resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed the results of surgical and combined treatment of IHCC between 1999 and 2023. Immediate and long-term outcomes were evaluated depending on negative prognostic factors and additional therapy.

RESULTS

The study included 195 patients. Postoperative complications grade ≥III were observed in 35 (17.9%) case. Mortality rate was 3.1% (n=6). Thirty-eight patients (19.5%) underwent treatment before surgery, 109 (55.9%) ones - after surgery. The median overall survival was 31 months, 5-year overall survival - 32.0%. The following factors worsened overall survival: node size ≥8 cm (HR 1.45; 95% CI 0.97-2.17), invasion (HR 1.63; 95% CI 1.07-2.47), multiple lesion (HR 1.51; 95% CI 1.00-2.28). R1 resection worsened disease-free survival (HR 1.88; 95% CI 1.14-3.10). Lymph node metastases decreased overall (HR 1.96; 95% CI 1.27- 3.04) and disease-free survival (HR 2.37; 95% CI 1.63-3.44). Two and more negative factors worsened overall (p=0.0013) and disease-free survival (p=0.0005). Absence of adjuvant therapy worsened overall (HR 2.12; 95% CI 1.41-3.20) and disease-free survival (HR 1.42; 95% CI 0.99-2.04). There was a trend towards higher overall (p=0.088) and progression-free survival (p=0.029) in case of preoperative therapy (n=195). In unfavorable prognosis group, preoperative therapy (n=33) was superior to standard treatment (resection+capecitabine after surgery, n=26). There was a trend towards higher overall survival (p=0.066) and significantly better progression-free survival (17 vs 13 months, p=0.018).

CONCLUSION

Negative prognostic factors for resectable IHCC are lesion size ≥8 cm, intrahepatic and regional metastases, invasion into neighboring structures, R1 resection. Combination of negative factors worsened prognosis. Adjuvant therapy improved postoperative outcomes. Preoperative therapy may be advisable in case of negative factors and high risk of R1 resection.

MRI-based microvascular invasion prediction in mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: survival and therapeutic benefit

OBJECTIVES

To establish an MRI-based model for microvascular invasion (MVI) prediction in mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (MF-iCCA) and further evaluate its potential survival and therapeutic benefit.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-six pathologically confirmed MF-iCCAs with traditional surgery (121 in training and 35 in validation cohorts), 33 with neoadjuvant treatment and 57 with first-line systemic therapy were retrospectively included. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify the independent predictors for MVI in the traditional surgery group, and an MVI-predictive model was constructed. Survival analyses were conducted and compared between MRI-predicted MVI-positive and MVI-negative MF-iCCAs in different treatment groups.

RESULTS

Tumor multinodularity (odds ratio = 4.498, p < 0.001) and peri-tumor diffusion-weighted hyperintensity (odds ratio = 4.163, p < 0.001) were independently significant variables associated with MVI. AUC values for the predictive model were 0.760 [95% CI 0.674, 0.833] in the training cohort and 0.757 [95% CI 0.583, 0.885] in the validation cohort. Recurrence-free survival or progression-free survival of the MRI-predicted MVI-positive patients was significantly shorter than the MVI-negative patients in all three treatment groups (log-rank p < 0.001 to 0.046). The use of neoadjuvant therapy was not associated with improved postoperative recurrence-free survival for high-risk MF-iCCA patients in both MRI-predicted MVI-positive and MVI-negative groups (log-rank p = 0.79 and 0.27). Advanced MF-iCCA patients of the MRI-predicted MVI-positive group had significantly worse objective response rate than the MVI-negative group with systemic therapy (40.91% vs 76.92%, χ2 = 5.208, p = 0.022).

CONCLUSION

The MRI-based MVI-predictive model could be a potential biomarker for personalized risk stratification and survival prediction in MF-iCCA patients with varied therapies and may aid in candidate selection for systemic therapy.

KEY POINTS

Question Identifying intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) patients at high risk for microvascular invasion (MVI) may inform prognostic risk stratification and guide clinical treatment decision. Findings We established an MRI-based predictive model for MVI in mass-forming-iCCA, integrating imaging features of tumor multinodularity and peri-tumor diffusion-weighted hyperintensity. Clinical relevance The MRI-based MVI-predictive model could be a potential biomarker for personalized risk stratification and survival prediction across varied therapies and may aid in therapeutic candidate selection for systemic therapy.

Systemic approaches in biliary tract cancers: a review in the era of multidirectional precision medicine

INTRODUCTION

Despite a rising incidence, biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are still considered a rare tumor entity. The disease's subtle clinical presentation and lack of effective early detection strategies often lead to a diagnosis at an advanced or unresectable stage, where curative options are limited.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides an overview of current systemic therapies and emerging novel approaches for BTC. For decades, the combination of gemcitabine with cisplatin (GemCis) has been the standard of care for palliative treatment. However, since 2020, the diagnostic and therapeutic landscape for BTC has evolved considerably, not only in the first-line setting but also beyond, driven by the development of clinical trials exploring immunotherapy and molecularly targeted agents. Due to the high frequency of targetable genetic alterations in BTC patients, there is a growing emphasis on obtaining tissue or liquid biopsy samples to identify markers like microsatellite instability and other actionable oncogenic driver genes.

EXPERT OPINION

Early initiation of systemic therapies in combination with multimodal approaches is essential for maximizing survival outcomes in patients with BTC.

A preliminary study of developing an MRI-based model for postoperative recurrence prediction and treatment direction of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSE

To establish an MRI-based predictive model for postoperative recurrence in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) and further to evaluate the model utility in treatment direction for neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Totally 114 iCCA patients with curative surgery were retrospectively included, including 38 patients in the neoadjuvant treatment, traditional surgery, and adjuvant treatment groups for each. Predictive variables associated with postoperative recurrence were identified using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, and a prognostic model was formulated. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) curves were compared using log-rank test between MRI-predicted high-risk and low-risk iCCAs stratified by the optimal threshold.

RESULTS

Tumor multiplicity (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.671 [95%CI 1.036, 2.695], P = 0.035), hemorrhage (HR = 2.391 [95%CI 1.189, 4.810], P = 0.015), peri-tumor diffusion-weighted hyperintensity (HR = 1.723 [95%CI 1.085, 2.734], P = 0.021), and positive regional lymph node (HR = 2.175 [95%CI 1.295, 3.653], P = 0.003) were independently associated with postoperative recurrence; treatment group was not significantly related to recurrence (P > 0.05). Independent variables above were incorporated for the recurrence prediction model, the 1-year and 2-year time-dependent area under the curve values were 0.723 (95%CI 0.631, 0.815) and 0.725 (95%CI 0.634, 0.816), respectively. After risk stratification, the MRI-predicted high-risk iCCA patients had higher cumulative incidences of recurrence and worse RFS than the low-risk patients (P < 0.001 for both). In the MRI-predicted high-risk patients, neoadjuvant therapy was associated with improved all-stage RFS (P = 0.034), and adjuvant therapy was associated with improved RFS after 4 months (P = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

The MRI-based iCCA recurrence predictive model may serve as a decision-making tool for both personalized prognostication and therapy selection.

Design of the distribution of iron oxide (Fe3O4) nano-particle drug in realistic cholangiocarcinoma model and the simulation of temperature increase during magnetic induction hyperthermia

The prognosis for Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is unfavorable, necessitating the development of new therapeutic approach such as magnetic hyperthermia therapy (MHT) which is induced by magnetic nano-particle (MNPs) drug to bridge the treatment gap. Given the deep location of CCA within the abdominal cavity and proximity to vital organs, accurately predict the individualized treatment effects and safety brought by the distribution of MNPs in tumor will be crucial for the advancement of MHT in CCA. The Mimics software was used in this study to conduct three-dimensional reconstruction of abdominal computed tomography (CT) and magnetic reso-nance imaging images from clinical patients, resulting in the generation of a realistic digital geometric model representing the human biliary tract and its adjacent structures. Subsequently, The COMSOL Multiphysics software was utilized for modeling CCA and calculating the heat transfer law resulting from the multi-regional distribution of MNPs in CCA. The temperature within the central region of irregular CCA measured approximately 46°C, and most areas within the tumor displayed temperatures surpassing 41°C. The temperature of the inner edge of CCA is only 39 ∼ 41℃, however, it can be ameliorated by adjusting the local drug concentration through simulation system. For CCA with diverse morphologies and anatomical locations, the multi-regional distribution patterns of intratumoral MNPs and a slight overlap of drug distribution areas synergistically enhance intratumoral temperature while ensuring treatment safety. The present study highlights the practicality and imperative of incorporating personalized intratumoral MNPs distribution strategy into clinical practice for MHT, which can be achieved through the development of an integrated simulation system which incorporates medical image data and numerical calculations.

Nab-paclitaxel plus capecitabine as first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancers: An open-label, non-randomized, phase II clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors with high malignancy, poor prognosis, and limited treatment options.

AIM

To explore the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus capecitabine as first-line treatment for advanced and metastatic BTCs.

METHODS

This open-label, non-randomized, double-center, phase II clinical trial recruited systemic therapy-naive patients with unresectable or metastatic BTCs between April 2019 and June 2022 at Beijing Cancer Hospital and the First Hospital of China Medical University. Eligible patients were administered nab-paclitaxel (150 mg/m2, day 1) and capecitabine (2000 mg/m2, twice daily, days 1-7) in 14-day cycles until experiencing intolerable toxicity or disease progression. The primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary outcomes included the disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 44 patients successfully completed the trial, with a median age of 64.00 years (interquartile range, 35.00-76.00), and 26 (59.09%) were females. Tumor response assessment was impeded for one patient due to premature demise from tumor hemorrhage. Among the remaining 43 patients undergoing at least one imaging assessment, the ORR was 23.26% [95% confidence interval (CI): 11.80%-38.60%], and the DCR was 69.77% (95%CI: 53.90%-82.80%). The median OS was 14.1 months (95%CI: 8.3-19.9), and the median PFS was 4.4 months (95%CI: 2.5-6.3). A total of 41 patients (93.18%) experienced at least one adverse event (AE), with 10 patients (22.73%) encountering grade ≥ 3 AEs, and the most frequent AEs of any grade were alopecia (79.50%), leukopenia (54.55%), neutropenia (52.27%), and liver dysfunction (40.91%), and no treatment-related deaths were documented.

CONCLUSION

Nab-paclitaxel plus capecitabine may be an effective and safe first-line treatment strategy for patients with advanced or metastatic BTCs.

The Recent Trends of Systemic Treatments and Locoregional Therapies for Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a hepatic malignancy that has a rapidly increasing incidence. CCA is anatomically classified into intrahepatic (iCCA) and extrahepatic (eCCA), which is further divided into perihilar (pCCA) and distal (dCCA) subtypes, with higher incidence rates in Asia. Despite its rarity, CCA has a low 5-year survival rate and remains the leading cause of primary liver tumor-related death over the past 10-20 years. The systemic therapy section discusses gemcitabine-based regimens as primary treatments, along with oxaliplatin-based options. Second-line therapy is limited but may include short-term infusional fluorouracil (FU) plus leucovorin (LV) and oxaliplatin. The adjuvant therapy section discusses approaches to improve overall survival (OS) post-surgery. However, only a minority of CCA patients qualify for surgical resection. In comparison to adjuvant therapies, neoadjuvant therapy for unresectable cases shows promise. Gemcitabine and cisplatin indicate potential benefits for patients awaiting liver transplantation. The addition of immunotherapies to chemotherapy in combination is discussed. Nivolumab and innovative approaches like CAR-T cells, TRBAs, and oncolytic viruses are explored. We aim in this review to provide a comprehensive report on the systemic and locoregional therapies for CCA.

Neoadjuvant therapy leads to objective response in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is the second most common hepatic malignancy and has a poor prognosis. Surgical resection is the standard of care for patients with resectable disease, representing 30-40% of cases. Increasingly, neoadjuvant systemic therapy is being utilized in patients due to high-risk anatomic or biologic considerations. However, data on the clinical effect of this approach are limited. We performed a cohort study to evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with oncologically high-risk iCCA.

METHODS

iCCA patients (n = 181) between the years 2014-2020 were reviewed for clinical, histopathologic, treatment, and outcome-related data. Tumor regression grade was scored per CAP criteria for gastrointestinal carcinomas.

RESULTS

47 iCCA patients received neoadjuvant therapy and 72 did not. Neoadjuvant treatment led to objective response and tumor regression by CAP score. After adjustment for age, clinical stage, and tumor size, the outcomes of patients who had neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery were not significantly different from those patients who had surgery first.

DISCUSSION

In conclusion, neoadjuvant therapy in iCCA facilitated surgical care. The progression-free and overall survival for surgical patients with and without neoadjuvant therapy were not significantly different suggesting this approach needs further exploration as an effective treatment paradigm.

Perihilar and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma after Resection: Clinicopathological Characteristics, Outcomes, and Implications for Addition of Chemoradiotherapy

Background

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate clinicopathological characteristics, patterns of recurrence, survival outcomes, and implications for the addition of chemoradiotherapy for patients with resected perihilar and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA).

Materials and methods

For the present retrospective study, we identified 38 and 10 patients with resected perihilar and intrahepatic CCA. In perihilar CCA, adjuvant treatment was given as chemotherapy (n = 13) or chemoradiotherapy (n = 10). In intrahepatic CCA, neoadjuvant treatment was given with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE, n = 1) or chemotherapy plus stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT, n = 1), and adjuvant treatment was given to 7 patients with chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.

Results

In perihilar CCA, preoperative biliary drainage procedures were performed in 27 out of 30 patients with jaundice. The adjacent liver showed secondary sclerosing cholangitis (n = 5) and fibrosis (n = 19). Locoregional recurrence involved the hepaticojejunostomy anastomotic site and lymph nodes. In intrahepatic CCA, the adjacent liver revealed cirrhosis (n = 1), secondary sclerosing cholangitis (n = 1), and fibrosis (n = 6). The sites of recurrence were in the remnant liver and lymph nodes (n = 6). In perihilar CCA, the median overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 30.1 months (95% CI: 22.9-37.4) and 15.1 months (95% CI: 9.74-20.5), respectively. The 2-year and 3-year OS were 60.5% and 44.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed a significant association of no adjuvant treatment with decreased DFS (p = 0.004), HR 4.03 (95% CI: 1.57-10.4). Recurrence showed an unfavorable association with OS (p = 0.056), HR 2.90 (95% CI: 0.98-8.66). In intrahepatic CCA, the median OS and DFS rates were 41.2 months (95% CI: 13.5-68.9) and 10.8 months (95% CI: 1.98-19.6), respectively. The 2-year and 3-year OS were 66.7% and 53.3%, respectively. The patient with multiple intrahepatic CCA lesions and treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and SBRT showed partial pathological necrosis after resection and was disease-free at 3.5 years.

Conclusions

The present study showed the effectiveness of the combination of chemoradiotherapy with resection in improving locoregional disease control and survival in patients with perihilar and intrahepatic CCA.

How to cite this article

Sahai P, Rastogi A, Gupta A, et al. Perihilar and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma after Resection: Clinicopathological Characteristics, Outcomes, and Implications for Addition of Chemoradiotherapy. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2024;14(2):134-144.

Evaluating the Therapeutic Potential of Durvalumab in Adults with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer: Evidence to Date

Advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs) have historically been managed with chemotherapy but, in recent years, this treatment paradigm has begun to shift with the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors in addition to standard of care chemotherapy. The tumor microenvironment of BTC may be enriched with regulatory T lymphocytes and immune checkpoint expression in some patients. Durvalumab, an anti-programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) antibody, in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin, has now received United States Food and Drug Administration approval for treatment of advanced BTC. Regulatory approval was based on the Phase III, randomized TOPAZ-1 trial that demonstrated survival benefit with addition of durvalumab to gemcitabine plus cisplatin compared to chemotherapy alone. The combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy was well tolerated, and a subset of patients were able to achieve a durable response, with a 2-year overall survival rate of 23.6%. However, limitations remain in identifying which patients are most likely to benefit from immune checkpoint inhibition. Future study should aim to identify biomarkers predictive of substantial benefit, as well as the role of immune checkpoint inhibition in combination with targeted therapies and radiotherapy in the management of advanced BTC.

Durvalumab Plus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Versus Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in Biliary Tract Cancer: a Real-World Retrospective, Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

The TOPAZ-1 phase III trial reported a survival benefit with the anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) durvalumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC).

OBJECTIVE

The present study investigated for the first time the impact on survival of adding durvalumab to cisplatin/gemcitabine compared with cisplatin/gemcitabine in a real-world setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The analyzed population included patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic BTC treated with durvalumab in combination with cisplatin/gemcitabine or with cisplatin/gemcitabine alone. The impact of adding durvalumab to chemotherapy in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) was investigated with univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 563 patients were included in the analysis: 213 received cisplatin/gemcitabine alone, 350 received cisplatin/gemcitabine plus durvalumab. At the univariate analysis, the addition of durvalumab was found to have an impact on survival, with a median OS of 14.8 months versus 11.2 months [hazard ratio (HR) 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50-0.80, p = 0.0002] in patients who received cisplatin/gemcitabine plus durvalumab compared to those who received cisplatin/gemcitabine alone. At the univariate analysis for PFS, the addition of durvalumab to cisplatin/gemcitabine demonstrated a survival impact, with a median PFS of 8.3 months and 6.0 months (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.47-0.70, p < 0.0001) in patients who received cisplatin/gemcitabine plus durvalumab and cisplatin/gemcitabine alone, respectively. The multivariate analysis confirmed that adding durvalumab to cisplatin/gemcitabine is an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS, with patients > 70 years old and those affected by locally advanced disease experiencing the highest survival benefit. Finally, an exploratory analysis of prognostic factors was performed in the cohort of patients who received durvalumab: neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and disease stage were to be independent prognostic factors in terms of OS. The interaction test highlighted NLR ≤ 3, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) = 0, and locally advanced disease as positive predictive factors for OS on cisplatin/gemcitabine plus durvalumab.

CONCLUSION

In line with the results of the TOPAZ-1 trial, adding durvalumab to cisplatin/gemcitabine has been confirmed to confer a survival benefit in terms of OS and PFS in a real-world setting of patients with advanced BTC.

WITHDRAWN: Neoadjuvant therapy leads to objective response in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

The Publisher regrets that this article is an accidental duplication of an article that has already been published, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2024.04.011. The duplicate article has therefore been withdrawn. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/article-withdrawal.

A phase II/III randomized clinical trial of CisPlatin plUs Gemcitabine and Nabpaclitaxel (GAP) as pReoperative chemotherapy versus immediate resection in patIents with resecTable BiliarY Tract Cancers (BTC) at high risk for recurrence: PURITY study

BACKGROUND

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are rare and lethal cancers, with a 5-year survival inferior to 20%(1-3). The only potential curative treatment is surgical resection. However, despite complex surgical procedures that have a remarkable risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality, the 5-year survival rate after radical surgery (R0) is 20-40% and recurrence rates are up to ~ 75%(4-6). Up to ~ 40% of patients relapse within 12 months after resection, and half of these patient will recur systemically(4-6). There is no standard of care for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in resectable BTC, but retrospective reports suggest its potential benefit (7, 8).

METHODS

PURITY is a no-profit, multicentre, randomized phase II/III trial aimed at evaluating the efficacy of the combination of gemcitabine, cisplatin and nabpaclitaxel (GAP) as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable BTC at high risk for recurrence. Primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant GAP followed by surgery as compared to upfront surgery, in terms of 12-month progression-free survival for the phase II part and of progression free survival (PFS) for the phase III study. Key Secondary objectives are event free survival (EFS), relapse-free survival, (RFS), overall survival (OS), R0/R1/R2 resection rate, quality of life (QoL), overall response rate (ORR), resectability. Safety analyses will include toxicity rate and perioperative morbidity and mortality rate. Exploratory studies including Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) in archival tumor tissues and longitudinal ctDNA analysis are planned to identify potential biomarkers of primary resistance and prognosis.

DISCUSSION

Considering the poor prognosis of resected BTC experiencing early tumor recurrence and the negative prognostic impact of R1/R2 resections, PURITY study is based on the rationale that NAC may improve R0 resection rates and ultimately patients' outcomes. Furthermore, NAC should allow early eradication of microscopic distant metastases, undetectable by imaging but already present at the time of diagnosis and avoid mortality and morbidity associated with resection for patients with rapid progression or worsening general condition during neoadjuvant therapy. The randomized PURITY study will evaluate whether patients affected by BTC at high risk from recurrence benefit from a neoadjuvant therapy with GAP regimen as compared to immediate surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PURITY is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06037980) and EuCT(2023-503295-25-00).

Precision Oncology in Hepatopancreatobiliary Cancer Surgery

Advances in technology have allowed for the characterization of tumors at the genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic levels. There are well-established targets for biliary tract cancers, with exciting new targets emerging in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and potential targets in hepatocellular carcinoma. Taken together, these data suggest an important role for molecular profiling for personalizing cancer therapy in advanced disease and need for design of novel neoadjuvant studies to leverage these novel therapeutics perioperatively in the surgical patient.

Management of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Narrative Review

The management of resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma remains a challenge due to the high risk of recurrence. Numerous clinical trials have identified effective systemic therapies for advanced biliary tract cancer; however, fewer trials have evaluated systemic therapies in the perioperative period. The objective of this review is to summarize the current recommendations regarding the diagnosis, surgical resection, and systemic therapy for anatomically resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Our review demonstrates that surgical resection with microscopic negative margins and lymphadenectomy remains the cornerstone of treatment. High-level evidence regarding specific systemic therapies for use in resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma remains sparse, as most of the evidence is extrapolated from trials involving heterogeneous tumor populations. Targeted therapies are an evolving practice for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with most evidence coming from phase II trials. Future research is required to evaluate the use of neoadjuvant therapy for patients with resectable and borderline resectable disease.

Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for biliary tract cancer: Advances and limitations

Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are a rare and aggressive consortium of malignancies, consisting of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and gallbladder carcinoma. While most patients present with metastatic disease, a minority of patients with BTC are eligible for curative surgical resection at the time of presentation. However, these patients have poor 5-year overall survival rates and high rates of recurrence, necessitating the improvement of the neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment of BTC. In this review, we assess the neoadjuvant and adjuvant clinical trials for the treatment of BTC and discuss the challenges and limitations of clinical trials, as well as future directions for the treatment of BTC.

Perioperative outcome and long-term survival for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after portal vein embolization and subsequent resection: A propensity-matched study

INTRODUCTION

In view of the high therapeutic value of surgical resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (ICC), our study addresses the question of clinical management and outcome in case of borderline resectability requiring hypertrophy induction of the future liver remnant prior to resection.

METHODS

Clinical data was collected of all primary ICC cases receiving major liver resection with or without prior portal vein embolization (PVE) from a single high-volume center. PVE was performed via a percutaneous transhepatic access. Propensity score matching was performed. Perioperative morbidity was assessed as well as long-term survival with a minimum follow-up of 36 months.

RESULTS

No significant difference in perioperative morbidity was seen between the PVE and the control group. For the PVE group, median OS was 28 months vs. 37 months for the control group (p = 0.418), median DFS 18 and 14 months (p = 0.703). Disease progression during hypertrophy was observed in 38% of cases. Here, OS and DFS was reduced to 18 months (p = 0.479) and 6 months (p = 0.013), respectively. In case of positive N-status or multifocal tumor (MF+) OS was also reduced (18 vs. 26 months, p = 0.033; MF+: 9 vs. 36months p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the surgical therapy in case of borderline resectability offers acceptable results with non-inferior OS rates compared to cases without preoperative hypertrophy induction and comparable oncological features. In the presence of additional risk factors (multifocal tumor, lymph node metastasis, PD during hypertrophy) the OS is notably reduced.

Annals of Surgical Oncology Practice Guidelines Series: Management of Primary Liver and Biliary Tract Cancers

Primary cancers of the liver and biliary tract are rare and aggressive tumors that often present with locally advanced or metastatic disease. For patients with localized disease amenable to resection, surgery typically offers the best chance at curative-intent therapy. Unfortunately, the incidence of recurrence even after curative-intent surgery remains high. In turn, patients with hepatobiliary cancers commonly require multimodality therapy including a combination of resection, systemic therapy (i.e., targeted therapy, cytotoxic chemotherapy, immunotherapy), and/or loco-regional therapies. With advancements in the field, it is crucial for surgical oncologists to remain updated on the latest guidelines and recommendations for surgical management and optimal patient selection. Given the complex and evolving nature of treatment, this report highlights the latest practice guidelines for the surgical management of hepatobiliary cancers.