Accuracy and Survival Outcomes after National Implementation of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Stage Endometrial Cancer

Range of Resection in Endometrial Cancer-Clinical Issues of Made-to-Measure Surgery

Endometrial cancer (EC) poses a significant health issue among women, and its incidence has been rising for a couple of decades. Surgery remains its principal treatment method and may have a curative, staging, or palliative aim. The type and extent of surgery depends on many factors, and the risks and benefits should be carefully weighed. While simple hysterectomy might be sufficient in early stage EC, modified-radical hysterectomy is sometimes indicated. In advanced disease, the evidence suggests that, similarly to ovarian cancer, optimal cytoreduction improves survival rate. The role of lymphadenectomy in EC patients has long been a controversial issue. The rationale for systematic lymphadenectomy and the procedure of the sentinel lymph node biopsy are thoroughly discussed. Finally, the impact of the molecular classification and new International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system on EC treatment is outlined. Due to the increasing knowledge on the pathology and molecular features of EC, as well as the new advances in the adjuvant therapies, the surgical management of EC has become more complex. In the modern approach, it is essential to adjust the extent of the surgery to a specific patient, ensuring an optimal, made-to-measure personalized surgery. This narrative review focuses on the intricacies of surgical management of EC and aims at summarizing the available literature on the subject, providing an up-to-date clinical guide.

Detection of metastatic lymph node and sentinel lymph node mapping ​using mannose receptor targeting in in vivo mouse footpad tumor models and rabbit uterine cancer models

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of neo-mannosyl human serum albumin-indocyanine green (MSA-ICG) for detecting metastatic lymph node (LN) and mapping sentinel lymph node (SLN) using mouse footpad uterine tumor models. Additionally, the authors assessed the feasibility of MSA-ICG in SLN mapping in rabbit uterine cancer models.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors compared the LN targeting ability of MSA-ICG with ICG. Six mouse footpad tumor models and two normal mice were each assigned to MSA-ICG and ICG, respectively. After the assigned tracers were injected, fluorescence images were taken, and the authors compared the signal-to-background ratio (SBR) of the tracers. A SLN biopsy was performed to confirm LN metastasis status and CD206 expression level. Finally, an intraoperative SLN biopsy was performed in rabbit uterine cancer models using MSA-ICG.

RESULTS

The authors detected 14 groin LNs out of 16 in the MSA-ICG and ICG groups. The SBR of the MSA-ICG group was significantly higher than that of the ICG group. The metastatic LN subgroup of MSA-ICG showed a significantly higher SBR than that of ICG. CD206 was expressed at a high level in metastatic LN, and the signal intensity difference increased as the CD206 expression level increased. SLN mapping was successfully performed in two of the three rabbit uterine cancer models.

CONCLUSIONS

MSA-ICG was able to distinguish metastatic LN for an extended period due to its specific tumor-associated macrophage-targeting property. Therefore, it may be a more distinguishable tracer for identifying metastatic LNs and SLNs during uterine cancer surgery. Further research is needed to confirm these results.

Oncologic Outcome of Robotic-Assisted and Laparoscopic Sentinel Node Biopsy in Endometrial Cancer

BACKGROUND

Recently, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been introduced in the surgical staging of endometrial cancer as an alternative to systematic lymph node dissection (LND). However, the survival impact of SLNB is not yet well characterised.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of 419 patients with endometrial cancer treated with SLNB alone or with pelvic and para-aortic LND. For SLNB mapping, indocyanine green was used.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 66 months. After exclusions, 337 patients were eligible for analysis. Of them, 150 underwent SLNB and 187 LND. During the follow-up time, 27 (24.7%) of the 150 who underwent SLNB and 54 (28.9%) of the 187 who underwent LND were diagnosed with recurrent disease (p = 0.459). The estimated 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 76.7% and 72.2% for patients in the SLNB and LND group, respectively (p = 0.419). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 80.7% and 77.0% in the SLNB and LND group, respectively (p = 0.895). Survival rates were similar in both groups independent of lymph node status. Multivariable analysis confirmed that the staging approach was not associated with oncological outcome. For patients without lymph node metastases, patient outcome was worsened by advanced tumour stage and non-endometrioid tumour histology. In the group of patients with confirmed lymph node metastases, advanced tumour stage and inadequate adjuvant treatment significantly reduced DFS and OS.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggested that SLNB did not compromise the oncological outcome of patients with endometrial cancer compared to LND.