Reversal of vinblastine resistance in human leukemic cells by haloperidol and dihydrohaloperidol

Drug Repurposing: The Mechanisms and Signaling Pathways of Anti-Cancer Effects of Anesthetics

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. There are only limited treatment strategies that can be applied to treat cancer, including surgical resection, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, but these have only limited effectiveness. Developing a new drug for cancer therapy is protracted, costly, and inefficient. Recently, drug repurposing has become a rising research field to provide new meaning for an old drug. By searching a drug repurposing database ReDO_DB, a brief list of anesthetic/sedative drugs, such as haloperidol, ketamine, lidocaine, midazolam, propofol, and valproic acid, are shown to possess anti-cancer properties. Therefore, in the current review, we will provide a general overview of the anti-cancer mechanisms of these anesthetic/sedative drugs and explore the potential underlying signaling pathways and clinical application of these drugs applied individually or in combination with other anti-cancer agents.

Drug rechanneling: A novel paradigm for cancer treatment

Cancer continues to be one of the leading contributors towards global disease burden. According to NIH, cancer incidence rate per year will increase to 23.6 million by 2030. Even though cancer continues to be a major proportion of the disease burden worldwide, it has the lowest clinical trial success rate amongst other diseases. Hence, there is an unmet need for novel, affordable and effective anti-neoplastic medications. As a result, a growing interest has sparkled amongst researchers towards drug repurposing. Drug repurposing follows the principle of polypharmacology, which states, "any drug with multiple targets or off targets can present several modes of action". Drug repurposing also known as drug rechanneling, or drug repositioning is an economic and reliable approach that identifies new disease treatment of already approved drugs. Repurposing guarantees expedited access of drugs to the patients as these drugs are already FDA approved and their safety and toxicity profile is completely established. Epidemiological studies have identified the decreased occurrence of oncological or non-oncological conditions in patients undergoing treatment with FDA approved drugs. Data from multiple experimental studies and clinical observations have depicted that several non-neoplastic drugs have potential anticancer activity. In this review, we have summarized the potential anti-cancer effects of anti-psychotic, anti-malarial, anti-viral and anti-emetic drugs with a brief overview on their mechanism and pathways in different cancer types. This review highlights promising evidences for the repurposing of drugs in oncology.

Antipsychotic dopamine receptor antagonists, cancer, and cancer stem cells

Cancer is one of the deadliest diseases in the world. Despite extensive studies, treating metastatic cancers remains challenging. Years of research have linked a rare set of cells known as cancer stem cells (CSCs) to drug resistance, leading to the suggestion that eradication of CSCs might be an effective therapeutic strategy. However, few drug candidates are active against CSCs. New drug discovery is often a lengthy process. Drug screening has been advantageous in identifying drug candidates. Current understanding of cancer biology has revealed various clues to target cancer from different points of view. Many studies have found dopamine receptors (DRs) in various cancers. Therefore, DR antagonists have attracted a lot of attention in cancer research. Recently, a group of antipsychotic DR antagonists has been demonstrated to possess remarkable abilities to restrain and sensitize CSCs to existing chemotherapeutics by a process called differentiation approach. In this review, we will describe current aspects of CSC-targeting therapeutics, antipsychotic DR antagonists, and their extraordinary abilities to fight cancer.

Repurposing antipsychotics as glioblastoma therapeutics: Potentials and challenges

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and most lethal primary brain tumor, with tragically little therapeutic progress over the last 30 years. Surgery provides a modest benefit, and GBM cells are resistant to radiation and chemotherapy. Despite significant development of the molecularly targeting strategies, the clinical outcome of GBM patients remains dismal. The challenges inherent in developing effective GBM treatments have become increasingly clear, and include resistance to standard treatments, the blood-brain barrier, resistance of GBM stem-like cells, and the genetic complexity and molecular adaptability of GBM. Recent studies have collectively suggested that certain antipsychotics harbor antitumor effects and have potential utilities as anti-GBM therapeutics. In the present review, the anti-tumorigenic effects and putative mechanisms of antipsychotics, and the challenges for the potential use of antipsychotic drugs as anti-GBM therapeutics are reviewed.

Antipsychotic drugs: pro-cancer or anti-cancer? A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Important data was recently published on the potential genotoxic or carcinogenic effects of antipsychotics, as well as on their cytotoxic properties on cancer cells, that must be considered by psychiatrists in the benefit/risk ratio of their prescriptions.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To answer whether or not antipsychotics, as a class or only some specific molecules, may influence cancer risk among treated patients. METHODS ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: All studies (in vitro, animal studies and human studies) concerning effects of antipsychotic drugs on cancer development were included. The search paradigm [neoplasms AND (antipsychotic agents OR neuroleptic OR phenothiazine)] was applied to Medline (1966-present) and Web of Science (1975-present).

RESULTS

Ninety-three studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Results can be summarized as follows: (1) patients with schizophrenia may be less likely to develop cancer than the general population, (2) antipsychotics as a class cannot be considered at the moment as at risk for cancer, even if some antipsychotics have shown carcinogenic properties among rodents, (3) phenothiazines seem to have antiproliferative properties that may be useful in multidrug augmentation strategies in various cancer treatments, but their bad tolerance may decrease usage amongst non-psychotic patients, and (4) clozapine appears to have a separate status given that this molecule shows antiproliferative effects implied in agranulocytosis as well as a potential increased risk for leukemia.

CONCLUSION

Benefit/risk ratio regarding cancer risk is in favor of treating patients with schizophrenia with antipsychotic drugs. The practicing clinician should be reassuring on the subject of cancer risk due to antipsychotic drugs.

Griseofulvin stabilizes microtubule dynamics, activates p53 and inhibits the proliferation of MCF-7 cells synergistically with vinblastine

Background

Griseofulvin, an antifungal drug, has recently been shown to inhibit proliferation of various types of cancer cells and to inhibit tumor growth in athymic mice. Due to its low toxicity, griseofulvin has drawn considerable attention for its potential use in cancer chemotherapy. This work aims to understand how griseofulvin suppresses microtubule dynamics in living cells and sought to elucidate the antimitotic and antiproliferative action of the drug.

Methods

The effects of griseofulvin on the dynamics of individual microtubules in live MCF-7 cells were measured by confocal microscopy. Immunofluorescence microscopy, western blotting and flow cytometry were used to analyze the effects of griseofulvin on spindle microtubule organization, cell cycle progression and apoptosis. Further, interactions of purified tubulin with griseofulvin were studied in vitro by spectrophotometry and spectrofluorimetry. Docking analysis was performed using autodock4 and LigandFit module of Discovery Studio 2.1.

Results

Griseofulvin strongly suppressed the dynamic instability of individual microtubules in live MCF-7 cells by reducing the rate and extent of the growing and shortening phases. At or near half-maximal proliferation inhibitory concentration, griseofulvin dampened the dynamicity of microtubules in MCF-7 cells without significantly disrupting the microtubule network. Griseofulvin-induced mitotic arrest was associated with several mitotic abnormalities like misaligned chromosomes, multipolar spindles, misegregated chromosomes resulting in cells containing fragmented nuclei. These fragmented nuclei were found to contain increased concentration of p53. Using both computational and experimental approaches, we provided evidence suggesting that griseofulvin binds to tubulin in two different sites; one site overlaps with the paclitaxel binding site while the second site is located at the αβ intra-dimer interface. In combination studies, griseofulvin and vinblastine were found to exert synergistic effects against MCF-7 cell proliferation.

Conclusions

The study provided evidence suggesting that griseofulvin shares its binding site in tubulin with paclitaxel and kinetically suppresses microtubule dynamics in a similar manner. The results revealed the antimitotic mechanism of action of griseofulvin and provided evidence suggesting that griseofulvin alone and/or in combination with vinblastine may have promising role in breast cancer chemotherapy.

Haloperidol is an inhibitor but not substrate for MDR1/P-glycoprotein

The involvement of the multidrug resistant transporter MDR1/P-glycoprotein in the penetration of haloperidol into the brain and absorption in the intestine was investigated to examine its role in inter/intra-individual variability, using the porcine kidney epithelial cell line LLC-PK1 and its MDR1-overexpressing transfectant, LLC-GA5-COL150. The inhibitory effect of haloperidol on other MDR1 substrates was also investigated in terms of the optimization of haloperidol-based pharmacotherapy. The transepithelial transport of [3H]haloperidol did not differ between the two cell lines, and vinblastine, a typical MDR1 substrate, had no effect on the transport, suggesting that haloperidol is not a substrate for MDR1, and it is unlikely that MDR function affects haloperidol absorption and brain distribution, and thereby the response to haloperidol. However, haloperidol was found to have an inhibitory effect on the MDR1-mediated transport of [3H]digoxin and [3H]vinblastine with an IC50 value of 7.84 ± 0.76 and 3.60 ± 0.64 μM, respectively, suggesting that the intestinal absorption, not distribution into the brain, of MDR1 substrate drugs could be altered by the co-administration of haloperidol in the clinical setting, although further clinical studies are needed.

Cytotoxic effects of antipsychotic drugs implicate cholesterol homeostasis as a novel chemotherapeutic target

The reported reduction in cancer risk in those suffering from schizophrenia may be because antipsychotic medications have antineoplastic effects. In this study, 6 antipsychotic agents with a range of structural and pharmacological properties (reserpine, chlorpromazine, haloperidol, pimozide, risperidone and olanzapine), were screened for their effect on the viability of cell lines derived from lymphoblastoma, neuroblastoma, non-small cell lung cancer and breast adenocarcinoma. We aimed to determine if antipsychotic drugs in general possess cancer-specific cytotoxic potential, and whether it can be attributed to a common mode of action. With the exception of risperidone, all drugs tested displayed selective inhibition of the viability of cancer cell lines compared with normal cells. Using Affymetrix expression microarrays and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, we found that for the antipsychotic drugs, olanzapine and pimozide, cytotoxicity appeared to be mediated via effects on cholesterol homeostasis. The role of cholesterol metabolism in the selective cytotoxicity of these drugs was supported by demonstration of their increased lethality when coadministered with a cholesterol synthesis inhibitor, mevastatin. Also, pimozide and olanzapine showed accelerating cytotoxic effects from 12 to 48 hr in time course studies, mirroring the time-dependent onset of cytotoxicity induced by the amphiphile, U18666A. On the basis of these results, we concluded that the Class II cationic amphiphilic properties of antipsychotic drugs contribute to their cytotoxic effects by acting on cholesterol homeostasis and altering the biophysical properties of cellular membranes, and that drugs affecting membrane-related cholesterol pathways warrant further investigation as potential augmentors of standard cancer chemotherapy.

Antipsychotic drugs influence transport of the β-adrenergic antagonist [3H]-dihydroalprenolol into neuronal and blood cells

The amine hypothesis suggests that the cause of schizophrenic or depressive psychosis is dysfunction of noradrenergic or serotonergic neurotransmission. We investigated pharmacological properties of [3H]-dihydroalprenolol (DHA) transport into C6, IMR32, native lymphocytes, B-lymphoblastoids and MOLT-3 cells. DHA transport was inhibited by a heterogeneous group of structurally related compounds exhibiting an amine group and various aromatic ring structures. It was verified on cells of neuronal/glial and blood cell origin but in detail on B-lymphoblastoids. The latter once showed strongest inhibition of DHA transport using tricyclic antidepressants (amitriptyline: IC50 = 2.86 microM, imipramine: IC50 = 3.33 microM) and haloperidol (IC50 = 3.98 microM) as a neuroleptic. Antipsychotics like clozapine (IC50 = 11 microM), olanzapine (IC50 = 15 microM), spiperone (IC50 = 66 microM) and EMD 49980 (ICso >> 100 microM) were less effective. In contrast to cells of blood origin, a stimulation of DHA transport by antipsychotics was not detectable using neuronal cells. As antipsychotics showed a distinct inhibition and, concerning cells of blood origin, a stimulation of transport after pre-incubation, further investigations seem to be of interest in respect to its involvement in the cellular uptake of drugs and therefore its impact on the quality of therapy of psychiatric patients.

An overview of psychotropic drug-drug interactions

The psychotropic drug-drug interactions most likely to be relevant to psychiatrists' practices are examined. The metabolism and the enzymatic and P-glycoprotein inhibition/induction profiles of all antidepressants, antipsychotics, and mood stabilizers are described; all clinically meaningful drug-drug interactions between agents in these psychotropic classes, as well as with frequently encountered nonpsychotropic agents, are detailed; and information on the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic results, mechanisms, and clinical consequences of these interactions is presented. Although the range of drug-drug interactions involving psychotropic agents is large, it is a finite and manageable subset of the much larger domain of all possible drug-drug interactions. Sophisticated computer programs will ultimately provide the best means of avoiding drug-drug interactions. Until these programs are developed, the best defense against drug-drug interactions is awareness and focused attention to this issue.

ABC transporters as multidrug resistance mechanisms and the development of chemosensitizers for their reversal

One of the major problems related with anticancer chemotherapy is resistance against anticancer drugs. The ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters are a family of transporter proteins that are responsible for drug resistance and a low bioavailability of drugs by pumping a variety of drugs out cells at the expense of ATP hydrolysis. One strategy for reversal of the resistance of tumor cells expressing ABC transporters is combined use of anticancer drugs with chemosensitizers. In this review, the physiological functions and structures of ABC transporters, and the development of chemosensitizers are described focusing on well-known proteins including P-glycoprotein, multidrug resistance associated protein, and breast cancer resistance protein.

Drug resistance in brain diseases and the role of drug efflux transporters

Resistance to drug treatment is an important hurdle in the therapy of many brain disorders, including brain cancer, epilepsy, schizophrenia, depression and infection of the brain with HIV. Consequently, there is a pressing need to develop new and more effective treatment strategies. Mechanisms of resistance that operate in cancer and infectious diseases might also be relevant in drug-resistant brain disorders. In particular, drug efflux transporters that are expressed at the blood-brain barrier limit the ability of many drugs to access the brain. There is increasing evidence that drug efflux transporters have an important role in drug-resistant brain disorders, and this information should allow more efficacious treatment strategies to be developed.

Identification of P-glycoprotein substrates and inhibitors among psychoactive compounds--implications for pharmacokinetics of selected substrates

The pharmacokinetics of antipsychotic drugs has become an integral part in understanding their pharmacodynamic activity and clinical effects. In addition to metabolism aspects, carrier-mediated transport, particularly secretion by ABC transporters, has been discussed as potentially relevant for this group of therapeutics. In this study, the psychoactive compounds perphenazine, flupentixol, domperidone, desmethyl clozapine, haloperidol, fluphenazine, fluvoxamine, olanzapine, levomepromazine, perazine, desmethyl perazine, clozapine, quetiapine and amisulpride were characterized in terms of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) affinity and transport. Experimental methods involved a radioligand displacement assay with [3H]talinolol as radioligand and transport--as well as transport inhibition--studies of the P-gp substrate [3H]talinolol across Caco-2 cell monolayers. In addition, the physicochemical descriptors log P and deltalog P were determined to test potential correlations between transporter affinity and lipophilicity parameters. All of the tested antipsychotics showed affinity to P-gp albeit their IC50 values (concentration of competitor that displaced 50% of the bound radioligand) differed by a factor exceeding 1000, when compared using the transport inhibition assay. From the group of P-gp substrates, amisulpride and fluphenazine were selected for in-vivo drug-drug interaction studies in rats to demonstrate the in-vivo relevance of the in-vitro findings. Compounds were administered by intraperitoneal injection either alone or in combination with 50 mg kg(-1) ciclosporin. The concentration versus time profiles for both drugs were followed in serum as well as in brain tissues. Significant differences between the treatments with the antipsychotic alone versus the combination of antipsychotic with ciclosporin were found for amisulpride. The distribution of amisulpride to the brain was increased and systemic serum levels were likewise increased indicating decreased systemic clearance for the combination regimen. For fluphenazine, systemic levels with and without co-administration of ciclosporin were comparable while higher brain-to-serum concentration ratios were found after co-administration of ciclosporin. The findings are explained on the basis of the limited contribution of P-gp-mediated transport to the elimination of fluphenazine and to a direct effect with respect to its distribution into the brain.

The medicinal chemistry of multidrug resistance (MDR) reversing drugs

Multidrug resistance (MDR) is a kind of resistance of cancer cells to multiple classes of chemotherapic drugs that can be structurally and mechanistically unrelated. Classical MDR regards altered membrane transport that results in lower cell concentrations of cytotoxic drug and is related to the over expression of a variety of proteins that act as ATP-dependent extrusion pumps. P-glycoprotein (Pgp) and multidrug resistance protein (MRP1) are the most important and widely studied members of the family that belongs to the ABC superfamily of transporters. It is apparent that, besides their role in cancer cell resistance, these proteins have multiple physiological functions as well, since they are expressed also in many important non-tumoural tissues and are largely present in prokaryotic organisms. A number of drugs have been identified which are able to reverse the effects of Pgp, MRPI and sister proteins, on multidrug resistance. The first MDR modulators discovered and studied in clinical trials were endowed with definite pharmacological actions so that the doses required to overcome MDR were associated with unacceptably high side effects. As a consequence, much attention has been focused on developing more potent and selective modulators with proper potency, selectivity and pharmacokinetics that can be used at lower doses. Several novel MDR reversing agents (also known as chemosensitisers) are currently undergoing clinical evaluation for the treatment of resistant tumours. This review is concerned with the medicinal chemistry of MDR reversers, with particular attention to the drugs that are presently in development.