Involvement of P-glycoprotein in blood-brain barrier transport of pentazocine in rats using brain uptake index method

The Impact of P-Glycoprotein on Opioid Analgesics: What's the Real Meaning in Pain Management and Palliative Care?

Opioids are widely used in cancer and non-cancer pain management. However, many transporters at the blood-brain barrier (BBB), such as P-glycoprotein (P-gp, ABCB1/MDR1), may impair their delivery to the brain, thus leading to opioid tolerance. Nonetheless, opioids may regulate P-gp expression, thus altering the transport of other compounds, namely chemotherapeutic agents, resulting in pharmacoresistance. Other kinds of painkillers (e.g., acetaminophen, dexamethasone) and adjuvant drugs used for neuropathic pain may act as P-gp substrates and modulate its expression, thus making pain management challenging. Inflammatory conditions are also believed to upregulate P-gp. The role of P-gp in drug-drug interactions is currently under investigation, since many P-gp substrates may also act as substrates for the cytochrome P450 enzymes, which metabolize a wide range of xenobiotics and endobiotics. Genetic variability of the ABCB1/MDR1 gene may be accountable for inter-individual variation in opioid-induced analgesia. P-gp also plays a role in the management of opioid-induced adverse effects, such as constipation. Peripherally acting mu-opioid receptors antagonists (PAMORAs), such as naloxegol and naldemedine, are substrates of P-gp, which prevent their penetration in the central nervous system. In our review, we explore the interactions between P-gp and opioidergic drugs, with their implications in clinical practice.

Opioids and the Blood-Brain Barrier: A Dynamic Interaction with Consequences on Drug Disposition in Brain

Background:

Opioids are widely used in pain management, acting via opioid receptors and/or Toll-like receptors (TLR) present at the central nervous system (CNS). At the blood-brain barrier (BBB), several influx and efflux transporters, such as the ATP-binding cassette (ABC)

P-glycoprotein (P-gp, ABCB1), Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP, ABCG2) and multidrug resistance-associated proteins (MRP, ABCC) transporters, and solute carrier transporters (SLC), are responsible for the transport of xenobiotics from the brain into the bloodstream or vice versa.

Objective:

ABC transporters export several clinically employed opioids, altering their neuro-

pharmacokinetics and CNS effects. In this review, we explore the interactions between opioids

and ABC transporters, and decipher the molecular mechanisms by which opioids can modify their expression at the BBB.

Results:

P-gp is largely implicated in the brain-to-blood efflux of opioids, namely morphine and oxycodone. Long-term ex-posure to morphine and oxycodone has proven to up-regulate the expression of ABC transporters, such as P-gp, BCRP and MRPs, at the BBB, which may lead to increased tolerance to the antinociceptive effects of such drugs. Recent studies uncov-er two mechanisms by which morphine may up-regulate P-gp and BCRP at the BBB: 1) via a glutamate, NMDA-receptor and COX-2 signaling cascade, and 2) via TLR4 activation, subsequent development of neuro-

inflammation, and activation of NF-κB, presumably via glial cells.

Conclusion:

The BBB-opioid interaction can culminate in bilateral consequences, since ABC transporters condition the brain disposition of opioids, while opioids also affect the expression of ABC transporters at the BBB, which may result in increased CNS drug pharmacoresistance.

Quantitative and Mechanistic Understanding of AZD1775 Penetration across Human Blood-Brain Barrier in Glioblastoma Patients Using an IVIVE-PBPK Modeling Approach

Purpose: AZD1775, a first-in-class, small-molecule inhibitor of the Wee1 tyrosine kinase, is under evaluation as a potential chemo- and radiosensitizer for treating glioblastoma. This study was to prospectively, quantitatively, and mechanistically investigate the penetration of AZD1775 across the human blood-brain barrier (BBB).Experimental Design: AZD1775 plasma and tumor pharmacokinetics were evaluated in 20 patients with glioblastoma. The drug metabolism, transcellular passive permeability, and interactions with efflux and uptake transporters were determined using human derived in vitro systems. A whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model integrated with a four-compartment permeability-limited brain model was developed for predicting the kinetics of AZD1775 BBB penetration and assessing the factors modulating this process.Results: AZD1775 exhibited good tumor penetration in patients with glioblastoma, with the unbound tumor-to-plasma concentration ratio ranging from 1.3 to 24.4 (median, 3.2). It was a substrate for ABCB1, ABCG2, and OATP1A2, but not for OATP2B1 or OAT3. AZD1775 transcellular passive permeability and active efflux clearance across MDCKII-ABCB1 or MDCKII-ABCG2 cell monolayers were dependent on the basolateral pH. The PBPK model well predicted observed drug plasma and tumor concentrations in patients. The extent and rate of drug BBB penetration were influenced by BBB integrity, efflux and uptake active transporter activity, and drug binding to brain tissue.Conclusions: In the relatively acidic tumor microenvironment where ABCB1/ABCG2 transporter-mediated efflux clearance is reduced, OATP1A2-mediated active uptake becomes dominant, driving AZD1775 penetration into brain tumor. Variations in the brain tumor regional pH, transporter expression/activity, and BBB integrity collectively contribute to the heterogeneity of AZD1775 penetration into brain tumors. Clin Cancer Res; 23(24); 7454-66. ©2017 AACRSee related commentary by Peer et al., p. 7437.

Blood-brain barrier models: in vitro to in vivo translation in preclinical development of CNS-targeting biotherapeutics

INTRODUCTION

The majority of therapeutics, small molecule or biologics, developed for the CNS do not penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB) sufficiently to induce pharmacologically meaningful effects on CNS targets. To improve the efficiency of CNS drug discovery, several in vitro models of the BBB have been used to aid early selection of molecules with CNS exposure potential. However, correlative studies suggest relatively poor predictability of in vitro BBB models underscoring the need to combine in vitro and in vivo BBB penetration assessment into an integrated preclinical workflow.

AREAS COVERED

This review gives a brief general overview of in vitro and in vivo BBB models used in the pre-clinical evaluation of CNS-targeting drugs, with particular focus on the recent progress in developing humanized models. The authors discuss the advantages, limitations, in vitro-in vivo correlation, and integration of these models into CNS drug discovery and development with the aim of improving translation.

EXPERT OPINION

Often, a simplistic rationalization of the CNS drug discovery and development process overlooks or even ignores the need for an early and predictive assessment of the BBB permeability. Indeed, past failures of CNS candidates in clinical trials argue strongly that the early deployment of in vitro and in vivo models for assessing BBB permeability, mechanisms of transport and brain exposure of leads, and the co-development of BBB delivery strategies will improve translation and increase the clinical success of CNS pipelines.

Opioids and efflux transporters. Part 4: influence of N-substitution on P-glycoprotein substrate activity of noroxymorphone analogues

The efflux transporter protein P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is capable of affecting the central distribution of diverse neurotherapeutics, including opioid analgesics, through their active removal from the brain. P-gp located at the blood brain barrier has been implicated in the development of tolerance to opioids and demonstrated to be up-regulated in rats tolerant to morphine and oxycodone. We have previously examined the influence of hydrogen-bonding oxo-substitutents on the P-gp-mediated efflux of 4,5-epoxymorphinan analgesics, as well as that of N-substituted analogues of meperidine. Structure-activity relationships (SAR) governing N-substituent effects on opioid efficacy is well-established, however the influence of such structural modifications on P-gp-mediated efflux is unknown. Here, we present SAR describing P-gp recognition of a short series of N-modified 4,5-epoxymorphinans. Oxymorphone, naloxone, naltrexone, and nalmexone all failed to demonstrate P-gp substrate activity, indicating these opioid scaffolds contain structural features that preclude recognition by the transporter. These results are examined using mathematical molecular modeling and discussed in comparison to other opioid scaffolds bearing similar N-substituents.

New therapeutic strategy for amino acid medicine: glycine improves the quality of sleep

Glycine is a non-essential amino acid that has indispensable roles in both excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission via N-methyl-D-aspartate type glutamate receptors and glycine receptors, respectively. We recently reported that glycine ingestion before bedtime significantly ameliorated subjective sleep quality in individuals with insomniac tendencies. Oral administration of glycine to rats was found to induce a significant increase in the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid glycine concentrations and a significant decrease in the core body temperature associated with an increase in cutaneous blood flow. The decline in the core body temperature might be a mechanism underlying glycine's effect on sleep, as the onset of sleep is known to involve a decrease in the core body temperature. Moreover, a low core body temperature is maintained during sleep in humans. Pharmacological studies investigating the mechanisms of glycine on sleep were also performed. In this review, we will describe both our recent findings regarding how and where orally administered glycine acts and findings from our rat study and human trials.

Pharmacokinetics and cerebral distribution of glycine administered to rats

High doses of glycine have been reported to improve negative schizophrenic symptoms, suggesting that ingested glycine activates glutamatergic transmission via N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors. However, the pharmacokinetics of administered glycine in the brain has not been evaluated. In the present study, the time- and dose-dependent distributions of administered glycine were investigated from a pharmacokinetic viewpoint. Whole-body autoradiography of radiolabeled glycine was performed, and time-concentration curves for glycine and serine in plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and brain tissues were obtained. Furthermore, pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. For a more detailed analysis, the amount of glycine uptake in the brain was evaluated using the brain uptake index method. Radiolabeled glycine was distributed among periventricular organs in the brain. Oral administration of 2 g/kg of glycine significantly elevated the CSF glycine concentration above the ED50 value for NMDA receptors. The glycine levels in CSF were 100 times lower than those in plasma. Glycine levels were elevated in brain tissue, but with a slower time-course than in CSF. Serine, a major metabolite of glycine, was elevated in plasma, CSF, and brain tissue. Glycine uptake in brain tissue increased in a dose-dependent manner. Time-concentration curves revealed that glycine was most likely transported via the blood-CSF barrier and activated NMDA receptors adjacent to the ventricles. The pharmacokinetic analysis and the brain uptake index for glycine suggested that glycine was transported into brain tissue by passive diffusion. These results provide further insight into the potential therapeutic applications of glycine.

Blood-brain barrier transport of naloxone does not involve P-glycoprotein-mediated efflux

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) transport of naloxone, a potent and specific opioid antagonist, was investigated in rats using the brain uptake index method and the brain efflux index method. The apparent influx clearance of [(3)H]naloxone across the BBB was 0.305 mL/min/g brain. [(3)H]naloxone was eliminated from the brain with an apparent elimination half-life of 15.1 min after microinjection into the parietal cortex area 2 regions of the rat brain. The apparent efflux clearance of [(3)H]naloxone across the BBB was 0.152 mL/min/g brain, which was calculated from the elimination rate constant (4.79 x 10(-2) min(-1)) and the distribution volume in the brain (3.18 mL/g brain). The influx clearance across the BBB was two times greater than the efflux clearance. The elimination of [(3)H]naloxone from the brain was not inhibited in the presence of the typical P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitors such as quinidine, verapamil, vinblastine, and vincristine, indicating that naloxone is not a P-gp substrate in the rat. In vitro experiments by using human multidrug resistance 1 (MDR1)/P-gp overexpressing HeLa cells showed that the uptake of naloxone by the cells did not change in the presence of the P-gp inhibitors. In conclusion, the present results obtained from in vivo and in vitro studies suggest that P-gp is not involved in the BBB transport of naloxone.

P-glycoprotein mediates brain-to-blood efflux transport of buprenorphine across the blood–brain barrier

The involvement of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) in buprenorphine (BNP) transport at the blood-brain barrier (BBB) in rats was investigated in vivo by means of both the brain uptake index technique and the brain efflux index technique. P-gp inhibitors, such as cyclosporin A, quinidine and verapamil, enhanced the apparent brain uptake of [3H]BNP by 1.5-fold. The increment of the BNP uptake by the brain suggests the involvement of a P-gp efflux mechanism of BNP transport at the BBB. [3H]BNP was eliminated with an apparent elimination half-life of 27.5 min after microinjection into the parietal cortex area 2 regions of the rat brain. The apparent efflux clearance of [3H]BNP across the BBB was 0.154 ml/min/g brain, which was calculated from the elimination rate constant (2.52 x 10- 2 min- 1) and the distribution volume in the brain (6.11 ml/g brain). The efflux transport of [3H]BNP was inhibited by range from 32 to 64% in the presence of P-gp inhibitors. The present results suggest that BNP is transported from the brain across the BBB via a P-gp-mediated efflux transport system, at least in part.

In vivoevidence for the efflux transport of pentazocine from the brain across the blood–brain barrier using the brain efflux index method

The efflux transport of pentazocine (PTZ) from the brain across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) was investigated using the Brain Efflux Index method. PTZ was eliminated with the apparent elimination half-life of 13.0 min after microinjection into the parietal cortex area 2 region of the rat brain. The apparent efflux clearance of PTZ across the BBB was 137 microl/min/g brain, which was calculated from the elimination rate constant (5.35 x 10(-2) min(-1) and the distribution volume in the brain (2.56 ml/g brain). The efflux transport of PTZ was decreased in the presence of unlabeled PTZ, suggesting that PTZ is eliminated by a carrier-mediated transport system across the BBB. To characterize the efflux transport of PTZ from the brain in vivo, the effects of several compounds on the efflux transport of PTZ were investigated. P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitors (verapamil and quinidine) reduced the PTZ efflux transport. In addition, the efflux transport of PTZ was inhibited by organic cations such as l-carnitine and tetraethylammonium (TEA), whereas organic anions such as p-aminohippuric acid, probenecid and taurocholate did not affect the PTZ efflux transport. The present results suggest that PTZ is transported from the brain across the BBB via l-carnitine/TEA-sensitive carrier-mediated efflux transport system(s) in addition to P-gp.

Targeting the brain: rationalizing the novel methods of drug delivery to the central nervous system

Drug delivery to the brain has remained one of the most vexing problems in translational neuroscience research. This review rationalizes the strategies to target drugs to the brain. Factors such as the speed of intervention, the scale of intervention, the state of BBB, and the permissible risks, will all be critical in deciding how best to deliver drugs to a target site in the brain for a specific clinical situation.

Nanomedicine in the diagnosis and therapy of neurodegenerative disorders

Neurodegenerative and infectious disorders including Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and stroke are rapidly increasing as population's age. Alzheimer's disease alone currently affects 4.5 million Americans, and more than $100 billion is spent per year on medical and institutional care for affected people. Such numbers will double in the ensuing decades. Currently disease diagnosis for all disorders is made, in large measure, on clinical grounds as laboratory and neuroimaging tests confirm what is seen by more routine examination. Achieving early diagnosis would enable improved disease outcomes. Drugs, vaccines or regenerative proteins present "real" possibilities for positively affecting disease outcomes, but are limited in that their entry into the brain is commonly restricted across the blood-brain barrier. This review highlights how these obstacles can be overcome by polymer science and nanotechnology. Such approaches may improve diagnostic and therapeutic outcomes. New developments in polymer science coupled with cell-based delivery strategies support the notion that diseases that now have limited therapeutic options can show improved outcomes by advances in nanomedicine.

Drug delivery across the blood–brain barrier: why is it difficult? how to measure and improve it?

The development of drugs that act in the CNS has been significantly impeded by the difficulty of delivering them across the blood-brain barrier (BBB). This article aims to provide the reader with a critical overview of important issues in the discovery and development of drugs that need to enter the brain to elicit pharmacological activity, focusing particularly on i) the role of drug transporters in brain permeation and how to manipulate them to enhance drug brain bioavailability; ii) the successful application, limitations and challenges of commonly used in vitro and in vivo methodologies for measuring drug transport across the BBB, and iii) a discussion of recently developed strategies (e.g., modulation of efflux transporters by chemical inhibitors and the employment of delivery vectors taking advantage of native transport systems at the BBB) for facilitating drug penetration into the brain.

Small molecular drug transfer across the blood-brain barrier via carrier-mediated transport systems

Because of the physiological nature of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), transport of chemical compounds between blood and brain has been widely believed to occur by means of passive diffusion, depending upon the lipophilicity of the compounds. However, discrepancies exist between the lipophilicity and apparent BBB permeation properties in many cases, and these discrepancies can be ascribed to the existence of multiple mechanisms of drug transport through the BBB. Molecular identification and functional analysis of influx transport proteins (from blood to brain) and efflux transport proteins (from brain to blood) have progressed rapidly. Therefore, the BBB is now considered to be a dynamic interface that controls the influx and efflux of a wide variety of substances, including endogenous nutrients and exogenous compounds such as drugs, to maintain a favorable environment for the CNS. This review focuses on the role of transport systems in the uptake of xenobiotics, including organic anionic/cationic and neutral drugs, across the BBB into the brain, as well as on strategies to increase drug delivery into the brain by blocking efflux transport protein function, or to reduce CNS side effects by modulating BBB transport processes.