[Studies on the experimental allergic rhinitis induced by Japanese cedar pollen--role of cysteinyl leukotrienes in nasal allergic symptoms]

Effect of the potent and selective DP1 receptor antagonist, asapiprant (S-555739), in animal models of allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma

Prostaglandin (PG) D2 elicits responses through either the DP1 and/or DP2 receptor. Experimental evidence suggests that stimulation of the DP1 receptor contributes to allergic responses, such that antagonists are considered to be directed therapies for allergic diseases. In this study, we demonstrate the activity of a novel synthetic DP1 receptor antagonist termed asapiprant (S-555739) for the DP1 receptor and other receptors in vitro, and assess the efficacy of asapiprant in several animal models of allergic diseases. We determined the affinity and selectivity of asapiprant for the DP1 receptor in binding assays. In the animal models of allergic rhinitis, changes in nasal resistance, nasal secretion, and cell infiltration in nasal mucosa were assessed after antigen challenge with and without asapiprant. Similarly, in the animal models of asthma, the effect of antigen challenge with and without asapiprant on antigen-induced bronchoconstriction, airway hyper-responsiveness, mucin production, and cell infiltration in lung were assessed. In binding studies, asapiprant exhibited high affinity and selectivity for the DP1 receptor. Significant suppression of antigen-induced nasal resistance, nasal secretion, and cell infiltration in nasal mucosa was observed with asapiprant treatment. In addition, treatment with asapiprant suppressed antigen-induced asthmatic responses, airway hyper-responsiveness, and cell infiltration and mucin production in lung. These results show that asapiprant is a potent and selective DP1 receptor antagonist, and exerts suppressive effects in the animal models of allergic diseases. Thus, asapiprant has potential as a novel therapy for allergic airway diseases.

Effect of Oral Immunotherapy on Nasal Blockage in Experimental Allergic Rhinitis

We previously reported that when Japanese cedar pollen was prophylactically p.o. administered before a sensitization stage in a guinea-pig model of allergic rhinitis, pollen-induced nasal blockage was suppressed. In this study, we evaluated whether the oral immunotherapy is also effective when the pollen extract was administered starting from the day when the nasal blockage was clearly induced and whether the effectiveness continued after cessation of the immunotherapy. Sensitized animals were repeatedly challenged by pollen inhalation once every week. After the 7th challenge, the extract was orally administered twice a week until the 30th challenge. At the 11th challenge, the oral immunotherapy showed inhibition of the biphasic nasal blockage. The effectiveness was consistently observed during the immunotherapy until the 30th challenge. Furthermore, the increased nasal responsiveness to intranasal application of leukotriene D4 was markedly suppressed by the immunotherapy. Interestingly, even after cessation of the therapy, inhibition of the nasal blockage was sustained for more than 2 months. Nevertheless, neither sneezing nor antigen-specific IgE antibody production was substantially influenced by the immunotherapy. In conclusion, Oral immunotherapy may be clinically useful for allergic nasal blockage. Mechanisms underlying the effectiveness may be associated with the hyporesponsiveness of the nasal mucosa to released mediators.

Kinins are involved in the development of allergic nasal hyperresponsiveness in guinea pigs

We evaluated roles of kinins in allergen-induced nasal blockage and sneezing, and development of nasal hyperresponsiveness to leukotriene D4 in a Japanese cedar pollen-induced allergic rhinitis model of guinea pigs. Sensitised guinea pigs were repeatedly challenged by pollen inhalation once every week. Neither a bradykinin B1 receptor antagonist, des-Arg9-[Leu8]bradykinin nor a bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist, icatibant suppressed allergen-induced sneezing and nasal blockage. However, development of nasal hyperresponsiveness to leukotriene D4 was significantly suppressed by them. The amount of bradykinin in nasal cavity lavage fluid was immediately increased after the challenge. In non-sensitised animals, hyperresponsiveness to leukotriene D4 was developed by a bradykinin B2 receptor agonist, bradykinin, but not by a bradykinin B1 receptor agonist, des-Arg10-kallidin, while in the sensitised-challenged animal, both agonists developed hyperresponsiveness. In conclusion, the nasal hyperresponsiveness appeared to be induced by kinins produced in response to the antigen challenge through activation of not only bradykinin B2 but also B1 receptors.