Sideline coverage of youth football

Neuropsychological Profiles of Athletes and Views of Parents Choosing Flag Versus Tackle Football Participation

Background:

Previous studies have found that injury rates are slightly higher in children who play flag football versus tackle football. It is unclear if this difference is due to the way each type is played or taught or whether there are intrinsic differences in attitudes or neuropsychological characteristics in children and their parents.

Purpose:

To determine whether children who play flag football score differently from those who play tackle football on validated neuropsychological tests.

Study Design:

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

Each participating athlete (aged 8-12 years) was recruited in 2018 and 2019 by email through local youth football leagues and the local university. Each athlete was administered a 1-time multidimensional assessment battery. The battery included the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence-2nd Edition, the children’s version of the Trail Making Test, the Integrated Digit Span and Spatial Span subtests of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-4th Edition (WISC-IV), and the Beck Self-Concept Inventory for Youth. The parent/guardian of each athlete completed the Achenbach Child Behavior Checklist-Parent Report Form, the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF)-Parent Form, and a custom survey. These tests were used to determine IQ estimates and standardized scores, measuring verbal comprehension, matrix reasoning, mental set-shifting, attention, cognitive processing speed, working memory, spatial processing, perception of self-concept, behavioral regulation index, metacognition index, and global executive composite. Scores were compared between flag football and tackle football groups by 2-sample t test, with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test used for nonparametric data.

Results:

A total of 64 athletes (41 tackle football, 23 flag football) were enrolled from youth football leagues (grades 4-6). Flag players scored significantly higher on the WISC-IV Spatial Span-Backward subtest (scaled mean, 12.0 vs 10.6; P = .046), while tackle players had significantly higher BRIEF-Inhibit subscores (mean t-score, 45 vs 42; P = .026). There were no significant differences in any of the other tests, including socioeconomic status and perceived concussion risks.

Conclusion:

Concerns that injury epidemiologic studies comparing flag with tackle football could be confounded by intrinsic differences in the children who choose to play each type seem to be unfounded.

Brain trauma exposure for American tackle football players 5 to 9 and 9 to 14 years of age

American football helmets used by youth players are currently designed and tested to the same standards as professionals. The National Operating Committee on Standard and Safety requested research aiming at understanding the differences in brain trauma in youth American football for players aged five to nine and nine to fourteen years old to inform a youth specific American football standard. Video analysis and laboratory reconstructions of head impacts were undertaken to measure differences in head impact frequency, event types, and magnitudes of maximum principal strain (MPS) for the two age groups. Overall frequencies and frequencies for five categories of MPS representing different magnitudes of risk were tabulated. The MPS categories were very low (<0.08), low (0.08-0.169), medium (0.17-0.259), high (0.26-0.349) and very high (>0.35). Both cohorts experienced a majority of head impacts (>56%) at very low magnitude of MPS. Youth American football players aged 9-14 yrs. sustained a greater frequency of head impacts at MPS between 0.08 and 0.169 % associated with changes in brain structure and function. There were no differences in overall frequency, or in frequency of head impacts in other categories of MPS. The proportion of impacts considered injurious (MPS > 0.08) was greater in the 5-9 group (44%), than the 9-14 group (39%), and impacts above 0.35 % were only reported for the younger age group. The larger helmet-to-shoulder ratio in the younger age groups may have contributed to this finding suggesting that youth American football players under the age of nine would benefit from a child-specific football helmet.