Measured versus self-reported physical function in adult survivors of childhood cancer

Associations of Symptom Clusters and Health Outcomes in Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer: A Report From the St Jude Lifetime Cohort Study

PURPOSE

To identify symptom clusters among adult survivors of childhood cancers and test associations with health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and physical and neurocognitive performance.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 3,085 survivors (mean age at evaluation 31.9 ± 8.3 years; mean years from diagnosis 28.1 ± 9.1) participating in the St Jude Lifetime Cohort Study. Survivors self-reported the presence of 37 symptoms capturing 10 domains (cardiac, pulmonary, sensory, motor/movement, nausea, pain, fatigue, memory, anxiety, and depression). The Short Form-36's Physical/Mental Component Summaries assessed HRQOL; the Physical Performance Test evaluated physical performance; and neurocognitive batteries tested attention, processing/psychomotor speed, memory, and executive function. Latent class analysis identified subgroups of survivors experiencing different patterns of symptom burden (ie, symptom clusters). Multivariable regression models identified risk of cluster membership and tested associations with health outcomes.

RESULTS

Four symptom clusters were identified including cluster 1 (prevalence 52.4%; low physical, somatization, and psychologic domains), cluster 2 (16.1%; low physical, moderate somatic, and high psychologic domains), cluster 3 (17.6%; high physical, moderate somatic, and low psychologic domains), and cluster 4 (13.9%; high in all three domains). Compared with cluster 1, survivors in cluster 4 were more likely to have less than high school education (odds ratio [OR], 7.71; 95% CI, 4.46 to 13.31), no insurance (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.13), and exposure to corticosteroids (OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.02 to 3.03); survivors in cluster 3 were more likely to have received platinum agents (OR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.34 to 3.68) and brain radiation ≥ 30 Gy (OR, 3.99; 95% CI, 2.33 to 6.86). Survivors in cluster 4 reported the poorest Physical Component Summary/Mental Component Summary scores (31.0/26.7) and physical and neurocognitive performance versus survivors in the other clusters (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Nearly 50% of survivors had moderate to high multisymptom burden, which was associated with sociodemographic, treatment factors, HRQOL, and functional outcomes.

The Impact of Abdominal Body Contouring Surgery on Physical Function After Massive Weight Loss: A Pilot Prospective Matched Comparison

BACKGROUND

Many individuals develop excess skin (ES) following massive weight loss (MWL). Patient-reported outcomes demonstrate that abdominal ES negatively impacts perceived physical function which is improved by abdominal body contouring surgery (ABCS). However, the effect of ABCS on objective measures of physical function is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to examine the impact of ABCS on objective measures of physical function in individuals who have undergone MWL.

METHODS

Patients who have undergone MWL with abdominal ES (grade, ≥2) underwent the following physical function assessments: 9-item modified physical performance test (mPPT), chair stand, star excursion balance test (SEBT), timed up and go (TUG), modified agility T test, and 6-minute walk test (6-MWT). Perception of physical exertion and BODY-Q questionnaire scales were also collected. Nonsurgical controls (n = 21) and those who had undergone ABCS (n = 6) after the first visit performed a second physical function assessment 8 to 12 weeks later to allow for postoperative healing.

RESULTS

No ceiling or floor effect was detected for any physical function measure. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.44, 0.91) for the mPPT and >0.80 for all other measures. The effect sizes were 0.74 (75% CI, 0.19, 1.28) for the mPPT, 0.54 (75% CI, 0.00, 1.08) for the SEBT, -0.63 (75% CI, -1.17, -0.09) for the modified agility T test, and 0.79 (75% CI, 0.24, 0.13) for the 6-MWT.

CONCLUSIONS

The mPPT and tests involving dynamic balance, agility, and walking were reliable and showed medium to large effect sizes, suggesting that these tests may be sensitive to change following ABCS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2

Physical and functional performance assessment in pediatric oncology: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Research indicates reduced physical performance from diagnosis into survivorship of pediatric cancer patients. However, there is no systematic information or guideline available on the methods to assess physical performance and function in this population. The purpose was to systematically compile and describe assessments of physical performance and function in patients and survivors of pediatric cancer, including cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength, speed, balance, flexibility, functional mobility, gait and motor performance test batteries.

METHODS

We searched the databases PubMed, SPORTDiscus, and Cochrane Database and performed abstract and full-text selection of 2619 articles according to the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews. Information on patients characteristics, assessments, information on validity and reliability, and relevant references was extracted.

RESULTS

In summary, 63 different assessments were found in 149 studies including 11639 participants. Most studies evaluated cardiorespiratory fitness and muscle strength with the majority conducted off treatment. Some outcomes (e.g. speed) and diagnoses (e.g. neuroblastoma) were severely underrepresented. With the exception of gait, leukemia patients represented the largest group of individuals tested.

CONCLUSIONS

Insufficient data and patient heterogeneity complicate uniform recommendations for assessments. Our results support researchers and practitioners in selecting appropriate assessment to meet their specific research questions or individual daily practice needs.

IMPACT

This systematic review includes 149 studies and provides a comprehensive summary of 63 assessments to evaluate cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength, speed, balance, flexibility, functional mobility, gait or motor performance test batteries in patients and survivors of pediatric cancer. We present the most studied fields within the pediatric cancer population, which are cardiorespiratory fitness and muscle strength, off treatment phase, and leukemia patients. We propose research priorities by identification of subgroups in terms of cancer type, phase of treatment, and outcome of interest that are underrepresented in studies currently available.

Clinical Outcome Assessment in Cancer Rehabilitation and the Central Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes

Simple Summary

After completion of acute cancer treatment, it is important to support patients in recovering physically and psychologically and to help them regain their social life. This is the goal of cancer rehabilitation. If we want to know which rehabilitation interventions are helpful, we must measure their effects. This can be done by asking clinicians, testing patients’ performance, observing their behaviors, or by asking patients directly about their experience. This paper focuses on reports from the patients. We give an overview of available questionnaires and offer advice regarding their use. Furthermore, we discuss how to integrate them into clinical practice and research. The most promising way to collect such data are electronic systems, which offer many advantages. The goal of assessing the patient perspective is to help patients, clinicians, and health insurance providers to decide which rehabilitation interventions suit patients’ needs, and therefore, which ones should be chosen and reimbursed.

Abstract

The aim of cancer rehabilitation is to help patients regain functioning and social participation. In order to evaluate and optimize rehabilitation, it is important to measure its outcomes in a structured way. In this article, we review the different types of clinical outcome assessments (COAs), including Clinician-Reported Outcomes (ClinROs), Observer-Reported Outcomes (ObsROs), Performance Outcomes (PerfOs), and Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs). A special focus is placed on PROs, which are commonly defined as any direct report from the patient about their health condition without any interpretation by a third party. We provide a narrative review of available PRO measures (PROMs) for relevant outcomes, discuss the current state of PRO implementation in cancer rehabilitation, and highlight trends that use PROs to benchmark value-based care. Furthermore, we provide examples of PRO usage, highlight the benefits of electronic PRO (ePRO) collection, and offer advice on how to select, implement, and integrate PROs into the cancer rehabilitation setting to maximize efficiency.

Exploring pulmonary function and physical function in childhood cancer: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Children with cancer experience pulmonary and physical function side effects from the cancer itself and the medical interventions. This systematic review examines the known relationship between pulmonary function and physical function in childhood cancer and identifies gaps in the literature.

METHODS

A search of Ovid Medline, CINAHL (EbscoHost) and Embase to identify literature from 2009 to March 2020.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven studies met inclusion criteria. Thirty-seven studies reported impaired pulmonary function. Incidence of pulmonary dysfunction ranged from 45.5 % to 84.1 %. Eighteen studies reported impaired physical function. Three studies investigated the relationship between pulmonary function and physical function. No studies explored inspiratory muscle strength.

CONCLUSION

Pulmonary function and physical function are related and frequently impaired in children during and after cancer treatment. A literature gap was found in diaphragm function and its relationship with physical function. Future studies should focus on interventions that target the pulmonary mechanisms impacting physical function.

Cumulative Burden of Chronic Health Conditions in Adult Survivors of Osteosarcoma and Ewing Sarcoma: A Report from the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Adult survivors of childhood osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma are at risk of developing therapy-related chronic health conditions. We characterized the cumulative burden of chronic conditions and health status of survivors of childhood bone sarcomas.

METHODS

Survivors (n = 207) treated between 1964 and 2002 underwent comprehensive clinical assessments (history/physical examination, laboratory analysis, and physical and neurocognitive testing) and were compared with community controls (n = 272). Health conditions were defined and graded according to a modified version of the NCI's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and the cumulative burden estimated.

RESULTS

Osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma survivors [median age 13.6 years at diagnosis (range 1.7-24.8); age at evaluation 36.6 years (20.7-66.4)] demonstrated an increased prevalence of cardiomyopathy (14.5%; P < 0.005) compared with controls. Nearly 30% of osteosarcoma survivors had evidence of hypertension. By age 35 years, osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma survivors had, on average, 12.0 (95% confidence interval, 10.2-14.2) and 10.6 (8.9-12.6) grade 1-4 conditions and 4.0 (3.2-5.1) and 3.5 (2.7-4.5) grade 3-4 conditions, respectively, compared with controls [3.3 (2.9-3.7) grade 1-4 and 0.9 (0.7-1.0) grade 3-4]. Both survivor cohorts exhibited impaired 6-minute walk test, walking efficiency, mobility, strength, and endurance (P < 0.0001). Accumulation of ≥4 grade 3-4 chronic conditions was associated with deficits in executive function [RR: osteosarcoma 1.6 (1.0-2.4), P = 0.049; Ewing sarcoma 2.0 (1.2-3.3), P = 0.01] and attention [RR: osteosarcoma 2.3 (1.2-4.2); P = 0.008].

CONCLUSIONS

Survivors of osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma experience a high cumulative burden of chronic health conditions, with impairments of physical function and neurocognition.

IMPACT

Early intervention strategies may ameliorate the risk of comorbidities in bone sarcoma survivors.

An investigation of methods to improve recall for the patient-reported outcome measurement in COPD patients: a pilot randomised control trial and feasibility study protocol

Background

Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) are used to measure the effectiveness of interventions for management of chronic conditions such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Many of these instruments require respondents to describe the change in their health status from baseline to a follow-up assessment and poor recall of previous health status often limits the usefulness and validity of these PRO measures. The use of technology has recently increased in PRO measurement. This study aims to mitigate the problems of poor recall by evaluating different strategies as a way to improve the validity of recall of health status among adults with COPD.

Methods

A pilot randomised controlled trial of three strategies to improve patient recall will be tested in an acute care clinical environment. The first strategy is the use of tablet computer technology’s audio-visual facility, the second strategy is the provision of base line PRO responses prior to patients completing their follow-up questionnaires and third is standard practice of completing a questionnaire independently of previous responses. The feasibility of conducting this study in a busy clinical environment will be ascertained using the NIHR criteria for assessing feasibility.

Discussion

There is variability in a person’s ability to recall past events. With studies utilising patient-reported outcome measurement, it has become critically important to develop strategies and ways of supporting the patient to be more accurate recalling their health status. The adaptation of various technological features within mobile devices may provide an opportunity in clinical research studies to improve patient recall of their health status.

Trial registration

ANZCTR12618001605280.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s40814-019-0475-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.