Clinical significance of the electrophysiologic study (EPS)-guided therapy for the secondary prevention of ventricular tachycardia

Role of electrophysiologic study (EPS)-guided preventive therapy for the management of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with heart failure

BACKGROUND

Ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VT/VF) are 1 of the most important factors determining the prognosis of patients with heart failure (HF). Although priority is given to implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy for the prevention of sudden cardiac death, electrophysiologic-study (EPS)-guided preventive therapy could be important for reducing the number of cardiac events.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Of 864 patients with a history of HF, an EPS was performed in 168 and 121 had inducible VT/VF. Under the basic therapy of an ICD, additional catheter ablation was attempted for 95 of 124 monomorphic VT foci in 74 patients, and 78 of the VT were successfully ablated. The prognoses were compared among 5 patient groups with different results for the EPS and catheter ablation: (1) success group (n=43), (2) failure group (n=15), (3) not attempted group (n=16), (4) VF group (n=47), and (5) no inducible VT/VF group. During a follow-up period of 31+/-22 months, the incidence of VT/VF was lower in the success and no inducible VT/VF groups than in the other groups (p=0.0018), although a significant difference was not observed for the total deaths.

CONCLUSION

EPS-guided preventive therapy using an ICD and catheter ablation can be useful, at least for the reduction of arrhythmic events in patients with HF.

Clinical usefulness of electrophysiologic study (EPS)-guided risk stratification for life-threatening arrhythmia in patients with heart failure

BACKGROUND

Ventricular tachyarrhythmia is one of the most important factors determining the prognosis of patients with heart failure and sudden death can be observed even during stable therapy controlling clinical heart failure. In this study, the usefulness of electrophysiologic study (EPS) for the prediction of a future arrhythmic event was evaluated in patients with heart failure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The patient population consisted of 474 patients with a history of clinical heart failure but without an episode of spontaneous sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation (VT/VF). A Holter ECG was performed in all patients, and 177 of the 474 patients underwent EPS because of a recording of nonsustained VT (NSVT, > 5 beats). When sustained VT/VF was inducible in EPS, the patient was assigned to implantation of a defibrillation device. The patients were divided into 3 groups, ie, 1) no NSVT (n = 297), 2) NSVT + no inducible VT/VF (n = 134), and 3) NSVT + inducible VT/VF (n = 43), and were followed-up for > 12 months. All patients were followed-up under standard therapy for heart failure. There were no significant differences in basic clinical characteristics and therapies among the 3 groups. During the follow-up period of 32 +/- 18 months, 56/474 patients suffered a VT/VF episode, ie, 21/297 in no NSVT, 14/134 in NSVT + no inducible VT/VF, and 21/43 in NSVT + inducible VT/VF patients (P = 0.032). All patients were rescued from sudden death among patients with an implanted defibrillator, but 11 patients without a defibrillator died.

CONCLUSION

In patients with heart failure, future arrhythmic events could be predicted by EPS and Holter ECG. EPS-guided risk stratification seems to be useful in managing patients with heart failure.