Quality of Life Improvement and Long-Term Effects of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell Transplantation for Severe Arteriosclerosis Obliterans in Diabetic Patients on Dialysis

PBMNCs Treatment in Critical Limb Ischemia and Candidate Biomarkers of Efficacy

When in critical limb ischemia (CLI) the healing process aborts or does not follow an orderly and timely sequence, a chronic vascular wound develops. The latter is major problem today, as their epidemiology is continuously increasing due to the aging population and a growth in the incidence of the underlying diseases. In the US, the mean annualized prevalence of necrotic wounds due to the fact of CLI is 1.33% (95% CI, 1.32–1.34%), and the cost of dressings alone has been estimated at USD 5 billion per year from healthcare budgets. A promising cell treatment in wound healing is the local injection of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNCs). The treatment is aimed to induce angiogenesis as well to switch inflammatory macrophages, called the M1 phenotype, into anti-inflammatory macrophages, called M2, a phenotype devoted to tissue repair. This mechanism is called polarization and is a critical step for the healing of all human tissues. Regarding the clinical efficacy of PBMNCs, the level of evidence is still low, and a considerable effort is necessary for completing the translational process toward the patient bed site. From this point of view, it is crucial to identify some candidate biomarkers to detect the switching process from M1 to M2 in response to the cell treatment.

Long-Term Outcomes of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells in the Treatment of Angiitis-Induced No-Option Critical Limb-Threatening Ischemia

Background: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNCs) showed encouraging short outcomes in the treatment of angiitis-induced no-option critical limb-threatening ischemia (AICLTI) in the pilot study. This study aimed to demonstrate the long-term outcomes of this treatment.

Methods: From May 2014 to December 2018, patients diagnosed with AICLTI and treated by autotransplantation of PBMNCs in our center were enrolled and analyzed. The primary endpoint was major amputation-free survival (MAFS), the secondary endpoints included peak pain-free walking time (PPFWT), Wong-Baker FACES pain rating scale score (WFPRSS), labor recovery, ankle-brachial index (ABI), transcutaneous partial oxygen pressure (TcpO2), and SF-36v2 scores.

Results: A total of 58 patients were enrolled. During a minimal follow-up of 36 months, the MAFS was 93.1% and the labor competence restored rate was 62.1%. The WFPRSS was decreased from 8.7 ± 1.6 to 1.6 ± 3.2, and PPFWT was significantly improved from 2.9 ± 4.2 min to 16.6 ± 6.9 min. The quality of life was also significantly improved at each follow-up point. Perfusion evaluating parameters, such as ABI and TcPO2, were also significantly improved. No critical adverse event was observed during the treatment and follow-up period.

Conclusions: The treatment of AICLTI by autotransplantation of PBMNCs demonstrated encouraging long-term results. It could not only restore labor competence, improve the quality of life, but also significantly reduce the major amputation rate.

Peripheral blood mononuclear cell transplantation to treat no-option critical limb ischaemia: effectiveness and safety

OBJECTIVE

Local intramuscular transplantation of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilised peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PB-MNC) has been shown to be effective for treating patients with no-option critical limb ischaemia (CLI) who are not considered suitable to undergo surgical bypass or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of PB-MNCs as a treatment for no-option CLI patients.

METHOD

This prospective cohort study was conducted between April 2013 and December 2017. Patients with no-option CLI were treated with G-CSF 5-10 µg/kg/day for 3 days. PB-MNCs (7.1±2.2×10¹⁰) with CD34+ cells (2.1±1.2×10⁸) were collected by blood cell separator and then injected into the calf or thigh of ischaemic limbs. Ankle-brachial index, toe-brachial index and transcutaneous oxygen tension were recorded at 1 and 3 months after injection. The amputation rate and the wound healing rate were also recorded.

RESULTS

Eight patients took part in the study. Two patients experienced rest pain relief 1 month after PB-MNC therapy. Five patients had healed ulcer at 6 months after PB-MNC therapy. Limb ischaemia did not improve after PB-MNC therapy in one patient. Below-knee amputation was performed in that patient due to extension of gangrene. Two patients required reinjection of PB-MNCs because of recurrence of ischaemic ulcer. The limb salvage rate after 1 year was 87.5%.

CONCLUSION

Local intramuscular transplantation of G-CSF-mobilised PB-MNCs might be a safe and effective treatment for no-option CLI patients.

Introduction to clinical research based on modern epidemiology

Over the past 20 years, recent advances in science technologies have dramatically changed the styles of clinical research. Currently, it has become more popular to use recent modern epidemiological techniques, such as propensity score, instrumental variable, competing risks, marginal structural modeling, mixed effects modeling, bootstrapping, and missing data analyses, than before. These advanced techniques, also known as modern epidemiology, may be strong tools for performing good clinical research, especially in large-scale observational studies, along with relevant research questions, good databases, and the passion of researchers. However, to use these methods effectively, we need to understand the basic assumptions behind them. Here, I will briefly introduce the concepts of these techniques and their implementation. In addition, I would like to emphasize that various types of clinical studies, not only large database studies but also small studies on rare and intractable diseases, are equally important because clinicians always do their best to take care of many kinds of patients who suffer from various kidney diseases and this is our most important mission.

Efficacy of trimetazidine and plasmin combined with alprostadil in treatment of lower extremity arteriosclerosis obliterans

Clinical efficacy of trimetazidine and plasmin combined with alprostadil in the treatment of lower extremity arteriosclerosis obliterans was investigated. A retrospective analysis was performed on 132 patients with lower extremity arteriosclerosis obliterans treated in Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital from March 2015 to August 2017. Among them, 68 patients were treated with trimetazidine combined with alprostadil (group A), and 64 patients were treated with plasmin combined with alprostadil (group B). Patients were administered 2 courses of treatment and observed with regard to therapeutic effects, changes in blood flow perfusion indicators (vascular peak velocity and blood flow) of the superficial femoral artery, posterior tibial artery and dorsalis pedis artery, in endothelial function, in left ankle brachial index, in pain-free walking distance and in maximum walking distance. After treatment, the vascular peak velocity of group B patients was lower than that in group A (P<0.05), but the blood flow was higher than that in group A (P<0.05). After treatment, endothelial esterase, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and circulating endothelial cell count levels after treatment were lower than those before treatment (P<0.05), but nitric oxide level was higher than that before treatment (P<0.05). After treatment, the left ankle brachial index was lower in group A of patients than that in group B (P<0.05). After treatment, the maximum walking distance was significantly higher in group A patients than that in group B (P<0.05). After treatment, the pain-free walking distance and maximum walking distance of the two groups of patients were higher than those before treatment (P<0.05). Both trimetazidine and plasmin combined with alprostadil can effectively treat lower extremity arteriosclerosis obliterans. The former is better than the latter in improving exercise capacity, but the latter is better than the former in improving blood flow perfusion in patients.

Autologous cells derived from different sources and administered using different regimens for 'no-option' critical lower limb ischaemia patients

BACKGROUND

Revascularisation is the gold standard therapy for patients with critical limb ischaemia (CLI). In over 30% of patients who are not suitable for or have failed previous revascularisation therapy (the 'no-option' CLI patients), limb amputation is eventually unavoidable. Preliminary studies have reported encouraging outcomes with autologous cell-based therapy for the treatment of CLI in these 'no-option' patients. However, studies comparing the angiogenic potency and clinical effects of autologous cells derived from different sources have yielded limited data. Data regarding cell doses and routes of administration are also limited.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of autologous cells derived from different sources, prepared using different protocols, administered at different doses, and delivered via different routes for the treatment of 'no-option' CLI patients.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist (CIS) searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), the Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED), and trials registries (16 May 2018). Review authors searched PubMed until February 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving 'no-option' CLI patients comparing a particular source or regimen of autologous cell-based therapy against another source or regimen of autologous cell-based therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors independently assessed the eligibility and methodological quality of the trials. We extracted outcome data from each trial and pooled them for meta-analysis. We calculated effect estimates using a risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI), or a mean difference (MD) with 95% CI.

MAIN RESULTS

We included seven RCTs with a total of 359 participants. These studies compared bone marrow-mononuclear cells (BM-MNCs) versus mobilised peripheral blood stem cells (mPBSCs), BM-MNCs versus bone marrow-mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs), high cell dose versus low cell dose, and intramuscular (IM) versus intra-arterial (IA) routes of cell implantation. We identified no other comparisons in these studies. We considered most studies to be at low risk of bias in random sequence generation, incomplete outcome data, and selective outcome reporting; at high risk of bias in blinding of patients and personnel; and at unclear risk of bias in allocation concealment and blinding of outcome assessors. The quality of evidence was most often low to very low, with risk of bias, imprecision, and indirectness of outcomes the major downgrading factors.Three RCTs (100 participants) reported a total of nine deaths during the study follow-up period. These studies did not report deaths according to treatment group.Results show no clear difference in amputation rates between IM and IA routes (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.18; three RCTs, 95 participants; low-quality evidence). Single-study data show no clear difference in amputation rates between BM-MNC- and mPBSC-treated groups (RR 1.54, 95% CI 0.45 to 5.24; 150 participants; low-quality evidence) and between high and low cell dose (RR 3.21, 95% CI 0.87 to 11.90; 16 participants; very low-quality evidence). The study comparing BM-MNCs versus BM-MSCs reported no amputations.Single-study data with low-quality evidence show similar numbers of participants with healing ulcers between BM-MNCs and mPBSCs (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.83; 49 participants) and between IM and IA routes (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.76; 41 participants). In contrast, more participants appeared to have healing ulcers in the BM-MSC group than in the BM-MNC group (RR 2.00, 95% CI 1.02 to 3.92; one RCT, 22 participants; moderate-quality evidence). Researchers comparing high versus low cell doses did not report ulcer healing.Single-study data show similar numbers of participants with reduction in rest pain between BM-MNCs and mPBSCs (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.06; 104 participants; moderate-quality evidence) and between IM and IA routes (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.64; 32 participants; low-quality evidence). One study reported no clear difference in rest pain scores between BM-MNC and BM-MSC (MD 0.00, 95% CI -0.61 to 0.61; 37 participants; moderate-quality evidence). Trials comparing high versus low cell doses did not report rest pain.Single-study data show no clear difference in the number of participants with increased ankle-brachial index (ABI; increase of > 0.1 from pretreatment), between BM-MNCs and mPBSCs (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.40; 104 participants; moderate-quality evidence), and between IM and IA routes (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.43 to 2.00; 35 participants; very low-quality evidence). In contrast, ABI scores appeared higher in BM-MSC versus BM-MNC groups (MD 0.05, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.09; one RCT, 37 participants; low-quality evidence). ABI was not reported in the high versus low cell dose comparison.Similar numbers of participants had improved transcutaneous oxygen tension (TcO₂) with IM versus IA routes (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.72; two RCTs, 62 participants; very low-quality evidence). Single-study data with low-quality evidence show a higher TcO₂ reading in BM-MSC versus BM-MNC groups (MD 8.00, 95% CI 3.46 to 12.54; 37 participants) and in mPBSC- versus BM-MNC-treated groups (MD 1.70, 95% CI 0.41 to 2.99; 150 participants). TcO₂ was not reported in the high versus low cell dose comparison.Study authors reported no significant short-term adverse effects attributed to autologous cell implantation.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Mostly low- and very low-quality evidence suggests no clear differences between different stem cell sources and different treatment regimens of autologous cell implantation for outcomes such as all-cause mortality, amputation rate, ulcer healing, and rest pain for 'no-option' CLI patients. Pooled analyses did not show a clear difference in clinical outcomes whether cells were administered via IM or IA routes. High-quality evidence is lacking; therefore the efficacy and long-term safety of autologous cells derived from different sources, prepared using different protocols, administered at different doses, and delivered via different routes for the treatment of 'no-option' CLI patients, remain to be confirmed.Future RCTs with larger numbers of participants are needed to determine the efficacy of cell-based therapy for CLI patients, along with the optimal cell source, phenotype, dose, and route of implantation. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm the durability of angiogenic potential and the long-term safety of cell-based therapy.

Outcome From a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial - Improvement of Peripheral Arterial Disease by Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor-Mobilized Autologous Peripheral-Blood-Mononuclear Cell Transplantation (IMPACT)

BACKGROUND

The clinical usefulness of peripheral blood (PB) mononuclear cell (MNC) transplantation in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD), especially in those with mild-to-moderate severity, has not been fully clarified.Methods and Results:A randomized clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized PBMNC transplantation in patients with PAD (Fontaine stage II-IV and Rutherford category 1-5) caused by arteriosclerosis obliterans or Buerger's disease. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). In total, 107 subjects were enrolled. At baseline, Fontaine stage was II/III in 82 patients and IV in 21, and 54 patients were on hemodialysis. A total of 50 patients had intramuscular transplantation of PBMNC combined with standard of care (SOC) (cell therapy group), and 53 received SOC only (control group). PFS tended to be improved in the cell therapy group than in the control group (P=0.07). PFS in Fontaine stage II/III subgroup was significantly better in the cell therapy group than in the control group. Cell therapy-related adverse events were transient and not serious.

CONCLUSIONS

In this first randomized, large-scale clinical trial of G-CSF-mobilized PBMNC transplantation, the cell therapy was tolerated by a variety of PAD patients. The PBMNC therapy was significantly effective for inhibiting disease progression in mild-to-moderate PAD.

A Five-Year Study of the Efficacy of Purified CD34+ Cell Therapy for Angiitis-Induced No-Option Critical Limb Ischemia

Angiitis‐induced critical limb ischemia (AICLI) patients constitute a remarkable proportion of no‐option critical limb ischemia (CLI) patients. Stem cell therapy has become an innovative and promising option for no‐option CLI patients. As one of these promising stem cell therapies, purified CD34+ cell transplantation (PuCeT) has shown favorable short‐term results. However, the long‐term efficacy of PuCeT has yet to be reported. This study evaluates the long‐term efficacy of PuCeT in AICLI patients. Twenty‐seven AICLI patients were enrolled from May 2009 to December 2011. Granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF) and enoxaparin sodium were administered for 5 days. On day 5, CD34+ cell isolation was performed, and cells were transplanted by intramuscular injection. The primary endpoint, major‐amputation‐free survival rate (MAFS), as well as secondary endpoints, such as peak pain‐free walking time (PPFWT) and the Wong‐Baker FACES pain rating scale score (WFPRSS), were routinely evaluated during the 5‐year follow‐up period. The endpoints were as follows: the MAFS was 88.89%; PPFWT increased from 3 ± 3 to 17 ± 6 minutes; WFPRSS decreased from 7 ± 2 to 0.3 ± 1.7; the ulcer healing rate was 85.71%; the recurrence rate was 11.11%; and SF‐36v2 scores were significantly improved at 5 years after PuCeT. The rate of labor recovery 5 years after PuCeT was 65.38%, and no severe adverse effect was observed during the treatment. PuCeT demonstrated long‐term efficacy and durability as a treatment of AICLI not only in achieving limb salvage but also in recovering the labor competence and improving the quality of life of patients. Stem Cells Translational Medicine2018;7:583–590

Characterization of the Pall Celeris system as a point-of-care device for therapeutic angiogenesis

BACKGROUND AIMS

The Pall Celeris system is a filtration-based point-of-care device designed to obtain a high concentrate of peripheral blood total nucleated cells (PB-TNCs). We have characterized the Pall Celeris-derived TNCs for their in vitro and in vivo angiogenic potency.

METHODS

PB-TNCs isolated from healthy donors were characterized through the use of flow cytometry and functional assays, aiming to assess migratory capacity, ability to form capillary-like structures, endothelial trans-differentiation and paracrine factor secretion. In a hind limb ischemia mouse model, we evaluated perfusion immediately and 7 days after surgery, along with capillary, arteriole and regenerative fiber density and local bio-distribution.

RESULTS

Human PB-TNCs isolated by use of the Pall Celeris filtration system were shown to secrete a panel of angiogenic factors and migrate in response to vascular endothelial growth factor and stromal-derived factor-1 stimuli. Moreover, after injection in a mouse model of hind limb ischemia, PB-TNCs induced neovascularization by increasing capillary, arteriole and regenerative fiber numbers, with human cells detected in murine tissue up to 7 days after ischemia.

CONCLUSIONS

The Pall Celeris system may represent a novel, effective and reliable point-of-care device to obtain a PB-derived cell product with adequate potency for therapeutic angiogenesis.

Limb rescue: a new autologous-peripheral blood mononuclear cells technology in critical limb ischemia and chronic ulcers

INTRODUCTION

Therapeutic angiogenesis by autologous-peripheral blood mononuclear cells (A-PBMNC) implantation has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment for critical limb ischemia (CLI). We herein report our investigation of the long-term efficacy of implantation of A-PBMNC produced by selective filtration to treat patients with CLI, for which surgical bypass and/or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty are not possible.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a prospective, and not a randomized, study based on a treated group who did not respond to conventional therapy (n=43) when implanted with A-PBMNC cells versus a historically matched control group. Patients of both groups were suffering from CLI Fontaine scale IV with chronic ulcers and various accompanying conditions (diabetes, heart disease, kidney failure, etc.). Treated patients were implanted with 12 mL of A-PBMNC, 0.2-0.3 mL for each bolus, collected by selective filtration from 120 mL of peripheral blood in the ischemic area of the limbs. Patients were not mobilized by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and the A-PBMNC treatment was repeated for a maximum of three times.

RESULTS

The A-PBMNC-treated group showed a statistically significant improvement of limb rescue of 95.3% versus 52.2% of the control group (p<0.001), and the result had been maintained for 2 years. The A-PBMNC group also showed reduction in pain at rest, increased maximum walking distance, and healing of the wound, which led to an overall improvement in the quality of life. Post-treatment radiological studies showed an improvement of vascularization with the formation of new collateral and by histological findings. Within 2 years of follow-up, none of the patients whom we treated showed any major or systemic adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

The local injection of A-PBMNC showed striking early and long-term effects together with a favorable safety profile, significantly decreasing the risk of amputation. Our results are comparable with published data obtained by injection of bone marrow mononuclear cells, but with a lot less invasive approach. Moreover the intraoperative selective filtration system we used is fast, safe, not operator dependent, and easy to use in a sterile operating theatre. This system aims to produce fresh A-PBMNC as a valuable treatment option, particularly for those difficult patients who cannot undergo revascularization.

Early and Long-term Effects of the Autologous Peripheral Stem Cell Implantation for Critical Limb Ischemia

OBJECTIVE

Therapeutic angiogenesis by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PB-MNCs) implantation has been shown to be a safe and effective treating for critical limb ischemia (CLI). We herein report our investigation of the long-term efficacy of implantation of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF)-induced PB-MNCs to treat patients with CLI for which surgical bypass and/or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty are not possible. Methods and Methods : Eleven cases were enrolled in this study. Following an injection of G-CSF (250 ug/day) for 3 days, PB-MNCs (1.1 ± 0.5 × 10(10) including 1.5 ± 0.2 × 10(7) CD34-positive cells) were harvested by apheresis and then injected into 13 ischemic limbs.

RESULTS

Resting pain either diminished or improved in 10 cases (91%) at 4 weeks, and ulcer formation was cured in 6 out of 10 limbs (60%) after treatment. The time required to enhance the arteries at the level of foot-joint by angiography which was performed in the abdominal aorta was shortened by 1 month (10 ± 4 seconds) and 6 months (12 ± 1) compared with the pretreatment time (15 ± 5). Three patients died after treatment, and the actuarial survival rate at 3 years was 73%. Freedom from major amputation at 3 years was 92%.

CONCLUSION

The local injection of G-CSF-induced PB-MNCs showed striking early and long-term effects.

Autologous stem cell therapy for peripheral arterial disease meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a common cause of disability and mortality. Up to one third of patients are not susceptible to traditional revascularization and may benefit from stem cell therapies.

OBJECTIVE

In this meta-analysis, we sought to determine whether autologous cell therapy is effective in the treatment of PAD.

METHODS

We searched the English literature in Medline, Excerpta Medica and the Cochrane database for trials of autologous cell therapy in patients with PAD published before 31 January 2009. We included controlled and non-controlled, randomized and non-randomized trials using autologous bone marrow or granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilized peripheral blood cells to treat PAD. We also collected data from trials of G-CSF monotherapy, as a control treatment.

RESULTS

In a meta-analysis of 37 trials, autologous cell therapy was effective in improving surrogate indexes of ischemia, subjective symptoms and hard endpoints (ulcer healing and amputation). On the contrary, G-CSF monotherapy was not associated with significant improvement in the same endpoints. Patients with thromboangiitis obliterans showed some larger benefits than patients with atherosclerotic PAD. The intramuscular route of administration and the use of bone marrow cells seemed somehow more effective than intrarterial administration and the use of mobilized peripheral blood cells. The procedures were well tolerated and generally safe.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis indicates that intramuscular autologous bone marrow cell therapy is a feasible, relatively safe and potentially effective therapeutic strategy for PAD patients, who are not candidate for traditional revascularization. Larger, placebo-controlled, randomized multicenter trials need to be planned and conducted to confirm these findings.

Long-term clinical outcomes for patients with lower limb ischemia implanted with G-CSF-mobilized autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cells

BACKGROUND

Many studies have described the clinical effects of treating critical limb ischemia with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cells (M-PBMNC); however, there are no long-term data available on survival, limb salvage, or prognostic factors.

METHODS

To investigate the long-term clinical outcomes of M-PBMNC implantation, we reviewed data for 162 consecutive patients with limb ischemia who were treated with M-PBMNC implantation at 6 hospitals between 2001 and 2006. A subset of 123 patients with homogenous clinical profiles was selected for prognostic factor analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 162 patients, 50 died during the follow-up period. The median follow-up time for surviving patients was 26.4 months. The 2-year survival rate was 65% for the 140 patients with arteriosclerosis obliterans (ASO), and 100% for the 11, 4 and 7 patients with thromboangiitis obliterans (TAO), diabetic gangrene (DG) and connective tissue disease (CTD), respectively. The 1-year amputation-free rates for ASO, TAO, DG and CTD were 70%, 79%, 75% and 83%, respectively. Common serious adverse events included heart failure (15 cases), myocardial infarction (15 cases), serious infection (13 cases), stroke (10 cases), and malignant tumor (9 cases). Significant negative prognostic factors associated with overall survival were ischemic heart disease and collection of a small number of CD34-positive cells. Factors associated with time-to-amputation and amputation-free survival were a combination of Fontaine classification and lower limb gangrene, and history of dialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Collection of a small number of CD34-positive cells and ischemic heart disease were associated with a reduction in overall survival.

Emerging hurdles in stem cell therapy for peripheral vascular disease

Peripheral vascular disease (PVD) is a growing medical problem in Western societies and presents itself mainly in two different clinical forms. Intermittent claudication is an early moderate manifestation, while patients with critical limb ischemia suffer from severe muscle tissue loss or ulcers and are at high risk for limb amputation. Unfortunately, many patients cannot be helped with currently available surgical or endovascular revascularization procedures because of the complex anatomy of the vascular occlusion and/or the presence of other risk factors. Noninvasive stem cell therapy has been proposed as an alternative for such patients. Although pioneering clinical experience with stem cell-related therapy seems promising, it is too early for general clinical use of this technique, since many questions remain unanswered. Indeed, while questions about safety, dose, and administration route/timing/frequency are the first ones to be addressed when designing a stem cell-based clinical approach, there is accumulating evidence from recent (pre-)clinical studies that other issues may also be at stake. For instance, the choice of stem cells to be used and its precise mechanism of action, the need/possibility for concurrent tissue regeneration in case of irreversible tissue loss, the differentiation degree and specific vascular identity of the transplanted cells, and the long-term survival of engrafted cells in the absence of a normal supportive tissue environment should be well considered. Here, rather than presenting a comprehensive and extensive overview on the current literature on stem/progenitor cells and revascularization, we highlight some of the outstanding issues emerging from the recent (pre-)clinical literature that may codetermine the successful application of stem cells in a wide range of PVD patients in the future.