The prognostic effect of ST-elevation in lead aVR on coronary artery disease, and outcome in acute coronary syndrome patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Rapid diagnosis of coronary artery disease has an important role in saving patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate if aVR lead ST-elevation (STE) can predict LM/3VD, left main (LM) disease, and three-vessel disease (3VD), outcome in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients.

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, 45 qualified studies were entered. Scopus, Pub med, Google scholar, Web of science, Cochrane library were searched on 12 November 2021.

RESULTS

This systematic review includes 52,175 participants. In patients with STE, the total odds ratios for LM, 3VD, and LM/3VD were 5.48 (95% CI 3.88, 7.76), 2.21 (95% CI 1.78, 3.27), and 6.21 (95% CI 3.49, 11,6), respectively. STE in lead aVR was linked with in-hospital death (OR = 2.99, CI 1.90, 4.72) and 90-day mortality (OR = 3.09, CI 2.17, 4.39), despite the fact that it could not predict 30-day mortality (OR = 1.11, CI 0.95, 1.31). The STE > 1 mm subgroup had the highest sensitivity for LM (0.9, 95% CI 0.82, 0.98), whereas the STE > 0.5 mm (0.76, 95% CI 0.61, 0.90) subgroup had the highest sensitivity for LM/3VD. The appropriate cut-off point with highest specificity for LM/3VD and LM was STE > 1.5 mm (0.80, 95% CI 0.75, 0.85) and STE > 0.5 mm, respectively (0.75, 95% CI 0.67, 0.84, I² = 97%).

CONCLUSION

The odds of LM and LM/3VD were higher than 3VD in ACS patients with STE in lead aVR. Also, STE > 0.5 mm was the best cut-off point to screen LM/3VD, whereas for LM diagnosis, STE > 1 mm had the highest sensitivity. Furthermore, LM/3VD had a higher overall specificity than LM.

Prognostic implications of ST-segment elevation in lead aVR in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

ST-segment elevation (STE) in lead aVR is a useful tool in recognizing patients with left main or left anterior descending coronary obstruction during acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The prognostic implication of STE in lead aVR on outcomes has not been established.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search for clinical studies about STE in lead aVR in four databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital (re)infarction, in-hospital heart failure, and 90-day mortality.

RESULTS

We included 7 studies with a total of 7,700 patients. The all-cause in-hospital mortality of patients with STE in lead aVR during ACS was significantly higher than that of patients without STE (OR: 4.37, 95% CI 1.63 to 11.68, p = .003). Patients with greater STE (>0.1 mV) in lead aVR had a higher in-hospital mortality when compared to lower STE (0.05-0.1 mV) (OR: 2.00, 95% CI 1.11-3.60, p = .02), However, STE in aVR was not independently associated with in-hospital mortality in ACS patients (OR: 2.72, 95% CI 0.85-8.63, p = .09). The incidence of in-hospital myocardial (re)infarction (OR: 2.77, 95% CI 1.30-5.94, p = .009), in-hospital heart failure (OR: 2.62, 95% CI 1.06-6.50, p = .04), and 90-day mortality (OR: 10.19, 95% CI 5.27-19.71, p < .00001) was also noted to be higher in patients STE in lead aVR.

CONCLUSIONS

This contemporary meta-analysis shows STE in lead aVR is a poor prognostic marker in patients with ACS with higher in-hospital mortality, reinfarction, heart failure and 90-day mortality. Greater magnitude of STE portends worse prognosis. Further studies are needed to establish an independent predictive role of STE in aVR for these adverse outcomes.

Value of ST-segment change in lead aVR in diagnosing left main disease in Non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome-A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous researches proved that the ST-segment elevation (STE) in lead aVR had great significance on the prediction of severe left main lesion or serious multivessel lesions. The current research is to summarize the published data and evaluate the overall association of STE in lead aVR and left main coronary artery disease (LMD) in Non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome.

METHODS

Literature searching was performed in the online database, and a systematic review was conducted based on the searched results. Meaningful STE in lead aVR was summarized and analyzed for odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

RESULTS

Twenty-seven articles were included for final data analysis. Compared with STE < 0.05, STE ≥ 0.05 mV was associated with a higher incidence rate of LMD (OR = 6.64, 95% CI: 4.80 ~ 9.17), and the degree of STE in lead aVR was significantly associated with LMD. Myocardial infarction was more likely to occur in patients with STE ≥ 0.05 mV than in patients with STE < 0.05 mV (OR = 3.12, 95% CI: 1.73 ~ 5.62).

CONCLUSIONS

The STE in lead aVR and the degree of STE are independent predictors in diagnosing LMD or myocardial infarction.

ST segment change and T wave amplitude ratio in lead aVR associated with coronary artery disease severity in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: A retrospective study

Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) severity is difficult only with electrocardiogram (ECG). In most cases, NSTEMI patients are followed with cardiac enzymes without early invasive intervention if no severe chest pain exists in the emergency department (ED) or coronary intensive care unit (CICU).Our aim was to evaluate association between CAD severity and ST segment change in lead aVR (STaVR)/T wave amplitude in lead aVR (TAaVR) ratio in patients with NSTEMI.We included 306 patients with NSTEMI in the ED between 2015 and 2016. STaVR and TAaVR values were measured from 12-derivation ECG underwent on admission to the ED. The absolute values of STaVR and TAaVR were calculated and the following were obtained; ratio 1:|STaVR|/|TAaVR|, ratio 2:|TAaVR|/|STaVR|, and ratio 3: by dividing the variable with larger absolute value to other variable with smaller absolute value (|larger value|/|smaller value|). The SYNTAX score (SS) was calculated from coronary angiography in all patients.In analysis of the bivariate correlation between SS and ratios; significantly positive, strongly with ratio 3 (r = 0.692, P < .001), and only ratio 3 was determined to be an independent predictor for SS in linear regression analysis (OR: 0.642, 95% CI: 0.432-0.853, P = .001).Severity of CAD may be estimated by evaluating STaVR and TAaVR ratio in patients with NSTEMI.

The forgotten lead: does aVR ST-deviation add insight into the outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients?

BACKGROUND

Lead aVR ST-segment deviation has been associated with increased mortality in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients treated with fibrinolysis. However, its prognostic value in a contemporaneous population undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention is unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A core laboratory examined the 12-lead baseline electrocardiogram in 5,683 patients presenting within 6 hours of symptom onset in the APEX-AMI trial, and readers were blinded to study treatment and clinical outcomes. aVR ST-deviation was significantly associated with 90-day death when compared with patients with no aVR ST-deviation (aVR ST-depression [ST-D] 5%, aVR ST-elevation [ST-E] 10.2%, no ST-deviation [N] aVR 3.8%, P < .001). After multivariable adjustment, aVR ST-E was strongly associated with 90-day death in inferior myocardial infarction (MI) (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 5.87, 95% CI 2.09-16.5), whereas aVR ST-D was associated with excess mortality in noninferior MI (1.53, 1.06-2.22; P [interaction] < .001). aVR ST-E was also significantly associated with the presence of left main coronary (N aVR 1.8%, aVR ST-E 7.7%, P ≤ .001) and multivessel coronary disease (N aVR 41.3%, aVR ST-E 53.3%, P ≤ .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Lead aVR ST-deviation is common, occurring in one-third of all ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients and independently associated with increased 90-day death. Myocardial infarction location modulates the prognostic significance of aVR ST-deviation such that lead aVR ST-E in inferior MI and ST-D in noninferior MI represent 2 high-risk groups. There was also more frequent advanced coronary disease in patients with aVR ST-E.

Early application of an intra-aortic balloon pump in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction scheduled for elective percutaneous coronary intervention

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the effect of early application of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) counterpulsation in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI), scheduled for elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

Patients who had experienced STEMI for 12-72 h received (IABP group) or did not receive (control group) IABP counterpulsation for 3-5 days before PCI.

RESULTS

One hundred patients were included. Frequencies of infarct-related artery thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow rate classes 0, I and II in the IABP group (11.5, 1.9 and 7.7%, respectively) were significantly lower than in the control group (29.1, 14.6 and 22.9%, respectively) before PCI. After PCI, the frequency of TIMI class III flow rate in the IABP group (96.2%) was significantly higher than that in the control group (81.3%). Four weeks after PCI, the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was significantly higher, and the incidence of major cardiac events was significantly lower, in the IABP group compared with the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Early use of IABP counterpulsation in STEMI patients scheduled for PCI was effective, with a favourable safety profile. IABP counterpulsation reduced the incidence of major adverse cardiac events and improved LVEF. However, IABP devices must be used at an early stage, to obtain optimal results.

ST-segment deviation in lead aVR on admission is not associated with left ventricular function at predischarge in first anterior wall ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction

Previous studies have shown that the analysis of ST-segment deviation in lead aVR on admission provides useful information on angiographic coronary anatomy and risk stratification in acute coronary syndromes. However, the association between ST-segment deviation in lead aVR on admission and left ventricular (LV) function has not been fully investigated in anterior wall acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. In this study, 237 patients with first anterior wall acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were examined. The patients were divided into the following 3 groups according to ST-segment deviation in lead aVR on admission: 85 with ST-segment elevation ≥0.5 mm (group A), 106 without ST-segment deviation (group B), and 46 with ST-segment depression ≥0.5 mm (group C). LV ejection fractions at predischarge were compared among the 3 groups. Among the 3 groups, there were significant differences in the prevalences of proximal left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) occlusion (group A 75.3%, group B 56.6%, group C 45.7%, p = 0.002), long LAD (group A 27.1%, group B 31.1%, group C 56.5%, p = 0.002), and good collaterals to the LAD (group A 40.0%, group B 25.4%, group C 17.4%, p = 0.01). LV ejection fractions at predischarge did not differ among the 3 groups (group A 56.4 ± 12.5%, group B 56.9 ± 12.7%, group C 53.3 ± 12.2%, p = 0.26). On a multiple regression analysis, establishment of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow, proximal LAD occlusion, and long LAD were associated with the LV ejection fraction at predischarge. In conclusion, ST-segment deviation in lead aVR on admission is not associated with LV function at predischarge in first anterior wall acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Significance of a prominent Q wave in lead negative aVR (-aVR) in acute anterior myocardial infarction

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to clarify the significance of a Q wave in lead negative aVR (-aVR) in anterior wall acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

METHODS

Eighty-seven patients with a first anterior wall AMI were classified into 2 groups according to the presence (n = 17, group A) or absence (n = 70, group B) of a prominent Q wave (duration > or =20 milliseconds) in lead -aVR at predischarge. Group A had a higher prevalence of a long left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), a lower left ventricular ejection fraction, and more reduced regional wall motion in the apical and inferior regions than group B. None of group A patients had an LAD that did not reach the apex.

CONCLUSION

A prominent Q wave in lead -aVR in anterior wall AMI is related to severe regional wall motion abnormality in the apical and inferior regions, with an LAD wrapping around the apex.