Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Frame Count for Coronary Blood Flow Evaluation during Interventional Diagnostic Procedures

Background and Objectives: An interventional diagnostic procedure (IDP), including intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) provocation and coronary physiological testing, is recommended as an invasive diagnostic standard for patients suspected of ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA). Recent guidelines suggest Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction frame count (TFC) as an alternative to wire-based coronary physiological indices for diagnosing coronary microvascular dysfunction. We evaluated trajectories of TFC during IDP and the impact of ACh provocation on TFC. Materials and Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective study. Patients who underwent IDP to diagnose INOCA were included and divided into two groups according to the positive or negative ACh provocation test. Wire-based invasive physiological assessment was preceded by ACh provocation tests and intracoronary isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN). We evaluated TFC at three different time points during IDP; pre-ACh, post-ISDN, and post-hyperemia. Results: Of 104 patients, 58 (55.8%) had positive ACh provocation test. In the positive ACh group, resting mean transit time (Tmn) and baseline resistance index were significantly higher than in the negative ACh group. Post-ISDN TFC was significantly correlated with resting Tmn (r = 0.31, p = 0.002). Absolute TFC values were highest at pre-ACh, followed by post-ISDN and post-hyperemia in both groups. All between-time point differences in TFC were statistically significant in both groups, except for the change from pre-ACh to post-ISDN in the positive ACh group. Conclusions: In patients suspected of INOCA, TFC was modestly correlated with Tmn, a surrogate of coronary blood flow. The positive ACh provocation test influenced coronary blood flow assessment during IDP.

Impact of preceding acetylcholine provocation testing on following coronary physiological assessment during an interventional diagnostic procedure

BACKGROUND

Intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) provocation test and coronary physiological assessment are useful interventional diagnostic procedures for evaluating ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA). However, the appropriate sequential order of the diagnostic procedures has been a matter of debate. We investigated the impact of preceding ACh provocation on following coronary physiological assessment.

METHODS

Patients suspected of INOCA underwent invasive coronary physiological assessment using thermodilution method and were divided into two groups according to the implementation of ACh provocation test. The ACh group was further divided into the positive and negative ACh groups. In the ACh group, intracoronary ACh provocation was performed before the invasive coronary physiological assessment. The main interest of this study was to compare coronary physiological indices among the no ACh, negative ACh, and positive ACh groups.

RESULTS

Of 120 patients, the no ACh, and negative and positive ACh groups included 46 (38.3 %), 36 (30.0 %), and 38 (31.7 %), respectively. Fractional flow reserve was lower in the no ACh group than in the ACh group. Resting mean transit time was significantly longer in the positive ACh group, followed by the no ACh and negative ACh groups (1.22 ± 0.55 vs. 1.00 ± 0.46 vs. 0.74 ± 0.36 s, p < 0.001). Index of microcirculatory resistance and coronary flow reserve did not differ significantly among the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Preceding ACh provocation influenced following physiological assessment, particularly when ACh test was positive. Further studies are warranted to determine which interventional diagnostic procedure, ACh provocation or physiological assessment, should be preceded in the invasive evaluation of INOCA.

Resistive reserve ratio and microvascular resistance reserve in patients with coronary vasospastic angina

Patients with epicardial coronary vasospastic angina (VSA) may be likely to have coronary microvascular dysfunction, although mixed results have been reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate coronary microvascular function in detail using novel invasive physiologic indices, such as resistive reserve ratio (RRR) and microvascular resistance reserve (MRR). A total of 45 patients undergoing intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) provocation test and invasive coronary circulatory evaluation using a thermodilution method were prospectively included. VSA was diagnosed as angiographic vasospasm accompanied by chest pain and/or ischemic electrocardiographic changes by intracoronary injection of ACh. Coronary circulation was assessed with physiologic indices including fractional flow reserve, resting and hyperemic mean transit time (Tmn), coronary flow reserve (CFR), basal resistance index, index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), RRR, and MRR. Of 45 patients, 23 (51.1%) were diagnosed as having VSA. Patients with positive ACh test had longer resting Tmn (slower coronary flow velocity), higher basal resistance index, and greater RRR and MRR than those without, while fractional flow reserve, CFR, and IMR did not differ significantly between the two groups. In conclusion, although conventional measures such as CFR and IMR failed to show significant differences, RRR and MRR, novel invasive coronary physiologic indices, provided counterintuitive insights that coronary microvascular dilation function was better preserved in patients with VSA than those without.

Decreased resting coronary flow and impaired endothelial function in patients with vasospastic angina

OBJECTIVES

Coronary endothelial and circulatory dysfunction plays important roles in the pathogenesis of vasospastic angina (VSA). However, a complete understanding of the entire coronary circulation including microvasculature in patients with VSA is lacking.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 32 patients without obstructive coronary artery disease in the left descending coronary artery, who underwent an intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) provocation test for diagnosis of VSA, were enrolled prospectively. A positive diagnosis of the ACh test was defined as total/subtotal coronary artery narrowing accompanied by chest pain and/or ischemic ECG changes. Angina frequency and severity at baseline, and 1 and 3 months were recorded. Coronary circulation was evaluated invasively using a thermodilution method by obtaining the mean transit time (Tmn) at rest and hyperemia, coronary flow reserve, and index of microcirculatory resistance. Systemic endothelial function was assessed by the reactive hyperemia index.

RESULTS

There were 14 (44%) and 18 (56%) patients with and without a positive ACh provocation test. The baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the two groups. Patients with VSA had a significantly lower reactive hyperemia index compared with those without VSA (1.70±0.33 vs. 2.12±0.53, P=0.02). Coronary flow reserve, index of microcirculatory resistance, and hyperemic Tmn were not different between the two groups, whereas resting Tmn was significantly longer in patients with VSA (1.20±0.44 vs. 0.71±0.37, P=0.002). Although the frequency and severity of angina improved from baseline to 1 and 3 months in patients with both positive and negative ACh tests, there was no difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients with VSA had decreased resting coronary flow and impaired endothelial function.

Role of coronary vasoconstriction in ischemic heart disease and search for novel therapeutic targets

Atherothrombosis has long been recognized as an important mechanism of cardiac events in ischemic heart disease, and large multicenter clinical studies have shown the benefit of antiplatelet agents, statins, beta-blockers and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in preventing these events. However, more recent studies have been less successful at showing incremental gains in targeting these mechanisms, suggesting that the limits of this strategy have been exploited. Coronary vasoconstriction is another important mechanism in ischemic heart disease but has received little attention and yet is a potential therapeutic target. In the current review, the reasons why coronary vasconstriction has received insufficient consideration are explored. In particular, we need to change our approach from lumping heterogeneous clinical entities together to focusing on clinically-discrete homogeneous groups with a common mechanism and thus therapeutic target. The role of coronary vasoconstriction is examined in the various ischemic syndromes (variant angina, chronic stable angina, acute coronary syndromes and syndrome X) and the underlying mechanisms discussed. Finally, in order to advance studies in this field, an innovative research strategy is proposed, including: (1) selection of paradigmatic cases for the various ischemic syndromes; (2) candidate therapeutic targets; and (3) approaches in assessing the clinical efficacy of these potential therapies.