Late progression after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for de novo lesions--comparison with bare metal stent implantation

Neointimal coverage after second generation drug-eluting stent implantation has a relationship with pre-existing atherosclerotic lesion characteristics

The relationship between preexisting atherosclerotic lesion characteristics and neointimal thickness after second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) placement is still unknown. Thus, we evaluated that relationship using optical coherence tomography (OCT).A single-center, retrospective, observational study was conducted. Patients with stable angina or asymptomatic myocardial ischemia who received percutaneous coronary intervention for a de novo lesion using a second-generation DES under frequency domain OCT guidance and underwent follow-up coronary angiography (CAG) and OCT between December 2010 and December 2015 were included. The relationship between the neointimal thickness on the stent strut and the plaque characteristics was retrospectively evaluated using OCT immediately after stent implantation and at the time of follow-up CAG.We analyzed 3459 struts from 20 stents in 15 patients. The mean follow-up period was 264 days. In the follow-up study, no angiographic in-stent restenosis was found. Of the 3459 struts, 3315 (95.8%) were covered with neointima. The median neointimal thicknesses of the stent struts on calcified, fibrous, and lipid-rich lesions were 20 μm (interquartile range [IQR], 10-50 μm), 70 μm (40-140 μm; P < .001), and 90 μm (50-170 μm; P < .001), respectively. These differences were observed regardless of the type of second-generation DES used.Most of the stent struts were covered with neointima. The neointimal thickness after the second-generation DES implantation had a close relationship with the preexisting atherosclerotic lesion characteristics. In this study, we found differences in arterial healing processes due to underlying plaque; therefore, evaluating the lesion characteristics by OCT may predict the risk for future restenosis and thrombosis.

Seven-year clinical outcomes of sirolimus-eluting stent versus bare-metal stent: a matched analysis from a real world, single center registry

The aim of this study is to compare clinical outcomes for seven years, between sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) and bare metal stent (BMS). During the BMS and drug-eluting stent (DES) transition period (from April 2002 to April 2004), 434 consecutive patients with 482 lesions underwent percutaneous coronary intervention, using BMS or SES. Using propensity score matching, 186 patients with BMS and 166 patients with SES were selected. Seven year clinical outcomes of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), such as cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR), and angiographic definite stent thrombosis (ST) were compared. At one-year follow up, patients with SES showed significantly lower MACE (9.1% in BMS vs 3.0% in SES, P = 0.024). However, cumulative MACE for 7 yr was not significantly different between two groups (24.7% in BMS vs 17.4% in SES, P = 0.155). There was no significant difference in MI, TVR, death and ST. The TVR were gradually increased from 1 to 7 yr in SES, on the contrary to that of BMS. In conclusion, although SES showed better clinical outcomes in the early period after implantation, it did not show significant benefits in the long-term follow up, compared with that of BMS.

Long-term serial angiographic outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated, using quantitative coronary angiography, the natural history of change that occurred in target lesions after successful sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation.

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents (DES) has significantly reduced the rate of repeated target lesion revascularization. However, early studies have raised concerns regarding the "late catch-up" phenomenon of DES.

METHODS

Between June 2004 and March 2007, consecutive 217 patients with 306 lesions without restenosis at early angiographic follow-up underwent late angiographic follow-up (early follow-up: 11.2 ± 2.1 months and late follow-up: 29.4 ± 5.2 months). Predictors of late catch-up were identified with univariate and multivariate regression analyses.

RESULTS

Although reference vessel diameter did not significantly change during follow-up [3.15 mm (interquartile range (IQR): 2.81-3.49 mm), 3.12 mm (IQR: 2.79-3.47 mm), and 3.08 mm (IQR: 2.76-3.46 mm) at postprocedure, and early and late angiographic follow-up, respectively; P = 0.2653], late loss (LL) significantly increased during follow-up [0.05 mm (IQR: 0.00-0.13 mm) and 0.08 mm (IQR: 0.01-0.19 mm) at early and late follow-up, respectively; P < 0.0001]. Univariate analysis showed previous intervention, adjunctive use of cutting balloon, lesion length, and progression of MLD, LL, %DS at early follow-up as predictors of late catch-up. Multivariate regression analysis identified %DS at early follow-up as a predictor of late catch-up (OR 1.076, CI 1.039-1.114, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Significant and continuous progression of neointima after SES implantation was observed in the present study. Larger LL may be a sign of late catch-up phenomenon.

Differences in clinical and angiographic outcomes with different drug-eluting stents in Japanese patients with and without diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Although percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with worse clinical outcomes, the efficacy of drug-eluting stents (DES) in Japanese patients and differences in effectiveness between different DES types remain unknown.

METHODS AND SUBJECTS

Five-hundred and sixty-two consecutive patients (183 with DM, 379 without DM) with 676 lesions were treated with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES, n=531; 160 DM group, 371 non-DM group) or paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES, n=145; 64 and 81, respectively). We assessed the initial and 8-month follow-up clinical and angiographic outcomes.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in clinical and lesion characteristics, although the pre-minimum luminal diameter was smaller in the DM group (p=0.016). The risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, or recurrent angina pectoris, was higher in the DM group compared with the non-DM group (17.4% vs 9.5%, p=0.007). Among diabetic patients, although SES reduced late loss by 0.45 mm (p<0.001) and the binary restenosis rate by 66.4% (7.4% vs 22.0%, p<0.001) compared with PES at 8 months, it did not reduce target lesion revascularization or MACE, as in the non-DM group.

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetic patients have worse mid-term prognosis than non-diabetic patients undergoing PCI with DES. Although the superiority of SES in terms of late loss or restenosis may not play a clinically meaningful role in the treatment of diabetic patients, this phenomenon was independent of the presence of diabetes.