Comparison of vascular response to zotarolimus-eluting stent vs paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation: pooled IVUS results from the ZoMaxx I and II trials

The effect of mechanical loads on the degradation of aliphatic biodegradable polyesters

Aliphatic biodegradable polyesters have been the most widely used synthetic polymers for developing biodegradable devices as alternatives for the currently used permanent medical devices. The performances during biodegradation process play crucial roles for final realization of their functions. Because physiological and biochemical environment in vivo significantly affects biodegradation process, large numbers of studies on effects of mechanical loads on the degradation of aliphatic biodegradable polyesters have been launched during last decades. In this review article, we discussed the mechanism of biodegradation and several different mechanical loads that have been reported to affect the biodegradation process. Other physiological and biochemical factors related to mechanical loads were also discussed. The mechanical load could change the conformational strain energy and morphology to weaken the stability of the polymer. Besides, the load and pattern could accelerate the loss of intrinsic mechanical properties of polymers. This indicated that investigations into effects of mechanical loads on the degradation should be indispensable. More combination condition of mechanical loads and multiple factors should be considered in order to keep the degradation rate controllable and evaluate the degradation process in vivo accurately. Only then can the degradable devise achieve the desired effects and further expand the special applications of aliphatic biodegradable polyesters.

Relative dose and vascular response after drug-eluting stent implantation: A dosimetric 3D-intravascular ultrasound study

BACKGROUND

In drug-eluting stents (DESs), the theoretical drug dose exposed to the vessel wall per stent surface area may vary due to the fixed loading dose and differences in the stent surface area once expanded in varying vessel sizes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential effects of different dose intensities, as estimated by 3D-IVUS dosimetry, on vascular response after DES implantation.

METHODS

Follow-up (6-9 months) 3D-IVUS was performed in 840 coronary lesions treated with a single DES of the following types: sirolimus (SES, n=148), paclitaxel (PES, n=162), Endeavor zotarolimus (E-ZES, n=233), Resolute zotarolimus (R-ZES, n=147), and everolimus (EES, n=150). Volume index (volume/length, mm(3)/mm) was obtained for vessel, lumen, plaque, stent, and neointima. In each lesion, exposed dose intensity was calculated as known loading dose divided by measured luminal surface area of the stented segment. Lesions were divided into tertiles based on the exposed dose intensity: high, medium, and low dose groups.

RESULTS

The exposed dose intensity ranged 0.74-1.76 μg/mm(2) for SES, 0.41-1.18 μg/mm(2) for PES, 0.71-1.57 μg/mm(2) for E-ZES, 0.72-1.63 μg/mm(2) for R-ZES, and 0.40-0.99 μg/mm(2) for EES. All types of DES showed no significant difference in neointimal hyperplasia among the 3 groups, except that E-ZES showed significantly less neointimal hyperplasia in the high dose group.

CONCLUSIONS

Detailed 3D-IVUS revealed significant lesion-to-lesion variability in dose intensity exposed to the vessel wall following DES implantation. However, the major types of DES appear to yield equally effective neointimal suppression, despite the varying dose intensity, except for E-ZES.

Comparison of vascular response to the everolimus-eluting stent versus the paclitaxel-eluting stent: intravascular ultrasound results from the SPIRIT III trial

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to investigate the vascular response of the everolimus-eluting stent (EES) compared with the paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) using serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data were obtained from the SPIRIT III trial, a multicentre, 2:1 randomised, controlled study comparing EES and PES in de novo native coronary artery lesions. IVUS images were eligible for volumetric analysis at eight-month follow-up in 158 lesions (EES: 113, PES: 45). At eight months, EES had a smaller neointimal volume index (VI: mm3/mm) (EES: 0.4±0.4 vs. PES: 0.8±0.8 mm3/mm, p=0.002) and also a smaller % neointimal obstruction (EES: 7.1±6.7% vs. PES: 11.1±10.5%, p=0.005) compared with PES. While there was no significant change in vessel VI with EES, there was a significant increase in vessel VI in PES during eight-month follow-up (EES: 0.1±1.2 vs. PES: 1.2±0.8 mm3/mm, p=0.001). There were no statistical differences in the frequency of edge dissection or incomplete stent apposition between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Detailed IVUS analysis confirmed significantly less neointimal hyperplasia with EES compared with PES. While there was no increase in vessel volume with EES during the eight-month follow-up period, vessel enlargement was seen at the stented segment in PES.

Impact of diabetes mellitus on vessel response in the drug-eluting stent era: pooled volumetric intravascular ultrasound analyses

BACKGROUND

Exaggerated neointimal hyperplasia is considered as the primary mechanism for increased restenosis in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) treated with bare-metal stent. However, the vessel response in DM and non-DM treated with different drug-eluting stents (DES) has not been systematically evaluated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We investigated 3D intravascular ultrasound (postprocedure and 6 to 9 months) in 971 patients (267 with DM and 704 without DM) treated with sirolimus- (n=104), paclitaxel- (n=303), zotarolimus- (n=391), or everolimus- (n=173) eluting stents. Volumetric data were standardized by length as volume index (VI). At postprocedure, lumen VI at the stented segment was significantly smaller in DM than in non-DM, whereas vessel VI was similar between the 2 groups. At follow-up, neointimal obstruction and maximum cross-sectional narrowing (neointimal area/stent area) were not significantly different between the 2 groups with no interaction for the DES type. Consequently, lumen VI was smaller in DM than in non-DM at follow-up. In the reference segments, residual plaque burden at postprocedure was significantly greater in DM than in non-DM, although change in lumen VI was similar between the 2 groups. The arterial responses at the reference segments also showed no interaction for the DES type.

CONCLUSIONS

DM and non-DM lesions showed similar vessel response in both in-stent and reference segments regardless of the DES type. In the DES era, the follow-up lumen in DM patients seems to be determined primarily by the smaller lumen at postprocedure rather than exaggerated neointima within the stent or plaque proliferation at the reference segments.

Inverse association of coronary soluble tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis inducing ligand (sTRAIL) levels to in-stent neointimal hyperplasia

OBJECTIVES

Soluble tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis inducing ligand (sTRAIL) has been shown to exert protective action against atherosclerosis. The aim of this study was to investigate potential associations of coronary sTRAIL levels with indices of in-stent neointimal hyperplasia.

METHODS

67 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent were followed up at approximately 12 months with determination of coronary sTRAIL concentration, angiography and intravascular ultrasound evaluation of the stent sites.

RESULTS

Mean sTRAIL concentration was 72.2 ± 2.8 pg/ml. sTRAIL was negatively correlated to indices of neointimal hyperplasia and positively correlated to in-stent minimum lumen area (p < 0.001). Neointimal obstruction and maximal in-stent cross-sectional neointima burden in patients in the upper sTRAIL quartile were 3.8 ± 1.2 and 12.6 ± 3.3%, respectively, versus 14.0 ± 0.7 and 49.8 ± 2.7% in the lower quartile (p < 0.001 for both). sTRAIL levels were significantly lower in patients with binary restenosis (48.7 ± 3.0 vs. 75.2 ± 2.9 pg/ml; p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, sTRAIL was an independent predictor of neointimal hyperplasia.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates a negative association of sTRAIL to in-stent neointima formation. The potential pathophysiologic substrate of this effect implicates modulation of apoptosis in various cell types. These observations should prompt further evaluation of the link between sTRAIL and in-stent restenosis.

Impact of Polymer Formulations on Neointimal Proliferation After Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With Different Polymers

Background—

Polymer formulation may affect the efficacy of drug-eluting stents. Resolute, Endeavor, and ZoMaxx are zotarolimus-eluting stents with different stent platforms and different polymer coatings and have been tested in clinical trials. The aim of this analysis was to compare the efficacy of zotarolimus-eluting stents with different polymers.

Methods and Results—

Data were obtained from the first-in man trial or first randomized trials of each stent, The Clinical RESpOnse EvaLUation of the MedTronic Endeavor CR ABT-578 Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (RESOLUTE), Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Medtronic AVE ABT-578 Eluting Driver Coronary Stent in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (ENDEAVOR II), and ZoMaxx I trials. Follow-up intravascular ultrasound analyses (8 to 9 months of follow-up) were possible in 353 patients (Resolute: 88, Endeavor: 98, ZoMaxx: 82, Driver: 85). Volume index (volume/stent length) was obtained for vessel, stent, lumen, peristent plaque, and neointima. Cross-sectional narrowing was defined as neointimal area divided by stent area (%). Neointima-free frame ratio was calculated as the number of frames without intravascular ultrasound–detectable neointima divided by the total number of frames within the stent. At baseline, vessel, lumen, and peristent plaque volume index were not significantly different among the 4 stent groups. At follow-up, percent neointimal obstruction was significantly lower in Resolute compared with Endeavor, ZoMaxx, and Driver (Resolute: 3.7±4.0, Endeavor: 17.5±10.1, ZoMaxx: 14.6±8.1, Driver: 29.4±17.2%; P <0.001). Greater maximum cross-sectional narrowing and higher neointima-free frame ratio, suggesting less neointimal coverage, were observed in Resolute compared with other stent groups. Multiple regression analysis confirmed that the biodurable polymer used in Resolute independently correlated with neointimal suppression among 3 zotarolimus-eluting stents.

Conclusions—

The different polymer formulations significantly affect the relative amount of neointima for zotarolimus-eluting stents.

Clinical Trial Registration—

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00248079.