Beneficial Effects of Valsartan on Target Lesion Revascularization After Percutaneous Coronary Interventions With Bare-Metal Stents

The Effect of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers on In-Stent Restenosis After Stent Implantation: A Meta-Analysis

AIM

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) have been shown to inhibit restenosis in vitro and in vivo, but the evidence found in humans is inconsistent. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ARBs in preventing in-stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHOD

Databases including the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, and CNKI were searched to collect randomised controlled trials on ARBs inhibiting restenosis that were published before October 2022. A total of 1,056 patients enrolled in eight trials were included in the study.

RESULTS

The ARBs group showed lower target lesion revascularisation than the control group (RR 0.54; 95% CI 0.34-0.86; p=0.01), but the restenosis incidence between these two groups was not statistically significant (RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.65-1.11; p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study found that ARBs might have a potential effect on reducing target lesion revascularisation after PCI in coronary heart disease patients but has no impact on angiographic restenosis.

Assessing the risk of angiotensin receptor blockers on major cardiovascular events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are commonly used as a treatment for many cardiovascular diseases, but their safety has been called into question. The VALUE trial found an increased risk of myocardial infarction in participants receiving ARBs compared to other antihypertensive. The aim of the meta-analysis was to synthetize the available evidence of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and elucidate if ARBs increase the risk of cardiovascular events.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted to identify RCTs that assessed the safety of ARBs. Titles and abstracts of all papers were independently screened by two authors. Data extraction and quality assessment were also performed independently. The relative risk (RR) of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke were pooled using the IVhet model. Multiple sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the effect of ARBs by restricting the analysis to different participants' characteristics.

RESULTS

Forty-five RCTs comprising of 170,794 participants were included in the analysis. The pooled estimates revealed that ARBs do not increase the risk of all-cause mortality (RR 1.00; 95%CI 0.97-1.04), myocardial infarction (RR 1.01; 95%CI 0.96-1.06), and stroke (RR 0.92; 95%CI 0.83-1.01). The sensitivity analysis did not yield a particular group of patients at increased risk of cardiovascular events with ARBs. Risk of all-cause mortality and stroke decreased with ARB when the proportion of smokers in a population was < 25% (RR 0.91; 95%CI 0.84-0.98) and in females (RR 0.76; 95%CI 0.68-0.84), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

ARBs do not increase the risk of major cardiovascular events and are safe for use in patients.

Valsartan decreases neointimal hyperplasia in balloon-injured rat aortic arteries by upregulating HO-1 and inhibiting angiotensin II type 1 receptor

AIMS

Upregulation of heme oxygenase (HO)-1 plays an important role in vascular protection. Valsartan attenuates neointimal hyperplasia in animal studies. The objective of this study was to examine the role of HO-1 and angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor in the action of valsartan on neointimal hyperplasia in balloon-injured rat aortic arteries.

MAIN METHODS

Thirty-six male Wistar rats were randomly divided into the following three groups with twelve rats in each group: control group, surgery (model) group, and valsartan group. Aortic balloon injury was performed to elicit endothelial denudation with a 2F balloon catheter. On days 14 and 28 after injury, blood was harvested to measure bilirubin levels. Aortic arteries were harvested for morphometry analysis, to determine angiotensin II (Ang II) level, and to analyze mRNA or protein expression.

KEY FINDINGS

Compared with the control group, proliferation and intimal thickening of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) were obvious in the surgery group rats on days 14 and 28 after injury. Valsartan significantly reduced the proliferation and intimal thickening. Additionally, pretreatment with valsartan significantly reduced Ang II levels, AT1 receptor, and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) expression. Valsartan increased HO-1 protein and mRNA expression, as well as increased serum bilirubin levels compared with the surgery group.

SIGNIFICANCE

Valsartan treatment decreased neointimal hyperplasia in balloon-injured rats. The mechanism of action might be linked to the upregulation of HO-1, downregulation of AT1 receptor and inhibition of p38MAPK signal pathway.

Comparison of the efficacies of irbesartan and olmesartan after successful coronary stent implantation

OBJECTIVE

We compared the efficacies of irbesartan and olmesartan after successful stent implantation in patients with stable angina.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients were randomly divided into irbesartan and olmesartan groups and treated for approximately eight months (at follow-up coronary angiography).

RESULTS

There were no differences in blood pressure (BP) reduction or late loss between the groups. The BP levels in both groups at follow-up were significantly reduced. The equality of variance of systolic (S)BP (i.e., the intragroup standard deviation of SBP) in the irbesartan group was significantly smaller than that observed in the olmesartan group at follow-up. In addition, log[pentraxin-3] was significantly decreased in all of the patients at follow-up, with no differences between the groups. Interestingly, the levels of log[high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)] measured at 0 weeks were positively associated with in-stent late loss, and among independent biochemical variables in addition to age, gender, body mass index and the kind of angiotensin receptor blockers at 0 weeks, only these levels were related to in-stent late loss, as assessed by a multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

The ability of irbesartan to reduce BP is comparable to that of olmesartan, and irbesartan exhibits a lower variance of systolic BP after treatment. The level of log[hs-CRP] before stent implantation is a predictor of in-stent late loss.