I prefer the MitraClip in these cases: the 5-year COAPT data

The COAPT 5-year data demonstrate that compared with medical treatment transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) with the MitraClip in symptomatic patients with Grade 3+/Grade 4+ secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) reduced by nearly half the annualized hospitalization risk (33 vs. 57%), by almost 30% the death rate (57 vs. 67%) and achieved significant and durable SMR reduction in 95% of patients. Control patients who crossed over to TEER at 2 years had better prognosis, but nearly half of them died before reaching crossover eligibility. Death or hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) occurred in 73.6% of TEER patients and 91.5% of controls within 5 years, pointing to a need for further study to address left ventricle (LV) dysfunction, the underlying cause of patient's disease. MTRA-FR targeted SMR using the same device and did not improve the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or HHF at 12 months. Possible reasons for the discrepancy include enrolment of patients with more severe MR and less-advanced LV disease (dilation/dysfunction), less-procedural complications, and higher success in reducing MR in COAPT compared with MITRA-FR. Thus, the ideal patient for MitraClip treatment would be one with severe MR, but with no too severe LV dilation/dysfunction, which is what differentiates COAPT patients from those in MITRA-FR.

Invasive hemodynamics are equivocal for functional outcomes after MitraClip

Objectives

To evaluate invasive hemodynamics in assessing MC therapy success as well as evaluate its effectiveness as a predictor of functional outcomes.

Background

Mitral regurgitation grade is a poor predictor of functional outcomes after a MitraClip. There is a paucity of data on invasive hemodynamics as a predictor of outcomes.

Methods

Sixty-nine patients underwent MC between 2015 and 2018 at the University of Minnesota Medical Center and were retrospectively analyzed. Invasive hemodynamics were performed before and after device deployment with transesophageal echocardiographic guidance. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA version 16. Student's t test was used for continuous variables and Pearson's chi-squared test for categorical variables. Mann-Whitney test was performed for continuous variables where data were not normally distributed. Logistic and linear regression were used to investigate relationships between variables and outcomes.

Results

A total of 69 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 83 (75-87) years and 38 (55%) were male. Eighty-one percentage had >/= NYHA III symptoms. Eighty-seven percentage had severe MR. Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was 20 (15-24). Overall, there was significant improvement in left atrial pressure including mean left atrial pressure index, MR, and NYHA class after MC (<.001). There was no significant association between invasive hemodynamics (including left atrial mean pressure index or its reduction rate) and functional outcomes (p = NS). MR grade was also not predictive of functional outcomes.

Conclusion

Left atrial pressure may not be a significant predictor of functional outcomes, and, in isolation, may not be an improvement over MR grade.

Prevalence and Predictors of Atherosclerotic Peripheral Arterial Obstructive Disease in Severe Heart Valve Diseases

Despite witnessing an upsurge in heart valve diseases (HVDs), the correlation between HVDs and atherosclerotic peripheral arterial obstructive disease (PAOD) remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the prevalence and predictors of PAOD in HVDs.In this study, a total of 245 consecutive patients were examined: 153 with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS), 66 with severe primary mitral valve regurgitation (MR), and 26 with severe pure native aortic valve regurgitation (AR). All patients underwent ultrasound scan of the carotid artery to ascertain the presence of internal carotid artery stenosis (ICAS). ICAS was defined as a peak systolic velocity ≥ 125 cm/second and/or ≥ 50% reduction in diameter. In addition, we measured the ankle-brachial index in each leg using a volume plethysmograph. A result of ≤ 0.9 was considered lower extremity artery disease (LEAD).The presence of ICAS was statistically more frequent in patients with severe AS than in patients with severe MR and AR (11.1% versus 1.5% versus 3.8%; P = 0.038). LEAD was present in patients with severe AS (17.6%) and MR (10.6%) but not in patients with severe AR (P = 0.037). The multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of severe AS (OR, 5.6 [1.3-24.9]; P = 0.023) was an independent predictor for ICAS, while history of coronary artery disease (OR, 4.8 [2.2-10.5]; P < 0.001) was an independent predictor for LEAD.The prevalence of PAOD varies depending on each valvular disease. Individual screening should be considered on the basis of atherosclerotic risk factors, especially for patients with severe AS.

[Percutaneous treatment of mitral regurgitation by Mitraclip in the elderly]

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the second most common form of valvular heart disease. It is classified as either primary (degenerative) or secondary (functional). Secondary MR is the consequence of myocardium disease. Primary MR from degenerative valve disease is due to a primary disruption of the mitral valve apparatus from either prolapsed or flail leaflets. It covers all aetiologies in which intrinsic lesions affect one or several components of the mitral valve apparatus. Gold-standard therapeutic management of severe primary MR is surgery usually to repair but sometime to replace the mitral valve. However patients considered to be at high-risk due to their age or the presence of comorbidities - accounting for 50% of all patients - are not eligible for surgery. Catheter-based interventions have been developed to correct MR percutaneously. The only such intervention which has been evaluated in organic MR is the edge-to-edge procedure using the MitraClip^® (Abbott Vascular, Menlo Park, CA). MitraClip^® offers an alternative to open surgical repair or replacement via a minimally invasive route and it was shown in the EVEREST II study that MitraClip^® was safer than surgery even though it was less effective in reducing MR. A substantial number of patients are ineligible for mitral valve surgery because of prohibitive surgical risk. For those patients, MitraClip^® may offer an alternative treatment option. Percutaneous edge-to-edge repair is the first percutaneous option accepted in the 2012 ESC guidelines: Percutaneous edge-to-edge procedure may be considered in patients with symptomatic severe primary MR who fulfill the echo criteria of eligibility, are judged inoperable or at high surgical risk by a 'heart team', and have a life expectancy greater than 1 year (recommendation class IIb, level of evidence C). Because of its frailty, MitraClip^® in the elderly may be a good alternative to mitral surgery when indicated for primary or secondary MD.

Acute and Midterm Outcome After MitraClip Therapy in Patients With Severe Mitral Regurgitation and Left Ventricular Dysfunction

The clinical outcome of patients with severe primary and secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) and heart failure or significantly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) who underwent percutaneous mitral valve repair (pMVR) is yet not well known. This study compares midterm outcome of patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction (EF ≤30%) versus patients with slightly or moderately reduced or normal LVEF (EF >30%) after pMVR. One hundred thirty-six consecutive patients were enrolled: 42 patients displayed severe left ventricular dysfunction, group 1 (logistic EuroSCORE I 27.7 ± 21.8%; secondary MR in 37 patients), and 94 patients displayed slightly or moderately reduced or normal LVEF, group 2 (logistic EuroSCORE I 17 ± 18.2%; secondary MR in 21 patients). The primary efficacy endpoint was death of any cause, repeat mitral valve intervention, and/or New York Heart Association class ≥III, which was reached in 31% of patients in group 1 versus 40% in group 2 (p = 0.719) at a median follow-up of 371 days. MR, graded by transthoracic echocardiography, was reduced in both groups (p <0.001) and New York Heart Association class improved in each group (p <0.001), with no differences between groups (p >0.05). In conclusion, at midterm follow-up, the pMVR provided significant clinical benefits with comparable results achieved both in patients with significantly reduced and in patients with moderately reduced to normal LVEF. Thus, pMVR represents a feasible and effective treatment in high-risk patients who otherwise have limited therapeutic options and no safe option to reduce MR.

Quantitation of mitral regurgitation after percutaneous MitraClip repair: comparison of Doppler echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVE

Percutaneous valve intervention for severe mitral regurgitation (MR) using the MitraClip is a novel technology. Quantitative assessment of residual MR by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is challenging, with multiple eccentric jets and artifact from the clips. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is the reference standard for left and right ventricular volumetric assessment. CMR phase-contrast flow imaging has superior reproducibility for quantitation of MR compared to echocardiography. The objective of this study was to establish the feasibility and reproducibility of CMR in quantitating residual MR after MitraClip insertion in a prospective study.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients underwent successful MitraClip insertion. Nine were excluded due to non-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compatible implants or arrhythmia, leaving 16 who underwent a comprehensive CMR examination at 1.5 T (Siemens Aera) with multiplanar steady state free precession (SSFP) cine imaging (cine CMR), and phase-contrast flow acquisitions (flow CMR) at the mitral annulus atrial to the MitraClip, and the proximal aorta. Same-day echocardiography was performed with two-dimensional (2D) visualization and Doppler. CMR and echocardiographic data were independently and blindly analyzed by expert readers. Inter-rater comparison was made by concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and Bland-Altman (BA) methods.

RESULTS

Mean age was 79 years, and mean LVEF was 44%±11% by CMR and 54%±16% by echocardiography. Inter-observer reproducibility of echocardiographic visual categorical grading by expert readers was poor, with a CCC of 0.475 (-0.7, 0.74). Echocardiographic Doppler regurgitant fraction reproducibility was modest (CCC 0.59, 0.15-0.84; BA mean difference -3.7%, -38% to 31%). CMR regurgitant fraction reproducibility was excellent (CCC 0.95, 0.86-0.98; BA mean difference -2.4%, -11.9 to 7.0), with a lower mean difference and narrower limits of agreement compared to echocardiography. Categorical severity grading by CMR using published ranges had good inter-observer agreement (CCC 0.86, 0.62-0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

CMR performs very well in the quantitation of MR after MitraClip insertion, with excellent reproducibility compared to echocardiographic methods. CMR is a useful technique for the comprehensive evaluation of residual regurgitation in patients after MitraClip. Technical limitations exist for both techniques, and quantitation remains a challenge in some patients.

Midterm outcomes of chordal cutting in combination with downsized ring annuloplasty for ischemic mitral regurgitation

PURPOSE

We describe midterm outcomes after division of secondary chords (chordal cutting) combined with downsized ring annuloplasty for ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR).

METHODS

We compared the clinical outcomes in patients who underwent chordal cutting with downsized ring annuloplasty (CC-group, n = 15) and those who underwent conventional ring annuloplasty only (Conventional-group, n = 35) for IMR. Follow-up was complete in all patients. The median follow-up time was 4.1 years.

RESULTS

Thirty-day mortality was 0% in CC-group and 20% in Conventional-group. The overall survival rate at 5-year was 80.8% ± 12.6% in CC-group and 61.7% ± 8.4% in Conventional-group (Log-rank, p = 0.145). The freedom rate from valve-related events at 5 year was 84.6% ± 10.0% in CC-group and 65.3% ± 10.1% in Conventional-group (Log-rank, p = 0.213). Recurrence of severe mitral regurgitation was revealed in 3 patients of CC-group. Preoperative tenting height was the significant predictor of mitral regurgitation recurrence. In CC-group, the mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 38.0% ± 14.0%, which was similar to the preoperative value of 40.0% ± 13.2% (p = 0.349).

CONCLUSIONS

Chordal cutting with downsized ring annuloplasty for IMR is a simple method and provides satisfactory early outcomes. However, it carries with high recurrence of MR especially for patients with high tenting height.

EVEREST II high risk study based UK cost-effectiveness analysis of MitraClip® in patients with severe mitral regurgitation ineligible for conventional repair/replacement surgery

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of MitraClip, an interventional procedure for patients with chronic severe mitral regurgitation.

METHODS

A decision analytic model with a lifetime horizon was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of MitraClip vs conventional medical management in patients with severe mitral regurgitation, ineligible for surgery. The analysis was performed from a UK NHS perspective and the estimates for mortality, adverse events, and cross-sectional NYHA class were obtained from the EVEREST II High Risk Study (HRS). Utility decrements were obtained from a heath technology assessment on Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, while unit costs were obtained from national databases. The concept model was clinically validated. Costs (2011 £UK) and benefits were discounted at an annual rate of 3.5%.

RESULTS

Compared to medical management, over 2- and 10-year periods MitraClip had incremental Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) gains of 0.48 and 2.04, respectively. The Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios for MitraClip at 2 and 10 years are £52,947 and £14,800 per QALY gained. Overall, the model was most sensitive to the choice of time horizon, the discount rate applied to benefits, the starting age of cohort, the utility decrement associated with NYHA II, and cost of the MitraClip procedure. The model was insensitive to changes in all other parameters. MitraClip was also found to be cost-effective, regardless of the modelling approach, and insensitive to the key assumptions of the procedure cost.

STUDY LIMITATIONS

The primary limitation of the analysis is the reliance on aggregate data from a modestly sized non-randomized study with a short-term follow-up period. Aligned to this was the need to extrapolate survival well beyond the study period in order to generate meaningful results. The impact of both of these limitations was explored via extensive sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

Compared to medical management, MitraClip is a cost-effective interventional procedure at conventional threshold values.