Differing effects of adaptive servoventilation and continuous positive airway pressure on muscle sympathetic nerve activity in patients with heart failure

Chronic Effects of Adaptive Servo-Ventilation Therapy on Mortality and the Urgent Rehospitalization Rate in Patients Experiencing Recurrent Admissions for Heart Failure - A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study (SAVIOR-L)

BACKGROUND

This study investigated whether the chronic use of adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) reduces all-cause mortality and the rate of urgent rehospitalization in patients with heart failure (HF).Methods and Results: This multicenter prospective observational study enrolled patients hospitalized for HF in Japan between 2019 and 2020 who were treated either with or without ASV therapy. Of 845 patients, 110 (13%) received chronic ASV at hospital discharge. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death and urgent rehospitalization for HF, and was observed in 272 patients over a 1-year follow-up. Following 1:3 sequential propensity score matching, 384 patients were included in the subsequent analysis. The median time to the primary outcome was significantly shorter in the ASV than in non-ASV group (19.7 vs. 34.4 weeks; P=0.013). In contrast, there was no significant difference in the all-cause mortality event-free rate between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic use of ASV did not impact all-cause mortality in patients experiencing recurrent admissions for HF.

Analysis of the effect of CPAP on hemodynamics using clinical data and a theoretical model: CPAP therapy decreases cardiac output mechanically but increases it via afterload reduction

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) has been established as an effective treatment for heart failure. Positive airway pressure such as continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) increases cardiac output (CO) in some patients but decreases it in others. However, the mechanism behind such unpredictable responses remains undetermined.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We measured hemodynamic parameters of 38 cases using Swan-Ganz catheter before and after CPAP in chronic heart failure status. In those whose CO increased by CPAP, pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) was significantly decreased and SpO2 significantly increased, but the other parameters were not changed. On the other hand, PVR was not changed, but systemic vascular resistance (SVR) was increased in those whose CO decreased by CPAP. To explain this phenomenon, we simulated the cardiovascular system using a cardiac model of time-varying elastance. In this model, it was indicated that CPAP decreases CO irrespective of cardiac function or filling status under constant PVR condition. However, when reduction of PVR by CPAP was taken into account, an increase in CO was expected especially in the hypervolemic and low right ventricle (RV) systolic function cases.

CONCLUSIONS

CPAP would increase CO only where PVR can be reduced by CPAP therapy, especially in the case with hypervolemia and/or low RV systolic function. Understanding the underlying mechanism should help identify the patients for whom NIPPV would be effective.

Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for central sleep apnoea in adults

BACKGROUND

Central sleep apnoea (CSA) is characterised by abnormal patterns of ventilation during sleep due to a dysfunctional drive to breathe. Consequently, people with CSA may present poor sleep quality, sleep fragmentation, inattention, fatigue, daytime sleepiness, and reduced quality of life.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPV) for the treatment of adults with CSA.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus on 6 September 2021. We applied no restrictions on language of publication. We also searched clinical trials registries for ongoing and unpublished studies, and scanned the reference lists of included studies to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reported in full text, those published as abstract only, and unpublished data.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias of the included studies using the Cochrane risk of bias tool version 1.0, and the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. In the case of disagreement, a third review author was consulted.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 15 RCTs with a total of 1936 participants, ranging from 10 to 1325 participants. All studies had important methodological limitations. We assessed most studies (11 studies) as at high risk of bias for at least one domain, and all studies as at unclear risk of bias for at least two domains. The trials included participants aged > 18 years old, of which 70% to 100% were men, who were followed from one week to 60 months. The included studies assessed the effects of different modes of NIPV and CSA. Most participants had CSA associated with chronic heart failure. Because CSA encompasses a variety of causes and underlying clinical conditions, data were carefully analysed, and different conditions and populations were not pooled. The findings for the primary outcomes for the seven evaluated comparisons are presented below.  Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) plus best supportive care versus best supportive care in CSA associated with chronic heart failure In the short term, CPAP plus best supportive care may reduce central apnoea hypopnoea index (AHI) (mean difference (MD) -14.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) -20.11 to -9.09; 1 study; 205 participants). However, CPAP plus best supportive care may result in little to no difference in cardiovascular mortality compared to best supportive care alone. The evidence for the effect of CPAP plus best supportive care on all-cause mortality is very uncertain. No adverse effects were observed with CPAP, and the results for adverse events in the best supportive care group were not reported. Adaptive servo ventilation (ASV) versus CPAP in CSA associated with chronic heart failure The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of ASV versus CPAP on quality of life evaluated in both the short and medium term. Data on adverse events were not reported, and it is not clear whether data were sought but not found. ASV versus bilevel ventilation in CSA associated with chronic heart failure In the short term, ASV may result in little to no difference in central AHI. No adverse events were detected with ASV, and the results for adverse events in the bilevel ventilation group were not reported. ASV plus best supportive care versus best supportive care in CSA associated with chronic heart failure In the medium term, ASV plus best supportive care may reduce AHI compared to best supportive care alone (MD -20.30, 95% CI -28.75 to -11.85; 1 study; 30 participants). In the long term, ASV plus best supportive care likely increases cardiovascular mortality compared to best supportive care (risk ratio (RR) 1.25, 95% CI 1.04, 1.49; 1 study; 1325 participants). The evidence suggests that ASV plus best supportive care may result in little to no difference in quality of life in the short, medium, and long term, and in all-cause mortality in the medium and long term. Data on adverse events were evaluated but not reported. ASV plus best supportive care versus best supportive care in CSA with acute heart failure with preserved ejection fraction Only adverse events were reported for this comparison, and no adverse events were recorded in either group. ASV versus CPAP maintenance in CPAP-induced CSA In the short term, ASV may slightly reduce central AHI (MD -4.10, 95% CI -6.67 to -1.53; 1 study; 60 participants), but may result in little to no difference in quality of life. Data on adverse events were not reported, and it is not clear whether data were sought but not found. ASV versus bilevel ventilation in CPAP-induced CSA In the short term, ASV may slightly reduce central AHI (MD -8.70, 95% CI -11.42 to -5.98; 1 study; 30 participants) compared to bilevel ventilation. Data on adverse events were not reported, and it is not clear whether data were sought but not found.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

CPAP plus best supportive care may reduce central AHI in people with CSA associated with chronic heart failure compared to best supportive care alone. Although ASV plus best supportive care may reduce AHI in people with CSA associated with chronic heart failure, it likely increases cardiovascular mortality in these individuals. In people with CPAP-induced CSA, ASV may slightly reduce central AHI compared to bilevel ventilation and to CPAP. In the absence of data showing a favourable impact on meaningful patient-centred outcomes and defining clinically important differences in outcomes in CSA patients, these findings need to be interpreted with caution. Considering the level of certainty of the available evidence and the heterogeneity of participants with CSA, we could draw no definitive conclusions, and further high-quality trials focusing on patient-centred outcomes, such as quality of life, quality of sleep, and longer-term survival, are needed to determine whether one mode of NIPV is better than another or than best supportive care for any particular CSA patient group.

Sympathetic neural overdrive in congestive heart failure and its correlates: systematic reviews and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Sympathetic neural activation occurs in congestive heart failure (CHF). However, the small sample size of the microneurographic studies, heterogeneity of the patients examined, presence of comorbidities as well as confounders (including treatment) represented major weaknesses not allowing to identify the major features of the phoenomenon, particularly in mild CHF. This meta-analysis evaluated 2530 heart failure (CHF) patients recruited in 106 microneurographic studies. It was based on muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) quantification in CHF of different clinical severity, but data from less widely addressed conditions, such as ischemic vs. idiopathic, were also considered.

METHODS

Assessment was extended to the relationships of MSNA with venous plasma norepinephrine, heart rate (HR) and echocardiographic parameters of cardiac morphology [left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic diameter] and function (LV ejection fraction) as well.

RESULTS

MSNA was significantly greater (1.9 times, P < 0.001) in CHF patients as compared with healthy controls, a progressive significant increase being observed from New York Heart Association classes I-IV in unadjusted and adjusted analyses. MSNA was significantly greater in both untreated and treated CHF (P < 0.001 for both), related to left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic diameter and to a lesser extent to LV ejection fraction (r = 0.24 and -0.05, P < 0.001 and <0.01, respectively), and closely associated with HR (r = 0.66, P < 0.001) and plasma norepinephrine (r = 0.68, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

CHF is characterized by sympathetic overactivity which mirrors the degree of LV dysfunction independently of the stage of CHF, its cause and presence of confounders or pharmacological treatment. plasma norepinephrine and HR represent potentially valuable surrogate markers of sympathetic activation in the clinical setting.

Prognostic values of 123I-MIBG myocardial scintigraphy and heart rate variability in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic values of sympathetic nerve system using 123I-MIBG myocardial scintigraphy and using Holter electrocardiogram (ECG) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Among 403 consecutive patients with stable HF who underwent 123I-MIBG myocardial scintigraphy and Holter ECG, we identified 133 patients (64 ± 16 years) who had preserved ejection fraction (≥ 50%) by echocardiography. Multivariate Cox model was used to assess if washout rate (WR) by 123I-MIBG scintigraphy and very low frequency power (VLFP) by Holter ECG was associated with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). During a mean follow-up of 5.4 ± 4.1 years, 39 MACE occurred. The lower nighttime VLFP (HR 3.29, 95% CI 1.56 to 6.92) and higher WR (HR 4.01, 95% CI 1.63 to 9.88) were the significant prognostic factors for MACE. As compared to high nighttime VLFP and low WR group, MACE risk was significantly the highest in the low nighttime VLFP and high WR group (HR 40.832; 95% CI 5.378 to 310.012, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that the nighttime VLFP adding to WR could be a potential prognostic value among patients with HFpEF.

Sympathetic overactivation predicts body weight loss in patients with heart failure

Neurohumoral activation is frequently observed in chronic heart failure (HF) patients who develop body weight (BW) loss. We therefore hypothesized that sympathetic overactivation can predict progression of BW loss in HF patients with reduced ejection fraction. We prospectively evaluated BW loss in 108 non-edematous HF in whom muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) was measured. Follow-up began on the day of first MSNA measurement. Patients with BW loss of ≥5% of baseline BW during the first year of follow-up were considered to be experiencing BW loss. Maximal BW loss (%) and time to first BW loss (i.e., ≥5%) were assessed. Primary cardiovascular endpoints included cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization. Predictors of outcomes were assessed on univariate, multivariate, and Kaplan-Meier analyses. BW loss ≥5% occurred in 14% of enrolled patients. Mean MSNA was significantly higher in the BW loss group than in the no-BW loss group (80 versus 58 bursts/100 beats; p < 0.001). Moreover, multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis revealed MSNA as the only independent predictor of BW loss. Multiple linear regression analysis identified MSNA as the strongest independent marker of maximal BW loss, even after adjusting for univariate predictors. BW loss, MSNA and several variables also correlated significantly with poor outcomes in univariate analyses. However, multivariate analysis only showed MSNA and NYHA III/IV as independent prognostic predictors, while BW loss did not predict prognosis. MSNA offered the most sensitive marker of BW loss in HF patients, but MSNA, not BW loss, was an independent predictor of poor outcome.

Epidemiology of Sleep-Disordered Breathing and Heart Failure: What Drives What

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The bidirectional relationships that have been demonstrated between heart failure (HF) and central sleep apnea (CSA) demand further exploration with respect to the implications that each condition has for the other. This review discusses the body of literature that has accumulated on these relationships and how CSA and its potential treatment may affect outcomes in patients with CSA.

RECENT FINDINGS

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) can exacerbate hypertension, type 2 diabetes, obesity, and atherosclerosis, which are known predicates of HF. Conversely, patients with HF more frequently exhibit OSA partly due to respiratory control system instability. These same mechanisms are responsible for the frequent association of HF with CSA with or without a Hunter-Cheyne-Stokes breathing (HCSB) pattern. Just as is the case with OSA, patients with HF complicated by CSA exhibit more severe cardiac dysfunction leading to increased mortality; the increase in severity of HF can in turn worsen the degree of sleep disordered breathing (SDB). Thus, a bidirectional relationship exists between HF and both phenotypes of SDB; moreover, an individual patient may exhibit a combination of these phenotypes. Both types of SDB remain significantly underdiagnosed in patients with HF and hence undertreated. Appropriate screening for, and treatment of, OSA is clearly a significant factor in the comprehensive management of HF, while the relevance of CSA remains controversial. Given the unexpected results of the Treatment of Sleep-Disordered Breathing with Predominant Central Sleep Apnea by Adaptive Servo Ventilation in Patients with Heart Failure trial, it is now of paramount importance that additional analysis of these data be expeditiously reported. It is also critical that ongoing and proposed prospective studies of this issue proceed without delay.

Beneficial effects of adaptive servo-ventilation therapy on readmission and medical costs in patients with chronic heart failure

Adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) therapy is a novel modality of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation and is now widely utilized to treat patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). However, there has been no clinical study of the effect of ASV therapy on readmission and cost-effectiveness for the treatment of CHF. The present study was conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of home ASV therapy in 45 patients with a history of two or more admissions a year for worsening CHF. Seven patients refused to undergo chronic ASV therapy and three died. Thus, 35 patients were eventually enrolled in the present study. New York Heart Association class (2.8 ± 0.4 versus 2.3 ± 0.5, p < 0.001), log plasma B-type natriuretic peptide level (2.53 ± 0.44 versus 2.29 ± 0.40 pg/mL, p < 0.0001), left atrial dimension (47.5 ± 7.0 versus 44.9 ± 7.6 mm, p = 0.014), and mitral regurgitation area ratio (20.3 ± 12.1 versus 16.9 ± 8.9%, p = 0.007) decreased significantly after 12 months of ASV therapy. The frequency of hospitalization after ASV was significantly lower than before ASV (1.0 ± 1.0 versus 2.3 ± 0.5 times/year/patient, p < 0.0001). ASV also decreased the duration of hospitalization from 64.4 ± 46.5 to 22.8 ± 27.5 days/year/patient (p < 0.0001). Consequently, the total medical costs were reduced by 37% after ASV (1.95 ± 1.37 versus 3.11 ± 1.75 million yen/patient, p = 0.003). ASV therapy reduced readmissions and medical costs in patients with CHF.

Acute Effects of Positive Airway Pressure on Functional Mitral Regurgitation in Patients with Systolic Heart Failure

Background: Acute effects of positive airway pressure (PAP) [including continuous PAP (CPAP) and adaptive servo-ventilation, an advanced form of bi-level PAP] on functional mitral regurgitation (fMR) in patients with heart failure (HF) with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction remain unclear. Thus, whether PAP therapy reduces fMR in such patients with HF was investigated. Methods and Results: Twenty patients with HF and LV systolic dysfunction defined as LV ejection fraction (LVEF) <50% (14 men; mean LVEF, 35.0 ± 11.5%) with fMR underwent echocardiography during 10-min CPAP (4 and 8 cm H₂O) and adaptive servo-ventilation. For fMR assessment, MR jet area fraction, defined as the ratio of MR jet on color Doppler to the left atrial area, was measured. The forward stroke volume (SV) index (fSVI) was calculated from the time-velocity integral, cross-sectional area of the aortic annulus, and body surface area. fMR significantly reduced on CPAP at 8 cm H₂O (0.30 ± 0.12) and adaptive servo-ventilation (0.29 ± 0.12), compared with the baseline phase (0.37 ± 0.12) and CPAP at 4 cm H₂O (0.34 ± 0.12) (P < 0.001). The fSVI did not change in any of the PAP sessions (P = 0.888). However, significant differences in fSVI responses to PAP were found between sexes (P for interaction, 0.006), with a significant reduction in fSVI in women (P = 0.041) and between patients with baseline fSVI ≥ and < the median value (27.8 ml/m², P for interaction, 0.018), with a significant fSVI reduction in patients with high baseline fSVI (P = 0.028). In addition, significant differences were found in fSVI responses to PAP between patients with LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) index ≥ and < the median value (62.0 ml/m², P for interaction, 0.034), with a significant fSVI increase in patients with a high LVESV index (P = 0.023). Conclusion: In patients with HF, LV systolic dysfunction, and fMR, PAP can alleviate fMR without any overall changes in forward SV. However, MR alleviation due to PAP might be associated with a decrease in forward SV in women with high baseline SV, whereas MR alleviation due to PAP might be accompanied by increased forward SV in patients with a dilated LV.

Adaptive servo-ventilation therapy reduces hospitalization rate in patients with severe heart failure

INTRODUCTION

Adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) therapy is a recently developed non-pharmacological therapy that has been reported to improve cardiac function and survival in patients with severe congestive heart failure (CHF). However, a recent large randomized study suggested that ASV does not improve survival in patients with reduced ejection fraction. It remains unclear whether ASV treatment can reduce the hospitalization rate of CHF patients. We thus examined the frequency of hospital admission before and after initiation of ASV therapy in patients with CHF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Hospitalization frequencies during the 12months before and 12months after initiation of ASV therapy (24 consecutive months) were retrospectively compared in 44 consecutive patients with severe CHF. The admission frequency decreased from 1.9±1.4 admissions in the 12months before ASV to 1.1±1.6 admissions in the 12months after ASV initiation (P<0.001). The decrease tended to be greater in those patients with more frequent hospitalizations before ASV initiation.

CONCLUSION

ASV therapy reduces hospital admissions in patients with severe CHF who are receiving maximum medical treatment.

Adaptive servo-ventilation therapy for patients with chronic heart failure in a confirmatory, multicenter, randomized, controlled study

BACKGROUND

Adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) therapy is expected to be novel nonpharmacotherapy with hemodynamic effects on patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), but sufficient evidence has not been obtained.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A 24-week, open-label, randomized, controlled study was performed to confirm the cardiac function-improving effect of ASV therapy on CHF patients. At 39 institutions, 213 outpatients with CHF, whose left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was <40% and who had mild to severe symptoms [New York Heart Association (NYHA) class: ≥II], were enrolled. After excluding 8 patients, 102 and 103 underwent ASV plus guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) [ASV group] and GDMT only [control group], respectively. The primary endpoint was LVEF, and the secondary endpoints were HF deterioration, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), and clinical composite response (CCR: NYHA class+HF deterioration). LVEF and BNP improved significantly at completion against the baseline values in the 2 groups. However, no significant difference was found between these groups. HF deterioration tended to be suppressed. The ASV group showed a significant improvement in CCR corroborated by significant improvements in NYHA class and ADL against the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Under the present study's conditions, ASV therapy was not superior to GDMT in the cardiac function-improving effect but showed a clinical status-improving effect, thus indicating a given level of clinical benefit.

Adaptive servoventilation improves cardiac dysfunction and prognosis in heart failure patients with sleep-disordered breathing: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Adaptive servoventilation (ASV) is a new therapeutic modality to treat sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) especially for central sleep apnoea associated with Cheyne-Stokes respiration, whereas the role of ASV in SDB patients with heart failure (HF) is controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of ASV on these patients through a meta-analysis of published data.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify studies focused on ASV through databases, including PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of science from 1950 to 2014. Parallel randomised controlled trials which compared ASV to other controls in HF and SDB patients with extractable data were meet our inclusion criteria. Random effects meta-analysis models were applied using RevMan 5.2.

RESULTS

Seven studies involving 301 patients were recruited in the meta-analysis. The weighted mean difference in apnoea hyponea index (-17.73 events/h, 95% CI, -21.85 to -2.94) and left ventricular ejection fraction (MD: 4.68, 95% CI, 2.74-6.63) both favored ASV compared to control conditions. The urinary noradrenaline level (MD: -32.18, 95%CI: -44.07 to -20.09) was decreased, while the exercise capacity measured by 6-min walk distance (MD: 41.26, 95% CI, 17.06-65.45) was improved after ASV treatment. Whereas neither left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) nor Epworth sleepiness-scale score (ESS) significantly changed after ASV therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

ASV is superior to other therapy, as it can result in good consequences for patients with SDB and improve their prognosis in cardiac function. Further studies will still be needed to assess the benefit of it.

Adaptive Servo-Ventilation Has More Favorable Acute Effects on Hemodynamics Than Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Patients With Heart Failure

Adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) has been attracting attention as a novel respiratory support therapy for heart failure (HF). However, the acute hemodynamic effects have not been compared between ASV and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in HF patients.We studied 12 consecutive patients with stable chronic HF. Hemodynamic measurement was performed by right heart catheterization before and after CPAP 5 cmH2O, CPAP 10 cmH2O, and ASV for 15 minutes each.Heart rate, blood pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), and stroke volume index (SVI) were not changed by any intervention. Right atrial pressure significantly increased after CPAP 10 cmH2O (3.6 ± 3.3 to 6.7 ± 1.6 mmHg, P = 0.005) and ASV (4.1 ± 2.6 to 6.8 ± 1.5 mmHg, P = 0.026). Cardiac index was significantly decreased by CPAP 10 cmH2O (2.3 ± 0.4 to 1.9 ± 0.3 L/minute/m(2), P = 0.048), but was not changed by ASV (2.3 ± 0.4 to 2.0 ± 0.3 L/ minute/m(2), P = 0.299). There was a significant positive correlation between baseline PCWP and % of baseline SVI by CPAP 10 cmH2O (r = 0.705, P < 0.001) and ASV (r = 0.750, P < 0.001). ASV and CPAP 10 cmH2O had significantly greater slopes of this correlation than CPAP 5 cmH2O, suggesting that patients with higher PCWP had a greater increase in SVI by ASV and CPAP 10 cmH2O. The relationship between baseline PCWP and % of baseline SVI by ASV was shifted upwards compared to CPAP 10 cmH2O. Furthermore, based on the results of a questionnaire, patients accepted CPAP 5 cmH2O and ASV more favorably compared to CPAP 10 cmH2O.ASV had more beneficial effects on acute hemodynamics and acceptance than CPAP in HF patients.

Effects of adaptive servo-ventilation therapy on cardiac function and remodeling in patients with chronic heart failure (SAVIOR-C): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) therapy, which is a form of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation therapy and uses an innovative ventilator that has simple operability and provides good patient adherence, potentially has therapeutic benefits—suppression of the deterioration and progression of chronic heart failure (CHF) and a reduction in the number of repeated hospitalizations. Therefore, ASV therapy draws attention as a novel, noninvasive nonpharmacotherapy for patients with CHF owing to its hemodynamics-improving effect, and it is currently being accepted in real-world clinical settings in Japan. However, clinical evidence sufficient for treatment recommendation is lacking because a multicenter, randomized, controlled study of ASV therapy has never been conducted.

Methods/Design

The present study is a confirmatory, prospective, multicenter, collaborative, open-label, blinded-endpoint, parallel-group, randomized, controlled study. At 40 medical institutions in Japan, 200 Japanese outpatients with mild to severe CHF (age: ≥ 20 years; New York Heart Association classification: greater than or equal to class II) will be randomly assigned to either of the following two study groups: the ASV group, in which 100 outpatients undergo guideline-directed medical therapy and ASV therapy for 24 weeks; and the control group, in which 100 outpatients undergo only guideline-directed medical therapy for 24 weeks. The objective of the present study is to confirm whether the ASV group is superior to the control group concerning the improvement of left ventricular contractility and remodeling, both assessed by two-dimensional echocardiography. Furthermore, the present study will also secondarily examine the effects of ASV therapy on the prognosis and quality of life of patients with CHF.

Discussion

ASV therapy using the device has the potential to provide therapeutic benefits based on its simple operability and good patient adherence and possesses the potential to improve left ventricular contractility and remodeling. Therefore, the present study is expected to afford more solid scientific evidence regarding ASV therapy as a novel, noninvasive, nonpharmacological, in-home, long-term ventilation therapy for patients with mild to severe CHF.

Trial registration

UMIN identifier: UMIN000006549, registered on 17 October, 2011.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-014-0530-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Positive airway pressure therapy for heart failure

Heart failure (HF) is a life-threatening disease and is a growing public health concern. Despite recent advances in pharmacological management for HF, the morbidity and mortality from HF remain high. Therefore, non-pharmacological approaches for HF are being developed. However, most non-pharmacological approaches are invasive, have limited indication and are considered only for advanced HF. Accordingly, the development of less invasive, non-pharmacological approaches that improve outcomes for patients with HF is important. One such approach may include positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy. In this review, the role of PAP therapy applied through mask interfaces in the wide spectrum of HF care is discussed.