ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction – ideal scenario for bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation?

Third-Generation Sirolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Tyrocore Scaffold Implantation in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Baseline and 6-Month OCT and Clinical Outcomes-a FANTOM STEMI Pilot Study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Fantom BRS 6 months after implantation using the optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging.

METHODS

Twenty STEMI patients treated with a sirolimus-eluting Fantom BRS were enrolled into a prospective, single-arm, serial observational study. The scaffold sizing, positioning and optimisation were guided by OCT imaging. The primary endpoint was device-orientated composite endpoints (DOCE), comprised of cardiac death, target-vessel-related myocardial infarction and target lesion failure. To evaluate the device performance at the scaffold level, we performed a quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and OCT imaging at 6 months.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint did not occur in any patient within the 6-month follow-up. There were no major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) or DOCEs, no cases of scaffold thrombosis, target lesion revascularization and no deaths. In QCA, we observed a decrease in the minimum and mean lumen diameter in the in-scaffold region and in the proximal and distal peri-scaffold region. Similarly, the minimum lumen area and reference vessel diameter had decreased in both QCA and OCT. The OCT imaging showed improvement in the expansion index and malposition rate.

CONCLUSION

A serial 6-month OCT imaging after implantation of a third-generation Tyrocore-based bioresorbable coronary scaffold indicated good coverage of the struts with excellent healing of the scaffold, low neointima growth and no signs of neoatherosclerosis.

Bioresorbable Magnesium-Based Stent: Real-World Clinical Experience and Feasibility of Follow-Up by Coronary Computed Tomography: A New Window to Look at New Scaffolds

(1) Background: The diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for coronary artery disease (CAD) has greatly improved so CCTA represents a transition in the care of patients suffering from CAD. Magnesium-based bioresorbable stents (Mg-BRS) secure acute percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) results without leaving, in the long term, a metallic caging effect. The purpose of this real-world study was to assess clinical and CCTA medium- and long-term follow-up of all our patients with implanted Mg-BRS. (2) Methods: The patency of 52 Mg-BRS implanted in 44 patients with de novo lesions (24 of which had acute coronary syndrome (ACS)) was evaluated by CCTA and compared to quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) post-implantation. (3) Results: ten events including four deaths occurred during a median follow-up of 48 months. CCTA was interpretable and in-stent measurements were successful at follow-up without being hindered by the stent strut's "blooming effect". Minimal in-stent diameters on CCTA were found to be 1.03 ± 0.60 mm smaller than the expected diameter after post-dilation on implantation (p < 0.05), a difference not found in comparing CCTA and QCA. (4) Conclusions: CCTA follow-up of implanted Mg-BRS is fully interpretable and we confirm the long-term Mg-BRS safety profile.

The resorbable magnesium scaffold Magmaris in acute coronary syndrome: An appraisal of evidence and user group guidance

Bioresorbable scaffolds provide transient vessel support without the long-term limitations of permanent metallic drug-eluting stents. The sirolimus-eluting resorbable magnesium scaffold Magmaris is the only CE-marked metallic bioresorbable scaffold and provides short-term lumen support before being completely bioresorbed. To date, clinical trial results have demonstrated low adverse event rates in patients with simple coronary lesions. Seven European centers with large experience in Magmaris implantation, combined efforts in an informal collaboration to evaluate and appraise clinical data currently available regarding the performance of Magmaris in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes, and to supply user-advice on patient selection and optimal implantation practice.

Magmaris resorbable magnesium scaffold for the treatment of coronary heart disease: overview of its safety and efficacy

Introduction: Bioresorbable scaffold technology provides transient vessel support with drug-delivery capability without the long-term limitations of the permanent metallic drug-eluting stents (DES). The technology has the potential to overcome many of the safety concerns associated with metallic DES, such as hypersensitivity reactions, late stent thrombosis and progression of atherosclerosis within the stented segment (i.e. neoatherosclerosis). Areas covered: The sirolimus-eluting resorbable magnesium scaffold Magmaris is the only metallic CE-marked resorbable scaffold currently available. This magnesium scaffold is designed for providing a short-term lumen support (up to 3 months) before being completely bioresorbed, eliminating the permanent caging typical of the metallic DES. This review will focus on the device development and characteristics, currently available clinical efficacy and safety data, and potential future perspectives. Expert opinion: The first clinical studies testing this device in a small number of patients have shown promising results with good clinical and safety outcomes up to 3 years' clinical follow-up, supporting the use of Magmaris in simple coronary artery disease.

Re-endothelialisation after Synergy stent and Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in acute myocardial infarction: COVER-AMI study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Drug eluting stent (DES) decrease the risk of restenosis by reducing the neointimal response. However, DES may impair strut coverage, and this has been associated with late stent/scaffold thrombosis. Bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) may overcome the risk of stent/scaffold thrombosis when completely resorbed. The purpose of this randomised trial was to compare the arterial healing response in the short term, as a surrogate for safety and efficacy, between the metallic everolimus-eluting stent (Synergy; Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) and the everolimus BVS (Absorb; Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) in the particular setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This pilot study sought to compare the neointimal response of metallic everolimus DES (Synergy) with polymeric everolimus BVS (Absorb) by optical coherence tomography (OCT) 3 months after an AMI.

METHODS

COVER-AMI was a single-centre, single-blind, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention were randomly allocated (1:1) to treatment with the Synergy DES or Absorb BVS. The primary endpoint was the 3-month neointimal response assessed as the percentage of uncovered struts, neointimal thickness, in-stent/scaffold area obstruction, and pattern of neointima. The main secondary endpoint included the device-oriented composite endpoint according to the Academic Research Consortium definition.

RESULTS

Twenty patients without clinical and/or angiographic complications (Synergy (n = 10) or BVS (n = 10); mean age 59.0 years; 20% female) were enrolled in our centre. The stent diameter was higher in the Synergy group (3.7 ± 0.4 mm vs 3.4 ± 0.4 mm in the BVS group, p = 0.01). At 3 months, no significant differences in angiographic lumen loss were observed between the everolimus DES and everolimus BVS (0.04 mm (IQR 0.00-0.07) vs 0.11 mm (IQR 0.04-0.31), p = 0.165). OCT analysis of 420 cross-sections showed that the total neointimal area and in-stent obstruction were lower in the Synergy group, while OCT analysis at the strut level (n = 3942 struts) showed that the rate of uncovered struts was lower in the BVS group.

CONCLUSIONS

Stenting of culprit lesions in the setting of STEMI resulted in a nearly complete arterial healing for both the Synergy and the BVS devices. Lower neointimal thickness and in-stent obstruction but a higher rate of uncovered struts were observed in the Synergy group. These findings provide the basis for further exploration in clinically oriented outcome trials.

Beneficial effects of combined administration of Clopidogrel and Aspirin on the levels of proinflammatory cytokines, cardiac function, and prognosis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A comparative study

OBJECTIVE

Both Aspirin and Clopidogrel are considered as effective drugs in decreasing ischemic events, which potentially contribute to a promising application regarding the cardiovascular events. In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy of the combination of both Clopidogrel and Aspirin to determine the influence among inflammatory factors, cardiac function, and treatment outcome of patients suffering from ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the Hebei province of China.

METHODS

To compare the efficacy of this combination therapy with a single Aspirin treatment, we experimented in 68 patients with the administration of both Clopidogrel and Aspirin as well as another 68 patients administered only with Aspirin. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to measure the expression of inflammatory factors, thereby evaluating the effect on inflammation. In addition, a series of indexes related to cardiac function and renal function were monitored by use of a color Doppler ultrasound and an automatic biochemical analyzer, respectively. Myocardial injury-related indicators were detected. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed so we could identify potential risk factors. In addition, both postoperative hemorrhages and cardiac events were observed to evaluate the treatment outcome of patients with STEMI.

RESULTS

Initially, the treatment outcome revealed a better efficacy in patients treated with the combination of both Clopidogrel and Aspirin, with the patients also showing more obviously alleviated myocardial injury, better cardiac and renal functions with lower serum levels of inflammatory factors. The lower incidence of postinfarction angina, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, and death also provide evidence that patients showed a better outcome after treatment with both Clopidogrel and Aspirin.

CONCLUSION

Taken together, the combination therapy of Clopidogrel and Aspirin provided a better improvement on both the cardiac function and outcome of STEMI patients in the Hebei province of China, with reduced inflammation as well.

Long-term outcomes of bioresorbable vascular scaffold in ST-elevation myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) implantation in selected patients with stable angina has been demonstrated feasible and safe. However, limited data are currently available on long-term outcomes after BVS implantation for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Therefore, we sought to assess the safety, efficacy and long-term results of BVS implantation in STEMI patients.

METHODS

Retrospective review of all STEMI patients treated with the Absorb^® BVS (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA) or conventional drug eluting stent (DES) between 1 April 2013 and 30 March 2014. Primary outcomes were procedural success, device thrombosis and device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE) including cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization. The study included 54 BVS patients and 121 DES patients.

RESULTS

Patients were slightly younger in the BVS group (60 vs. 63 years old, p = .03). Other baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Procedural success was achieved in all patients. Median follow-up was 901 days and 849 days for BVS and DES patients, respectively (p = .01). The cumulative incidence of DOCE was not significantly different between the BVS and DES groups (7.5% vs. 9.1%, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.74 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.26-2.2], p = NS). Rate of probable/definite device thrombosis were not statistically different between both groups (3.7% vs. 3.3%, p = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this single-centre retrospective study, one of the first assessing long-term safety and efficacy of BVS in STEMI, seems reassuring with similar long-term results as compared with patients treated with conventional DES.

Contemporary management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), which constitutes nearly 25-40 % of current acute myocardial infarction (AMI) cases, is a medical emergency that requires prompt recognition and treatment. Since the 2013 STEMI practice guidelines, a wealth of additional data that may further advance optimal STEMI practices has emerged. These data highlight the importance of improving patient treatment and transport algorithms for STEMI from non-primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centers. In addition, a focus on the reduction of total pain-to-balloon (P2B) times rather than simply door-to-balloon (D2B) times may further improve outcomes after primary PCI for STEMI. The early administration of newer oral P2Y12 inhibitors, including crushed forms of these agents for faster absorption, represents another treatment advancement. Recent data also suggest avoiding concurrent morphine use due to interactions with P2Y12 inhibitors. Furthermore, new technological advancements and investigational therapies, including Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds and the use of pre-intervention intravenous microbubbles with transthoracic ultrasound, hold promise to play a useful role in future STEMI care. Despite these advancements, the prompt recognition of STEMI, at both the patient and health care system level, remains the cornerstone of optimal treatment.

Bioresorbable scaffold - A magic bullet for the treatment of coronary artery disease?

Today, drug-eluting metal stents are considered the gold standard for interventional treatment of coronary artery disease. While providing inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia, drug-eluting metal stents have many limitations such as the risk of late and very late stent thrombosis, restriction of vascular vasomotion and chronic local inflammatory reaction due to permanent implantation of a 'metallic cage', recognized as a foreign body. Bioresorbable scaffold stents (BRS) are a new solution, which is trying to overcome the limitation of the 'metallic cage'. This structure provides short-term scaffolding of the vessel and then disappears, leaving nothing behind. The purpose of this review is to present the theoretical rationale for the use of BRS and to outline the clinical outcomes associated with their use in terms of data obtained from RCTs, clinical trials, registries and real life use. We have also tried to answer all questions on this intervention based on available data, with a focus on ABSORB BVS (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, USA). We consider that this new technology can be the "magic bullet" to treat coronary artery disease.

Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable stent vs. durable polymer everolimus-eluting metallic stent in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of the randomized ABSORB ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction-TROFI II trial

AIMS

Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) feature thrombus-rich lesions with large necrotic core, which are usually associated with delayed arterial healing and impaired stent-related outcomes. The use of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (Absorb) has the potential to overcome these limitations owing to restoration of native vessel lumen and physiology at long term. The purpose of this randomized trial was to compare the arterial healing response at short term, as a surrogate for safety and efficacy, between the Absorb and the metallic everolimus-eluting stent (EES) in patients with STEMI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

ABSORB-STEMI TROFI II was a multicentre, single-blind, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial. Patients with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention were randomly allocated 1:1 to treatment with the Absorb or EES. The primary endpoint was the 6-month optical frequency domain imaging healing score (HS) based on the presence of uncovered and/or malapposed stent struts and intraluminal filling defects. Main secondary endpoint included the device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE) according to the Academic Research Consortium definition. Between 06 January 2014 and 21 September 2014, 191 patients (Absorb [n = 95] or EES [n = 96]; mean age 58.6 years old; 17.8% females) were enrolled at eight centres. At 6 months, HS was lower in the Absorb arm when compared with EES arm [1.74 (2.39) vs. 2.80 (4.44); difference (90% CI) -1.06 (-1.96, -0.16); Pnon-inferiority < 0.001]. Device-oriented composite endpoint was also comparably low between groups (1.1% Absorb vs. 0% EES). One case of definite subacute stent thrombosis occurred in the Absorb arm (1.1% vs. 0% EES; P = ns).

CONCLUSION

Stenting of culprit lesions with Absorb in the setting of STEMI resulted in a nearly complete arterial healing which was comparable with that of metallic EES at 6 months. These findings provide the basis for further exploration in clinically oriented outcome trials.

Bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in acute coronary syndromes: clinical evidence, tips and tricks

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a drug-eluting stent (DES) is routine treatment for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). However, permanent metallic caging of the vessel has several shortcomings, such as side branch jailing and impossibility of late lumen enlargement. Moreover, DES PCI is affected by vasomotion impairment. In ACS a high thrombus burden and vasospasm lead to a higher risk of acute and late acquired stent malapposition than in stable patients. This increases the risk of acute, late and very late stent thrombosis. In this challenging clinical setting, the implantation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) could represent an appealing therapeutic option. Temporary vessel scaffolding has proved to have several advantages over metallic stent delivery, such as framework reabsorption, late lumen enlargement, side branch patency, and recovery of physiological reactivity to vasoactive stimuli. In the thrombotic environment of ACS, BVS implantation has the benefit of capping the thrombus and the vulnerable plaque. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds also seems to reduce the incidence of angina during follow-up. Acute coronary syndromes patients may therefore benefit more from temporary polymeric caging than from permanent stent platform implantation. The aim of this review is to update the available knowledge concerning the use of BVS in ACS patients, by analyzing the potential pitfalls in this challenging clinical setting and presenting tricks to overcome these limitations.